Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
GU Jia-yan, TIAN Hong, YIN Hui, HE Guo-fu, XU Yue-qing. VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS IN WATER ENVIRONMENT OF DIFFERENT TAILWATER RECEIVING RIVERS IN WINTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 64-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101009
Citation: GU Jia-yan, TIAN Hong, YIN Hui, HE Guo-fu, XU Yue-qing. VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS IN WATER ENVIRONMENT OF DIFFERENT TAILWATER RECEIVING RIVERS IN WINTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 64-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101009

VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS IN WATER ENVIRONMENT OF DIFFERENT TAILWATER RECEIVING RIVERS IN WINTER

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101009
  • Received Date: 2020-03-03
    Available Online: 2021-04-23
  • To study the characteristics of water environment changes in different tail water receiving rivers, 33 samples were collected from 4 groups of the rivers, and five indicators, CODMn, TN, TP, NH3-N and Chl-a, were determined. Combined with high-throughput sequencing, the water quality changes, eutrophication characteristics and bacterial community structure were analyzed along the distance. Results showed that:the change of pollutant concentration caused by tailwater would recover to background value within 50~100 m except TN. The supplement of tailwater increased the bacterial richness and diversity, but the proportion of dominant species decreased and their relative abundance changed. After 50~100 m, the proportion began to increase and Proteobacteria became the absolute dominant phylum. At the level of genus, the relative abundance of dominant bacteria in background section all decreased with supplement of tailwater, while the abundance of Rhodovulum, Pseudoalteromonas, Massilia were significantly negative correlated to river eutrophication index (P<0.05). When the discharge ratio was ≥ 50%, the similarity of bacterial community structure between downstream and tailwater outlet was higher. In addition, tailwater may bring a large number of other microbial species, causing an increase in ecological risk of river.
  • 杨国胜,叶闽,李德旺,等. 建设项目入河排污口设置论证实例分析[J]. 人民长江, 2008, 39(23):59-61.
    田涛,赵坤,布旻晟,等. 城市污水处理厂尾水排放对水环境质量影响定量评估[J]. 环境工程, 2014,32(6):140-144.
    朱琦明,刘晓杰,李冬. 提标改造中心城区再生水厂用于城市河道治理的探讨[J]. 中国市政工程, 2018(5):60-63.
    王虹. 城市污水处理厂消毒工艺的研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2005.
    王坦,李昊. 再生水回用于景观水体的富营养化问题和生态修复[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2011, 36(3):134-137.
    魏京焘,龚雪,李雪,等. 不同地区污水厂尾水中微生物群落结构多样性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(11):23-25.
    郎秀璐,宋志文,徐爱玲,等. 基于细菌群落结构和病原菌定量检测的尾水环境安全研究[J]. 青岛理工大学学报, 2017, 38(2):62-71

    , 79.
    国家环境环保局, 水和废水监测分析方法编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
    BLAXTER M, MANN J, CHAPMAN T, et al. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 2005, 360(1462):1935-1943.
    祁昌斌,朱亮,吴云海, 等.污水厂尾水排放对受纳水体的累积生态效应研究[C].//Asia Pacific Environmental Science Research Center, Hong Kong, Huazhong Normal University, China, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan Institute of Technology, China. Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Remote Sensing (ICRS 2010).杭州, 2010.3.
    汪锋,钱庄,张周,等. 污水处理厂尾水对排放河道水质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(14):65-68.
    郭茹. 太湖流域浙江片区典型山区及平原型河流氮磷生态阈值评估[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2013.
    刘维. 沉水植物对再生水景观水体营养盐的控制机制研究[D]. 西安:西安理工大学, 2012.
    李春丽,周律,贾海峰, 等.城市污水厂再生水用于景观水体的富营养化防治[C].//中国土木工程学会.住区水环境国际研讨会论文集,2003:88-91.
    张荣海,方淑霞,杨阿香,等. 城市污水处理厂尾水消毒应急提标改造研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2019(7):97-100.
    李天琦,杨盈,徐俪轩,等. 紫外辐照技术处理船舶压载水的应用优势与存在问题[J]. 海洋科学前沿, 2018, 5(4):128-133.
    KEMP P F, ALLER J Y. Bacterial diversity in aquatic and other environments:what 16S rDNA libraries can tell US[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2004, 47(2):161-177.
    徐爱玲,任杰,宋志文,等. 污水处理厂尾水细菌群落结构分析[J]. 环境科学, 2014,35(9):3473-3479.
    邸琰茗,王广煊,黄兴如,等. 再生水补水对河道底泥细菌群落组成与功能的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(2):743-751.
    NGUYEN H T T, VANG Q L, AVIAJA A H, et al. High diversity and abundance of putative polyphosphate-accumulating Tetrasphaera-related bacteria in activated sludge systems[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2011, 76(2):256-267.
    VIERHEILIG J, FRICK C, MAYER R E, et al. Clostridium perfringens is not suitable for the indication of fecal pollution from ruminant wildlife but is associated with excreta from nonherbivorous animals and human sewage[J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2013, 79(16):5089-5092.
    高晨晨,郑兴灿,游佳,等. 城市污水脱氮除磷系统的活性污泥菌群结构特征[J]. 中国给水排水, 2015,31(23):37-42.
    GUPTA R S. The phylogeny and signature sequences characteristics of fibrobacteres, chlorobi, and bacteroidetes, critical reviews in microbiology, informa healthcare[J]. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 2004, 30(2):123-143.
    王鹏,陈波,李传琼,等. 赣江南昌段丰水期细菌群落特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(8):2453-2462.
    刘晨宇,祝亚楠,王继华,等. 不同季节尾水排放对河道细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(5):113-120.
    杨雪辰,王继华.污水厂尾水中微生物群落结构多样性研究[C].//中国环境科学学会,环境保护部环境规划院,哈尔滨工业大学,中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所.2013年水资源生态保护与水污染控制研讨会论文集.哈尔滨,2013:572-576.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LE Jihang, WANG Wenlong, WU Qianyuan, CHEN Zhuo, WU Yinhu, JIA Haifeng, LIU Fanghua, WANG Fang, HU Hongying. Quality and risk characteristics of effluent from wastewater treatment plants in central area of Luzhou[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 135-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501015
    [2]GAO Wenyuan, ZOU Lin, ZHU Junyi, XIAO Tongjue, YU Yi, SHEN Jianlin. TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND DRIVING FACTORS OF SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN HUNAN PROVINCE, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 17-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408003
    [3]WU Yi, WANG Hua, DENG Yanqing, LI Xiaoying, XU Haosen. EVALUATION AND DRIVING CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER NUTRIENTS IN POYANG LAKE BASED ON TLI METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 10-17. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405002
    [4]LI Yunong, WEN Donghui. IMPACTS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS EFFLUENT ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY OF RECEIVING WATER BODIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 167-179. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409016
    [5]WANG Yan, WANG Jie, XIE Zijian, LI Chunhua, YE Chun, MIAO Kexin, WEI Weiwei, ZHENG Ye. NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTIONS IN TYPICAL RIVER BASINS IN HILLY AND MOUNTAINOUS AREAS AND PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 33-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410005
    [6]LIU Wenqiang, YU Dawei, LI Kun, ZHENG Libing, ZHU Liying, GUI Shuanglin, WEI Yuansong. EFFECTS OF RAINFALL CHARACTERISTICS ON RIVER WATER QUALITY IN DIFFERENT WATER PERIODS: A CASE STUDY OF NANCHANG SECTION IN THE GANJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 91-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308012
    [7]PENG Yuyao, LI Panwu, GAO Xiaobo, YU Huibin, GUO Xujing. EFFECT OF LOESS FLOCCULANT ON WATER PURIFICATION AND DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER REMOVAL IN SHAHU LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 140-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305019
    [8]WANG Gang, WO Yubao, MAO Jingqiao, XIAO Yang, PENG Jirong. SPATIO-TEMPORAL VARIATION ANALYSIS OF WATER QUALITY IN SLUICE-CONTROLLED URBAN RIVER BASED ON TWO-STEP CLUSTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 117-122,160. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201017
    [9]WANG Yiming, DING Lu, XU Jiaying, SHI Lei, LIU Yifan, LIANG Wenbo, YANG Xiaoli. CONSTRUCTION OF MICRO-ECOSYSTEM IN RURAL RIVERS AND IN-SITU REMEDIATION ON THE SEDIMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 54-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211008
    [10]TIAN Han-xin, WANG Jia-jun, ZHOU Lei, XU De-fu, ZHANG Jian-wei, PENGCUO Ci-ren. WATER QUALITY STATUS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF LHALU WETLAND IN TIBET IN DIFFERENT PERIODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 198-206. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106030
    [11]ZHOU Guo-hua, ZHANG Bei, WANG Gang, LI Meng-meng, CHEN Liang. ANALYSIS OF ODOR SOURCES IN STORMWATER PUMP POOL AND STORMWATER PIPE OF A STORMWATER PUMP STATION IN THE SINO-SINGAPORE TIANJIN ECO-CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 30-35,127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104006
    [12]QI Er-bing, HUANG Ya-ji, YUAN Qi, HU Hua-jun, FAN Cong-hui, CAO Yan-yan, DING Shou-yi. LIME COAGULATION-SUBMERGED EVAPORATION SYNERGISTIC TREATMENT FOR NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANE CONCENTRATE OF LANDFILL LEACHATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 54-58,77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012010
    [13]SHEN Jie, JIN Wei. REVIEW ON EFFECT OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT ON RECEIVING WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 92-98,115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003016
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 樊杰,谭振宇,黄发新,雷阳,閤成成. 污水厂尾水对河流水质和底泥细菌群落的影响. 绿色科技. 2024(14): 153-158 .
    2. 荆玉姝,王黎佳,王丽艳,牟润芝,陈栋,刘长青. 尾水排放对河道水质及底泥细菌群落结构影响. 环境科学与技术. 2021(01): 85-93 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.4 %FULLTEXT: 11.4 %META: 80.9 %META: 80.9 %PDF: 7.7 %PDF: 7.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.7 %其他: 7.7 %China: 2.4 %China: 2.4 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 2.0 %上海: 2.0 %临夏回族自治州: 0.2 %临夏回族自治州: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %伊犁哈萨克自治州: 0.4 %伊犁哈萨克自治州: 0.4 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %信阳: 0.7 %信阳: 0.7 %兰州: 1.8 %兰州: 1.8 %北京: 8.4 %北京: 8.4 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 2.0 %南京: 2.0 %南京市江宁区: 0.2 %南京市江宁区: 0.2 %南宁: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %厦门: 0.7 %厦门: 0.7 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %太原: 0.4 %太原: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 3.3 %广州: 3.3 %张家口: 1.5 %张家口: 1.5 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %昆明: 1.5 %昆明: 1.5 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %武汉: 1.8 %武汉: 1.8 %汕头: 0.7 %汕头: 0.7 %江门: 0.2 %江门: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %湖州: 0.7 %湖州: 0.7 %漯河: 1.5 %漯河: 1.5 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 8.8 %芒廷维尤: 8.8 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 1.1 %苏州: 1.1 %莱芜: 0.7 %莱芜: 0.7 %西宁: 30.1 %西宁: 30.1 %西安: 1.3 %西安: 1.3 %西雅图: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.7 %运城: 1.8 %运城: 1.8 %通辽: 0.2 %通辽: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 2.4 %郑州: 2.4 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %银川: 0.4 %银川: 0.4 %长沙: 0.2 %长沙: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.9 %阳泉: 0.9 %阿克苏: 0.2 %阿克苏: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.2 %其他China[]上海临夏回族自治州临汾乌鲁木齐伊犁哈萨克自治州保定信阳兰州北京十堰南京南京市江宁区南宁南昌厦门台州呼和浩特天津太原安康常德广州张家口徐州成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汕头江门沈阳济源深圳温州湖州漯河绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莱芜西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城通辽遵义邢台邯郸郑州重庆银川长沙长治阳泉阿克苏青岛鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (367) PDF downloads(36) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return