Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 6
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(6): 59-64,178
XUE Tong-lai, ZHAO Dong-hui, HAN Fei. SVR WATER QUALITY PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON GA OPTIMIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 123-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003021
Citation: LI Na, DENG Yi-xing, LI Guo-de, WU Shi-wei, HU Xiao-min, DAI Lan. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT BIOFILM CULTURING METHODS IN MBBR FOR OIL SHALE RETORTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 59-64,178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106010
shu

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT BIOFILM CULTURING METHODS IN MBBR FOR OIL SHALE RETORTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106010

  • 1. Experimental center of Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China;

  • 2. Office of Academic Research, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China;

  • 3. School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China;

  • 4. Grain College of Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China

  • Received Date: 2020-09-09
    Available Online: 2022-01-18
    Abstract
  • In order to realize the rapid start-up and stable operation of the biofilm reactor, comparative studies were conducted on different methods of biofilm culturing in the process of MBBR of oil shale retorting wastewater treatment. The experiment was carried out by two methods of filming and domestication. Method 1 was to film the filler with simulated domestic sewage, and then domesticate the biofilm by using the oil shale retorting wastewater diluted 20 times by the simulated domestic sewage; Method 2 directly used oil shale retorting wastewater diluted 20 times with simulated domestic sewage for continuous flow film domestication. The results showed that:in the same operation stage, the growth of biofilm in method 2 was better than that in method 1, and the biomass of method 1 and method 2 were 941 mg/L and 1628 mg/L respectively, on the 35 th day. From the perspective of nitrogen and carbon removal, the start-up and stable operation time of method 2 was shorter, and the treatment efficiency was also better than that of method 1; the biofacies and SEM images showed that compared with method 2, the biofilm structure in method 2 was more compact, and the arrangement of microorganisms was more closely and the number of microorganisms was lager. So directly adopting the oil shale retorting wastewater diluted 20 times with simulated domestic sewage to carry out continuous flow film domestication was proved to be the best starting method.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    KLEIN K,KATTEL E,GOI A,et al.Combined treatment of pyrogenic wastewater from oil shale retorting[J].Oil Shale,2017,34(1):82-96.
    [2]
    DYNI J R.Geology and resources of some world oil shale deposits[J].Oil Shale,2003,20(3):193-252.
    [3]
    MATOUQ M,ALAYED O,ALANBER Z,et al.Wastewater treatment resulting from an oil shale retorting at high frequency ultrasound waves with a chemical elemental analysis[J].Energy.Sources Part A,2010,32:1878-1884.
    [4]
    WARWICK D P,HACKLEY P C.Unconventional energy resources:2013 Review[J].Natural Resources Research,2014,23(1):19-98.
    [5]
    JIANG S Y,WANG W X,XUE X X,et al.Fungal diversity in major oil-shale mines in China[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2016,41:81-89.
    [6]
    KAMENEV I,MUNTER R,KEKISHEVA L P L.Wastewater treatment in oil shale chemical industry[J].Oil Shale,2003,20(4):443-457.
    [7]
    李文深,王彩旭,刘洁,等.我国页岩油组成及加工技术的研究进展[J].应用化工,2015,44(7):1318-1322.
    [8]
    HOU J L,LI S Y,QIAN J L,et al.Resurces and development status of Chinese oil shale[C]//34th Oil Shale Symposium,Colorado School of Mines:Golden,Colorado,2014.
    [9]
    GUAN X H,XU X H,LU M,et al.Pretreatment of oil shale retort wastewater by acidification and ferric-carbon micro-electrolysis[J].Energy Procedia,2012,17:1655-1661.
    [10]
    WANG H,LI H B,DU L N.Study on the treatment of oil shale retort wastewater by high performance compact reactor[J].Advanced Materials Research,2013,800:576-579.
    [11]
    全水清,刘晓舒.磷系混凝剂在油页岩干馏废水处理中的应用[J].南昌航空大学学报(自然科学版),2008,22(3):90-93.
    [12]
    肖丽光,周文权,曲艳迪.A/O-MBR工艺处理油页岩干馏废水的试验研究[J].工业用水与废水,2014,45(2):23-26.
    [13]
    李亮,陈文希,于鑫,等.电凝聚强化A/O-MBR处理油页岩废水研究[J].环境工程,2015,33(12):58-62.
    [14]
    关晓辉,孙丹,宋广亮,等.ABR处理油页岩干馏污水的试验研究[J].工业水处理,2009,29(6):32-35.
    [15]
    钱壁,陈晨,祝伟,等.膜吸收法去除油页岩干馏污水中的氨氮[J].油气田环境保护,2015,25(3):29-31

    ,45.
    [16]
    JENNIFER L S,WILLIAM S M'C,CLAUDIA K G,et al.Application of a moving bed biofilm reactor for tertiary ammonia treatment in high temperature industrial wastewater[J].Bioresource Technology,2012,112:51-60.
    [17]
    LEE W,KANG I,LEE C.Factors affectingfiltration characteristics in membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor[J].Water Research,2006,40:1827-1835.
    [18]
    KADIYA C,JAIME M,JOSÉ M,et al.Comparative analysis of the bacterial diversity in a lab-scale moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) applied to treat urban wastewater under different operational conditions[J].Bioresource Technology,2012,121:119-126.
    [19]
    LEYVA-DÍAZ J C,MARTÍN-PASCUAL J,GONZÁLEZ-LÓPEZ J,et al.Effects of scale-up on a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor for treating urban wastewater[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2013,104:808-816.
    [20]
    YOUSEF R,ALI T,NASER M,et al.Optimizing aeration rates for minimizing membrane fouling and its effect on sludge characteristics in a moving bed membrane bioreactor[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,186:1097-1102.
    [21]
    KRISTI B,MICHAEL W T,SUSAN J T.Successional development of biofilms in moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) systems treating municipal wastewater[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2014,98:1429-1440.
    [22]
    SCHNEIDER E E,CERQUEIRA A C F P,DEZOTTI M.MBBR evaluation for oil refinery wastewater treatment,with post-ozonation and BAC,for wastewater reuse[J].Water Science & Technology,2011,63(1):143-148.
    [23]
    张铁,朱晓云.载体移动床生物膜反应器(MBBR)在炼油废水处理工程中的研究与应用[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,34(6):146-148.
    [24]
    袁志宇,刘锋,陆大培.A/三级MBBR法处理炼油废水的中试研究[J].精细化工,2009,26(10):1016-1018.
    [25]
    ESCUDIÉ R,CRESSON R,DELGENÈS J P,et al.Control of start-up and operation of anaerobic biofilm reactors:an overview of 15 years of research[J].Water Research,2011,45(1):1-10.
    [26]
    李信仕.不同挂膜方式对移动床生物膜反应器启动的影响[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2012,28(5):921-926.
    [27]
    黄鹏.好氧移动床生物膜反应器处理PVC高温母液废水研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2007:36-37.
    [28]
    黄天寅.悬浮填料床的启动与挂膜机理研究[J].中国给水排水,2010,26(17):23-26

    ,30.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]DUAN Huabo, ZHOU Jijiao, ZHAO Nana, LAN Xiaofeng, ZHENG Ruiying, FU Xingrui, CHEN Ying, SUN Jianming. A DIGITAL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM FOR SUPPORTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CLASSIFICATION: AN APPLICATION CASE OF HUZHOU, ZHEJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 230-238. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402027
    [2]ZHU Yixin, YE Zhen, REN Lingwei, ZHONG Yuchi, ZHOU Wenjun. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION WASTE TO BURN CERAMICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 206-212,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312025
    [3]JIA Jinming, REN Fumin, HU Shuxin, GUO Changhong, LIU Junshi, MA Li, LU Tong, CUI Can, LIU Guotao, ZHANG Boyu. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION RISK ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IN MAJOR URBAN CLUSTERS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 98-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302014
    [4]ZHAO Tianrui, LIU Yiming, LÜ Pengzhao, LI Yanliang, TANG Xiaomi, GUO Wei, ZHANG Jun, TIAN Yu. CONSTRUCTION OF LightGBM WASTE PRODUCTION PREDICT MODEL IN A SCENARIO OF ZERO-WASTE CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 210-215. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303028
    [5]XU Chong-ping, YUE Qiang, ZHANG Yu-jie, WANG Huan-yu. EVALUATION OF OPTIMIZATION POTENTIAL OF URBAN METABOLIC SYSTEM DRIVEN BY “ZERO-WASTE CITY”: A CASE STUDY IN PANJIN, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209030
    [6]YANG Guodong, LAN Tian, SONG Mengzhu, DU Yufeng, LIU Mengdan, SONG Yingchun, JIANG Jianguo. ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF A DRY-WET PRESS SEPARATION-HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION TECHNOLOGY FOR FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 53-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212008
    [7]YANG Tao, LIU Peng-yu, XU Ya-qiang, CHEN Dai-jie, JING Mei-ying, CHU Xiao-he. PILOT STUDY ON TREATMENT OF ACARBOSE RESIDUE BY A MULTI-STAGE ANAEROBIC SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 123-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104019
    [8]YU Jin-tao, MA Xiao-yu, ZHANG Chang-bo. AN EFFICIENT SCREENING SYSTEM OF CLAY SOIL PARTICLES IN THE SOIL WASHING REMEDIATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 160-166. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106024
    [9]ZHAO Xi, WU Shan-shan, LU Ke-ding. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING CONSTRUCTION LEVEL IN OPERATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT PARK FOR ZERO-WASTE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 136-140,15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102022
    [10]YANG Shu-jun, ZHANG Chen, HE Jun, XIONG Jian-ying, LI Xue-ting, HUANG Xiao-wen. ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF NANOFILTRATION & THREE-LEVELS REDUCTION OF NANOFILTRATION CONCENTRATE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADVANCED TREATMENT OF LANDFILL LEACHATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 81-87,114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006013
    [11]WANG Ruo-fei, ZHANG Guang-zhi, WANG Ning, REN Fu-min, CHEN Rui, XI Cheng-gang. ANALYSIS ON DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE RELATED STANDARDS AND PATENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 27-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003005
    [12]QI Guo-ping, LI Wei-wei, NIU Yong-jian, NING Gao-yang, SUN Hong-wei. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON REDUCTION OF OXYTETRACYCLINE RESIDUE BY ALKALINITY OF NaOH’s DOSAGES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 140-144,151. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011023
    [13]ZENG Guang, LI Fang-fang, TANG Tang, LU Guan-you, LEI Guo-yuan. CONSTRUCTION WASTE REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY BASED ON CLEAN PRODUCTION CONCEPT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 138-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005024
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(25)

    1. 陈肖，陈峰. 基于HLCMEA-SWRELM的水体pH值预测. 计算机应用与软件. 2024(02): 123-129 .
    2. 王彩玲，张国浩. 结合光谱降维的IPSO-SVR水体总磷浓度预测模型. 水土保持通报. 2024(02): 196-204 .
    3. 杜先君，柴俊伟. 基于优化特征选择的污水处理过程BOD神经网络软测量模型. 兰州理工大学学报. 2024(06): 85-91 .
    4. 倪浩然，张坤，陈曦，白晓波，郑守磊. 基于遗传-支持向量回归算法的计量标准稳定性预测研究. 计量与测试技术. 2024(12): 102-105+108 .
    5. 胡龙元，刘黎志. 基于改进鲸鱼算法优化GRU-CNN的溶解氧预测. 环境工程学报. 2024(10): 2957-2964 .
    6. 杨坪宏，胡奥，崔东文，杨杰. 基于数据处理与若干群体算法优化的 GRU/LSTM水质时间序列预测. 水资源与水工程学报. 2023(04): 45-53 .
    7. 罗学刚，吕俊瑞. 基于张量特征-GRU和多头自注意力机制的水质预测模型方法. 攀枝花学院学报. 2023(05): 89-96 .
    8. 吴瑞姣. 基于BP-SVR混合模型的古田水库总磷浓度遥感反演. 福建地质. 2023(03): 224-230 .
    9. 许浩然，陈中举，杨兆前，房梦婷，詹炜. 基于Prophet模型的湖北省月降水量预测. 节水灌溉. 2022(02): 7-12+20 .
    10. 董陈超，田明昊，赵伟朝. 基于GA优化的RF-Softmax水质预测模型研究. 湖北农业科学. 2022(07): 60-65+82 .
    11. 王昱文，杜震洪，戴震，刘仁义，张丰. 基于复合神经网络的多元水质指标预测模型. 浙江大学学报(理学版). 2022(03): 354-362+375 .
    12. 石翠翠，刘媛华，陈昕. 基于粒子群算法优化支持向量回归的水质预测模型. 信息与控制. 2022(03): 307-317 .
    13. 李俊禹，刘书明，吴雪，谢涛，金晔. 基于动态剪枝的城市供水管网优化调度算法. 环境工程. 2022(06): 226-232+153 . 本站查看
    14. 白雯睿，杨毅强，朱雪芹. 基于VMDLSTNet的水质预测模型. 科学技术与工程. 2022(22): 9881-9889 .
    15. 史利涛. 基于数据挖掘的城市人居环境河流水质变化监测模型设计. 四川环境. 2022(04): 219-224 .
    16. 白雯睿，杨毅强，郭辉，朱雪芹. 基于VMD-CNN-LSTM的珠江流域水质多步预测模型研究. 四川轻化工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 66-74 .
    17. 白雯睿，杨毅强，李强. 引入小波分解的Seq2Seq水质多步预测模型研究. 现代电子技术. 2022(17): 100-105 .
    18. 盛家豪，钱进，王一桂，黄凤启. 基于GA-SVR的循环流化床锅炉床温预测. 智能计算机与应用. 2022(09): 105-109 .
    19. 凌从高，穆溪，许敏，王思晨，赵秋雨，江鹏. 湿地生态系统实际蒸散发数据驱动估算模型研究. 安徽农业大学学报. 2022(05): 771-779 .
    20. 曹斐，周彧，王春晓，任梦宇，周峰. 一种改进的支持向量回归的混凝土强度预测方法. 硅酸盐通报. 2021(01): 90-97 .
    21. 孟滔. 改进粒子群算法优化SVR水质预测模型研究. 农业与技术. 2021(03): 33-36 .
    22. 孟滔. 支持向量回归水质预测模型的研究进展. 绿色科技. 2021(08): 77-79 .
    23. 王旭生，王昕，孙晓川. 改进RVM预测海水水质. 计算机工程与设计. 2021(12): 3562-3568 .
    24. 梁小林，秦欢，陈敏茹，许奇，梁曌. 基于Adaboost-SVR模型的我国碳排放强度分析与预测. 经济数学. 2020(03): 167-174 .
    25. 何山，尹心安. 不同入流类型对生态流量管理效果的影响. 环境工程. 2020(10): 76-82 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(23)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.3 %FULLTEXT: 13.3 %META: 82.3 %META: 82.3 %PDF: 4.4 %PDF: 4.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.2 %其他: 16.2 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %Canton: 0.3 %Canton: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Dallas: 0.3 %Dallas: 0.3 %Macau: 0.6 %Macau: 0.6 %上海: 2.9 %上海: 2.9 %东莞: 4.1 %东莞: 4.1 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %北京: 5.0 %北京: 5.0 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南京市建邺区: 0.3 %南京市建邺区: 0.3 %南通: 0.9 %南通: 0.9 %台北: 0.6 %台北: 0.6 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %哈密尔顿: 0.3 %哈密尔顿: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %喀什: 0.3 %喀什: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大连: 1.2 %大连: 1.2 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %宿迁: 0.3 %宿迁: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %布兰普顿: 0.3 %布兰普顿: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %柳州: 0.3 %柳州: 0.3 %桂林: 0.3 %桂林: 0.3 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %永州: 1.5 %永州: 1.5 %江门: 0.3 %江门: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济源: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %深圳: 0.9 %深圳: 0.9 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %湘潭: 0.6 %湘潭: 0.6 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.6 %秦皇岛: 0.6 %绵阳: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.3 %肇庆: 0.6 %肇庆: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 25.7 %芒廷维尤: 25.7 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %荆州: 0.9 %荆州: 0.9 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %衢州: 1.2 %衢州: 1.2 %西宁: 7.7 %西宁: 7.7 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.7 %运城: 2.7 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 1.8 %郑州: 1.8 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %门尼菲: 0.6 %门尼菲: 0.6 %青岛: 0.9 %青岛: 0.9 %其他其他CantonChinaDallasMacau上海东莞临汾乌鲁木齐保定北京南京南京市建邺区南通台北台州哈密尔顿哈尔滨喀什嘉兴大同大连天津太原宁波安康宿迁密蘇里城布兰普顿常德广州张家口成都拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州柳州桂林武汉永州江门洛阳济源深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河石家庄秦皇岛绵阳肇庆芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州菏泽衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治门尼菲青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (133) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(48)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return