Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 2
Jul.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(2): 47-52
WU Jun, WANG Yi-yao, MA Yan. ANALYSIS ON RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS OF DIFFERENT IMPERVIOUS UNDERLYING SURFACES BASED ON A NOVEL RUNOFF COLLECTION METHOD FOR CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 47-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102008
Citation: WU Jun, WANG Yi-yao, MA Yan. ANALYSIS ON RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS OF DIFFERENT IMPERVIOUS UNDERLYING SURFACES BASED ON A NOVEL RUNOFF COLLECTION METHOD FOR CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 47-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102008
shu

ANALYSIS ON RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS OF DIFFERENT IMPERVIOUS UNDERLYING SURFACES BASED ON A NOVEL RUNOFF COLLECTION METHOD FOR CITIES

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102008

  • 1. Shanghai Urban Water Resources Development & Utilization National Engineering Center Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China;

  • 2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;

  • 3. Chengdu Environmental Protection Research Institute, Chengdu 610072, China

  • Received Date: 2020-03-26
    Available Online: 2021-07-19
    Abstract
  • By constructing the artificial rainfall system and the collection system of underlying surface runoff, the runoff coefficients of different impervious underlying surface in the city was analyzed. The analysis results of runoff coefficients of underlying surface showed that the average runoff coefficient of urban road was 0.82, which was lower than that of other the non permeable underlying surface (0.87~0.89). This was mainly due to the stronger permeability of urban road made of asphalt material and the strong absorption capacity of its coarse pores to water flow. Rainfall duration and intensity were the key factors affecting runoff coefficient of the underlying surface. The influence of rainfall duration on runoff coefficient of six non permeable underlying surfaces was significant, especially in the initial 20 minutes of rainfall, and the runoff coefficient rise rapidly, which was more than 4 times of the initial value at most; the increase of rainfall intensity was bound to shorten the runoff production time, intensify its impact on runoff coefficient, and make its correlation with runoff coefficient significantly higher than rainfall duration.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(17)
  • [1]
    唐宁远,车伍,潘国庆. 城市雨洪控制利用的雨水径流系数分析[J]. 中国给水排水,2009,25(22):4-8.
    [2]
    BLACKWELL M S A, HOGAN D V, MALTBY E. The use of conventionally and alternatively located buffer zones for the removal of nitrate from diffuse agricultural run-off[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1999,39(12):157-164.
    [3]
    DELETIC A, MAKSIMOVIC C. Evaluation of Water Quality Factors in Storm Runoff from Paved Areas[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1998,124(9):869-879.
    [4]
    DILKS D W, HELFAND J S, BIERMAN JR V J, et al. Field application of a steady-state mass balance model for hydrophobic organic chemicals in an estuarine system[J]. Water Science & Technology, 1993,28(8/9):263-271.
    [5]
    SANSALONE J, KORAN J, SMITHSON J, et al. Physical characteristics of urban roadway solids transported during rain events[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1998,124(5):427-440.
    [6]
    袁爱萍. 美国人工降雨模拟设备的引进与应用[J]. 北京水利,2004(6):36-37.
    [7]
    吴晓丹. 上海中心城区暴雨积水机理分析[D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2012.
    [8]
    刘兰岚. 上海市中心城区土地利用变化对径流的影响及其水环境效应研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2007.
    [9]
    SEN Z K. Instantaneous runoff coefficient variation and peak discharge estimation model[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2008,13(4):270-277.
    [10]
    高小梅,李兆麟,贾雪,等. 人工模拟降雨装置的研制与应用[J]. 辐射防护,2000,20(2):86-90.
    [11]
    陈文亮,唐克丽. SR型野外人工模拟降雨装置[J]. 水土保持研究,2000,7(4):106-110.
    [12]
    武晟. 西安市降雨特性分析和城市下垫面产汇流特性实验研究[D]. 西安:西安理工大学,2004.
    [13]
    李红,傅智. 水泥混凝土路面与沥青路面粗集料技术指标的对比研究[J]. 公路,2005(11):168-172.
    [14]
    王小梅. 北京地区街尘-径流污染特征及潜在污染负荷估算[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2011.
    [15]
    郭禹含,王中根,姜爱华,等. 济南主城区不透水地表分布分析及其水文效应[J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2020,87-96.
    [16]
    王萌萌,刘文龙,申红彬. 城市不透水地表降雨径流系数变化规律分析[J]. 山东水利,2019(9):31-33.
    [17]
    邵崴,潘文斌. 城市不透水面与降雨径流关系研究[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报,2012,7(4):20-27.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]TIAN Weichao, CHEN Rongxu, TIAN Shimin, WANG Xin, LIU Jiaxin. EFFECT OF POLYPLOID ARUNDO DONAX L. ON POLLUTION CONTROL OF SLOPE RUNOFF IN HILLY AREA IN WEST HENAN PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 60-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412008
    [2]HE Tian, XUE Chonghua, SUN Jiarong, HAN Songlei, LÜ Yongpeng, LI Junqi, WANG Jianlong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON FORMS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS IN PARTICULATE MATTERS IN URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 61-71. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408008
    [3]HAO Yan, GONG Yongwei, LI Junqi, WANG Sisi, ZHANG Zhiming. EFFECT OF BIORETENTION SYSTEMS ON REDUCING RUNOFF POLLUTION BASED ON RAINFALL AND RUNOFF CHARACTERISTICS OF BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 16-21,124. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305003
    [4]XIE Shangyu, QIU Chunsheng, ZHAO Xiaojia, WANG Chenchen, WANG Shaopo, SUN Liping, ZHAO Lejun, SONG Xiancai. ANALYSIS OF RAINFALL RUNOFF POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFERENT ROOF UNDERLYING SURFACES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS OF TIANJIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 38-45. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201007
    [5]WANG Si-si, HOU Shuang, WANG Rong. A MULTI-METHOD COMPARISON OF INFLUENCING FACTORS AND VALUE OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENT OF URBAN GREEN SPACE IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 84-90,242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112013
    [6]MAO Xu-hui, XU Lu-ping, LIU Zhe, LIU Hai-long, JIA Hai-feng. STORMWATER RUNOFF MANAGEMENT SCHEME USING LID-BMPs FOR A HISTORICAL SITE AND ITS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 158-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004028
    [7]YIN Ding-kun, CHEN Zheng-xia, YANG Meng-qi, JIA Hai-feng, XU Ke, WANG Teng-xu. EVALUATION OF RUNOFF CONTROL EFFECT IN SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION BASED ON ONLINE MONITORING+SIMULATION MODELING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 151-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004027
    [8]XU Wei-tong, WANG Jian-long, WU Yan-jie, LV Yun-jie. ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ON THERMAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS, LOAD ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL MEASURES OF URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 26-31,58. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004006
    [9]ZHANG Qiang, WANG Mei-rong, ZHANG Shu-han, GONG Ying-an, WANG Li-jing, CAO Xiu-qin. DEVELOPMENT OF AN AUTOMATIC SAMPLING TECHNOLOGY FOR URBAN RAINFALL RUNOFF QUALITY MONITORING AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 141-144,150. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004025
    [18]Ma Xiaofang Tao Quan Yao Jing Liang Ying, . REVIEW OF SITUATIONS AND PROSPECTS OF BIORETENTION FOR THE CONTROL OF URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 6-9. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506002
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 张宗嘉，胡泽安，刘琪玉，赖洁蓉，田林灵，崔文惠，杨丽丽，郭君. 基于多源信息融合的超大城市极端暴雨易涝区识别——以深圳市福田区为例. 灾害学. 2025(02): 65-70 .
    2. 陈至诚，邵铭炜，冯修平，林芳，余子健，刘希庭，宋姗姗，吴俊. 电导率作为排水管道水质特征指标的潜力分析. 净水技术. 2024(03): 152-158 .
    3. 徐志欢，纪静怡. 基于GIS的城市区域雨水资源可利用量估算. 海河水利. 2021(01): 14-18+21 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.2 %FULLTEXT: 9.2 %META: 89.5 %META: 89.5 %PDF: 1.3 %PDF: 1.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 12.1 %其他: 12.1 %China: 0.8 %China: 0.8 %Slovenia: 2.9 %Slovenia: 2.9 %United States: 0.8 %United States: 0.8 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %北京: 1.7 %北京: 1.7 %十堰: 0.8 %十堰: 0.8 %南京: 2.9 %南京: 2.9 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %卢布尔雅那: 0.8 %卢布尔雅那: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %安顺: 0.4 %安顺: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %拉萨: 0.4 %拉萨: 0.4 %揭阳: 0.4 %揭阳: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %格兰特县: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.8 %洛阳: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %清迈府: 1.3 %清迈府: 1.3 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %漯河: 5.4 %漯河: 5.4 %濮阳: 0.8 %濮阳: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %美国弗吉尼亚阿什本: 0.4 %美国弗吉尼亚阿什本: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 29.7 %芒廷维尤: 29.7 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %蚌埠: 1.3 %蚌埠: 1.3 %衡水: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %西宁: 10.0 %西宁: 10.0 %西雅图: 0.4 %西雅图: 0.4 %贵阳: 1.7 %贵阳: 1.7 %运城: 3.8 %运城: 3.8 %遵义: 0.8 %遵义: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %郑州: 1.3 %郑州: 1.3 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %铜陵: 0.4 %铜陵: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %其他ChinaSloveniaUnited States[]上海临汾北京十堰南京南通卢布尔雅那台州合肥呼和浩特天津安顺宣城常德张家口成都扬州拉萨揭阳昆明晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉洛阳济源深圳清迈府温州漯河濮阳石家庄美国弗吉尼亚阿什本芒廷维尤苏州蚌埠衡水西宁西雅图贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铜陵长沙长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (213) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return