Core Chinese Journal
Source Journal of CSCD(Core Version)
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 39 Issue 4
Jul.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Yi-wen, YANG Guo-dong, WANG Feng-xia, CHEN Hui-ting, HUANG Ai-lian, LIU Li-ting, JIANG Yan-hang, SONG Ying-chun, JIANG Jian-guo. EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENTS AND SUBSTRATE COMPOSITIONS ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF ORGANIC WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 100-106. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104016
Citation: XU Yi-wen, YANG Guo-dong, WANG Feng-xia, CHEN Hui-ting, HUANG Ai-lian, LIU Li-ting, JIANG Yan-hang, SONG Ying-chun, JIANG Jian-guo. EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENTS AND SUBSTRATE COMPOSITIONS ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF ORGANIC WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 100-106. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104016

EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENTS AND SUBSTRATE COMPOSITIONS ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF ORGANIC WASTE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104016
  • Received Date: 2020-04-13
    Available Online: 2021-07-21
  • With the implementation of waste sorting policy in China, efficient utilization of organic waste becomes a great challenge in China. In this paper, continuous experiments on anaerobic digestions of kitchen waste, fruit and vegetable waste and garden waste were conducted, while ultrasound and alkali-thermal pretreatment were applied to enhance methane production, with the mono-digestion of food waste served as the control. According to different OLRs, the reaction period was divided into low OLR phase[OLR=1, 2 g/(L·d)] and high OLR phase[OLR=4, 6 g/(L·d)]. The results showed that under low OLR, all reaction systems showed strong stability, among which, kitchen waste had the highest VS removal rate of 90.3% and methane yield of 460 mL/g. Besides, after ultrasonic pretreatment and alkali-thermal pretreatment, the methane yields of co-substrates were increased by 7%~8% and 3%~7%, respectively. Under high organic load, the stability of mono-digestion system was significantly reduced, specifically, the pH value was decreased to 6.70 and the concentration of VFA and TAN was accumulated to 1230, 1519 mg/L, while the VS removal rate and methane yield were reduced by 2.8% and 11% as well. However, the co-digestion systems showed stronger resistance to high OLRs. Compared with kitchen waste, the methane yield of co-substrate was increased to 420 mL/g. After ultrasonic pretreatment, the methane yield was further increased by 3%, while the methane yield after alkali-thermal pretreatment was decreased by 4%.
  • loading
  • [1]
    国家发展改革委, 住房城乡建设部. 生活垃圾分类制度实施方案[R]. 北京:国务院办公厅, 2017.
    [2]
    董玥, 梅凤乔. 基于干湿分类优化的城市生活垃圾收运处理系统研究[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(8):112-115

    ,151.
    [3]
    GUO Q, DAI X H. Analysis on carbon dioxide emission reduction during the anaerobic synergetic digestion technology of sludge and kitchen waste:taking kitchen waste synergetic digestion project in Zhenjiang as an example[J]. Waste Management, 2017, 69:360-364.
    [4]
    SHEN F, YUAN H R, PANG Y Z, et al. Performances of anaerobic co-digestion of fruit & vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW):single-phase vs. two-phase[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 144:80-85.
    [5]
    SHI Y, GE Y, CHANG J, et al. Garden waste biomass for renewable and sustainable energy production in China:potential, challenges and development[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 22:432-437.
    [6]
    BROWN D, LI Y B. Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 127:275-280.
    [7]
    REN Y Y, YU M, WU C F, et al. A comprehensive review on food waste anaerobic digestion:research updates and tendencies[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 247:1069-1076.
    [8]
    GARCIA-PEÑA E I, PARAMESWARAN P, KANG D W, et al. Anaerobic digestion and co-digestion processes of vegetable and fruit residues:process and microbial ecology[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(20):9447-9455.
    [9]
    ZUO Z, WU S B, ZHANG W Q, et al. Effects of organic loading rate and effluent recirculation on the performance of two-stage anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 146:556-561.
    [10]
    YANG L C, XU F Q, GE X M, et al. Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 44:824-834.
    [11]
    ZHAO J, GE X M, VASCO-CORREA J, et al. Fungal pretreatment of unsterilized yard trimmings for enhanced methane production by solid-state anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 158:248-252.
    [12]
    PAVI S, KRAMER L E, GOMES L P, et al. Biogas production from co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and fruit and vegetable waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 228:362-367.
    [13]
    钱玉婷, 杜静, 陈广银, 等. 温和水热预处理促进秸秆产沼气的条件优化研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(12):3703-3710.
    [14]
    WANG L, SHEN F, YUAN H R, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and fruit/vegetable waste:lab-scale and pilot-scale studies[J]. Waste Management, 2014, 34(12):2627-2633.
    [15]
    ZHANG Y, BANKS C J, HEAVEN S. Co-digestion of source segregated domestic food waste to improve process stability[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 114:168-178.
    [16]
    GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ C, SIALVE B, BERNET N, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and thermal pretreatment of Scenedesmus biomass on methane production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 110:610-616.
    [17]
    徐一雯, 蒋建国, 刘诺, 等. 预处理对厨余垃圾等有机废弃物联合厌氧发酵的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(7):558-566.
    [18]
    LI Y Y, JIN Y Y, BORRION A, et al. Effects of organic composition on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 244:213-224.
    [19]
    MATAALVAREZ J, CECCHI F, LLABRES P, et al. Anaerobic-digestion of the Barcelona central food market organic wastes-plant-design and feasibility study[J]. Bioresource Technology, 1992, 42(1):33-42.
    [20]
    李海红, 巴琦玥, 闫志英, 等. 不同原料厌氧发酵及其微生物种群的研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(5):1449-1457.
    [21]
    CESARO A, BELGIORNO V. Sonolysis and ozonation as pretreatment for anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2013, 20(3):931-936.
    [22]
    LIU X, WANG W, GAO X B, et al. Effect of thermal pretreatment on the physical and chemical properties of municipal biomass waste[J]. Waste Management, 2012, 32(2):249-255.
    [23]
    KWIATKOWSKA B, BENNETT J, AKUNNA J, et al. Stimulation of bioprocesses by ultrasound[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2011, 29(6):768-780.
    [24]
    PAUDEL S R, BANJARA S P, CHOI O K, et al. Pretreatment of agricultural biomass for anaerobic digestion:current state and challenges[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 245:1194-1205.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (98) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return