HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER

LIU Zhao; ZHOU Hong; LIU Wei; CAO Wen-jia; LAN Sheng-tao

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028

Volume 39 Issue 5

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2021 > 39(5): 196-203

ZHENG Kai-kai, ZHOU Zhen, ZHOU Yuan, WANG Yan, ZHOU Jian-chun, LI Ji. A QUANTITIVE STUDY ON PROPORTION OF GROUNDWATER, RIVER WATER AND RAINWATER IN INFLUENT OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 75-80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007012

Citation:

LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028

Citation:

PDF( 14387 KB)

HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028

LIU Zhao¹,
ZHOU Hong^{1
,
,},
LIU Wei^1,2,3,
CAO Wen-jia¹,
LAN Sheng-tao¹

1. Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS, Guilin 541004, China;
3. Key laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky Desertification, Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS, MNR, Guilin 541004, China

Received Date: 2020-04-20
Available Online: 2022-01-17

Abstract

Abstract

In order to preliminarily find out the health risk of heavy metals in groundwater of the Qingjiang River, here the springs (with discharge>50 L/s, and applied as the regional water supply source) in the Qingjiang River were sampled and analyzed for Pb, As, Mn, Cr, Ni, Fe, Cu, Zn and Cd concentration. Health risk for adults and children from these heavy metals was evaluate by a water environmental health risk assessment model of the USEPA and AHP model was also combined. It found that concentration of As and Pb exceeded the national standard limit, and their distribution sequence was downstream>upstream>middle, which mainly originated from human input. As, Cr and Cd were the chemical carcinogens and the reginal health risk prevention elements of groundwater. The health risk assessment result was in the sequence of downstream>upstream>middle. Children were the main concerning group of health risk prevention in the study area.
- the Qingjiang River,
- groundwater,
- heavy metals,
- health risk assessment

FullText(HTML)

References(32)

References

[1]	LIU Q Q, SHENG Y Q, JIANG M, et al. Attempt of basin-scale sediment quality standard establishment for heavy metals in coastal rivers[J]. Chemosphere,2020,245:125596.
[2]	COSTA-BODDEKER S, THUYEN L X, HOELZMANN P, et al.Heavy metal pollution in a reforested mangrove ecosystem (Can Gio Biosphere Reserve, Southern Vietnam):effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors over a thirty-year history[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,716:137035.
[3]	RAJKUMAR H, NAIK P K,RISHI M S. A new indexingapproach for evaluating heavy metal contamination in groundwater[J]. Chemosphere,2020,245:125598.
[4]	ADIMALLA N, LI P Y, QIAN H. Evaluation of groundwater contamination for fluoride and nitrate in semi-arid region of Nirmal Province, South India:a special emphasis on human health risk assessment (HHRA)[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,2019,25(5):1107-1124.
[5]	魏亚强,陈坚,文一,等. 中国地下水污染模拟预测标准体系研究现状[J]. 环境污染与防治,2019,41(11):1387-1392.
[6]	孙毅. 清江上游岩溶流域径流特征及洪水预报[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2015.
[7]	程凤. 清江高坝洲水库重金属污染及食物网结构研究[D]. 武汉:中南民族大学,2018.
[8]	ADIMALLA N, LI P Y, Venkatayogi S. Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Groundwater Quality for Drinking and IrrigationPurposes and Integrated Interpretation with Water Quality Index Studies[J]. Environmental Processes-an International Journal,2018,5(2):363-383.
[9]	ADIMALLA N, LI P Y. Occurrence, health risks, and geochemical mechanisms of fluoride and nitrate in groundwaterof the rock-dominant semi-arid region, Telangana State, India[J]. Human and EcologicalRiskIAeeseement,2019,25(1/2):81-103.
[10]	张芳,常春平,李静等. 胶东半岛农村地区地下水重金属健康风险评价——以山东省莱阳市为例[J]. 环境科学与技术,2013,36(9):180-186.
[11]	饶志,储小东,吴代赦,等. 鄱阳湖平原地下水重金属含量特征与健康风险评估[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2019,46(5):31-37.
[12]	杨彦,陆晓松,李定龙. 我国环境健康风险评价研究进展[J]. 环境与健康杂志,2014,31(4):357-363.
[13]	TAHERI K, THOMAS M, TAHERI M, et al. Critical zone assessments of an alluvial aquifer system using the multi-influencing factor (MIF) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) models in western Iran[J]. Natural Resources Research,2018,29(2):1163-1191.
[14]	GNANAVELBABU A, ARUNAGIRI P. Ranking of MUDA using AHP and Fuzzy AHP algorithm[J]. Materialstoday:Proceedings,2018,5(5):13406-13412.
[15]	郭森,肖捷颖,张依章,等. 环南四湖区地下水中重金属健康风险评价[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(11):59-64.
[16]	ADIMALLA N. Groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes and potential health risks assessment:a case study from semi-arid region of south india[J]. Exposure and Health,2019,11(2):109-123.
[17]	马振华. 湖北人均GDP破1万美元,平均预期寿命达76.65岁[N]. 武汉晚报,2019-8-17(3).
[18]	环境保护部. 中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2013:90-780.
[19]	环境保护部. 中国人群暴露参数手册(儿童卷)[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2016:30-560.
[20]	AHADA C P S, SUTHAR S. Groundwater nitrate contamination and associated human health risk assessmentin southern districts of Punjab, India[J]. Environmental Scienceand Pollution Research,2018,25(25):25336-25347.
[21]	CEMEK M, AKKAYA L, BIRDANE Y O, et al. Nitrate and nitrite levels in fruity and natural mineral waters marketed in western Turkey[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2007,20(3/4):236-240.
[22]	邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
[23]	任晓霞,张鸣之,韩明伟,等. 咸阳市地下水饮用水源地的水环境评价[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(4):17-21.
[24]	刘昭,周宏,曹文佳,等.清江流域地表水重金属季节性分布特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学,2021,42(1):175-183.
[25]	卫生部和国家标准化管理委员会. GB 5749-2006,生活饮用水卫生标准[S].北京,2007.
[26]	陈窈君,胡学玉,王向前,等. 湖北省农村小型水源地水体环境中重金属污染状况[J]. 环境科学与技术,2017,40(3):153-160.
[27]	况琴,黄庭,向京,等. 鄂西北某农田保护区土壤重金属分布特征及生态风险评价[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(5):45-49 ,55.
[28]	王健康,周怀东,陆瑾,等. 三峡库区水环境中重金属污染研究进展[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2014,12(1):49-53.
[29]	肖尚斌,刘德富,王雨春,等. 三峡库区香溪河库湾沉积物重金属污染特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(8):983-989.
[30]	张勇,郭纯青,孙平安,等. 基于空间分析荞麦地流域地下水健康风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学,2019,39(11):4762-4768.
[31]	鲍丽然,邓海,贾中民,等.重庆秀山西北部农田土壤重金属生态健康风险评价[J/OL].中国地质,1-16[2020-05-22 ].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1167.P.20200220.1019.002.html.
[32]	吴佳,纪雄辉,朱坚,等. 长株潭地区水环境重金属污染健康风险评价[J]. 湖南农业科学,2018(1):64-68.

Relative Articles

[1]	LIU Xiaoji, YAN Kun, XU Heng, WANG Yongqun, WANG Zhihua, ZHANG Dejia, CHANG Fengmin. COUPLING H₂-RICH SYNGAS BIOMETHANATION WITH ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE: A PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 131-137. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403016
[2]	ZHAO Shuiqian, DUAN Nina, TAN Xue jun, ZHANG Chen. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ON “ANAEROBIC DIGESTION+LAND USE” TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL TECHNICAL ROUTE FOR MUNICIPAL SEWAGE SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 1-9. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402001
[3]	YUE Liangchen, YU Miao, CHENG Jun, LIU Keliang, HUA Junjie, GUO Hao. INFLUENCE OF LIPID CONTENT AND ELECTRIC FERMENTATION VOLTAGE ON METHANE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 200-207. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407022
[4]	ZHANG Da, LIN Qingshan, CUI Peng, CHENG Boyi, WANG Zongping, GUO Gang. EFFECTS OF MATERIAL RATIO ON VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS PRODUCTION FROM ANAEROBIC CO-FERMENTATION OF FOOD WASTE AND WASTE-ACTIVATED SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 125-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408015
[5]	MA Yuanyuan, WU Yang, WANG Puchun, CHEN Yinguang, ZHENG Xiong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON ANAEROBIC CO-FERMENTATION OF WASTE-ACTIVATED SLUDGE TO PRODUCE ACID UNDER THE GOAL OF LOW CARBON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 102-109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401014
[6]	WANG Yanzhao, WU Yang, LIU Yiwei, CHEN Yinguang, ZHENG Xiong. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF CARBON-BASED CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS TO PROMOTE METHANE PRODUCTION FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 146-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309018
[7]	ZHEN Zhaogan, SU Yang, LUO Junxiao, AN Tong, CHEN Yao, GOU Min. EFFECTS OF POLYETHYLENE MICROPLASTICS ON MESOPHILIC AND THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 86-91,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304012
[8]	XU Hui-ting, LIU Hui, MA Zhang-wen, CHEN Hao, ZHU Zhi-hao, XU Tian-chen, YE Jian-feng. EFFECTS OF ALKALI TREATMENT ON METHANE AND INTERMEDIATE AMINO ACIDS AND THEIR CORRELATION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 88-94. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205013
[9]	XIANG Yinping, XIONG Weiping, ZHANG Yanru, JIA Meiying, PENG Haihao, YANG Zhaohui. EFFECT OF SLUDGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION ON THE REDUCTION OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 192-202,241. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210026
[10]	CHEN Yuqi, ZHANG Yanlong, WANG Yuzheng, LI Junxin, CAO Wenzhi. EFFECTS OF TYPICAL ANTIBIOTICS ON METHANOGENESIS EFFICIENCY AND MICROBIAL METABOLITES DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF PIG MANURE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 89-96,120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204013
[11]	TANG Xin-yi, CHEN Xiang-yu, XIAO Ben-yi, LIU Rong-zhan. THERMAL-ALKALINE TREATMENT OF SEWAGE SLUDGE AND ITS ENHANCEMENT ON ANAEROBIC SLUDGE DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 218-226. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205031
[12]	GENG Ziqian, DAI Wenting, LI Chao, TANG Jie, DAI Kun, CENG Jianxiong, ZHANG Fang. ENHANCED METHANOGENESIS OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE FERMENTATION BY DOSING AN ALGINATE-DEGRADING CONSORTIUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 90-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208012
[13]	GUO Guang-ze, LI Ye-mei, ZHOU Shi-tong, LI Yu-you. ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF SEWAGE SLUDGE BY A HIGH SOLID MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 101-107. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107012
[14]	LIU Xin-yuan, HU Wen-jia, OUYANG Fan, NIE Jia-min, WU Nan, YANG Fan, KONG Si-fang. BIOGAS PRODUCTION AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY SUCCESSION DURING SEQUENCING BATCH ACCLIMATIZATION OF DIGESTED SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 136-141,188. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103019
[15]	ZHOU Yu-qi, XU Jun-chao, ZHUO Gui-hua, CHEN Jian-yong, LIU Chang-qing. INFLUENCE OF SLUDGE INOCULATION VOLUME ON METHANOGENESIS OF RESIDUE FROM ANAEROBIC FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION USING COMBINED SLUDGE AND FOOD WASTE UNDER MEDIUM TEMPERATURE CONDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 144-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106021
[16]	CHEN Si-yuan, XIAO Xiang-zhe, TENG Jun, DONG Shan-yan, LIAN Jun-feng, ZHU Yi-chun. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON METHANOGENIC INHIBITION TECHNOLOGY DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF EXCESS SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 137-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106020
[17]	JING Xue, CHENG Jie-hong, KONG Feng, ZHANG Chun-yong, CHENG Qing-lin, HUANG Shou-qiang. EFFECT OF ADDED IRON ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE IN METHANE PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 125-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102020
[18]	DENG Qing-hua, ZHANG Jian, XIAN-Ping, FANG Qing, MENG Zheng-cheng. IMPROVING ANAEROBIC DIGESTIBILITY OF SLUDGE PRETREATED BY THERMAL HYDROLYSIS AND BANANA STRAW ADDED[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 144-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005025
[19]	WANG Yuan-yuan, QIN Xiao-jie, NIU Lai-chun, FAN Jia-qi. ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF VEGETATION IN EBB ZONE ENHANCED BY CaO FOR METHANE PRODUCTION AND ITS MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 208-212,218. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009033
[20]	Li Wei Liang Meisheng Pei Xuqian Jiang Junjie, . RESEARCH ON APPLICATION OF PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD IN ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 106-109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503022

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(11)

1.	何宽畅，冯诗洋，杨文剑，杨奎，尹征，何燕生，马金星. 基于合成电化学技术的水中污染物增值转化研究进展. 能源环境保护. 2025(01): 34-47 .
2.	赵霞，石诗义，毛杨，武桢寓. 城市污水处理厂的“水-能-碳”协调调度模型. 电网技术. 2024(05): 1918-1928 .
3.	涂倩倩，沈鹏飞，刘鸣燕，张梓璇，余波，杨凯. 城镇污水处理厂碳排放核算方法及特征. 净水技术. 2024(06): 52-62 .
4.	于翔，潘兴朋，王永乐. 浅析化工污水处理装置的改进创新措施和社会效益. 中国轮胎资源综合利用. 2024(12): 67-69 .
5.	李哲坤，张立秋，杜子文，封莉，刘永泽. 城市污泥不同处理处置工艺路线碳排放比较. 环境科学. 2023(02): 1181-1190 .
6.	任南琪，王旭. 城市水系统发展历程分析与趋势展望. 中国水利. 2023(07): 1-5 .
7.	纪义虎，左其亭，马军霞. 基于Tapio和LMDI模型的沁河流域碳排放与水资源利用脱钩关系分析. 水资源保护. 2023(04): 94-101 .
8.	谢琤琤，刘刚. 城市污水处理厂碳中和路径解析. 环境工程. 2023(09): 181-186 . 本站查看
9.	蒲贵兵，王鹏，卫然. 基于城市生活污水系统全生命周期的直接碳减排路径研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(10): 11-16 .
10.	张海亚，李思琦，黎明月，段亮，张洪伟，秦伟，赵立伟，刘鹏，吕云龙，王玉龙. 城镇污水处理厂碳排放现状及减污降碳协同增效路径探讨. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(06): 2053-2062 .
11.	李天昕，翁锐，徐新朋，程世昆，杨朕，李勇，李子富. 基于还田视角的人粪尿处理研究进展. 农业资源与环境学报. 2023(06): 1388-1399 .