Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 5
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(5): 231-237,245
CAO Wen-ping, LIU Xi-kun, ZHAO Tian-qing, TIAN Li, LIU Yong. EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OF PAN'AN LAKE WETLAND BASED ON PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE (PSR) MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 231-237,245. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105032
Citation: CAO Wen-ping, LIU Xi-kun, ZHAO Tian-qing, TIAN Li, LIU Yong. EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OF PAN'AN LAKE WETLAND BASED ON PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE (PSR) MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 231-237,245. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105032
shu

EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OF PAN'AN LAKE WETLAND BASED ON PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE (PSR) MODEL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105032

  • 1. School of Environmental Engineering, Xuzhou Institute of Technology, Xuzhou 221111, China;

  • 2. Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;

  • 3. Hohai University, State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing 210098, China;

  • 4. Nantong Branch of Jiangsu Province Hydrology and Water Resources Investigation Bureau, Nantong 226000, China;

  • 5. China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

  • Received Date: 2020-11-20
    Available Online: 2022-01-17
    Abstract
  • Based on the PSR model, 14 evaluation indexes, including sewage treatment rate, water quality status, biodiversity and environmental investment index were selected to establish the water environment health evaluation system of Pan'an Lake wetland, and their weights of indexes were determined by analytic hierarchy process. The health status of wetland water environment was classified into 5 levels from very healthy to morbid, and then the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate the health status of Pan'an Lake wetland water environment. The evaluation results showed that the water environmental health index of Pan'an Lake wetland was 2.8166, belonging to sub-health state. The stress index score was 1.7405, which was in disease status. The status index score was 3.2563, belonging to the sub-health state. The response index score was 2.4483, which was between sub-health state and disease state.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    SPIEGEL J M, BONET M, YASSI A. Developing ecosystem health indicators in centro Habana:a community-based approach[J]. Ecosystem Health, 2001, 7(1):15-26.
    [2]
    武海涛, 吕宪国. 中国湿地评价研究进展与展望[J].世界林业研究, 2005, 18(4):49-53.
    [3]
    ROMBOUTS I, BEAUGRAND G, ARTIGAS L F, et al. Evaluating marine ecosystem health:case studies of indicators using direct observations and modelling methods[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 24(1):353-365.
    [4]
    SCHNEIDER B D. Monitoring for ecological integrity:the state of treat In Daninel. Ecological Indicators[M]. Barking:Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd,1992:1403-1419.
    [5]
    蒋卫国. 基于RS和GIS的湿地生态系统健康评价——以辽河三角洲盘锦市为例[D]. 南京:南京师范大学, 2003.
    [6]
    刘明华, 董贵华. 城市生态系统健康评价指标体系的构建——以秦皇岛市生态系统为例[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2005, 14(3):161-164.
    [7]
    张有贤, 李二强, 罗东霞, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的兰州水环境安全模糊综合评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020,20(2):709-718.
    [8]
    陈凤, 苏少川, 陈妍, 等. 基于PSR模型的闽东滨海湿地生态系统健康评价[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2020, 16(3):25-28.
    [9]
    张二丽, 王太行, 王玉龙, 等. 基于模糊综合评价模型的郑州市东风渠水环境质量评价研究[J]. 商丘职业技术学院学报, 2020,19(2):80-84.
    [10]
    王亚斌, 师宝忠, 管景峰. 白洋淀湿地生态环境监测体系的构建[J]. 环境工程, 2013,31(增刊1):625-628.
    [11]
    CHEN Y L, LI T C, HU H J, et al. Transport and fate of microplastics in constructed wetlands:a microcosm study[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021,415(8):125615-125627.
    [12]
    吕添贵, 孔安妮, 汪立. 基于PSR模型的生态文明示范区生态安全评价及其障碍诊断[J].水土保持研究. 2021,28(2):343-350.
    [13]
    王维晴, 周立志, 陈薇, 等. 长江下游升金湖湿地保护有效性评价(1989-2019年)[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(3):494-506.
    [14]
    李虹, 王丽婧, 刘永. 水库型流域水质安全评估与预警技术框架. 水生态学杂志, 2018, 39(6):1-7.
    [15]
    XIAO S. Risk Identification and evaluation of science and technology collaborative innovation in Jiangxi Province[J].Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, 2021, 3(2):54003-55011.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHAO Xi, WEI Si. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR RANKING QUANTITATIVE DETECTION LIST FROM NONTARGET SCREENING OF EMERGING POLLUTANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 81-87. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407008
    [2]DONG Yihua, ZHANG Xueying, ZHANG Xinyue, LI Liang. EVALUATION OF FARMLAND NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY IN LIAOHE RIVER BASIN BASED ON AHP-FCE METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 150-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312018
    [3]YIN Hao, ZHAN Ya, ZHANG Liu, LIU Gui-jian. SUITABILITY EVALUATION OF RIPARIAN ZONE OF CLEAR WATER GALLERY BASED ON AHP[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 193-196,250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205028
    [4]ZHAO Xi, WU Shan-shan, LU Ke-ding. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING CONSTRUCTION LEVEL IN OPERATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT PARK FOR ZERO-WASTE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 136-140,15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102022
    [5]ZHAO Yan-min, QIN Yan-wen, MA Ying-qun, ZHANG Lei, CAO Wei, CHI Ming-hui, SHI Yao. ASSESSMENT OF ECOSYSTEM HEALTH OF THE YANGTZE RIVER ESTUARY BASED ON THE PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 207-212. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110030
    [6]SONG Jing-hui, LIU Han-hu, FU Bo, CHENG Han-yu, ZHANG Shuang-sheng. A SECONDARY COMPREHREHENSIVE FUZZY EVALUATION MODEL OF EUTROPHICATION BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD: A CASE STUDY OF JIULI WETLAND PARK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 126-132. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009021
    [7]LONG Jia, WANG Si-si, FENG Meng-ke. APPLICATION STATUS AND EVALUATION OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANTS IN BEIJING LID FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 89-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004016
    [8]LIU Tong-li, ZHAO Li-xin, MENG Hai-bo, YAO Zong-lu, ZHANG Xi-rui, HUO Li-li. RESEARCH AND OPTIMIZATION OF EVALUATION METHODS FOR STRAW ENERGY UTILIZATION TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 195-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008032
    [9]LIN Chu-qiao, YI Yun-jun, LIU Tie. WATER SYSTEM CONNECTIVITY EVALUATION AND OPTIMIZATION CONTROL IN BOSTEN LAKE BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 21-25. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010004
    [12]Wang Jiahui, Zhang Xuefeng, Deng Panbo. APPLICATION OF VICIA-MICRONUCLEUS TEST TO MONITOR THE UNDERGROUND WATER POLLUTION OF TAILINGS SURROUNDING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 117-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510026
    [13]Qin Lanlan Wang Youle, . CASE STUDY ON THE INDICATOR SYSTEM OF PLANNED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 143-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502032
    [14]Huo Pan, Cao Liwen, Tian Yanfeng. APPLICATION AND COMPARISON OF AHP AND FUZZY EVALUATION METHOD IN LANDFILL SITING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 131-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503026
    [15]Shen Lei Zhuang Huisheng, . STUDY ON COMPREHENSIVE RISK ASSESSMENT OF BIOMASS GASIFICATION POWER GENERATION INDUSTRY IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 137-141. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504029
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(16)

    1. 朱颖，王春文，周昕宇，冯育青. 基于PSR模型的城市河流湿地生态健康评价——以苏州市姑苏区为例. 湿地科学与管理. 2024(01): 41-45+51 .
    2. 刘成前，黄超，曹光秀，陈冬，潘珉，宋迪. 河湖健康评价方法研究进展. 环境保护与循环经济. 2024(02): 58-64 .
    3. 符蓉，梁玉洁，谢治国，韩沛东，王绒，温仲明，张伟，刘洋洋. 汉江流域生态安全时空变化及其影响因素. 水土保持研究. 2024(06): 139-148+160 .
    4. 王睿，张伟. 采煤塌陷区湿地生态修复与景观再生设计研究——以徐州市潘安湖为例. 能源与环保. 2024(09): 71-76+83 .
    5. 李春慧，陈翔，李向阳，王思淼，汪子雄，汪天祥. 新型工业化城市环境能源复合承载力评价——以东莞市环境能源可持续发展为例. 南方能源建设. 2024(06): 79-87 .
    6. 杨璐璐. 仰天岗国家森林公园康复性景观综合评价研究. 森林工程. 2023(02): 63-71+81 .
    7. 李雨衡，赵艳，程磊磊，刘涧樱，李雪辉，白建华. 中亚地区生态脆弱性时空演变及其驱动因素. 陆地生态系统与保护学报. 2023(01): 47-56 .
    8. 马国强，李秋洁，张锦绣，涂宏涛，赵凯瑞. 基于PSR方法的抚仙湖流域土地生态安全评估. 江西科学. 2023(03): 507-513 .
    9. 李雨衡，郭红，常艳，张廉昀，胡新培，白建华. 基于SPR模型的黄河郑州段滩区生态脆弱性研究. 中国水土保持. 2023(12): 54-58 .
    10. 陈文婷，夏青，苏婧，郑明霞，席北斗，向维. 基于时差相关分析和模糊神经网络的白洋淀流域水环境承载力评价预警. 环境工程. 2022(06): 261-271 . 本站查看
    11. 邓图南，鲁春阳. 基于PSR模型的河南省耕地生态安全诊断. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(05): 104-109+130 .
    12. 王成军，赵丹，王秉琦，冯涛，张炜，董明放. 基于DPSIR理论的水环境协调发展及时空演化研究. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 466-474 .
    13. 王敏，宋昊洋，朱雯，汪洁琼. 国土空间规划背景下城市水网空间近自然修复规划策略与实践——以江苏省太仓市为例. 风景园林. 2022(12): 36-42 .
    14. 郄子君，郭文林. 常态化防控阶段公民新冠疫情应对行为及引导策略研究——基于PSR模型的实证分析. 中国卫生事业管理. 2022(12): 881-888+898 .
    15. 安敏，李文佳，吴海林，安慧，黄进. 三峡库区生态环境质量的时空格局演变及影响因素. 长江流域资源与环境. 2022(12): 2743-2755 .
    16. 鲁春阳，李松涛，赵占辉，李会杰，肖靖. 藏粮于地战略下河南省耕地利用效率评价. 河南城建学院学报. 2022(06): 70-78 .

    Other cited types(18)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.4 %FULLTEXT: 7.4 %META: 90.9 %META: 90.9 %PDF: 1.7 %PDF: 1.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.2 %其他: 10.2 %San Lorenzo: 0.7 %San Lorenzo: 0.7 %Singapore: 0.3 %Singapore: 0.3 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %三亚: 0.5 %三亚: 0.5 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %伊犁: 0.3 %伊犁: 0.3 %伦敦: 0.3 %伦敦: 0.3 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %六安: 0.5 %六安: 0.5 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 4.4 %北京: 4.4 %十堰: 1.0 %十堰: 1.0 %南京: 1.9 %南京: 1.9 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.7 %嘉兴: 0.7 %天水: 0.2 %天水: 0.2 %天津: 4.7 %天津: 4.7 %宣城: 0.7 %宣城: 0.7 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %徐州: 2.0 %徐州: 2.0 %悉尼: 0.7 %悉尼: 0.7 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %扬州: 2.9 %扬州: 2.9 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 2.4 %杭州: 2.4 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %武汉: 2.2 %武汉: 2.2 %沧州: 0.2 %沧州: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %淮安: 0.2 %淮安: 0.2 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湛江: 1.0 %湛江: 1.0 %漯河: 9.8 %漯河: 9.8 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %烟台: 0.7 %烟台: 0.7 %盐城: 0.3 %盐城: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 29.4 %芒廷维尤: 29.4 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %萍乡: 0.2 %萍乡: 0.2 %衢州: 1.2 %衢州: 1.2 %襄阳: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %西宁: 2.0 %西宁: 2.0 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 1.7 %运城: 1.7 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 1.4 %郑州: 1.4 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %长春: 0.8 %长春: 0.8 %长沙: 2.7 %长沙: 2.7 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %其他San LorenzoSingapore[]三亚上海东莞临汾伊犁伦敦保定六安兰州北京十堰南京南通台州嘉兴天水天津宣城常州常德广州徐州悉尼成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县桂林武汉沧州济南济源淮安深圳温州湖州湛江漯河潍坊烟台盐城石家庄福州绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州萍乡衢州襄阳西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铁岭银川长春长沙长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (536) PDF downloads(16) Cited by(34)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return