A GROUNDWATER INFLOW PREDICTION METHOD FOR FUSHUN WEST OPEN-PIT MINE BASED ON GMS

ZHAO Yan; GUO Jia-lin; SHI Yang; WU Zhi-qi; JIANG Bin-hui

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202101011

Volume 39 Issue 1

Apr. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2021 > 39(1): 75-79,129

ZHAO Yan, GUO Jia-lin, SHI Yang, WU Zhi-qi, JIANG Bin-hui. A GROUNDWATER INFLOW PREDICTION METHOD FOR FUSHUN WEST OPEN-PIT MINE BASED ON GMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 75-79,129. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101011

Citation:

ZHAO Yan, GUO Jia-lin, SHI Yang, WU Zhi-qi, JIANG Bin-hui. A GROUNDWATER INFLOW PREDICTION METHOD FOR FUSHUN WEST OPEN-PIT MINE BASED ON GMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 75-79,129. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101011

Citation:

PDF( 7653 KB)

A GROUNDWATER INFLOW PREDICTION METHOD FOR FUSHUN WEST OPEN-PIT MINE BASED ON GMS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101011

School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

Received Date: 2020-04-07
Available Online: 2021-04-23

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, a mathematical model was set up, taking the Fushun West Open-pit mine as the research area, using the GMS (groundwater modeling system) numerical simulation software, based on the analysis of the mining area and its surrounding area, geological and hydrogeological conditions, as well as the characteristics of the formation lithology and geological structure. Based on the geological exploration data of the working area and the analysis of water filling factors, a hydrogeological model was established to predict the water inflow, and the layout scheme of drainage well in equilibrium state was put forward. The results showed that according to the topographic characteristics of the mine, when five horizontal wells with depth of 100 m, length of 100 m and displacement volume of 10~20 m³/d were placed on the north and south sides of the mine, and four shafts with depth of 70~100 m and displacement volume of 20 m³/d were placed at the bottom of the mine according to the spacing of 100 m in the simulation area, no water would overflow from the mine.
- GMS model,
- numerical simulation,
- open pit mine,
- water inflow

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

冯翔. 基于GMS三维地下水模型的矿井涌水量预测研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2017:36-38.

张政. 某露天矿采场地下水调查研究[D]. 包头:内蒙古科技大学, 2015:58-59.

LIANG S C, ZHAO X S, LI S. The application of gms in numerical simulation of groundwater and faults disposing in Gaizi River source[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 14(2):20-24.

陈劲松, 万力. MODFLOW中不同方程组求解方法差异分析[J]. 工程勘察, 2002(2):25-27.

杨旭, 黄家柱, 许建军, 等. 基于组件式GIS的地下水动态管理系统设计与开发[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2004, 20(1):47-50.

陈锁忠, 闾国年, 朱莹, 等. 基于GIS的地下水流有限差数值模拟参数自动提取研究[J]. 地球信息科学, 2006, 8(2):77-83.

GUO X. Application development of groundwater value simulation software in our country[J]. Technical Report, 2010, 32(2):20-23.

WHELAN, Castleton, KARL J, et al. FRAMES-2.0 Software System:Linking to the Groundwater Modeling System (GMS) RT3D and MT3DMS Models[J]. Technical Report, 2007, 25(4):58-62.

SHANG H, WANG W K, ZHANG J. Application of GMS in groundwater numerical simulation in the northern foot of Tianshan Mountain[J]. Water Resource and Environmental Protection, 2011, 20(3):12-15.

傅耀军, 杜金龙, 牟兆刚, 等. 基于煤矿井地下水含水系统的矿井涌水量预测方法-释水-断面流法[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2018, 9(30):37-43.

Relative Articles

[1]	YIN Leyi, HUANG Guoxin, NIU Haobo, CHEN Jian, XIE Yueqing, YANG Lihu, LIU Ling. GROUNDWATER POLLUTION DYNAMIC RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND RISK SCREENING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 199-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401026
[2]	YAN Cailian, LIN Xiuli, HU Longji, LIU Jingxian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF FILTRATION VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION OF CYLINDRICAL AND PLEATED FILTER BAGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 225-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403028
[3]	LIN Huili, JIN Zhaodi, ZHANG Shuli, ZHANG Guangxue, YU Qun, ZHANG Min. NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EVALUATION OF INDIRECT THERMAL DESORPTION EQUIPMENT FOR PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 261-267. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403032
[4]	YIN Yalun, HOU Jingming, LI Xinyi, LUAN Guangxue, GAO Xujun, WANG Tian, SHEN Jian, QIAO Mengxi. APPLICATION OF GAST-SWMM COUPLED NUMERICAL MODEL IN LARGE-SCALE URBAN INUNDATION RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 82-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404010
[5]	LI Jian, WU Chunmao, QI Zhanfeng. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF AIRFLOW DISTRIBUTION AND STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION IN AN ELECTROSTATIC OIL MIST PURIFIER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 202-208. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308026
[6]	DU Chuan, LI Houen, CHEN Suyun. APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY IN EXTRACTION AND TREATMENT OF POLLUTED GROUNDWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 102-108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307014
[7]	ZHANG You, ZHAO Tingting, DU Ranli, LI Huashan, KONG Xiangcheng, XUE Jianliang. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCENDING FILM EVAPORATION OF SALT-CONTAINING WASTEWATER IN COAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 17-22,31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306003
[8]	LI Debo, CHEN Zhaoli, CHEN Zhihao, FENG Yongxin, HUANG Zigan, WEI Chen, MA Xiaoqian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MIXED FIRING OF AGED REFUSE AND AIR DISTRIBUTION OPTIMIZATION IN A MSW INCINERATION FURNACE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 113-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211016
[9]	LIU Pengyu, LI Debo, LIU Yanfeng, QUE Zhengbin, MIAO Jianjie, CHEN Zhaoli. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SCR DENITRIFICATION SYSTEM IN A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210029
[10]	ZHENG Kaixuan, HUANG Junlong, LUO Xingshen, WANG Hongtao, CHEN Tan. APPLICATION PROGRESS OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION IN PERMEABLE REATIVE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 22-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206003
[11]	ZHANG Yun. ADVANCES IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF GROUNDWATER IN-SITE CHEMICAL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 197-204,217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205029
[12]	LI Wenjun, ZHENG Chenghang, WANG Yifan, ZHAO Zhongyang, LIU Chang, WU Weihong, LIU Shaojun. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ON SPRAY EVAPORATION PROCESS FOR SMALL-SCALE QUENCH TOWER IN LIMITED SPACE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 50-56,78. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204008
[13]	NIE Peng-fei, GAO Zhi, MENG De-run, ZHANG Hong-bo, ZHANG Qing. APPLICATION OF CFD IN A DOUBLE STAGE DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 119-124,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108016
[14]	HAN Xiao-dong, SUN Ye. SITE SELECTION OF WASTE TRANSFER STATION BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF ODOR DISPERSION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 130-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103018
[15]	ZHAO Kun, LI Ruo-hua, CHENG Wen-long, YANG Yuan-ping, YUE Shu-bo. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF SEWAGE DISCHARGE ON ESTUARY WATER FUNCTIONAL AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 33-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010006
[16]	ZHOU Chuan, WU Qi-rong, YU Jiang-tao, QIN Fu-chu. NUMERICAL SIMULATION FOR FGD WASTEWATER EVAPORATION IN THE FLUE DUCT OF A 2×350 MW COAL-FIRED UNIT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 96-101. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005017
[17]	QU Guang-fei, AN Zhi, NING Ping, XIE Ruo-song. GENERAL SURVEY ON APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION IN SEWAGE BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 99-104,179. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003017
[18]	SHEN Li. PREDICTION OF DUST MOVEMENT LAW IN COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS BASED ON GAS-PARTICLE TWO-PHASE FLOW MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 181-187,93. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006030
[19]	Ding Zhijiang Lu Mingyuan Xiao Lichun, . NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHOD OF GAS FLOW DISTRIBUTION IN ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR FOR CONVERTER GAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 92-96. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504019
[20]	Mao Rui, Liu Genfan, Deng Xiang, Fan Ning. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF BAG FILTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 77-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503016

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	陆睿，尹尚先，王玉国，孟浩鹏，王旭. 基于GMS的深部煤层开采工作面涌水量预测. 煤矿安全. 2025(01): 164-170 .
2.	曲为贵，从辉，牛真茹，李智，赵鹏，赵丽. 基坑疏干抽排对区域水文地质的影响分析. 地下水. 2023(02): 66-69 .
3.	张培森，李复兴，付翔，田志兆，牛辉，许大强. 祁东煤矿构造控水特征和地下水运移规律. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(02): 292-305 .
4.	杜成鸿，向琪云，刘国东. 基于GMS的地下水油气井污染运移研究. 环境工程. 2023(S1): 561-565 . 本站查看
5.	赵雷，侯克鹏，者亚雷，何全松，何平. 露天大水矿床开采渗流场及帷幕防治水模拟研究. 现代矿业. 2023(07): 63-67 .
6.	王帅，何少林，苑宏英，纪冬丽，齐志斌. 基于GMS应用的开采区地下水模拟的研究进展. 地下水. 2022(01): 14-17 .
7.	吴季寰，张春山，孟华君，郭涵，吴坤罡，李洪嘉. 抚顺西露天矿区滑坡易发性评价与时空特征分析. 地质力学学报. 2021(03): 409-417 .