Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
WANG Chao, WANG Yuan, DOU Peng, WANG Zhenmei, MENG Qingyi, YANG Moyuan, TAO Haijun. SIMULATION OF WATER BLOOM CONTROL EFFECT OF LANDSCAPE SLOW-MOVING WATER BODIES BY VELOCITY UNDER ECOLOGICAL WATER REPLENISHMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 195-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301024
Citation: LING Xiao-jia, DONG Wan-jun, LEI Bin, DONG Bo, XU Kai-xiang, WU Chang-jian. THE PERFORMANCE OF WATER HYACINTH DETECTED BY FLOATING PLANT RADAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 92-96. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012016

THE PERFORMANCE OF WATER HYACINTH DETECTED BY FLOATING PLANT RADAR

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012016
  • Received Date: 2019-08-13
    Available Online: 2021-04-23
  • In this paper, a standard foam board tied with water hyacinth was set as the target, and the performance of the floating plant radar, including measurement target recognition, detection rang, distance, area and speed, was systematically studied using the radar detection technology. The results showed that floating plant radar could distinguish water hyacinth from water and wall. When the range of radial detection ranged from 37 to 114.5 m, the average ranging errors of different radial distances were within 0.6%. In small-area scan mode with radar sector-scan velocity at 3°/s, the average measurement error of area at long distance was 26.99% higher than that at close distance. At the same distance, the average area measurement error of radar sector-scan velocity at 12°/s was 12.13% lower than that at 3°/s. Meanwhile, the mean square error of radar velocity measurement for water hyacinth was less than 8% within the range of 0.1 m/s to 1.0 m/s.
  • 张霞,蔡宗寿,陈丽红,等. 滇池水葫芦规模化控养生态环境效应分析[J]. 环境工程, 2013(增刊1):288-291.
    邵江樵. 生态入侵者:水葫芦[J]. 生物学教学, 2003, 28(3):63-64.
    秦智雅,陶景怡,胡辰,等. 我国水域水葫芦的分布·影响·防治措施[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(28):81-84.
    赵月琴. 外来入侵种凤眼莲在不同营养水平下的生长及对本地水生植物的影响[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2006.
    许美玲,谢恭莉,彭建松. 云南普洱市湿地植物调查研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014(5):1486-1488.
    CANAVAN K, COETZEE J A, HILL M P, et al. Effect of water trophic level on the impact of the water hyacinth moth Niphograpta albiguttalis on Eichhornia crassipes[J]. Journal of the Limnological Society of Southern Africa, 2014, 39(2):203-208.
    殷利利,谭万忠. 外来入侵植物水葫芦及其防治技术[C]//庆祝重庆市植物保护学会成立10周年暨植保科技论坛, 重庆:2007:129-132.
    上海:苏州河现大量水葫芦:水管处等部门增强力量,加紧打捞[J]. 环境与发展, 2015,27(5):8.
    崔烨,田兴山,岳茂峰,等. 水葫芦在广东省的发生危害及治理概况[C]//中国植物保护学会杂草学分会第十二届全国杂草科学大会,太原:2015.
    杨静学,陈亮雄,李伟添,等. 多源卫星遥感数据和水色遥感技术在水库水葫芦覆盖监察中的应用[J]. 农业与技术, 2019, 39(3):5-7.
    顾成花. 基于反卷积的方位超分辨研究[D]. 成都:电子科技大学, 2013.
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 陈倩,黄强,陈浩. 基于MIKE模型下生态补水效果分析——以无锡市滨湖区梁溪河为例. 中国水运. 2025(02): 43-44 .
    2. 刘烨凌,尹慧慧,王璇,莫雁迪,裴博群,肖雨龙,翟羽佳,王青,崔保山,窦鹏. 永定河主要水化学特征及离子来源. 环境工程. 2025(02): 87-95 . 本站查看
    3. 明建,丁飞杨,王楠,张瑞峰,熊家晴,刘言正,白梦圆. 西南地区城市景观水体富营养化特征及环境因子分析. 环境科技. 2024(02): 46-51 .
    4. 万能胜,鲁照. 城市河流生态补水对水质影响研究. 安徽水利水电职业技术学院学报. 2024(02): 5-11 .
    5. 貟婧. 基于特征提取和BP神经网络的音乐喷泉控制系统研究. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2024(07): 313-316 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.8 %FULLTEXT: 10.8 %META: 85.6 %META: 85.6 %PDF: 3.6 %PDF: 3.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.9 %其他: 14.9 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %上海: 1.4 %上海: 1.4 %东莞: 2.3 %东莞: 2.3 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %佛山: 0.9 %佛山: 0.9 %保定: 0.9 %保定: 0.9 %北京: 2.3 %北京: 2.3 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %合肥: 0.9 %合肥: 0.9 %商丘: 0.5 %商丘: 0.5 %嘉兴: 1.8 %嘉兴: 1.8 %大同: 0.9 %大同: 0.9 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %常州: 1.4 %常州: 1.4 %常德: 1.4 %常德: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %成都: 2.3 %成都: 2.3 %扬州: 0.9 %扬州: 0.9 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋中: 0.5 %晋中: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %杭州: 2.7 %杭州: 2.7 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %深圳: 0.9 %深圳: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %漯河: 2.7 %漯河: 2.7 %盐城: 0.9 %盐城: 0.9 %石家庄: 1.8 %石家庄: 1.8 %芒廷维尤: 29.7 %芒廷维尤: 29.7 %芝加哥: 2.3 %芝加哥: 2.3 %衡阳: 0.5 %衡阳: 0.5 %衢州: 2.3 %衢州: 2.3 %西宁: 3.2 %西宁: 3.2 %西安: 1.4 %西安: 1.4 %贵阳: 1.8 %贵阳: 1.8 %运城: 2.7 %运城: 2.7 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %郑州: 1.8 %郑州: 1.8 %鄂州: 0.5 %鄂州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.9 %重庆: 0.9 %长沙: 2.3 %长沙: 2.3 %其他其他上海东莞临汾佛山保定北京南京合肥商丘嘉兴大同天津常州常德张家口成都扬州昆明晋中晋城杭州武汉沈阳济源深圳温州湖州漯河盐城石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义郑州鄂州重庆长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (173) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return