Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Cheng Haochen, Zheng Chunli, Wang Jianying, Si Wantong, Zhang Xuefeng. DIAGNOSES ON THE HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE SOIL SURROUNDING A TAILING RESERVOIR OF MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(5): 149-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201505032
Citation: PENG Jin-jin, LI Lin, ZHENG Chuan, HU Ling, WU Xiao-xu. ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF BTEX IN A DYESTUFF CHEMICAL SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 187-194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104028

ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF BTEX IN A DYESTUFF CHEMICAL SITE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104028
  • Received Date: 2020-05-08
    Available Online: 2021-07-21
  • In order to understand the distribution characteristics of benzene series(BTEX) in the soil of a dye chemical pollution site in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, 17 groundwater samples and 343 soil samples were determined. The results showed that:the distribution of BTEX in groundwater and soil was consistent, and the pollution had homology; due to the flat terrain and poor horizontal permeability of soil, the diffusion range of pollutants was limited. Influenced by soil anti-pollution performance, benzene, m,p-xylene and o-xylene were mainly detected in soil layer above 7.2 m, the three substances mainly existed as light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) in the soil, and they accumulated near the groundwater level, and continued to migrate in the saturated zone in dissolved state. Chlorobenzene mainly existed in soil as heavy nonaqueous liquid (DNAPL), the concentration of chlorobenzene in soil was higher, and the depth of migration was deeper, related to the form, migration time and geological conditions. It was suggested that the combination of ex-situ normal temperature desorption and chemical oxidation technology should be used for shallow contaminated soil, and in-situ chemical oxidation technology should be used for deep contaminated soil and polluted groundwater, in the remediation project.
  • [1]
    LI X N, JIAO W T, XIAO R B, et al. Contaminated sites in China:countermeasures of provincial governments[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 147:485-496.
    [2]
    陈梦舫.我国工业污染场地土壤与地下水重金属修复技术综述[J].中国科学院院刊,2014,29(3):327-335.
    [3]
    吴俭,邓一荣,肖荣波,等.当前我国污染地块环境管理存在的问题与对策探析[J].环境监测管理与技术,2018,30(3):1-3.
    [4]
    QIAO W J, LUO F,LOMHEIM L, et al. Natural attenuation and anaerobic benzene detoxification processes at a chlorobenzene-contaminated industrial site inferred from field investigations and microcosm studies[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 52(1):22-31.
    [5]
    QIAO L, ZHENG X B, ZHENG J, et al. Legacy and currently used organic contaminants in human hair and hand wipes of female Ewaste dismantling workers and workplace dust in South China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(5):2820-2829.
    [6]
    常春英,吴俭,邓一荣,等.中国土壤污染防治地方立法思路与探索:以广东省为例[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(11):2170-2178.
    [7]
    IARC(International Agency for Research on Cancer). List of classifications by alphabetical order[EB/OL]. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/ClassificationsGroupOrder.pdf.
    [8]
    谭冰,王铁宇,李奇锋,等.农药企业场地土壤中苯系物污染风险及管理对策[J].环境科学,2014,35(6):2272-2280.
    [9]
    鲁炳闻,韩春媚,周友亚,等.土壤中苯系物的顶空气相色谱-质谱联用测定方法研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(4):812-816.
    [10]
    童玲,郑西来,李梅,等.不同下垫面苯系物的挥发行为研究[J].环境科学,2008,29(7):2058-2062.
    [11]
    奚旦立.环境监测[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,1995.
    [12]
    毛跟年,许牡丹,黄建文.环境中有毒有害物质与分析检测[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.122-124.
    [13]
    胡枭, 胡永梅,樊耀波,等. 土壤中氯苯类化合物的迁移行为[J].环境科学,2000,21(6):32-36.
    [14]
    李盼盼,杨悦锁,路莹,等.水位波动对土壤苯系物的污染运移和水化学影响[J].环境化学,2017,36(8):1842-1848.
    [15]
    YANG Q S, LI Y,ZHOU J F, et al. Modelling of benzene distribution in the subsurface of an abandoned gas plant site after a long term of groundwater table fluctuation[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2013, 27(22):3217-3226.
    [16]
    GHOSHAL S, PASION C, ALSHAFIE M. Reduction of benzene and naphthalene mass transfer from crude oils by aging-induced interfacial films[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(7):2102-2110.
    [17]
    庞博,王铁宇,杜力宇,等.农药企业场地土壤中苯系物污染风险及调控对策[J].环境科学,2013,34(7):2829-2836.
    [18]
    邓一荣,陆海建,董敏刚,等.粤港澳大湾区典型化工场地苯系物污染特征及迁移规律[J].环境科学,2019,40(12):5615-5622.
    [19]
    张宏凯,左锐,王金生,等.加油站泄漏污染物的迁移分布规律[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(4):1532-1539.
    [20]
    梁荣辉,章洁怡.动态顶空-气相色谱/质谱法监测土壤中苯系物及卤代烃[J].广东化工,2019,24(46):96-98.
    [21]
    陈虹,钟明,唐浩冶,等.直接加热-静态顶空-气相色谱/质谱法测定土壤中苯系物[J].土壤学报,2016,53(4):1075-1083.
    [22]
    US EPA 8260C:2006 Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)[S].
    [23]
    GB/T 50123-1999土工试验标准[S].
    [24]
    高培. 色酚AS-BI的制备工艺[D].天津:天津大学,2007.
    [25]
    丛鑫,朱书全,薛南冬,等.有机氯农药企业搬迁遗留场地土壤中污染物的垂向分布特征[J].环境科学研究,2009, 22(3):351-355.
    [26]
    孟宪荣,许伟,张建荣.化工污染场地氯苯分布特征[J].土壤, 2019, 51(6):1144-1150.
    [27]
    HJ 610-2016环境影响评价技术导则地下水环境[S].
    [28]
    王颖,陈雷,杨洋,等.基于TMVOC的地下水位波动带苯系物迁移转化模拟[J].环境科学研究,2020,33(3):634-642.
    [29]
    杨明星,杨悦锁,曹玉清,等.包气带土壤对石油烃的截留作用研究[J].环境污染与防治,2011,33(3):51-57.
    [30]
    陈华清,李义连.地下水苯系物污染原位曝气修复模拟研究[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(3):46-51.
    [31]
    SOOKHAK-LARI K,DAVIS G B,JOHNSTON C D. Incorporating hysteresis in a multi-phase multi-component NAPL modeling framework:a multi-component LNAPL gasoline example[J].Advances in Water Resources, 2016, 96:190-201.
    [32]
    余梅. 氯苯类化合物在低渗透粘性介质中的迁移规律研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2016.
    [33]
    罗泽娇,李龙媛,余江,等.氯苯(CB)在粘土上的解吸特征[J].地球科学,2015,40(5):933-940.
    [34]
    董敏刚,张建荣,罗飞,等.我国南方某典型有机化工污染场地土壤与地下水健康风险评估[J].土壤,2015,47(1):100-106.
    [35]
    裴芳,罗泽娇,彭进进,等.某炼油厂退役场地土壤与浅层地下水酚类污染特征研究[J].环境科学,2012,33(12):4251-4255.
    [36]
    环境保护部自然生态保护司编译(第一辑).土壤修复技术方法与应用[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2011.
    [37]
    陈宏,刘翔,卢欣,等.某化工污染场地土壤与地下水污染特征分析[J].油气田环境保护,2017,27(1):21-24.
    [38]
    魏鹏鹏,赵保军,赵彩云,等. 一种污染土壤常温解吸处理系统:中国, CN208162282U[P]. 2018-11-30.
    [39]
    ALVIM-Ferraz M C M, ALBERGARIA J T, DELERUE-Matos C. Soil remediation time to achieve clean-up goals I:influence of soil water content[J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 62(5):853-860.
    [40]
    杨乐巍,张晓斌,李书鹏,等.土壤及地下水原位注入-高压旋喷注射修复技术工程应用案例分析[J].环境工程,2018,36(12):48-53.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIU Zhihua, NING Beiyao, RONG Hui, WANG Anhui, ZHANG Yanfang, FENG Yang, LIU De'e, HAN Zhaopan, YUE Changsheng, DAI Xiaomeng. EFFECT OF MICROBIAL MODIFICATION ON STEEL SLAG ON ITS STABILITY AND ITS APPLICATION IN ROAD ENGINEERING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 208-216. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407023
    [2]LIU Wenhao, CHEN Qingcai, XU Tengfei. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION TECHNOLOGY OF STEEL SLAG UNDER THE BACKGROUND OF DUAL CARBON STRATEGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 172-182. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405022
    [3]WU Yuedong, LÜ Wen, YUE Changsheng, WU Long, PENG Ben. THEORETICAL RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF CARBONATION AND MICROBIAL MINERALIZATION OF STEEL SLAG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 171-175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403021
    [4]LI Sha, WANG Zhaojia, WANG Mingwei, ZHENG Yongchao, ZHAN Jiayu. LONG-TERM LEACHING BEHAVIORS OF HEAVY METALS FROM STEEL SLAG IN CEMENT-BASED CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 136-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303018
    [5]SHAO Yan, JIANG Mingming, XIONG Jingchao, GUO Huajun, CHEN Kun, LIU Zihao, XU Xiaoming, HU Guofeng. INFLUENCE OF ADMIXTURES ON STRENGTH AND HYDRATION PERFORMANCE OF STEEL SLAG & DESULFURIZATION ASH BASED CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 134-141. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212018
    [6]WAN Jing-min, ZHANG Fa-wang, HAN Zhan-tao, SONG Pei-pei, BAI Yun. ADSORPTION OF HEAVY METAL IONS ON ALKALI-MELTIING AND HYDROTHERMAL MODIFIED BIOFUEL ASH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 108-117. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209015
    [7]HAN Meng, ZHANG Liangliang, LU Zhongfei, SUN Jian. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EVALUATION METHODS FOR STEEL SLAG SOUNDNESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 235-239. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202034
    [8]WANG Yu-hang, YU Wei, ZHAO Si-yu, LIU Shan, JIANG Xiao-hui, LI Qi. ADSORPTION OF ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS IN WATER ENVIRONMENT BY MODIFIED BIOCHAR:A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 91-99,134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112014
    [9]WU Yue-dong, PENG Ben, WU Long, LV Wen, ZHANG Guo-hua. REVIEW ON GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT OF TREATMENT AND UTILIZATION OF STEEL SLAG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 161-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101025
    [10]YONG Xiao-jing, GUAN Chong, ZHANG Hao, JIN Zheng-wei, YAO Min. RESEARCH PROGRESS IN PREPARATION TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATION OF NANO-ZERO-VALENT IRON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 14-22. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009003
    [11]LV Wen, JIA Jin-wei, ZHANG Shao-fei, ZHANG Fan, SONG Qiang, GU Qiu-xiang, SHU Xin-qian. INFLUENCE OF STEEL SLAG ON PYROLYSIS OF OIL TANK BOTTOM SLUDGE IN BEIJING-TIANJIN-HEBEI REGION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 169-176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010027
    [12]HUANG Xiang-yun, HE Wen-yan, LI Jin-xin, YANG Jin-yan. ADSORPTION AND FIXATION OF VANADIUM IN SOIL BY SEPIOLITES MODIFIED BY ACID-THERMAL ACTIVATION, SULFHYDRYL ORGANISATION AND HYDROXYL IRON-ALUMINUM PILLARING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 147-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002020
    [15]Peng Ben Yue Changsheng Huang Shishuo Zhang Mei Guo Min Hu Tianqi, . CO2 MODIFICATION AND THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTY OF HOT STEEL SLAG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 100-102. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504021
    [17]Zhang Xiaoxu, Zhang Hongyu, Li Guoxue, . EFFECT OF ADDITIVE QUANTITY OF STALKS ON H2 S AND NH3 EMISSION DURING KITCHEN WASTE COMPOSTING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 95-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501022
    [18]THE RESEARCH PROGRESS ON THE REMOVAL OF ORGANIC POLLUTANTS BY Ti-BASED LEAD DIOXIDE ANODE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 1-4. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412001
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 何志军,盛宏沅,高立华,刘吉辉. 利用生物质能实现低碳炼铁的研究进展. 钢铁. 2025(01): 1-14 .
    2. 唐瑞骏,朱圆圆,余永建,程思远,刘稼鑫,叶晓婷. 类腐殖酸的水热炭化制备及其在醋糟中的利用综述. 林产化学与工业. 2025(01): 173-184 .
    3. 刘耀鑫,汪远,潘一辉,伯灵,文博. 酸碱催化对果木枝水热炭组成及结构影响. 太阳能学报. 2025(02): 18-24 .
    4. 尹理亚,丁开,杜文泽,芦天亮,王剑峰,韩丽. 金属/非金属和氮共掺杂生物炭的制备及其在有机污水处理中的应用进展. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 9-17 .
    5. 宋瑞珍,杨晓阳,张鹏,王宝凤. 低阶煤和生物质水热碳化特性及水热炭功能化改性研究进展. 洁净煤技术. 2024(03): 72-85 .
    6. 傅文煜,孙文强,王连勇. 煤气化渣资源化利用技术研究进展. 环境工程. 2023(12): 319-328 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.9 %FULLTEXT: 11.9 %META: 84.4 %META: 84.4 %PDF: 3.7 %PDF: 3.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.4 %其他: 8.4 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 1.0 %China: 1.0 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %东莞: 7.1 %东莞: 7.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %包头: 0.9 %包头: 0.9 %北京: 8.6 %北京: 8.6 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 4.0 %南京: 4.0 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 1.5 %台州: 1.5 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %唐山: 1.3 %唐山: 1.3 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 0.9 %太原: 0.9 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %常州: 1.0 %常州: 1.0 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.7 %广州: 0.7 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %无锡: 0.4 %无锡: 0.4 %昆明: 2.5 %昆明: 2.5 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 2.5 %杭州: 2.5 %桂林: 1.2 %桂林: 1.2 %武汉: 1.5 %武汉: 1.5 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %济南: 1.2 %济南: 1.2 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 1.2 %湖州: 1.2 %湛江: 0.3 %湛江: 0.3 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %焦作: 0.3 %焦作: 0.3 %百色: 0.1 %百色: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.9 %绵阳: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 23.7 %芒廷维尤: 23.7 %芝加哥: 0.9 %芝加哥: 0.9 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %衢州: 0.6 %衢州: 0.6 %西宁: 3.0 %西宁: 3.0 %西安: 1.6 %西安: 1.6 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 1.3 %运城: 1.3 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %重庆: 1.0 %重庆: 1.0 %长沙: 2.1 %长沙: 2.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阿勒泰: 0.1 %阿勒泰: 0.1 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %鞍山: 0.3 %鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 1.9 %马鞍山: 1.9 %黄石: 0.3 %黄石: 0.3 %其他其他Central DistrictChina[]上海东莞临汾临沂保定包头北京十堰南京南宁南昌台北台州合肥呼和浩特唐山大同天津太原娄底宁波宣城常州常德平顶山广州廊坊张家口徐州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦揭阳无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林武汉沈阳沧州济南济源深圳温州湖州湛江漯河烟台焦作百色石家庄福州绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治阳泉阿勒泰青岛鞍山马鞍山黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (396) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return