EFFECTS OF AERATION MODES ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION, DEHYDRATION EFFICIENCY AND NITROGEN LOSS OF KITCHEN WASTE BIO-DRYING

ZHAN Ya-bin; WEI Yu-quan; LIN Yong-feng; ZHANG A-ke; TAO Xing-ling; REN Jian-guo; SHEN Wei-dong; LI Ji

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202105017

Volume 39 Issue 5

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2021 > 39(5): 124-130

ZHANG Qiuying, LI Liang, BIAN Di. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTERS ON ANAMMOX REACTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 190-195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201028

Citation:

ZHAN Ya-bin, WEI Yu-quan, LIN Yong-feng, ZHANG A-ke, TAO Xing-ling, REN Jian-guo, SHEN Wei-dong, LI Ji. EFFECTS OF AERATION MODES ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION, DEHYDRATION EFFICIENCY AND NITROGEN LOSS OF KITCHEN WASTE BIO-DRYING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 124-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105017

ZHANG Qiuying, LI Liang, BIAN Di. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTERS ON ANAMMOX REACTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 190-195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201028

Citation:

PDF( 2679 KB)

EFFECTS OF AERATION MODES ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION, DEHYDRATION EFFICIENCY AND NITROGEN LOSS OF KITCHEN WASTE BIO-DRYING

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105017

1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Organic Recycling Research Institute(Suzhou), China Agricultural University, Suzhou 215100, China;
3. Village Committee of Linghu Village, Linhu Town, Wuzhong District, Suzhou City, Suzhou 215106, China

Received Date: 2020-08-19
Available Online: 2022-01-17

Abstract

Abstract

Aiming at the problems of long treatment cycle and low dehydration efficiency of kitchen waste bio-drying, the effects of different aeration modes (groups with aeration controlled by temperature:TFWD 45-50, TFWD 50-55, TFWD 55-60, TFWD 60-65; groups with aeration controlled by time:TFSJ 20, TFSJ 60) on energy consumption, dehydration efficiency and nitrogen loss of kitchen waste biol-drying, on the bio-drying machine with external auxiliary heating, were evaluated. The results showed that:1) compared with the four treatments of aeration controlled by temperature, the two treatments of aeration controlled by time were with less total nitrogen (TN) and ammonium nitrogen losses, and higher germination index (GI); 2) continuous aeration, TFSJ 60, was with the lowest dehydration efficiency (66.78%), lowest TN and ammonium nitrogen losses (8.14% and 12.96%, respectively), highest maturity (EC was 2.72 mS/cm and GI was 75.00%), and the lowest energy consumption per unit of mass dehydration (1.10 kW·h/kg); 3) TFWD 50-55 was with the highest dehydration efficiency (more than 99%), TN and ammonium nitrogen losses (16.95% and 57.83%, respectively), lower maturity (EC was 4.28 mS/cm and GI was 19.58%), and higher energy consumption per unit of mass dehydration (1.74 kW·h/kg). Pearson correlation analysis results showed that TN and ammonium nitrogen were positively correlated with moisture content (P<0.05), and negatively correlated with temperature, EC and energy consumption (P<0.05). Therefore, continuous aeration (TFSJ 60) was recommended for kitchen waste, if the bio-dried materials were treated by aerobic composting to return to the soil; aeration controlled by temperature (TFWD 50-55) was recommended, if the bio-dried materials were to be incinerated or landfilled. This study could provide references for the selection of aeration mode for the treatment of kitchen waste by external auxiliary heating bio-drying machine.
- aeration,
- kitchen waste,
- bio-drying,
- energy consumption,
- dehydration efficiency,
- nitrogen loss

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	施军营,薛方亮,DODA Ada,等.城市餐厨垃圾前处理的工艺优化[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(10):5658-5662.
[2]	袁京,张地方,李赟,等.外加碳源对厨余垃圾生物干化效果的影响[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(2):628-635.
[3]	黄文雄,苏红玉,黄丹丹,等.通风方式对高含水率垃圾生物干化的影响[J].中国环境科学,2012,2(8):1480-1486.
[4]	VELIS C A, LONGHURST P J, DREW G H, et al. Bio-drying for mechanical-biological treatment of wastes:A review of process science and engineering[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100:2747-2761.
[5]	余旺,黄绍松,孙水裕,等.接种菌剂和外加能源对污泥生物干化效果的影响[J].环境污染与防治,2012,34(8):39-43.
[6]	BIAN B, SHEN Y, HU X R, et al. Reduction of sludge by a biodrying process:parameter optimization and mechanism[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 248:125970.
[7]	张小娟,黄绍松,孙水裕,等.接种菌剂对城市污泥生物干化过程中干化效果和氮素转化的影响[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(4):1669-1673.
[8]	陈峰,陈丹,胡勇有.垃圾高温好氧生物干化效果的影响因素分析[J].环境工程,2020,8(1):141-145.
[9]	张玉冬,张红玉,顾军,等.通风量对厨余垃圾堆肥过程中H₂S和NH₃排放的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,4(7):1371-1377.
[10]	迟孟浩,杨帆,李旺旺,等.厨余垃圾堆肥间歇通风方式的可行性研究[J].环境污染与防治,2018,40(8):917-921 ,942.
[11]	李兵,董志颖,王英.两种供能方式对厨余垃圾好氧堆肥的影响研究[J]. 环境工程,2012,30(5):86-90.
[12]	秦莉,沈玉君,李国学,等.不同C/N比对堆肥腐熟度和含氮气体排放变化的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(12):2668-2673.
[13]	LARNEY F J, HAO X Y. A review of composting as a management alternative for beef cattle feedlot manure in southern Alberta, Canada[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(17):3221-3227.
[14]	陈是吏,袁京,李国学,等.过磷酸钙和双氰胺联用减少污泥堆肥温室气体及NH₃排放[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(6):199-206.
[15]	FREI K M, CAMERON D,Stuart P R. Novel drying process using forced aeration through a porous biomass matrix[J]. Drying Technology,2004,22(5):1191-1215.
[16]	HE Z H, LIN H, HAO J W, et al. Impact of vermiculite on ammonia emissions and organic matter decomposition of food waste during composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 263:548-554.
[17]	杜龙龙,袁京,李国学,等. 通风速率对厨余垃圾堆肥NH₃和H₂S排放及腐熟度的影响[J]. 中国环境科学,2015,35(12):3714-3720.
[18]	VELIS C A, LONGHURST P J, DREW G H, et al. Production and quality assurance of solid recovered fuels using mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) of waste:a comprehensive assessment[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 40:979-1105.
[19]	何品晶,陈淼,杨娜,等.我国生活垃圾焚烧发电过程中温室气体排放及影响因素:以上海某城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂为例[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(3):402-407.
[20]	刘洪涛,陈同斌,杭世珺,等.不同污泥处理与处置工艺的碳排放分析[J].中国给水排水,2010,26(17):106-108.
[21]	VELIS C A, LONGHURST P J, DREW G H, et al. Biodrying for mechanical-biological treatment of wastes:A review of process science and engineering[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100:2747-2761.

Relative Articles

[1]	CUI Qian, ZHOU Zhixiang, GUAN Dongjie, XUE Yuqian. Research progress on accounting, modeling and influencing factors of transportation carbon emissions[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 31-41. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501004
[2]	LI Cheng, LU Binbin, YI Xinyuan, SHAO Xuehong, XU Bin, TANG Yulin. CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF TYPICAL WATER SUPPLY PLANTS IN SHANGHAI BASED ON MONTHLY DATA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 131-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411014
[3]	HE Kaijie, HE Youjiang, YANG Xin, CHENG Miaomiao, LI Fuqiang, PENG Yujie, LI Bin. CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF ATMOSPHERIC NH₃ POLLUTION IN SHIHEZI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 162-170. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407018
[4]	HE Zihao, YI Mengting, ZHONG Qiumeng, LIANG Sai. INFLUENCING FACTORS OF SYNERGY DEGREE FOR INDUSTRIAL POLLUTANT AND CARBON REDUCTIONS IN CHINESE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 206-214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401027
[5]	ZHENG Xiaoying, LI Wenfei, ZHANG Huijie, HU Ruijie, XU Yadong, HAN Zongshuo, HE Haidong, CHEN Wei. RESEARCH ON ENDOGENOUS PARTIAL DENITRIFICATION GRANULAR SLUDGE CULTIVATION AND KEY INFLUENCING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 116-123. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409011
[6]	YUAN Ye, GAO Jun, ZHANG Lulu, CHEN Tianming, DING Cheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON INFLUENCING FACTORS AND THEIR PREDICTION MODELS OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE GENERATION IN MUNICIPAL SEWAGE PIPELINES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 69-77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311013
[7]	REN Hongyang, DU Ruolan, XIE Guilin, JIN Wenhui, LI Xi, DENG Yuanpeng, MA Wei, WANG Bing. RESEARCH STATUS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION METHODS OF CARBON EMISSIONS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 195-203,244. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310023
[8]	MA Yan, ZHANG Dading, ZHANG Fan, CHENG Lu, MA Yue, GUO Jianda. INFLUENTING FACTORS OF CHITOSAN-MODIFIED ZEOLITE AND ITS STABILIZATION EFFECT ON MULTI METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 94-101,116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201014
[9]	CHEN Yue, PAN Yang, NI Min, HUANG Yong, LI Da-peng, BI Zhen, ZHANG Xing-yu, WEN Lin-xiao. ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS OF PHOSPHATE ENHANCED ABSORPTION IN BSBR PROCESS UNDER LOW CARBON SOURCE CONDITIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 69-73,191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209009
[10]	TANG Xin-yi, CHEN Xiang-yu, XIAO Ben-yi, LIU Rong-zhan. THERMAL-ALKALINE TREATMENT OF SEWAGE SLUDGE AND ITS ENHANCEMENT ON ANAEROBIC SLUDGE DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 218-226. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205031
[11]	XU Ziqi, YAN Zhong, GE Yanju, WEI Quanyuan, HUANG Bo. OPTIMIZATION OF TECHNICAL PARAMETERS OF MECHANICAL ENHANCED RAPID COMPOSTING TECHNOLOGY FOR ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 159-163,142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208022
[12]	CHEN Si-yu, ZHANG Shao-qing, CHEN Peng, CHEN Qiu-li, ZHANG Li-qiu, LI Shu-geng. RECENT ADVANCES IN PARTIAL DENITRIFICATION BASED BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105006
[13]	XU Chuang, WU Yin-hu, HU Hong-ying, XU Ao, NI Xin-ye. CHLORINE DIOXIDE'S INACTIVATION ON DIFFERENT MICROORGANISMS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 57-63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110008
[14]	LI Chung-yan, ZHANG Xi, SHEN Yu-jun, MENG Hai-bo, WEN Hong-da, ZHENG Sheng-wei, ZHOU Hai-bin, CHENG Hong-sheng. EFFECTS OF TURNING STRATEGY ON AEROBIC FERMENTATION PROPERTY OF PIG BIOGAS RESIDUE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 130-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101020
[15]	XU Chen, ZHAN Jian, HU Jia-jun, WANG Liu-peng, CHEN Yun-hui, XUE Zhen-zhou. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF RAINWATER RUNOFF RETENTION AND POLLUTION INTERCEPTION EFFECT OF EXTENSIVE GREEN ROOF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 76-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009013
[16]	ZHU Wen-bin, GAO Ming, YIN Zi-he, WU Chuan-fu, WANG Qun-hui. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON CAPROIC ACID PRODUCTION FROM ORGANIC WASTE BY ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001020
[17]	WANG Lei, ZHAN Han-hui, WANG Qing-qing, WU Gang. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF INFLUENCE PARAMETERS AND METHODS FOR RAPIDLY CULTIVATING AEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 1-7,29. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005001
[18]	CHEN Feng, CHEN Dan, HU Yong-you. ANALYSIS ON INFLUENCING FACTORS OF EFFECT OF HIGH TEMPERATURE AEROBIC BIOLOGICAL DRYING PROCESS OF GARBAGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 141-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001022
[19]	LIU Wen-jie, WANG Li-ming, SHEN Yu-jun, ZHANG Xi, MENG Hai-bo, FAN Sheng-yuan, ZHANG Da-niu. EFFECTS OF CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO ON MATURITY AND ODOR EMISSION IN AEROBIC FERMENTATION OF VEGETABLE WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 233-239. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006038
[20]	CALCULATION OF CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION OF NEW ENERGY VEHICLES AND ANALYSIS OF ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 148-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412027

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	段佩，张锋，崔宏志，杜妍. 基于LSSVM与NSGA-Ⅱ的反硝化-Anammox工艺协同优化研究. 粘接. 2023(12): 131-134 .
2.	胡锦刚，肖春桥，邓祥意，万凯，刘雪梅，池汝安. 稀土矿山氨氮废水生物脱氮方法研究进展. 武汉工程大学学报. 2022(01): 1-8 .

Other cited types(3)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (178) PDF downloads(4)