Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028
Citation: LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028

HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028
  • Received Date: 2020-04-20
    Available Online: 2022-01-17
  • In order to preliminarily find out the health risk of heavy metals in groundwater of the Qingjiang River, here the springs (with discharge>50 L/s, and applied as the regional water supply source) in the Qingjiang River were sampled and analyzed for Pb, As, Mn, Cr, Ni, Fe, Cu, Zn and Cd concentration. Health risk for adults and children from these heavy metals was evaluate by a water environmental health risk assessment model of the USEPA and AHP model was also combined. It found that concentration of As and Pb exceeded the national standard limit, and their distribution sequence was downstream>upstream>middle, which mainly originated from human input. As, Cr and Cd were the chemical carcinogens and the reginal health risk prevention elements of groundwater. The health risk assessment result was in the sequence of downstream>upstream>middle. Children were the main concerning group of health risk prevention in the study area.
  • [1]
    LIU Q Q, SHENG Y Q, JIANG M, et al. Attempt of basin-scale sediment quality standard establishment for heavy metals in coastal rivers[J]. Chemosphere,2020,245:125596.
    [2]
    COSTA-BODDEKER S, THUYEN L X, HOELZMANN P, et al.Heavy metal pollution in a reforested mangrove ecosystem (Can Gio Biosphere Reserve, Southern Vietnam):effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors over a thirty-year history[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,716:137035.
    [3]
    RAJKUMAR H, NAIK P K,RISHI M S. A new indexingapproach for evaluating heavy metal contamination in groundwater[J]. Chemosphere,2020,245:125598.
    [4]
    ADIMALLA N, LI P Y, QIAN H. Evaluation of groundwater contamination for fluoride and nitrate in semi-arid region of Nirmal Province, South India:a special emphasis on human health risk assessment (HHRA)[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2019,25(5):1107-1124.
    [5]
    魏亚强,陈坚,文一,等. 中国地下水污染模拟预测标准体系研究现状[J]. 环境污染与防治,2019,41(11):1387-1392.
    [6]
    孙毅. 清江上游岩溶流域径流特征及洪水预报[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2015.
    [7]
    程凤. 清江高坝洲水库重金属污染及食物网结构研究[D]. 武汉:中南民族大学,2018.
    [8]
    ADIMALLA N, LI P Y, Venkatayogi S. Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Groundwater Quality for Drinking and IrrigationPurposes and Integrated Interpretation with Water Quality Index Studies[J]. Environmental Processes-an International Journal,2018,5(2):363-383.
    [9]
    ADIMALLA N, LI P Y. Occurrence, health risks, and geochemical mechanisms of fluoride and nitrate in groundwaterof the rock-dominant semi-arid region, Telangana State, India[J]. Human and EcologicalRiskIAeeseement,2019,25(1/2):81-103.
    [10]
    张芳,常春平,李静等. 胶东半岛农村地区地下水重金属健康风险评价——以山东省莱阳市为例[J]. 环境科学与技术,2013,36(9):180-186.
    [11]
    饶志,储小东,吴代赦,等. 鄱阳湖平原地下水重金属含量特征与健康风险评估[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2019,46(5):31-37.
    [12]
    杨彦,陆晓松,李定龙. 我国环境健康风险评价研究进展[J]. 环境与健康杂志,2014,31(4):357-363.
    [13]
    TAHERI K, THOMAS M, TAHERI M, et al. Critical zone assessments of an alluvial aquifer system using the multi-influencing factor (MIF) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) models in western Iran[J]. Natural Resources Research,2018,29(2):1163-1191.
    [14]
    GNANAVELBABU A, ARUNAGIRI P. Ranking of MUDA using AHP and Fuzzy AHP algorithm[J]. Materialstoday:Proceedings,2018,5(5):13406-13412.
    [15]
    郭森,肖捷颖,张依章,等. 环南四湖区地下水中重金属健康风险评价[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(11):59-64.
    [16]
    ADIMALLA N. Groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes and potential health risks assessment:a case study from semi-arid region of south india[J]. Exposure and Health,2019,11(2):109-123.
    [17]
    马振华. 湖北人均GDP破1万美元,平均预期寿命达76.65岁[N]. 武汉晚报,2019-8-17(3).
    [18]
    环境保护部. 中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2013:90-780.
    [19]
    环境保护部. 中国人群暴露参数手册(儿童卷)[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2016:30-560.
    [20]
    AHADA C P S, SUTHAR S. Groundwater nitrate contamination and associated human health risk assessmentin southern districts of Punjab, India[J]. Environmental Scienceand Pollution Research,2018,25(25):25336-25347.
    [21]
    CEMEK M, AKKAYA L, BIRDANE Y O, et al. Nitrate and nitrite levels in fruity and natural mineral waters marketed in western Turkey[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2007,20(3/4):236-240.
    [22]
    邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
    [23]
    任晓霞,张鸣之,韩明伟,等. 咸阳市地下水饮用水源地的水环境评价[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(4):17-21.
    [24]
    刘昭,周宏,曹文佳,等.清江流域地表水重金属季节性分布特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学,2021,42(1):175-183.
    [25]
    卫生部和国家标准化管理委员会. GB 5749-2006,生活饮用水卫生标准[S].北京,2007.
    [26]
    陈窈君,胡学玉,王向前,等. 湖北省农村小型水源地水体环境中重金属污染状况[J]. 环境科学与技术,2017,40(3):153-160.
    [27]
    况琴,黄庭,向京,等. 鄂西北某农田保护区土壤重金属分布特征及生态风险评价[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(5):45-49

    ,55.
    [28]
    王健康,周怀东,陆瑾,等. 三峡库区水环境中重金属污染研究进展[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2014,12(1):49-53.
    [29]
    肖尚斌,刘德富,王雨春,等. 三峡库区香溪河库湾沉积物重金属污染特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(8):983-989.
    [30]
    张勇,郭纯青,孙平安,等. 基于空间分析荞麦地流域地下水健康风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学,2019,39(11):4762-4768.
    [31]
    鲍丽然,邓海,贾中民,等.重庆秀山西北部农田土壤重金属生态健康风险评价[J/OL].中国地质,1-16[2020-05-22

    ].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1167.P.20200220.1019.002.html.
    [32]
    吴佳,纪雄辉,朱坚,等. 长株潭地区水环境重金属污染健康风险评价[J]. 湖南农业科学,2018(1):64-68.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIANG Lichen, YAN Xiaofei, WANG Lili, JIANG Hao, XU Yuanshun. SOIL HEAVY METAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF A SIMPLE DOMESTIC GARBAGE LANDFILL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 177-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410021
    [2]QIAN Jiangbo, CHEN Di, WANG Xiahui, LI Xilin, HUANG Guoxin. RISK DIAGNOSIS OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN REGIONAL SOIL BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 296-303. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312037
    [3]YU Tianzhi, LIU Yuntao, CAO Di, FANG Lijun, WANG Yingchao, MA Guangbiao, CAO Zihao. STUDY ON POLLUTION CONTROL FACTORS AND THEIR INFLUENCING LAWS ON HEAVY METAL MIGRATION IN THE SHAYING RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 30-36,52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302005
    [4]GAO Mengfei, ZHENG Shun'an, LIU Changhua, GAO Yunbing, GAO Ge, ZHAO Ya'nan. RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN FARMLAND SOIL BASED ON MULTI-FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 233-241. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308030
    [5]YOU Yangyang, LIANG Zengqiang, HUO Ning. GROUNDWATER EVALUATION OF INFORMAL LANDFILLS BASED ON WATER QUALITY IDENTIFICATION INDEX METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 264-269,311. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312033
    [6]LI Ganyu, CUI Xingtao. CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY METAL ELEMENTS POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST-FALL IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 278-287. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312035
    [7]KONG Huimin, ZHAO Xiaohui, XU Wan, DAI Yuhan, ZHANG Jiayu. OCCURRENCE AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF ANTIBIOTICS IN GROUNDWATER ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 219-226. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302029
    [8]GUO Yake, GAO Yanyan, QIAN Hui, TANG Shunqi, WANG Haike, SHI Xiaoxin. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN THE CHU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 112-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301014
    [9]NI Haifeng, DAN Zeng, ZHOU Wenwu, ZHOU Peng, XU Fei, YANG Tao, MENG Dean, CHEN Guanyi. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 89-93,131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014
    [10]LU Yifan, LU Yin, CAI Hui, SUN Shoujun, SHI Weilin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FIELD LEFT BY A LEAD-ACID BATTERY FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 135-140,189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201020
    [11]CUI Feijian, QIN Guangxiong, ZENG Hailong, HUANG Zhiwei, LI Wenjing, YANG Hanjie, HU Yanfang, FANG Huaiyang, ZENG Fantang, DU Hongwei. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND HEAVY METAL IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF HEAVILY POLLUTED TRIBUTARIES OF SHAHE RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 110-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201016
    [12]TU Degang, FENG Tao, YANG Guodong, LUO Weiwei, NIE Beili. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED MACHINERY PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 217-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204031
    [13]DOU Wei-qiang, AN Yi, QIN Li, LIN Da-song, DONG Ming-ming. CHARACTERISTICS OF VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION AND MIGRATION OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 166-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102027
    [14]MA Tao, SONG Jiang-min, LIU Qun-qun, SHENG Yan-qing. COMPARISON OF ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN DREDGED SEDIMENT TREATED BY DIFFERENT METHODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 141-146,152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102023
    [15]XU Hao, SUN Xiao-ling. THE INTERACTIVE MODELING AND JOINT PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER IN MAOZHOU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106004
    [16]FANG Qing, XIAN Ping, MENG Zheng-cheng. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF AGRICULTURAL LAND BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 147-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102024
    [17]XU Si-han, WANG Min-yan, ZHANG Jin, DIAO Han-jie, LI Yan-ming, SHAN Sheng-dao, CAO Yu-cheng. EFFECT OF PYROLYSIS TIME ON CHARACTERISTICS AND HEAVY METAL ECOLOGICAL RISKS IN BIOCHAR MADE FROM WASTEWATER SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 162-167. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003027
    [18]ZHANG Fu-xiang, CUI Song, ZHU Qian-de, GAO Shang, LI Kun-yang. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTIC AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT OF QIXING RIVER WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 68-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010011
    [19]CUI Yong, BAI Lian-yang, LONG Yue-lin, YANG Kai-qin. ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOILS OF LIANHUA TOWN IN THE SUBURBS OF CHANGSHA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 202-209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005035
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 谢宗圆,徐超,郑刘根,丁浩然,田德金,吴腾,陈成. 某钢铁厂地下水中重金属来源解析与风险评价. 环境监测管理与技术. 2024(04): 43-48 .
    2. 樊会锋,周青,徐向华,尧一骏. 中国地下水砷浓度时空分布特征及其健康风险评估. 环境生态学. 2024(08): 1-14 .
    3. 刘昊洋,谢浩,林永生,辛博,杨国丽,李军,邹胜章. 清江流域岩溶地下水金属元素来源解析及健康风险评价. 环境科学与技术. 2024(09): 138-148 .
    4. 和永贤,许鸿,王健康,李俊峰,孙志华,薛海斌,陈翠忠,蓝明菊,吴心蓉. 新疆典型地区地表水与地下水重金属分布特征及健康风险评价. 环境化学. 2024(11): 3716-3732 .
    5. 秦欢欢,黄丽想,陈益平,高柏,孙占学. 拉萨河水体砷和镉的分布特征与健康风险评价. 生态与农村环境学报. 2023(01): 107-114 .
    6. 朱明澹,李波,刘国. 广元市周边废弃煤矿酸性矿井涌水水质分析及地下水健康风险评价. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(03): 1097-1107 .
    7. 陈慧,赵鑫宇,常帅,宋圆梦,卢梦淇,赵波,陈昊达,高赛,王琳静,崔建升,张璐璐. 华北平原典型城市(石家庄)地下水重金属污染源解析与健康风险评价. 环境科学. 2023(09): 4884-4895 .
    8. 李东风,郑文杰,文少杰,胡文乐. 改性黄土材料对Pb(Ⅱ)的吸附阻滞特性实验和内在机理探究. 环境工程. 2023(S2): 1268-1275+11 . 本站查看
    9. 秦欢欢,高柏,孙占学. 西藏拉萨河重金属含量特征与健康风险评价. 水资源与水工程学报. 2022(04): 1-7 .
    10. 张艳杰. 天津某典型开发区地下水水质及健康风险评价. 山东化工. 2021(05): 255-257+261 .
    11. 倪碧珩,陆胤,陈洁,施维林. 评价金属形态和人体健康风险影响的方法. 环境科学与技术. 2021(06): 163-171 .
    12. 肖勇,莫培,尹世洋,刘洪禄,张云辉. 北京南郊平原地下水化学特征及成因分析. 环境工程. 2021(08): 99-107 . 本站查看
    13. 朱雪凝,刘跃斌,张逸冰,梁轶群,张远,兰建林,樊景森,牛红亚. 滏阳河邯郸段地表水重金属污染特征研究. 能源环境保护. 2021(06): 94-101 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.4 %FULLTEXT: 13.4 %META: 82.2 %META: 82.2 %PDF: 4.5 %PDF: 4.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.4 %其他: 10.4 %China: 2.2 %China: 2.2 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 1.9 %上海: 1.9 %东莞: 1.5 %东莞: 1.5 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %信阳: 0.4 %信阳: 0.4 %兰州: 0.7 %兰州: 0.7 %北京: 3.0 %北京: 3.0 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %台州: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %宁波: 0.7 %宁波: 0.7 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %弗吉: 0.4 %弗吉: 0.4 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %恩施: 0.7 %恩施: 0.7 %攀枝花: 0.4 %攀枝花: 0.4 %昆明: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 3.0 %杭州: 3.0 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %泰安: 0.4 %泰安: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济源: 0.7 %济源: 0.7 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 39.0 %芒廷维尤: 39.0 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.7 %苏州: 0.7 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 11.2 %西宁: 11.2 %运城: 3.7 %运城: 3.7 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %铁岭: 0.7 %铁岭: 0.7 %长治: 1.1 %长治: 1.1 %阜阳: 0.7 %阜阳: 0.7 %阳泉: 0.7 %阳泉: 0.7 %其他China[]上海东莞临汾信阳兰州北京十堰南京台州宁波常州常德广州廊坊弗吉张家口恩施攀枝花昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉泰安洛阳济南济源温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铁岭长治阜阳阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (220) PDF downloads(13) Cited by(19)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return