AN OVERVIEW OF COAL-TO-LIQUID TECHNOLOGY AND COMPREHENSIVE UTILIZATION OF COAL-TO-LIQUID RESIDUE

LI Zhen; WANG Jun-zhang; SHEN Li-ming; ZHAO Jun-ji; SHI Peng-fei; WANG Jie; ZHU Tao

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202105019

Volume 39 Issue 5

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2021 > 39(5): 135-141,149

LIU Peng-xiao, WANG Xu, FENG Ling. OCCURRENCES, RESOURCES AND RISK OF ANTIBIOTICS IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 36-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005007

Citation:

LI Zhen, WANG Jun-zhang, SHEN Li-ming, ZHAO Jun-ji, SHI Peng-fei, WANG Jie, ZHU Tao. AN OVERVIEW OF COAL-TO-LIQUID TECHNOLOGY AND COMPREHENSIVE UTILIZATION OF COAL-TO-LIQUID RESIDUE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 135-141,149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105019

LIU Peng-xiao, WANG Xu, FENG Ling. OCCURRENCES, RESOURCES AND RISK OF ANTIBIOTICS IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 36-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005007

Citation:

PDF( 1614 KB)

AN OVERVIEW OF COAL-TO-LIQUID TECHNOLOGY AND COMPREHENSIVE UTILIZATION OF COAL-TO-LIQUID RESIDUE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105019

1. Shanxi Lu'an Mining(Group) Co., Ltd, Changzhi 046299, China;
2. State Key Lab. of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guangzhou 510640, China;
3. Institute of Atmospheric Environmental Management and Pollutant Control, China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2021-01-04
Available Online: 2022-01-17

Abstract

Abstract

In order to alleviate the risk caused by China's high dependence on oil import, the development of a coal-to-liquid process that converts coal into oil through scientific means is a practical mean. This article reviewed the four most common coal-to-liquid technologies in China, analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the four coal-to-liquid technologies, and provided a basis for the research of coal-to-liquid technology. The coal-to-liquid residue was the main pollution product of the coal-to-liquid industry. This article also classified the residues produced by different coal-to-liquid processes, summarized their composition and physical and chemical properties, and selected the direct coal liquefaction residue system to explain the current utilization technology of coal direct liquefaction residues. The research progress mainly included four parts:combustion, pyrolysis, preparation of asphalt products and the other. It was suggested that the development trend of coal-to-liquid technology was to study the structure conversion process of coal, cheaper and more efficient catalysts and their catalytic principles, high-throughput reactors for catalyst separation, and product separation technology. Among the high-value utilization methods of coal-to-liquid residue, asphalt products and high-performance carbon materials had good economic prospects and research value.
- coal-to-liquid technology,
- coal-to-liquid residue,
- utilization

FullText(HTML)

References(43)

References

[1]	贾众杰,阿格茹.探讨煤制油加氢残渣的综合利用[J].云南化工,2020,47(10):25-26 , 29.
[2]	张瑞,李峰,石磊,等.煤制油加氢残渣的综合利用研究[J].化学工程师,2015,29(2):33-35.
[3]	胡发亭,王学云,毛学锋,等.煤直接液化制油技术研究现状及展望[J].洁净煤技术,2020,26(1):99-109.
[4]	秦怡晨.煤制油工艺技术研究[J].山西化工,2020,40(3):37-38 , 41.
[5]	高阳.煤制油液化化工工艺简述[J].山西化工,2020,40(2):28-30.
[6]	李克健,吴秀章,舒歌平.煤直接液化技术在中国的发展[J].洁净煤技术,2014,20(2):39-43.
[7]	曹永坤.甲醇制汽油、甲醇制烯烃技术进展及工业应用[J].煤化工,2010,38(4):25-27.
[8]	李碧峰.由甲醇制烯烃和汽油的技术进展[J].化工厂设计,1984(1):84-85.
[9]	BRUCE C F, ANTHONY C S, JOSHUA R S, et al. Process development and demonstration of coal and biomass indirect liquefaction to synthetic iso-paraffinic kerosene[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2011, 92(10):1939-1945.
[10]	崔普选.煤基甲醇制烯烃工艺技术发展现状[J].现代化工,2020,40(4):5-9.
[11]	吴春梅.我国煤基甲醇制烯烃技术进展[J].化工设计通讯,2019,45(2):13, 71.
[12]	胡艳. 煤基甲醇制高性能清洁汽油组分研究与应用[D].上海:华东理工大学,2018.
[13]	苏航.煤基甲醇制对二甲苯工艺过程的多目标优化和评价研究[D].锦州:渤海大学,2020.
[14]	任帅,杨军,郭生飞,等.煤焦油加氢制轻质油品技术进展[J].广州化工,2020,48(14):22-24.
[15]	永成.煤焦油加氢制燃料油品[J].化工管理,2019(29):194-195.
[16]	崔文岗,李冬,樊安,等.低温煤焦油加氢制备清洁燃料油品中试试验研究[J].化工进展,2018,37(6):2192-2202.
[17]	刘世雄.悬浮床煤焦油加氢装置加热炉的技术改造与应用[J].化学工程与装备,2019(12):165-166.
[18]	罗万江,兰新哲,宋永辉,等.煤直接液化残渣的利用研究进展[J].材料导报,2013,27(11):153-157.
[19]	谷小会.煤直接液化残渣的性质及利用现状[J].洁净煤技术,2012,18(3):63-66.
[20]	刘子梁,孙英杰,李卫华,等. 媒间接液化工艺中气化炉渣综合利用进展[J].洁净煤技术,2016,22(1):118-123.
[21]	张瑞,李峰,石磊,等.煤制油加氢残渣的综合利用研究[J].化学工程师,2015,29(2):33-35.
[22]	贾众杰,阿格茹.探讨煤制油加氢残渣的综合利用[J].云南化工,2020,47(10):25-26 , 29.
[23]	王宁,刘刚,高宝宝.煤化工技术发展现状及其新型技术研究[J].智能城市,2020,6(11):122-123.
[24]	楚希杰,赵丽红,李文,等.神华煤及其直接液化残渣热解动力学试验研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2010,38(5):121-124.
[25]	方磊,周俊虎,周志军, 等.煤液化残渣与褐煤混煤燃烧特性的实验研究[J].燃料化学学报,2006,34(2):245-248.
[26]	董子平. 煤液化残渣的污染特性和焚烧特征研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2015.
[27]	周俊虎,方磊,程军,等.煤液化残渣硫析出动态特性的研究[J].动力工程,2005,25(3):412-415.
[28]	许邦,初茉,张慧慧, 等.煤直接液化残渣热解研究现状[J].洁净煤技术,2013,19(4):81-84.
[29]	李凯. 低变质煤与神华煤直接液化残渣共热解特性研究[D].西安:西北大学,2019.
[30]	李丽丽. 神东煤直接液化残渣与煤共热解相互作用研究[D].山西:太原理工大学,2016.
[31]	LI K, MA X, HE R, et al. Co-pyrolysis characteristics and interaction route between low-rank coals and Shenhua coal direct liquefaction residue[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019.
[32]	位艳宾. 煤液化残渣的组成结构分析和催化加氢[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2013.
[33]	陈茂山,要辉,王洪学,等.煤直接液化残渣制备高附加值产品的探索研究[J].中国煤炭,2020,46(5):74-80.
[34]	QIN F F, JIANG W, NI G S, et al. From coal-heavy oil co-refining residue to asphaltene-based functional carbon materials[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019.
[35]	刘国库,胡威威,黄动昊,等.煤直接液化残渣提纯工艺研究[J].河南科技,2020(22):73.
[36]	宋真真. 神华煤直接液化残渣的萃取组分及模型化合物改性石油沥青[D].西安:西北大学,2017.
[37]	何亮. 煤液化残渣复合改性沥青制备及其性能研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2013.
[38]	毛海臻. 煤制油渣改性沥青及其混合料技术性能研究与应用[D].郑州:郑州大学,2019.
[39]	LU H, PENG B Z, GE Z F, et al. The viscosity and crystallization behavior of slag from co-gasification of coal and extraction residue from direct coal liquefaction residue at high temperatures[J]. Fuel, 2021,285:119119.
[40]	CAO X, PENG B Z, KONG L X, et al. Flow properties of ash and slag under co-gasification of coal and extract residue of direct coal liquefaction residue[J]. Fuel, 2020, 264:116850.1-116850.9.
[41]	LIU X,ZHOU Z J, HU Q J, et al. Experimental study on Co-gasification of coal liquefaction residue and petroleum coke[J]. Energy & Fuels,2011,25(8):3377-3381.
[42]	REN L W, WEI R D, ZHU T C. Co-gasification reactivity of petroleum coke with coal and coal liquefaction residue[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2020, 93(1):436-441.
[43]	WANG Y G, NIU Z S, SHEN J, et al. Extraction of direct coal liquefaction residue using dipropylamine as a CO₂-triggered switchable solvent[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2017,159:27-30.

Relative Articles

[1]	LI Cheng, LU Binbin, YI Xinyuan, SHAO Xuehong, XU Bin, TANG Yulin. CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF TYPICAL WATER SUPPLY PLANTS IN SHANGHAI BASED ON MONTHLY DATA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 131-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411014
[2]	XIA Qiongqiong, ZHENG Xingcan, GU Miao, LI Mai, SHANG Wei, TIAN Yongying, HUANG Haiwei, ONG Say Leong. CHARACTERIZATION OF SUMMER GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SEPTIC TANKS AND MEASUMENT OF CH₄ EMISSION FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 240-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409023
[3]	XIAO Yanghui, LÜ Hui, LÜ Da'e. ANALYSIS OF CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL OF CAMPUS BUILDING OPERATION BASED ON STIRPAT MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 117-123. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310015
[4]	LIU Xirong, DONG Zhen, LI Fayu, CAI Lijie, SUN Lin, LI Pengpeng. ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE YELLOW RIVER DELTA BASED ON HIGH-RESOLUTION REMOTE SENSING DATA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 9-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306002
[5]	ZHAO Gang, TANG Jianguo, XU Jingcheng, LUO Jingyang, JIANG Ming, YUAN Xianchen, ZHOU Chuanting. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON ENERGY AND CARBON EMISSION OF TYPICAL SLUDGE TREATMENT PROJECTS IN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 9-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212002
[6]	WANG Xuelian, LIU Bo, ZHAO Changsen, HUANG Zhenfang, PAN Xu. STUDY ON CALCULATION METHOD SYSTEM OF POLLUTANT LOAD FROM NON-POINT SOURCE INTO RIVERS IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 166-172,211. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203025
[7]	YIN Zi-yuan, ZHANG Kai-shan. MODEL ANALYSIS FOR EMISSIONS OF LIGHT-DUTY GASOLINE VEHICLES IN A TYPICAL CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 64-71. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104011
[8]	ZHANG Ying, DENG Jian-guo, WANG Gang, LI Yan-jing, XU Peng, JIANG Jing-kun. CHARACTERIZATION OF CONDENSABLE PARTICULATE MATTER EMITTED FROM A TYPICAL COKING PLANT IN IRON AND STEEL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 154-158,125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009025
[9]	FANG Li, LIU Ji-ye, NIE Lei, HE Li-juan, WANG Hai-lin. VOCs EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND OZONE IMPACT ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL AUTOMOBILE REPAIR ENTERPRISES IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 146-150,155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010023
[10]	LV Chen, LI Yan-xia, YANG Nan, LIU Hao, LIU Zhong-liang. ASSESSMENT AND SCENARIO ANALYSIS OF ON-ROAD VEHICLE GREENHOUSE GASES EMISSION: A CASE STUDY OF BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 25-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011005
[20]	He Li, Zhu Jianwen, Qian Yi. STUDY ON POLLUTANTS EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF VEHICLES IN URUMQI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(5): 90-94. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201505019