Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 5
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(5): 80-88
YANG Zhi-hua, ZHANG Rui, LIU Qiong-yu, TAO Yuan, JIANG Jun-ting, TAN Jing, CHENG Jin-jun, YE Xun. ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS ON FINE PARTICULATE MATTER SOURCE PROFILE OF OPEN-SOURCES IN WUHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 80-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105011
Citation: YANG Zhi-hua, ZHANG Rui, LIU Qiong-yu, TAO Yuan, JIANG Jun-ting, TAN Jing, CHENG Jin-jun, YE Xun. ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS ON FINE PARTICULATE MATTER SOURCE PROFILE OF OPEN-SOURCES IN WUHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 80-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105011
shu

ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS ON FINE PARTICULATE MATTER SOURCE PROFILE OF OPEN-SOURCES IN WUHAN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105011

  • 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Fume and Dust Pollution Control, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China;

  • 2. Suichang Branch of Ecological and Environmental Bureau of Lishui City, Suichang 323300, China;

  • 3. Hubei Jiutai Safety and Environmental Protection Technology Ltd, Shiyan 442000, China

  • Received Date: 2020-04-20
    Available Online: 2022-01-17
    Abstract
  • Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) samples from four kinds of open-sources (soil dust, construction dust, road dust and yard dust) in Wuhan were obtained by re-suspension sampling method, then the content of inorganic elements, water-soluble ions and carbon fractions of samples were analyzed. On this basis, the source profiles of PM2.5 for four kinds of open-sources in Wuhan were established. The results showed that crustal elements were the primary components in PM2.5 source profiles of open-sources and accounted for 62.69%~80.14% of the total chemical compositions, which was obviously a natural background feature. The results revealed that Si and Al were the relatively high constituents in soil dust, and the contents of Ca and OC in PM2.5 of construction dust were significantly higher than other three kinds of sources. Ca, Si and OC were the main composition in PM2.5 of road dust, and the main composition in PM2.5 of yard dust were Si and Ca. Ca, Cu and Zn were strongly enriched in construction dust, road dust and yard dust, respectively, and each of the enrichment facts(EF) was all greater than 20, which suggested that the influence of man-made sources was significant. OC was the dominating part of carbon fractions of source profiles, and all the values of OC/EC were greater than 2, indicating that open-sources had a certain influence on the formation of secondary aerosols. The divergence coefficient among four kinds of source profiles was between 0.29 and 0.47, and the correlation coefficient was between 0.19 and 0.97. The similarity between soil dust and the other three kinds of source profiles was not high. Relatively high similarity were observed among yard dust, construction dust and road dust, and these three kinds of sources had extremely strong collinearity. The establishment of refined PM2.5 source profiles of open-source in Wuhan could provide scientific support for PM2.5 source apportionment, and also provide important references for the prevention and control of open-sources in Wuhan.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(42)
  • [1]
    中国环境监测总站. 环境空气颗粒物来源解析监测方法指南(试行)[EB/OL]. 2版. http://www.mee.gov.cn/.2014-2-28.
    [2]
    北京市生态环境局. 最新科研成果新一轮北京市PM2.5来源解析正式发布[EB/OL]. http://sthjj.beijing.gov.cn/bjhrb/xxgk/jgzn/jgsz/jjgjgszjzz/xcjyc/xwfb/832588/index.html.2018-5-14.
    [3]
    上海市环保局. 上海公布大气颗粒物源解析结果[EB/OL]. http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2315/nw17239/nw17252/u21aw968232.html.2015-1-8.
    [4]
    广州市生态环境局. 2018年度广州PM2.5来源解析发布[EB/OL]. http://sthjj.gz.gov.cn/ysxw/content/post_5283732.

    html.2019-11-26.
    [5]
    深圳市人居环境委. 深圳官方公布PM2.5元凶[EB/OL]. http://gd.qq.com/a/20150428/010944.htm.2015-4-28.
    [6]
    济南市人民政府. 济南市2017年度环境空气PM10、PM2.5

    来源解析结果发布[EB/OL]. http://www.jinan.gov.cn/art/2018/5/18/art_28939_2636331.html.2018-5-18.
    [7]
    江苏省生态环境厅. 南京环保局发布PM2.5源解析工业污染是祸首[EB/OL]. http://hbt.jiangsu.gov.cn/art/2015/5/8/art_1565_4434877.html.2015-05-08.
    [8]
    杭州市生态环境局. 2014年杭州市环境状况公报[EB/OL]. http://epb.hangzhou.gov.cn/art/2015/6/5

    /art_1692349_38353527.html.2015-06-05.
    [9]
    武汉市环保局. 武汉雾霾成因报告出炉[EB/OL]. http://www.hubei.gov.cn/gzhd/gzhd/hygq_49009/.2016-4-22.
    [10]
    胡月琪,李萌,颜旭,等. 北京市典型道路扬尘化学组分特征及年际变化[J]. 环境科学,2019,40(4):1646-1655.
    [11]
    马召辉,梁云平,张健,等. 北京市典型排放源PM2.5成分谱研究[J]. 环境科学学报,2015,35(12):4043-4052.
    [12]
    陈筱佳,程金平,江璇,等. 上海市中心城区主干道道路扬尘组分特征及来源解析[J]. 环境污染与防治,2015,37(6):10-13.
    [13]
    余南娇,黄渤,李梅,等. 大气细颗粒物扬尘源单颗粒质谱特征[J]. 中国环境科学,2017,37(4):1262-1268.
    [14]
    吴虹,毕晓辉,冯银厂,等. 天津市大气颗粒物源成分谱特征研究[C]//中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集,2013,4812-4818.
    [15]
    XUE H Q, LIU G J, ZHANG H, et al. Similarities and differences in PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, chemical compositions and sources in Hefei City, China[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 220(4):760-765.
    [16]
    YU H, ZHAO X Y, WANG J, et al. Chemical characteristics of road dust PM2.5 fraction in oasis cities at the margin of Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 95:217-224.
    [17]
    CHIANESE E, TIRIMBERIO G, RICCIO A. PM2.5 and PM10 in the urban area of Naples:chemical composition, chemical properties and influence of air masses origin[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2019, 76:151-169.
    [18]
    刘琼玉,姜郡亭,余新明,等. 一种颗粒物再悬浮采样装置:CN203658113U[P]. 2014-6-18.
    [19]
    黄睿,谈静,刘琼玉. PM2.5中有机碳/元素碳测定探讨[J]. 江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(1):11-17.
    [20]
    ANDREWS E, SAXENA P, MUSARRA S, et al. Concentration and composition of atmospheric aerosols from the 1995 SEVAS experimentand a review of the closure between chemical and gravimetric measurements[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000, 50:648-664.
    [21]
    陈涛. 成都市中心城区细粒子来源解析研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2009.
    [22]
    王珍,郭军,陈卓. 贵阳市PM2.5主要污染源源成分谱分析[J]. 安全与环境学报,2016,16(2):346-351.
    [23]
    宋韶华,陈筱佳,文建辉,等. 桂林市开放扬尘源源谱构建及化学组成特征研究[J]. 工业安全与环保,2017,43(10):81-83

    ,92.
    [24]
    温新欣. 济南市环境空气细颗粒物污染特征研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2009.
    [25]
    KONG S F, JI Y Q, LU B, et al. Characterization of PM10 source profiles for fugitive dust in Fushun:a city famous for coal[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45:5351-5365.
    [26]
    HO K F, LEE S C, CHOW J C, et al. Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 source profiles for fugitive dust in Hong Kong[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(8):1023-1032.
    [27]
    CHOW J C, WATSON J G, KUHNS H, et al. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend regional aerosol visibility and observational study[J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 54(2):185-208.
    [28]
    叶荣民,王洪涛,董敏丽,等. 舟山市大气细颗粒物组分特征及其污染来源解析[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(5):122-128.
    [29]
    SUTHERLAND R A. Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream, Oahu, Hawai[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000, 39(6):611-627.
    [30]
    FAN J, SHANG Y N, ZHANG X J, et al. Joint pollution and source apportionment of PM2.5 among three different urban environments in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 714:1-9.
    [31]
    KATARZYNA J R, MAGDALENA R, KATARZYNA M, et al. Characterization of atmospheric PM2.5 sources at a central European urban background site[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 713:1-15.
    [32]
    黎彤. 化学元素的地球丰度[J]. 地球化学,1976(3):167-174.
    [33]
    魏复盛,陈静生,吴燕玉,等. 中国土壤环境背景值研究[J]. 环境科学,1991,12(4):12-20.
    [34]
    FERGUSSON J E, KIM N D. Trace elements in street and house dusts:sources and speciation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1991, 100:125-150.
    [35]
    叶巡,程晋俊,陈莎,等. 秸秆燃烧PM2.5及其碳组分排放特征研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2019,38(5):1165-1175.
    [36]
    JOSEPH A E, UNNIKRISHNAN S, KUMAR R. Chemical characterization and mass closure of fine aerosol for different land use patterns in Mumbai city[J]. Aerosol & Air Quality Research, 2012, 12(1):61-72.
    [37]
    WONGPHATARAKUL V, FRIEDLANDER S K, PINTO J P. A comparative study of PM2.5 ambient aerosol chemical databases[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(24):3926-3934.
    [38]
    张伟,姬亚芹,张军,等. 辽宁省典型城市道路尘PM2.5成分谱研究[J]. 中国环境科学,2018,38(2):412-417.
    [39]
    戴树桂,朱坦,傅学起,等. 天津市大气颗粒物主要排放源的成分谱研究,城市生态系统与污染综合防治[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,1988:425-436.
    [40]
    胡月琪,郭建辉,张超,等. 北京市道路扬尘重金属污染特征及潜在生态风险[J]. 环境科学,2019,40(9):3924-3934.
    [41]
    蒋耀东,张雪,张雷,等. 南京市、苏州市及南通市城区道路扬尘排放特性研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2017,42(2):47-51.
    [42]
    SUN J, SHEN Z X, ZHANG L M, et al. Chemical source profiles of urban fugitive dust PM2.5 samples from 21 cities across China[J]. The ence of the Total Environment, 2019, 649:1045-1053.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LE Jihang, WANG Wenlong, WU Qianyuan, CHEN Zhuo, WU Yinhu, JIA Haifeng, LIU Fanghua, WANG Fang, HU Hongying. Quality and risk characteristics of effluent from wastewater treatment plants in central area of Luzhou[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 135-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501015
    [2]ZHANG Li, HE Shanshan, ZHEN Xianghua, XIE Pengchao, WAN Nianhong, LIU Haiyan. ORGANIC EMERGING CONTAMINANTS REMOVAL PROCESS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS AND PROSPECT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 15-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407002
    [3]XU Huayi, LI Shanwei, WEI Jing, ZHOU Xiangtong, WU Zhiren. STUDY ON OXYGEN SUPPLY CONDITION AND INFLUENCE OF ALGAL IN PARTIAL NITRIFICATION PROCESS IN A BACTERIA AND ALGAE SYMBIOTIC SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 42-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405006
    [4]LI Yunong, WEN Donghui. IMPACTS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS EFFLUENT ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY OF RECEIVING WATER BODIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 167-179. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409016
    [5]LI Feifei, SU Zhiguo, CAO Feng, MU Qinglin, HUANG Bei, CHEN Lüjun, WEN Donghui. CONTRIBUTION OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE FROM SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS TO ANTIBIOTIC POLLUTION IN COASTAL WATER: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU BAY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 1-8. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404001
    [6]LIU Yuxin, ZENG Lingwu, FANG Zheng, SUN Dezhi. COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE REACHES OF THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 34-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412005
    [7]WANG Xiaoyan, LIANG Meisheng, ZHANG Tong, CHEN Xi, LI Long. IN-SITU PREPARATION OF Cu/Al MODIFIED MCM-41 MOLECULAR SIEVE CATALYST AND ITS DEOXYGENATION PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 192-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307026
    [8]WANG Shuo, LU Yunping, LIU Shuyang, CHEN Kangli. CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN AND INDUSTRIAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS OF SUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 173-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310021
    [9]XIE Chengcheng, LIU Gang. ROAD MAP FOR CUSTRUCTING CARBON NEUTRAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 181-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309022
    [10]LIU Sixuan, LI Yiping, ZHU Ya, WEI Yao, LI Ronghui, WANG Can, CHEN Yu, PENG Yanli, LIANG Dan. INFLUENCE OF WATER LEVEL DESCENDING OF LAYERED RESERVOIRS ON WATER QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS IN SOUTH CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 179-186,194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305024
    [11]ZHANG Qi, WANG Ya'e, LI Jie, XIE Huina, LI Yuanyi. EFFECT OF DISSOLVED OXYGEN ON CORROSION OF SPONGE IRON IN BIOLOGICAL SPONGE IRON SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 60-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302009
    [12]YU Huaixing, YUAN Ding, HE Zihao. APPLICATION OF SHORT-RANGE PRECISION AERATION AND INTELLIGENT CONTROL SYSTEM IN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 165-171. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311026
    [13]MENG Xiaojun, HAN Yong, HUANG Zhigui, GONG Xiaosong. CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS OF ANAMMOX IN MAINSTREAM WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 203-214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210027
    [14]LI Wen-gang, SUN Yao-sheng, YAO Qiang, CHEN Fang, LIU Jing-yi. REVIEW ON POLLUTION STATUS AND ADVANCED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES OF EMERGING ORGANIC POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 77-87. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108010
    [15]HE Yuan-pu, FAN Hai-tao, LIU Guo-hua, QI Lu, XU Xiang-long, SHAO Yu-ting, WANG Hong-chen. STATUS AND TREND OF AERATION CONTROL STRATEGY DURING BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 34-41,121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106006
    [16]YU Yong, YU Sheng-hua, CHEN Da-gang. PRACTICE AND REFLECTION ON CLEAN EMISSION TECHNOLOGY TRANSFORMATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IN ZHEJIANG PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 19-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007003
    [17]SHEN Jie, JIN Wei. REVIEW ON EFFECT OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT ON RECEIVING WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 92-98,115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003016
    [18]SHAN Wei, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, LI Ji. TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ON COD REMOVAL UPGRADING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS FOR HIGH PROPORTION OF INDUSTRY WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 32-37,24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007005
    [20]INFLUENCES OF DO AND AERATION TIME ON DENITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE OF AEROBIC DENITRIFYING BACTERIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 62-64. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412010
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 窦娜莎，孙治国，付友先，刘克琼，盛祥涛，杜欣然，牛亚婷，卞荣星，赵旭. 北方某渗滤液生化处理系统水质变化特征及节能降耗对策研究. 山东化工. 2025(02): 267-271 .
    2. 肖梅. 基于神经网络的污水处理鼓风机曝气控制方法. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2025(02): 116-120 .
    3. 于金旗，孙磊，刘然彬，薛松，杨童，张鹤清. 污水处理厂减污降碳技术探讨. 水处理技术. 2024(04): 18-25 .
    4. 王兴斌. 城镇污水处理厂碳减排技术研究和应用. 绿色矿冶. 2024(03): 88-93+98 .
    5. 丁万杰，刘钊，王孝红. 石化废水处理溶解氧浓度优化控制研究进展. 现代化工. 2024(S1): 16-20 .
    6. 龚洁，郝森舰，芦川，冯立辉，邹曦，朱利明. 苦草-附着生物复合系统对水体磺胺降解的贡献评估. 水生态学杂志. 2023(05): 142-148 .
    7. 朱文秀. 污水处理中技术创新与节能降耗研究. 科技创新与应用. 2022(27): 174-177 .
    8. 高新磊，邱颉，黄睿，房睿. 精准曝气技术在污水处理中的研究进展. 资源节约与环保. 2022(10): 93-96 .
    9. 楚金喜，付根深，王小玲，高静，赵晓娟. 基于改良UCT工艺的精确曝气技术的应用. 净水技术. 2022(11): 70-75 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.9 %FULLTEXT: 10.9 %META: 83.3 %META: 83.3 %PDF: 5.8 %PDF: 5.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.8 %其他: 6.8 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 3.5 %上海: 3.5 %东莞: 1.3 %东莞: 1.3 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丽水: 0.4 %丽水: 0.4 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 5.9 %北京: 5.9 %十堰: 1.0 %十堰: 1.0 %南京: 2.9 %南京: 2.9 %南宁: 1.5 %南宁: 1.5 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %厦门: 0.4 %厦门: 0.4 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 1.4 %合肥: 1.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.1 %宣城: 1.3 %宣城: 1.3 %崇左: 0.1 %崇左: 0.1 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %弗吉: 0.4 %弗吉: 0.4 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 4.3 %杭州: 4.3 %株洲: 0.5 %株洲: 0.5 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %武汉: 1.3 %武汉: 1.3 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %江门: 0.8 %江门: 0.8 %池州: 0.1 %池州: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济宁: 0.4 %济宁: 0.4 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %深圳: 1.1 %深圳: 1.1 %温州: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 6.6 %漯河: 6.6 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %百色: 0.1 %百色: 0.1 %盐城: 1.1 %盐城: 1.1 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %肇庆: 0.3 %肇庆: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 17.7 %芒廷维尤: 17.7 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 1.0 %苏州: 1.0 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %西宁: 8.7 %西宁: 8.7 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.5 %郑州: 1.5 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %镇江: 2.4 %镇江: 2.4 %长沙: 1.5 %长沙: 1.5 %阜阳: 0.1 %阜阳: 0.1 %青岛: 1.9 %青岛: 1.9 %其他其他Central DistrictChina[]上海东莞临汾丽水佛山保定兰州北京十堰南京南宁南通厦门台州合肥哈尔滨嘉兴天津安庆宜宾宣城崇左常州常德广州弗吉张家口徐州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州株洲桂林武汉汕头江门池州沈阳济南济宁济源深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊百色盐城眉山石家庄福州绍兴肇庆芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莆田菏泽蚌埠衡阳西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙阜阳青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (162) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return