Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
XU Hao, SUN Xiao-ling. THE INTERACTIVE MODELING AND JOINT PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER IN MAOZHOU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106004
Citation: XU Hao, SUN Xiao-ling. THE INTERACTIVE MODELING AND JOINT PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER IN MAOZHOU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106004

THE INTERACTIVE MODELING AND JOINT PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER IN MAOZHOU RIVER BASIN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106004
  • Received Date: 2020-05-19
    Available Online: 2022-01-18
  • Based on the qualitative analysis of relationship of recharge and discharge between surface water and groundwater in Maozhou River Basin, we established SWAT and SWAT-LUD models to simulate the circulation and transformation process of watershed water, quantified the interactive volume between surface water and ground water, and estimated the pollutant contribution. The results showed that the volume of groundwater recharge to surface water was 1.6×108 m3 in 2017, with the amount of NH3-N、TP and COD at 0.9×104, 0.2×104 and 1.7×104 t, respectively, and approximately contributed 3% of the total river pollutants; the volume of surface water recharge to groundwater was 1.0×106 m3, with the amount of NH3-N, TP and COD at 11 t, 1.1 t and 510 t, respectively, and contributed 2% of the total pollutants of groundwater recharge surface water; the amount of groundwater recharged by river water infiltration in flood area was 6.7×106 m3. On the basis of above research, we suggested to adopt engineering measures, such as sediment dredging, construction of permeable reaction wall in interactive zone, building sluice on river estuary, watershed water environmental early-warning and monitoring in interactive zone, to implement joint prevention of surface water and groundwater pollution in Maozhou River Basin.
  • [1]
    朱金峰,刘悦忆,章树安,等.地表水与地下水相互作用研究进展[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(8):3002-3010.
    [2]
    凌郡鸿,张依章,王民浩,等.深圳茅洲河下游柱状沉积物中碳氮同位素特征[J].环境科学,2017,38(12):5081-5089.
    [3]
    王磊,刘亭亭,谢建治.基于SWAT模型的张家口清水河流域土地利用情景变化对径流影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(4):245-251.
    [4]
    CHANG C,SUN D M,FENG P,et al.Impacts of nonpoint source pollution on water quality in the Yuqiao Reservoir[J].Environmental Engineering Science,2017,34(6):418-432.
    [5]
    SUN X L,BERNARD-JANNIN L,GRUSSON Y,et al.Using SWAT-LUD model to estimate the influence of water exchange and shallow aquifer denitrification on water and nitrate flux[J].Water,2018,10(4):528.
    [6]
    许自舟,周旭东,隋伟娜,等.基于SWAT模型的碧流河流域入海径流模拟研究[J].海洋环境科学,2020,39(2):216-222.
    [7]
    董立俊,董晓华,曾强,等.气候变化条件下雅砻江流域未来径流变化趋势研究[J].气候变化研究进展,2019,15(6):596-606.
    [8]
    付潇然,王东,栾清华,等.大尺度无管流数据城区SWMM构建及模拟-Ⅱ.模型参数校验及暴雨径流模拟分析[J].水科学进展,2020,31(1):51-60.
    [9]
    王胜,许红梅,高超,等.基于SWAT模型分析淮河流域中上游水量平衡要素对气候变化的响应[J].气候变化研究进展,2015,11(6):402-411.
    [10]
    李星,徐学选,宇苗子,等.SWAT模型在黄土丘陵区燕沟流域的应用研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(3):141-144.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]REN Lifang, GONG Youkui, SUN Hongwei. CHARACTERISTICS OF DENITRIFYING PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL AND N2O EMISSION OF AN AOA-SBR UNDER DIFFERENT CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIOS (C/N)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 1-9. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405001
    [2]WEI Qingfu, SHAO Xiaojing, CAI Jie, DONG Yaping. SEDIMENT POLLUTION AND ECOLOGICAL DREDGING IN THE WANSHAN LAKE IN XISHAN DISTRICT, WUXI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 173-180. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301021
    [3]QIN Yu, SHU Yuqing, WANG Yuxiao. VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF CO2 FLUXES IN THE MAIN STREAM AND TYPICAL TRIBUTARIES OF WANZHOU SECTION OF THE THREE GORGES RESERVOIR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 43-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302007
    [4]LI Liang, JIN Rong, LIU Chen, LI Chao-hui, WANG Xue-feng. LEACHING AND DISSOLVING CHARACTERISTICS OF OIL SHALE RETORTING SOLID WASTE FROM FUSHUN WEST OPEN PIT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 183-188. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103026
    [5]FU Jin-xiang, QIAN Jie, ZHANG Li, YU Peng-fei, LUO Di, YOU Kun. EFFECT OF HIGH CONCENTRATION PHOSPHORUS ON ANAEROBIC AMMONIA OXIDATION PERFORMANCE AND GRANULAR SLUDGE PROPERTY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 98-102,109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011016
    [6]LI Na, WEI Xin, HAN Wei-zheng, SUN Si-yue. RIGIONAL DISPARITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BREEDING INDUSTRY IN JILIN PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 166-170,146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002024
    [7]ZHOU Li, WANG Mao-wei, GAO Jing-si, ZHU Jia. EFFECTS OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS ON GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC PHYSIOLOGY OF Pseudanabaena sp.[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 110-116,134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011018
    [8]FENG Xiao-hua. EFFECT OF SHOAL WETLAND WATER DEPTH ON NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL AND ITS APPLICATION IN RIVER REGULATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 53-58,223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009009
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 梁文雅,王冼民,刘琦. 廉江高桥红树林沉积物微生物群落结构特征及其与营养因子相关性. 广东海洋大学学报. 2024(04): 80-87 .
    2. 张亚,张鹏,张庆华,彭卫平. 海岸带生态修复技术研究——以广州市虎门大桥(北侧)海岸带为例. 甘肃科学学报. 2023(05): 1-7 .
    3. 王日明,戴志军,黄鹄,龙楚琪,梁喜幸,黎树式. 南流江河口桐花树生物动力地貌过程研究. 海洋学报. 2021(09): 102-114 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.0 %FULLTEXT: 7.0 %META: 88.8 %META: 88.8 %PDF: 4.3 %PDF: 4.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.1 %其他: 17.1 %China: 1.1 %China: 1.1 %Togo: 2.1 %Togo: 2.1 %United States: 0.5 %United States: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 1.1 %上海: 1.1 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %北京: 3.7 %北京: 3.7 %十堰: 1.6 %十堰: 1.6 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南充: 0.5 %南充: 0.5 %南昌: 1.6 %南昌: 1.6 %台州: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %威海: 1.1 %威海: 1.1 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %延安: 0.5 %延安: 0.5 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %昆明: 1.6 %昆明: 1.6 %晋城: 1.1 %晋城: 1.1 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %泉州: 0.5 %泉州: 0.5 %济源: 1.1 %济源: 1.1 %海口: 0.5 %海口: 0.5 %淮南: 0.5 %淮南: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湛江: 0.5 %湛江: 0.5 %漯河: 1.6 %漯河: 1.6 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %福州: 3.7 %福州: 3.7 %绍兴: 0.5 %绍兴: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 21.4 %芒廷维尤: 21.4 %芝加哥: 1.6 %芝加哥: 1.6 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %衡阳: 0.5 %衡阳: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 8.6 %西宁: 8.6 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 4.8 %运城: 4.8 %遵义: 1.1 %遵义: 1.1 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 3.7 %郑州: 3.7 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他ChinaTogoUnited States[]上海临汾北京十堰南京南充南昌台州天津威海常德广州延安张家口昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沈阳泉州济源海口淮南深圳温州湖州湛江漯河石家庄福州绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (238) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return