Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 2
Jul.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(2): 147-152
LONG Tengfa, LIN Qingyu, ZHANG Zhonglan, SUN Yuxuan, JIN Yao, HUO Qiang, CHEN Chunqiang. SCREENING OF LIPID-DEGRADING BACTERIA AND OPTIMIZATION OF ENZYME-PRODUCING CONDITION FOR PERISHABLE KITCHEN ORGANIC WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 103-110. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406012
Citation: FANG Qing, XIAN Ping, MENG Zheng-cheng. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF AGRICULTURAL LAND BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 147-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102024
shu

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF AGRICULTURAL LAND BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102024

  • College of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

  • Received Date: 2019-10-29
    Available Online: 2021-07-19
    Abstract
  • In order to scientifically and reasonably assess the soil health risks of agricultural land, based on the environmental risk assessment system of the US Environmental Protection Agency, this paper established a soil health risk assessment model for agricultural land use in China. Monte Carlo simulations were also introduced to reduce the uncertainty of risk assessment results. The health risk assessment results of heavy metals in regional agricultural land soils showed that the total carcinogenic risk CR caused by the agricultural land obeyed a log-normal distribution, which was (2.898±2.425)×10-4, and the total hazard index HQ obeyed a log-normal distribution, which was 15.775±13.797, the priority soil control pollutant was determined to be As, and the priority control exposure route was oral route. The model was applicable to the evaluation of human health risks by multiple pollutants in agricultural land, and could obtain key information such as priority control factors and priority control for exposure routes.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(26)
  • [1]
    尹国庆,江宏,王强,等.安徽省典型区农用地土壤重金属污染成因及特征分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(1):96-104.
    [2]
    王玉军,吴同亮,周东美,等.农田土壤重金属污染评价研究进展[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(12):2365-2378.
    [3]
    秦旭芝,郑涵文,苏荣,等.洪水淹没对矿区下游农用地土壤重金属污染特征的影响[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(12):4242-4250.
    [4]
    中华人民共和国环境保护部. 污染场地风险评估技术导则HJ 25.3-2014[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2014.
    [5]
    USEPA. Risk assessment guidance for superfund. volume 1, human health evaluation manual. Part A[R]. Washington DC, 1990.
    [6]
    HASAN B, MURAT S, EMRE G, et al. A case study on pollution and a human health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soils around Sinop province, Turkey[J]. Chemosphere, 2020,241:125015.
    [7]
    YANG Q Q, LI Z Y, LU X N, et al. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China:Pollution and risk assessment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 642:690-700.
    [8]
    MOBAROK H, PULAK K P. Contamination zoning and health risk assessment of trace elements in groundwater through geostatistical modelling[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 189:110038.
    [9]
    JIANG H H, CAI L M, WEN H H, et al. An integrated approach to quantifying ecological and human health risks from different sources of soil heavy metals[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 701:134466.
    [10]
    ZHAO R, GUAN Q Y, LUO H P, et al. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation and health risk assessment quantification of heavy metals in Zhangye agricultural soil from the perspective of sources[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 697:134126.
    [11]
    王月,安达,席北斗,等.基于正态随机模拟的武烈河环境健康风险评价[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(5):3334-3340.
    [12]
    环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2014:87-799.
    [13]
    王积才,张朝,谢雨呈,等.重金属污染场地土壤风险筛选值关键影响因子研究:以砷为例[J].生态毒理学报,2018,13(6):175-185.
    [14]
    王晓钰,李飞.农用土壤重金属多受体健康风险评价模型及实例应用[J].环境工程,2014,32(1):120-125.
    [15]
    佟瑞鹏,杨校毅.基于蒙特卡罗模拟的土壤环境健康风险评价:以PAHs为例[J].环境科学,2017,38(6):2522-2529.
    [16]
    杨杰,刘茂,李敏嫣.基于蒙特卡罗的垃圾焚烧产生二噁英健康风险评估[J].安全与环境学报,2011,11(4):234-238.
    [17]
    贺莉萍. 基于GIS和风险评估模型对矿区农用地土壤重金属污染和学龄儿童健康的研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2018.
    [18]
    杨涛. 赣南钨矿区农田土壤重金属污染特征及风险评价[D]. 赣州:江西理工大学,2016.
    [19]
    刘丹,赵永红,周丹,等.赣南某钨矿区土壤重金属污染生态风险评价[J].环境化学,2017,36(7):1556-1567.
    [20]
    陈明,杨涛,李登宇,等.赣南某钨矿区稻田土壤中重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J].有色金属工程,2016,6(2):89-95.
    [21]
    赵永红,张静,周丹,等.赣南某钨矿区土壤重金属污染状况研究[J].中国环境科学,2015,35(8):2477-2484.
    [22]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 15618-2018[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2018.
    [23]
    黄国勤.江西省土壤重金属污染研究Ⅲ.不同类型和深度土壤重金属污染状况[C].中国环境科学学会学术年会, 2015:4308-4316.
    [24]
    USEPA. Integrated Risk Information System[R]. Washington DC, 2013.
    [25]
    王嘉. 铜陵矿区土壤重金属污染现状评价与风险评估[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学,2010.
    [26]
    张应华,刘志全,李广贺,等.基于不确定性分析的健康环境风险评价[J].环境科学,2007,28(7):1409-1415.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]DENG Jie, WEI Yuquan, WANG Yuyun, ZHANG Kui, ZHAN Yabin, CHANG Yuan, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou, XU Zhi, LI Ji. EFFECTS OF OIL ON HUMIFICATION PROCESS OF AEROBIC COMPOSTING OF KITCHEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 111-118. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406013
    [2]MIAO Luyuan, JIANG Ye, YAN Tingchun, SHEN Yuexi, WANG Siyi, QUAN Yue. OPTIMIZATION OF ELECTROCHEMICAL OXIDATION FOR TREATING CHLOROBENZENE WASTE GAS BY RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 97-104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408012
    [3]YUE Liangchen, YU Miao, CHENG Jun, LIU Keliang, HUA Junjie, GUO Hao. INFLUENCE OF LIPID CONTENT AND ELECTRIC FERMENTATION VOLTAGE ON METHANE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 200-207. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407022
    [4]LUO Haoli, LI Haihong, MA Qian. SCREENING AND IDENTIFICATION OF SURFACTANT-PRODUCING PETROLEUM-DEGRADING BACTERIA AND THEIR REMEDIATION EFFICACY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 199-206. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403025
    [5]XU Ziqi, YAN Zhong, GE Yanju, WEI Quanyuan, HUANG Bo. OPTIMIZATION OF TECHNICAL PARAMETERS OF MECHANICAL ENHANCED RAPID COMPOSTING TECHNOLOGY FOR ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 159-163,142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208022
    [6]ZHANG Tingting, KONG Xiangqing, FU Ying, ZHANG Zhenbin, ZHAO Fei, YUAN Dan, ZHOU Yuanming. RESPONSE SURFACE OPTIMIZATION OF GRAPHENE OXIDE PREPARATION USING MUNICIPAL SLUDGE AS THE SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 25-30,51. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207004
    [7]HE Wen-shan, ZHANG Ru, LI Si-qi, LI Wen-jin, SONG Zhe-hua, PENG Guang, SHEN Peng, WANG Xiao-hui. SCREENING OF A CHLORTETRACYCLINE-DEGRADING STRAIN AND ITS DEGRADATION CONDITIONS OPTIMIZATION USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 53-58,66. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205008
    [8]XIANG Hong-lin, LIU Li, LIANG Guo-bin, ZHANG Huan-wei, LI Cong-ming, ZHOU Chang, HAN Si-yu, JIANG Jian-guo. PREPARATION OF RDF BY HYDROLYSIS RESIDUES FROM ORGANIC WASTE AND PROPERTIES OPTIMIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 189-194,147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103027
    [16]Hu Hao, Wang Fan, Liu Li, He Wenzhi, Li Guangming. STUDY ON EXTRACTION PROCESS OF LIPID IN SOLID-PHASE OF KITCHEN GARBAGE BY MICROWAVE HYDRO-HEATING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(5): 118-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201505025
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.6 %FULLTEXT: 18.6 %META: 78.8 %META: 78.8 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 34.7 %其他: 34.7 %Kao-sung: 0.8 %Kao-sung: 0.8 %上海: 0.8 %上海: 0.8 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %南京: 0.8 %南京: 0.8 %合肥: 0.8 %合肥: 0.8 %呼和浩特: 0.8 %呼和浩特: 0.8 %唐山: 0.8 %唐山: 0.8 %天津: 1.7 %天津: 1.7 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %广州: 1.7 %广州: 1.7 %张家口: 4.2 %张家口: 4.2 %成都: 4.2 %成都: 4.2 %扬州: 1.7 %扬州: 1.7 %昆明: 1.7 %昆明: 1.7 %杭州: 2.5 %杭州: 2.5 %漯河: 5.1 %漯河: 5.1 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 21.2 %芒廷维尤: 21.2 %芝加哥: 3.4 %芝加哥: 3.4 %西宁: 0.8 %西宁: 0.8 %运城: 2.5 %运城: 2.5 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 2.5 %重庆: 2.5 %长沙: 1.7 %长沙: 1.7 %其他Kao-sung上海北京南京合肥呼和浩特唐山天津太原广州张家口成都扬州昆明杭州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁运城郑州重庆长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (455) PDF downloads(17) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return