Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
JIA Chao, YANG Xiao, LIU Sen, WANG Song-tao, WANG Hui-hui, LIU Jian-zhang. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LANDFILL ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY BASED ON INDEX ANALYSIS AND GIS METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 156-163,155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104024
Citation: JIA Chao, YANG Xiao, LIU Sen, WANG Song-tao, WANG Hui-hui, LIU Jian-zhang. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LANDFILL ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY BASED ON INDEX ANALYSIS AND GIS METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 156-163,155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LANDFILL ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY BASED ON INDEX ANALYSIS AND GIS METHOD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104024
  • Received Date: 2020-05-30
    Available Online: 2021-07-21
  • To reasonably evaluate the pollution potential of the landfill site and its impact on the surrounding groundwater environment, a landfill site in Shandong Province was selected as the research object. LPI index method and WQI index method were used to evaluate the pollution situation of landfill leachate and the water quality of surrounding groundwater. At the same time, GIS spatial analysis and other functions were used to evaluate the pollution impact distribution. Using numerical simulation and ammonia nitrogen as the characteristic pollutant, the laws of pollutant migration and diffusion in leachate were calculated and analyzed. The results showed that the leachate in the study area had a large pollution potential and risk of polluting the surrounding groundwater. At present, the quality of surrounding groundwater met the requirements of WHO and China national standards, and was generally in good condition. However, with the leakage of leachate, the polluted area of ammonia nitrogen and other pollutants gradually spread into the feather shape, and the groundwater quality would continue to deteriorate. It was expected that the leachate would begin to contaminate the groundwater in the surrounding residential area and gradually expand by 2025. So it is necessary to take corresponding anti-seepage measures to protect the surrounding groundwater.
  • [1]
    JIANG Y, LI R, YANG Y N, et al. Migration and evolution of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachate-contaminated groundwater plume[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019,151:104463.
    [2]
    TENODI S, KR AČG1 MAR D, AGBABA J, et al. Assessment of the environmental impact of sanitary and unsanitary parts of a municipal solid waste landfill[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020,258:110019.
    [3]
    马仕君, 周传斌, 杨光, 等. 城市生活垃圾填埋场的物质存量特征及其环境影响:以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 环境科学, 2019,40(12):5593-5603.
    [4]
    SIZIRICI B, TANSEL B. Parametric fate and transport profiling for selective groundwater monitoring at closed landfills:a case study[J]. Waste Management, 2015,38(1):263-270.
    [5]
    杨妍妍, 徐谦, 李金香, 等. 北京市典型垃圾填埋场渗滤液污染物监测与评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2014,14(2):235-238.
    [6]
    熊建英, 郑正. 垃圾填埋场渗滤液溶解性有机质特性及其去除技术综述[J]. 环境化学, 2015,34(1):44-53.
    [7]
    叶雅丽, 李山河, 肖宁, 等. 垃圾渗滤液处理技术发展趋势探讨[J]. 中国给水排水, 2014,30(22):55-56.
    [8]
    张贺. 垃圾填埋场渗滤液处理技术研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2014.
    [9]
    杜越, KO J H, 黄丹丹, 等. 模拟生活垃圾填埋反应器堆体底部抽气对污染气体排放的控制[J]. 环境工程学报, 2020,14(11):3182-3191.
    [10]
    旦增, 周鹏, 周文武, 等. 西藏日喀则市垃圾填埋场地下水环境质量评价[J]. 环境工程, 2019,37(5):200-205.
    [11]
    刘国, 刘晏辉, 何天煜, 等. 某垃圾填埋场地下水水化学与水质评价研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019,42(4):221-228.
    [12]
    廖镭, 张涵, 郭珊珊. 简易垃圾填埋场渗滤液地下水溶质运移数值模拟[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2019,26(2):76-83.
    [13]
    赵春兰, 凌成鹏, 吴勇, 等. 垃圾渗滤液对地下水水质影响的数值模拟预测:以冕宁县漫水湾生活垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境工程, 2017,35(2):163-167.
    [14]
    赵卫东, 魏超, 卫佳佳, 等. 基于GIS的垃圾填埋场渗滤液环境影响评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019,19(4):1431-1438.
    [15]
    高绍博, 李瑞, 席北斗, 等. 海积平原区某非正规垃圾填埋场地下水氨氮污染模拟研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019,39(10):3535-3541.
    [16]
    周文武, 陈冠益, 旦增, 等. 垃圾填埋场区域地下水铅的修复方案比选:以拉萨市为例[J]. 环境工程, 2020,38(6):88-93.
    [17]
    付康, 张涵, 廖镭. 非正规垃圾填埋场土壤污染及修复方法探讨[J]. 中国测试, 2018,44(11):81-87.
    [18]
    KUMAR D, ALAPPAT B J. Evaluating leachate contamination potential of landfill sites using leachate pollution index[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2005,7(3):190-197.
    [19]
    ARUNBABU V, INDU K S, RAMASAMY E V. Leachate pollution index as an effective tool in determining the phytotoxicity of municipal solid waste leachate[J]. Waste Management, 2017,68:329-336.
    [20]
    ŞCENER S, ŞENER E, DAVRAZ A. Evaluation of water quality using water quality index (WQI) method and GIS in Aksu River (SW-Turkey)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,584/585:131-144.
    [21]
    MISHRA S, TIWARY D, OHRI A, et al. Impact of municipal solid waste landfill leachate on groundwater quality in varanasi, india[J]. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2019,9:100230.
    [22]
    WHO. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality-edition 4[S]. Geneva:World Health Organization, 2011.
    [23]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 地下水质量标准:GB/T 14848-2017[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2017.
    [24]
    安瑞瑞, 张永波, 朱君. 地下水数值模拟中4条人为边界模型处理[J]. 人民黄河, 2014,36(3):61-63.
    [25]
    沈媛媛, 蒋云钟, 雷晓辉, 等. 地下水数值模拟中人为边界的处理方法研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2008,35(6):12-15.
    [26]
    ZHENG C, WANG P P. MT3DMS:A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems; Documentation and User's Guide[R]. Vicksburg,MS:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1999.
    [27]
    马志飞, 安达, 姜永海, 等. 某危险废物填埋场地下水污染预测及控制模拟[J]. 环境科学, 2012,33(1):64-70.
    [28]
    环境保护部, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 生活垃圾填埋场污染控制标准:GB 16889-2008[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2008.
    [29]
    LUIS F, BAKKEN D P. Solid Waste Management[M]. Nairobi:United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2005:384-388.
    [30]
    RAGHAB S M, ABD EL MEGUID A M, Hegazi H A. Treatment of leachate from municipal solid waste landfill[J]. HBRC Journal, 2013,9(2):187-192.
    [31]
    COSSU R, FANTINATO G, PIVATO A, et al. Further steps in the standardization of BOD5/COD ratio as a biological stability index for MSW[J]. Waste Management, 2017,68:16-23.
    [32]
    张东, 秦勇, 赵志琦. 我国北方小流域硫酸参与碳酸盐矿物化学风化过程研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015,35(11):3568-3578.
    [33]
    中国地质调查局. 地下水流数值模拟技术要求:GWI-D1[S].北京:地质出版社,2004.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIU Jinhe, ZHENG Yuna, LIU Peng, LIN Kuangfei, HUANG Kai, ZHOU Changrui. SIMULATION OF POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND MIGRATION LAW OF CADMIUM IN SOIL OF A TYPICAL ELECTRONIC WASTE DISMANTLING AREA IN TAIZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 150-158. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408018
    [2]YIN Yalun, HOU Jingming, LI Xinyi, LUAN Guangxue, GAO Xujun, WANG Tian, SHEN Jian, QIAO Mengxi. APPLICATION OF GAST-SWMM COUPLED NUMERICAL MODEL IN LARGE-SCALE URBAN INUNDATION RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 82-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404010
    [3]YANG Yanmei, XIA Tong, ZHANG Yun, AO Liang. SIMULATION ON TRANSPORT OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTANTS AFTER CLOSURE OF A LANDFILL IN CHONGQING BASED ON VISUAL MODFLOW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 40-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404005
    [4]LIN Huili, JIN Zhaodi, ZHANG Shuli, ZHANG Guangxue, YU Qun, ZHANG Min. NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EVALUATION OF INDIRECT THERMAL DESORPTION EQUIPMENT FOR PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 261-267. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403032
    [5]YIN Leyi, HUANG Guoxin, NIU Haobo, CHEN Jian, XIE Yueqing, YANG Lihu, LIU Ling. GROUNDWATER POLLUTION DYNAMIC RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND RISK SCREENING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 199-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401026
    [6]DU Chuan, LI Houen, CHEN Suyun. APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY IN EXTRACTION AND TREATMENT OF POLLUTED GROUNDWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 102-108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307014
    [7]NIU Yi, LI Wei, LI Gongke, WANG Weixing, LI Mingming, CAO Shuping, LÜ Xiaowen. SIMULATION OF RESTORATION OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION IN A LANDFILL IN COASTAL PLAIN AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 12-20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303002
    [8]LI Qiuhua, WANG Qunhui. ADVANCED TREATMENT OF SOLID WASTE LANDFILL LEACHATE BY A COMBINED PROCESS OF Fe/C MICROELECTROLYSIS-FENTON OXIDATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 18-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203004
    [9]CHANG Weicen, LI Yumeng, ZHONG Qiumeng, LIANG Sai. HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION ENVIRONMENTAL DATASET AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 1-11. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206001
    [10]LUO Wei, LI Pinyi, PENG Hui, YE Yong. NUMERICAL STUDY ON EFFECT OF STRIP MAGNET GEOMETRIC CONFIGURATION ON SEPARATION BEHAVIORS OF MAGNETIC PARTICLES IN LAMINAR FLOW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 32-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211005
    [11]HUANG Yanpeng, WANG Yuanhao, WANG Chao, LIU Weijiang, WANG Hong, LV Guangfeng, LIN Sijie, HU Qing. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND ZONING CONTROL OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION BASED ON SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS AND K-MEANS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 31-41,47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206004
    [12]LI Debo, CHEN Zhaoli, CHEN Zhihao, FENG Yongxin, HUANG Zigan, WEI Chen, MA Xiaoqian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MIXED FIRING OF AGED REFUSE AND AIR DISTRIBUTION OPTIMIZATION IN A MSW INCINERATION FURNACE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 113-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211016
    [13]ZHANG Yun. ADVANCES IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF GROUNDWATER IN-SITE CHEMICAL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 197-204,217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205029
    [14]ZHAO Yan, GUO Jia-lin, SHI Yang, WU Zhi-qi, JIANG Bin-hui. A GROUNDWATER INFLOW PREDICTION METHOD FOR FUSHUN WEST OPEN-PIT MINE BASED ON GMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 75-79,129. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101011
    [15]LU Guang-hua, LIU Chang-bo, XIA Chun, YUE Chang-sheng, LIU Shi-cheng, WU Jie. APPLICATION OF MONITORING TECHNOLOGY FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER IN AN INFORMAL LANDFILL SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 180-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104027
    [16]HAN Xiao-dong, SUN Ye. SITE SELECTION OF WASTE TRANSFER STATION BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF ODOR DISPERSION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 130-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103018
    [17]QI Er-bing, HUANG Ya-ji, YUAN Qi, HU Hua-jun, FAN Cong-hui, CAO Yan-yan, DING Shou-yi. LIME COAGULATION-SUBMERGED EVAPORATION SYNERGISTIC TREATMENT FOR NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANE CONCENTRATE OF LANDFILL LEACHATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 54-58,77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012010
    [18]XU Xin-yu, LI Wei-min, YE Jiang-yu. TREATMENT OF LANDFILL LEACHATE BY PHOTOSYNTHETIC BACTERIA IN SBR SYSTEM AND ANALYSIS ON BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 99-104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001015
    [19]ZHAO Kun, LI Ruo-hua, CHENG Wen-long, YANG Yuan-ping, YUE Shu-bo. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF SEWAGE DISCHARGE ON ESTUARY WATER FUNCTIONAL AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 33-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010006
    [20]Wang Huitao Wu Yong Ke Bin Wu Weijie Cui Zhijun, . PRETREATMENT OF LANDFILL LEACHATES BY MICRO-ELECTROLYSIS INTEGRATED EQUIPMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 16-20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502004
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 刘子平. 河南某垃圾填埋场地下水环境污染调查预测研究. 黑龙江环境通报. 2024(05): 39-41 .
    2. 袁增,冯小波,杨江海,王珏,裴逸智,郭劲松,高俊敏. 川东地区天然气场站固化池渗滤液污染特征及其对地下水影响研究. 环境科学学报. 2024(05): 264-272 .
    3. 凌波,帅焕,陈婉君,孙杨艳,张海忠,欧阳琦. 地下水阻隔墙对湖南某生活垃圾填埋场地下水污染源头减量的模拟研究. 矿产与地质. 2024(06): 1109-1119 .
    4. 张霞,杨永森,杨渤京,范德强,朱性宝,娄满君,王海东,王一冰. 基于GIS和EVS方法的退役化肥企业场地开发前环境调查与污染特征分析. 环境与发展. 2023(01): 83-89+95 .
    5. 牛毅,李炜,李攻科,王卫星,李明明,曹淑萍,吕潇文. 滨海平原区某生活垃圾填埋场地下水污染修复模拟. 环境工程. 2023(03): 12-20 . 本站查看
    6. 宋方玉,陈婷婷,马崇迪. GIS技术在环境影响评价中的应用. 皮革制作与环保科技. 2023(11): 57-59 .
    7. 申二宁. 基于因子分析—模糊综合法的地下水环境影响数值模拟分析. 环境保护与循环经济. 2023(09): 16-19+61 .
    8. 游洋洋,梁增强,霍宁. 基于改进的水质标识指数法垃圾填埋场地下水评价. 环境工程. 2023(12): 264-269+311 . 本站查看
    9. 吉栋梁,张鲁玉,黄兆琴,杜布云,徐亚,杨枫. 海滨危废填埋场与水源缓冲距离要求及调控. 环境科学研究. 2022(06): 1499-1508 .
    10. 赵坤. 垂直防渗在地下水污染防控中的应用. 皮革制作与环保科技. 2022(23): 109-111 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.9 %FULLTEXT: 16.9 %META: 79.3 %META: 79.3 %PDF: 3.8 %PDF: 3.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.0 %其他: 10.0 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %China: 1.6 %China: 1.6 %[]: 2.2 %[]: 2.2 %上海: 2.7 %上海: 2.7 %东莞: 1.3 %东莞: 1.3 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %信阳: 0.2 %信阳: 0.2 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %凉山: 0.2 %凉山: 0.2 %北京: 3.3 %北京: 3.3 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南通: 0.7 %南通: 0.7 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %周口: 0.2 %周口: 0.2 %天津: 2.4 %天津: 2.4 %太原: 0.7 %太原: 0.7 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 1.8 %广州: 1.8 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 1.3 %武汉: 1.3 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %濮阳: 0.4 %濮阳: 0.4 %石嘴山: 0.2 %石嘴山: 0.2 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 41.8 %芒廷维尤: 41.8 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衢州: 0.9 %衢州: 0.9 %西宁: 7.8 %西宁: 7.8 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %许昌: 0.4 %许昌: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.7 %赣州: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %运城: 2.2 %运城: 2.2 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.8 %郑州: 1.8 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %铁岭: 0.4 %铁岭: 0.4 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %阜阳: 0.4 %阜阳: 0.4 %雅安: 0.2 %雅安: 0.2 %青岛: 1.1 %青岛: 1.1 %其他其他China[]上海东莞临汾信阳兰州凉山北京南京南宁南通台州周口天津太原安康常德广州廊坊张家口成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉济南济源深圳温州湖州漯河濮阳石嘴山福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水衢州西宁西安许昌贵阳赣州运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铁岭银川长沙长治阜阳雅安青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (356) PDF downloads(20) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return