Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
ZHAO Tao, ZHOU Yu, MA Gang-ping, LI Shi-qing, CAO Xue-long. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RESTORATION EFFECT OF IN SITU THERMAL DESORPTION IN COKING CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 201-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104030
Citation: ZHAO Tao, ZHOU Yu, MA Gang-ping, LI Shi-qing, CAO Xue-long. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RESTORATION EFFECT OF IN SITU THERMAL DESORPTION IN COKING CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 201-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104030

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RESTORATION EFFECT OF IN SITU THERMAL DESORPTION IN COKING CONTAMINATED SITES

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104030
  • Received Date: 2020-05-09
    Available Online: 2021-07-21
  • In-situ gas thermal desorption experiments were conducted on coking sites contaminated by benzene and PAHs. In this paper, the disposal effect and energy consumption of the secondary combustion of organic pollutants reached an optimal state by innovatively combining combustion and extraction and means of the design form with small extraction tube. In the modular design of tail gas and tail water, the combined process of secondary combustion and adsorption of activated carbon, as well as oil-water separation and activated carbon was adopted, thereby enhancing the removal effect of organic pollutants, and reducing the production of waste gas and activated carbon. Through the remediation experiments conducted on a coking contaminated site of 100 square meters, the four heating periods in the thermal desorption process were well-defined, and the remediation duration was about 55 days. After remediation, the concentrations of benzo (a) pyrene and benzene were less than the standard values for screening the second type land according to Soil Environment Quality Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Development Land (GB 36600-2018), and the exhaust emissions conformed to the Comprehensive Emission Standard of Air Pollutants of Beijing (DB 11/501-2017).
  • [1]
    黎箭. 土壤污染修复技术综述[J]. 区域治理, 2019(28):72-74.
    [2]
    许春娅. 工业污染场地土壤修复技术研究[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2019(3):99.
    [3]
    王玉军, 刘存, 周东美,等. 客观地看待我国耕地土壤环境质量的现状:关于《全国土壤污染状况调查公报》中有关问题的讨论和建议[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(8):1465-1473.
    [4]
    苏杨, 程红光. 解读土壤污染公报,量化结果需纠偏[J]. 环境经济, 2014(8):20.
    [5]
    李书鹏, 焦文涛, 李鸿炫,等. 燃气热脱附技术修复有机污染场地研究与应用进展[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019,13(9):2037-2048.
    [6]
    徐建, 林玉锁, 李群, 等. GTR技术对土壤加热效果及对污染物的去除效果[C]//中国环境科学学会2016年学术年会. 2016.
    [7]
    刘惠. 污染土壤热脱附技术的应用与发展趋势[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2019,44(4):144-148.
    [8]
    康绍果, 李书鹏, 范云. 污染地块原位加热处理技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 化工进展, 2017,36(7):2621-2631.
    [9]
    王锦淮. 原位热脱附技术在某有机污染场地修复中试应用[J]. 化学世界, 2018, 59(3):182-186.
    [10]
    赵涛, 马刚平, 周宇,等. 多环芳烃类污染土壤热脱附修复技术应用研究[J]. 环境工程, 2017,35(11):183-186.
    [11]
    刘凯, 张瑞环, 王世杰. 污染地块修复原位热脱附技术的研究及应用进展[J]. 中国氯碱, 2017(12):31-37.
    [12]
    王雄科. 挥发性有机物废气处理技术进展与前瞻[J]. 探索科学, 2019(4):89-90.
    [13]
    张学良, 廖朋辉, 李群, 等. 复杂有机物污染地块原位热脱附修复技术的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 49(4):243-250.
    [14]
    王奕文, 马福俊, 张倩, 等. 热脱附尾气处理技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2017, 7(1):52-58.
    [15]
    蒋村, 孟宪荣, 施维林,等. 氯苯污染土壤低温原位热脱附修复[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 13(7):1720-1726.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]CUI Feijian, QIN Guangxiong, ZENG Hailong, HUANG Zhiwei, LI Wenjing, YANG Hanjie, HU Yanfang, FANG Huaiyang, ZENG Fantang, DU Hongwei. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND HEAVY METAL IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF HEAVILY POLLUTED TRIBUTARIES OF SHAHE RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 110-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201016
    [2]CHEN Ying-ying, ZHANG Liu, YIN Hao, WANG Yu-lai. CHARACTERISTICS OF PHOSPHORUS FRACTIONS IN SURFACE SEDIMENT FROM A CLEAR WATER GALLERY IN PAIHE RIVER, AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 71-78. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112011
    [3]ZHU Xue-tao, LIN Hai-ying, FENG Qing-ge, ZHAO Bo-han, ZHU Yi-fan, LAN Wen-lu, LI Tian-shen. POLLUTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, SOURCE ANALYSIS OF HEAVY METALS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF BEIBU GULF, GUANGXI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 69-76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108009
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 杨秀英,郑芳文,雷祥,黄诚,储小东,唐林森. 长江中下游抚河流域沉积物重金属分布特征及来源. 南昌工程学院学报. 2023(06): 29-37 .
    2. 周东,雷琦,杜彩丽,张玮,王丽卿,张瑞雷. 南淝河和十八联圩湿地底栖动物及其与环境因子的关系. 水生态学杂志. 2022(02): 54-61 .
    3. 李家兵,赖月婷,吴如林,曹石云,谢蓉蓉,文昊,秦安贵,孙志高. 河口潮间带沉积物重金属累积及生态风险评价. 生态学报. 2020(05): 1650-1662 .
    4. 张福祥,崔嵩,朱乾德,高尚,李昆阳. 七星河湿地水环境重金属污染特征与风险评价. 环境工程. 2020(10): 68-75 . 本站查看
    5. 陈影影,范颖,张振克,康婷婷,于世永,陈诗越. 东平湖表层沉积物粒度空间分布特征及影响因素. 海洋湖沼通报. 2019(01): 65-70 .
    6. 栗文佳,陈影影,于世永,陈诗越,张云峰. 近40年来东平湖水环境变迁及驱动因素. 环境工程. 2018(10): 48-52 . 本站查看
    7. 王秀,王振祥,潘宝,周春财,刘桂建. 南淝河水-沉积物中重金属的分布规律、环境评价与溯源研究. 环境工程. 2017(04): 134-138 . 本站查看
    8. 潘健,于丹丹,何振芳,姜涵,盖贝贝. 东平湖湿地景观演变对人类活动的响应机制. 水资源保护. 2017(04): 88-94 .
    9. 张菊,陈明文,鲁长娟,郭娜,殷山红,邓焕广. 东平湖表层沉积物重金属形态分布特征及环境风险评价. 生态环境学报. 2017(05): 850-856 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040246810
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.6 %FULLTEXT: 9.6 %META: 90.4 %META: 90.4 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.0 %其他: 16.0 %其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %China: 2.1 %China: 2.1 %United States: 1.1 %United States: 1.1 %[]: 1.1 %[]: 1.1 %上海: 5.3 %上海: 5.3 %伊利诺伊州: 1.1 %伊利诺伊州: 1.1 %北京: 4.3 %北京: 4.3 %南京: 6.4 %南京: 6.4 %台州: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %弗吉尼亚州: 1.1 %弗吉尼亚州: 1.1 %张家口: 3.2 %张家口: 3.2 %杭州: 3.2 %杭州: 3.2 %武汉: 1.1 %武汉: 1.1 %深圳: 2.1 %深圳: 2.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 25.5 %芒廷维尤: 25.5 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %苏州: 1.1 %苏州: 1.1 %衡水: 1.1 %衡水: 1.1 %衢州: 3.2 %衢州: 3.2 %西宁: 8.5 %西宁: 8.5 %西雅图: 1.1 %西雅图: 1.1 %贵阳: 1.1 %贵阳: 1.1 %邯郸: 1.1 %邯郸: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %阳泉: 2.1 %阳泉: 2.1 %黄石: 1.1 %黄石: 1.1 %其他其他ChinaUnited States[]上海伊利诺伊州北京南京台州天津弗吉尼亚州张家口杭州武汉深圳石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水衢州西宁西雅图贵阳邯郸重庆阳泉黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (285) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return