THE INTERACTIVE MODELING AND JOINT PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER IN MAOZHOU RIVER BASIN

XU Hao; SUN Xiao-ling

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202106004

Volume 39 Issue 6

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2021 > 39(6): 21-26

ZHOU Zhi-cai. EFFECT ASSESSMENT OF SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION IN THE INTERNATIONAL ECO-BUSINESS DISTRICT IN SONGJIANG DISTRICT IN SHANGHAI BASED ON SWMM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 167-173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008028

Citation:

XU Hao, SUN Xiao-ling. THE INTERACTIVE MODELING AND JOINT PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER IN MAOZHOU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106004

Citation:

PDF( 4106 KB)

THE INTERACTIVE MODELING AND JOINT PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER IN MAOZHOU RIVER BASIN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106004

XU Hao^{1,2,3
,
,},
SUN Xiao-ling¹

1. PowerChina Eco-Environmental Group Co. Ltd, Shenzhen 518102, China;
2. Guangdong Industry Intelligent Manufacturing Co., Ltd, Zhongshan 528400, China;
3. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received Date: 2020-05-19
Available Online: 2022-01-18

Abstract

Abstract

Based on the qualitative analysis of relationship of recharge and discharge between surface water and groundwater in Maozhou River Basin, we established SWAT and SWAT-LUD models to simulate the circulation and transformation process of watershed water, quantified the interactive volume between surface water and ground water, and estimated the pollutant contribution. The results showed that the volume of groundwater recharge to surface water was 1.6×10⁸ m³ in 2017, with the amount of NH₃-N、TP and COD at 0.9×10⁴, 0.2×10⁴ and 1.7×10⁴ t, respectively, and approximately contributed 3% of the total river pollutants; the volume of surface water recharge to groundwater was 1.0×10⁶ m³, with the amount of NH₃-N, TP and COD at 11 t, 1.1 t and 510 t, respectively, and contributed 2% of the total pollutants of groundwater recharge surface water; the amount of groundwater recharged by river water infiltration in flood area was 6.7×10⁶ m³. On the basis of above research, we suggested to adopt engineering measures, such as sediment dredging, construction of permeable reaction wall in interactive zone, building sluice on river estuary, watershed water environmental early-warning and monitoring in interactive zone, to implement joint prevention of surface water and groundwater pollution in Maozhou River Basin.
- SWAT model,
- interactive volume distribution,
- Maozhou River Basin,
- surface water,
- groundwater

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

[1]	朱金峰,刘悦忆,章树安,等.地表水与地下水相互作用研究进展[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(8):3002-3010.
[2]	凌郡鸿,张依章,王民浩,等.深圳茅洲河下游柱状沉积物中碳氮同位素特征[J].环境科学,2017,38(12):5081-5089.
[3]	王磊,刘亭亭,谢建治.基于SWAT模型的张家口清水河流域土地利用情景变化对径流影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(4):245-251.
[4]	CHANG C,SUN D M,FENG P,et al.Impacts of nonpoint source pollution on water quality in the Yuqiao Reservoir[J].Environmental Engineering Science,2017,34(6):418-432.
[5]	SUN X L,BERNARD-JANNIN L,GRUSSON Y,et al.Using SWAT-LUD model to estimate the influence of water exchange and shallow aquifer denitrification on water and nitrate flux[J].Water,2018,10(4):528.
[6]	许自舟,周旭东,隋伟娜,等.基于SWAT模型的碧流河流域入海径流模拟研究[J].海洋环境科学,2020,39(2):216-222.
[7]	董立俊,董晓华,曾强,等.气候变化条件下雅砻江流域未来径流变化趋势研究[J].气候变化研究进展,2019,15(6):596-606.
[8]	付潇然,王东,栾清华,等.大尺度无管流数据城区SWMM构建及模拟-Ⅱ.模型参数校验及暴雨径流模拟分析[J].水科学进展,2020,31(1):51-60.
[9]	王胜,许红梅,高超,等.基于SWAT模型分析淮河流域中上游水量平衡要素对气候变化的响应[J].气候变化研究进展,2015,11(6):402-411.
[10]	李星,徐学选,宇苗子,等.SWAT模型在黄土丘陵区燕沟流域的应用研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(3):141-144.

Relative Articles

[1]	LIAO Xun, LI Yancheng, ZHANG Yuduo, YANG Qilin, LI Jiang. RESEARCH ON GROUNDWATER NITRATE REDUCTION EFFICIENCY BASED ON METHANOTROPH AND FUNCTIONAL MICROORGANISMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 113-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402013
[2]	KONG Huimin, ZHAO Xiaohui, XU Wan, DAI Yuhan, ZHANG Jiayu. OCCURRENCE AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF ANTIBIOTICS IN GROUNDWATER ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 219-226. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302029
[3]	YOU Yangyang, LIANG Zengqiang, HUO Ning. GROUNDWATER EVALUATION OF INFORMAL LANDFILLS BASED ON WATER QUALITY IDENTIFICATION INDEX METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 264-269,311. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312033
[4]	NIU Yi, LI Wei, LI Gongke, WANG Weixing, LI Mingming, CAO Shuping, LÜ Xiaowen. SIMULATION OF RESTORATION OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION IN A LANDFILL IN COASTAL PLAIN AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 12-20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303002
[5]	LI Jingjie, CAI Wutian, LU Yonggao, BIAN Chao, YANG Li, WANG Mingguo. EFFECT EVALUATION OF Cr（Ⅵ） CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION BY PERMEABLE REACTIVE WALL IN PILOT SCALE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 162-167,176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202025
[6]	SONG Binxue, HE Yueling, JIA Linchun, CENG Lin, CHEN Hong, XUE Gang. Fe⁰ SUPPORTED MIXOTROPHIC DENITRIFICATION FOR GROUNDWATER TREATMENTS: PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 22-30,54. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208003
[7]	LIANG Yu, YAN Haihong, YIN Qin, NIAN Yuegang, ZHANG Xianqi, WANG Xingzhi. RESEARCH ON GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SITUATION IN CHIFENG LANDFILL AND CAUSE ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 188-195,223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204027
[8]	ZHANG Yun. ADVANCES IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF GROUNDWATER IN-SITE CHEMICAL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 197-204,217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205029
[9]	PAN Ying, HAN Rui, ZHANG Yin, ZHANG Jin, YI Qitao, LI Ruonan. SCENARIO STUDY OF HYDROLOGICAL PROCESS IN COAL MINING SUBSIDENCE AREA BASED ON SWAT-FLUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 272-279. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206034
[10]	YIN Shu-zheng, XU Feng, WANG Wen-hui, HUO Wen-rong, HUANG Yun-xin. SIMULATION OF RUNOFF AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL VARIATIONS OF BLUE AND GREEN WATER RESOURCES IN SIHU BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 133-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205019
[11]	YE Zhao-yong, YANG Yu, HOU Li-an. HOTSPOTS AND TRENDS OF GROUNDWATER RELATED RESEARCHES NEAR LANDFILLS:VISUAL ANALYSIS BASED ON CITESPACE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 65-71. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106011
[12]	XIANG Jia-jia. GROUNDWATER POLLUTION CONTROL BY CEMENT SOIL BARRIER WALL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 63-68,91. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109010
[13]	SUN Jun-liang, GONG Zhi-qiang, LI Lu, NIU Hao-bo, YIN Le-yi, CHEN Jian. OPTIMIZATION OF GROUNDWATER PUMPING SCHEME FOR A CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON-CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 172-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111023
[14]	XIAO Yong, MO Pei, YIN Shi-yang, LIU Hong-lu, ZHANG Yun-hui. HYDROCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND GENESIS OF GROUNDWATER IN SOUTHERN SUBURB OF BEIJING PLAIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 99-107. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108013
[15]	LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028
[16]	CHEN Si-li, YI Zhong-yuan, WANG Ji, PAN Chao-yi, CHANG Sha, GUO Qing-wei, ZHOU Jun-guang, SUN Lan. CASE STUDY ON REMEDIATION OF DIESEL CONTAMINATED SOIL AND GROUNDWATER BY ELUENT-EXTRACTION TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 178-182. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001029
[17]	WEI Jing, ZHENG Xiao-gang, ZHANG Guo-wei, ZHANG Yan-xi, WANG Cai-ling, WANG Ran. NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS CONTENT OF SURFACE WATER IN THE UPSTREAM BASIN OF GUANTING RESERVOIR AND MIYUN RESERVOIR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 101-105,144. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009017
[18]	GAO Shang, HU Peng, CUI Song, ZHANG Zu-lin, XING Zhen-xiang, ZHANG Fu-xiang. NUMERICA SIMULATION AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF SURFACE RUNOFF IN NAOLI RIVER BASIN BASED ON SWAT MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 83-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010013
[19]	Li Jingjie Cai Wutian Geng Tingting Liu Jiangtao Liu Jinwei Zhang Tao Cao Yueting, . THE EFFECTS OF FIELD MEASURING CONDITIONS ON PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION GROUNDWATER CONVENTIONAL WATER CHEMISTRY PARAMETERS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 70-74. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504015
[20]	Liu Yi, Dong Wenna, Li Ye, Ren Peifang. PROGRESS IN RESEARCH ON POLLUTION STATUS AND HAZARDS OF PERFLUORINATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ( PFCs) IN SURFACE WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 43-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502009

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	张庆民，赵庚润，刘晨宇. 典型系统泵站放江对城市河道水质弹性的影响分析. 四川环境. 2025(01): 16-23 .
2.	折帅，董高明，罗黑龙，张海洋，陆丽花，刘子扬. 基于SWMM模型的产业园区LID设施方案评估研究. 施工技术(中英文). 2025(04): 151-156+166 .
3.	程新月，王昊，李智，周晋军. 基于OPUT的城市LID设施防涝布设方法. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 638-648 .
4.	张惠，黄志金，张庆民. 基于数值模拟的雨水泵站放江污染控制研究. 四川环境. 2023(06): 8-15 .
5.	王二松，宫永伟，周国华. 基于SWMM的天津市某海绵型建筑小区径流水量水质效果模拟分析. 环境工程. 2023(12): 48-53+115 . 本站查看
6.	戎贵文，甘丹妮，李姗姗，孙浩淼，王莉莉. 不同LID设施的面积比例优选及径流污染控制效果. 水资源保护. 2022(03): 168-173+204 .
7.	解超，王思思，吕彬. 基于LCA的北京市透水水泥混凝土路面的环境影响分析. 环境工程. 2022(09): 118-125 . 本站查看
8.	靳伟，赵军伟，孙健，黄鹏程. 山区河流倒灌引发管网溢流洪水数值模拟研究. 中国农村水利水电. 2022(11): 77-82 .
9.	胥瑞晨，逄勇，胡祉冰. 1990-2019年江苏片区入太湖水量变化及原因分析. 湖泊科学. 2021(03): 797-805 .
10.	纪亚星，同玉，侯精明，苏锋，杨霄，吕鹏，李东来，石佳. 西咸新区海绵城市建设对沣河洪水特性影响模拟研究. 水资源与水工程学报. 2021(02): 50-57 .