ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INDEXES IN SELECTION OF REMEDIATION SCHEMES: A CASE STUDY OF AN ABANDONED COKING SITE

MENG Xiang-shuai; CHEN Hong-han; HE Ya-ping; ZHENG Cong-qi; YUE Xi

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202102025

Volume 39 Issue 2

Jul. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2021 > 39(2): 153-159

MENG Xiang-shuai, CHEN Hong-han, HE Ya-ping, ZHENG Cong-qi, YUE Xi. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INDEXES IN SELECTION OF REMEDIATION SCHEMES: A CASE STUDY OF AN ABANDONED COKING SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102025

Citation:

MENG Xiang-shuai, CHEN Hong-han, HE Ya-ping, ZHENG Cong-qi, YUE Xi. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INDEXES IN SELECTION OF REMEDIATION SCHEMES: A CASE STUDY OF AN ABANDONED COKING SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102025

Citation:

MENG Xiang-shuai, CHEN Hong-han, HE Ya-ping, ZHENG Cong-qi, YUE Xi. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INDEXES IN SELECTION OF REMEDIATION SCHEMES: A CASE STUDY OF AN ABANDONED COKING SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102025

PDF( 1327 KB)

ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INDEXES IN SELECTION OF REMEDIATION SCHEMES: A CASE STUDY OF AN ABANDONED COKING SITE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102025

1. School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
2. CERI Eco Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100053, China;
3. Beijing Institute of Geological & Prospecting Engineering, Beijing 100048, China;
4. Shandong Hydrology and Water Resources Bureau, Jinan 250002, China

Received Date: 2019-12-19
Available Online: 2021-07-19

Abstract

Abstract

The environmental management framework of contaminated sites is not completed in China, and there is often lack of clear understanding about environmental impacts in the process of remediation technology development or program selection. As a result, sometimes secondary pollution caused by remediation is ignored. The research established the environmental indexes including pollutant discharge, environmental sensitivity, environmental risk, soil and ecological environment, laws, regulations and standards, and social acceptability based on green and sustainable principle. The environmental comparison between two remediation technologies was carried out at an abandoned coking site in Beijing. The result showed that the emission of CO₂ and organized atmospheric pollutants of thermal desorption in situ were 6.0, 1.49 times larger than that of ex-situ thermal desorption, since the latter had advantages in energy saving and emission reduction. While the indexes such as environmental risk, sensitivity and social acceptance of in-situ thermal desorption were better and the in-situ program was chosen as the preferred plan. How to reduce emission of pollutants and lower environmental risks further was the key point to improve the two programs respectively. The index system could be used for screening or optimizing the remediation schemes by identifying critical environmental factors.
- contaminated sites,
- sceening,
- environmental indexes,
- green and sustainable principle

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	李玮,王明玉,韩占涛,等. 棕地地下水污染修复技术筛选方法研究:以某废弃化工厂污染场地为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2016, 43(3):131-140.
[2]	白利平,罗云,刘俐,等. 污染场地修复技术筛选方法及应用[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(11):4218-4224.
[3]	BELLO-DAMBATTA A, FARMANI R, JAVADI A A, et al. The analytical hierarchy process for contaminated land management[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2009, 23(4):433-441.
[4]	廉新颖,杨昱,席北斗,等. 地下水污染修复技术验证评价方法研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(10):1743-1750.
[5]	BAI L P, LUO Y, SHI D R, et al. TOPSIS-based screening method of soil remediation technology for contaminated sites and its application[J]. Journal of Soil Contamination, 2015, 24(4):386-397.
[6]	樊陆欢,洪岚,蒋澄宇,等. 基于PROMETHEEⅡ法的POPs污染场地修复技术评价体系[J]. 环境工程, 2014, 32(9):172-176.
[7]	CADOTTE M, LOUISE D, RÉJEAN S. Selection of a remediation scenario for a diesel-contaminated site using LCA[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12(4):239-251.
[8]	HIGGINS M R, OLSON T M. Life-cycle case study comparison of permeable reactive barrier versus pump-and-treat remediation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(24):9432-9438.
[9]	胡新涛,朱建新,丁琼. 基于生命周期评价的多氯联苯污染场地修复技术的筛选[J]. 科学通报, 2012, 57(2/3):129 -137.
[10]	环境保护部. 工业企业场地环境调查评估与修复工作指南(试行)[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2014.
[11]	邢颖,吕永龙,史雅娟,等. 焚烧、水泥窑和安全填埋法处置PCBs污染物技术优选[J]. 环境科学, 2007, 28(3):673-678.
[12]	张倩,蒋栋,谷庆宝,等. 基于AHP和TOPSIS的污染场地修复技术筛选方法研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(6):1088-1094.
[13]	陶欢,廖晓勇,阎秀兰,等. 应用多属性决策分析法筛选污染场地土壤修复技术[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(8):4850-4860.
[14]	HOU D Y, AL-TABBAA A, LUO J. Assessing effects of site characteristics on remediation secondary life cycle impact with a generalised framework[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2014, 57(7):1083-1100.
[15]	RIDSDALE D R, NOBLE B F. Assessing sustainable remediation frameworks using sustainability principles[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 184(Part 1):36-44.
[16]	侯德义,宋易南. 农田污染土壤的绿色可持续修复:分析框架与相关思考[J]. 环境保护, 2018, 46(1):36-40.
[17]	MARTIN L. Incorporating values into sustainability decision-making[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 105:146-156.
[18]	张丽峰. 我国产业结构、能源结构和碳排放关系研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25(5):1-7.
[19]	HOLLAND K S, LEWIS R E, TIPTON K, et al. Framework for integrating sustainability into remediation projects[J]. Remediation Journal, 2011, 21(3):7-38.
[20]	CAPPUYNS V. Environmental impacts of soil remediation activities:quantitative and qualitative tools applied on three case studies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 52(4):145-154.
[21]	United States Environmental Protection Agency. Superfund remedy report, 15th ed. EPA-542-R-17-001, 2017.
[22]	马妍,董彬彬,杜晓明,等. 挥发及半挥发性有机物污染场地异位修复技术的二次污染及其防治[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(4):174-178.
[23]	甘平,杨乐巍,房增强,等. 挥发性有机物污染场地挖掘过程中污染扩散特征[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(12):4619-4626.
[24]	KENNEY M, WHITE M. A cost-benefit model for evaluating remediation alternatives at superfund sites incorporating the value of ecosystem services[R]. Springer US, 2007:169-196.
[25]	BURGER J. Environmental management:integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 400(1):6-19.
[26]	刘锴,宋易南,侯德义. 污染地块修复的社会可持续性与公众知情研究[J]. 环境保护, 2018,46(9):37-44.
[27]	陈卫平,谢天,李笑诺,等. 中国土壤污染防治技术体系建设思考[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(3):557-568.
[28]	孟祥帅,庞然,吴萌萌,等. 某废弃焦化场地原位燃气热脱附污染排放及控制[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(11):177-183.
[29]	籍龙杰,刘鹏,韦云霄,等. 单根加热管原位加热土壤过程中温度变化规律[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(2):165-169.
[30]	北京市环境保护局,北京市质量技术监督局. 大气污染物综合排放标准:DB 11/501-2017[S].2017.
[31]	HOU D Y, O'CONNOR D, AL-TABBAA A. Comparing the adoption of contaminated land remediation technologies in the United States, United Kingdom, and China[J]. Remediation Journal, 2015, 25(1):33-51.