REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA

LIANG Jing; WANG Shi-jie; ZHANG Wen-yu; ZHANG Dan; ZHANG Yuan; ZOU Hui

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026

Volume 39 Issue 6

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2021 > 39(6): 173-178

LIANG Jing, WANG Shi-jie, ZHANG Wen-yu, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Yuan, ZOU Hui. REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 173-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026

Citation:

LIANG Jing, WANG Shi-jie, ZHANG Wen-yu, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Yuan, ZOU Hui. REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 173-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026

Citation:

PDF( 4644 KB)

REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026

LIANG Jing^1,2,
WANG Shi-jie^{1,2,3
,
,},
ZHANG Wen-yu^1,3,
ZHANG Dan^1,3,
ZHANG Yuan¹,
ZOU Hui¹

1. Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100037, China;
2. National Engineering Research Center for Urban Environmental Pollution Control, Beijing 100037, China;
3. Beijing Key Laboratory for Risk Modeling and Remediation of Contaminated Sites, Beijing 100037, China

Received Date: 2020-06-04
Available Online: 2022-01-18

Abstract

Abstract

Soil pollution becomes more and more serious in China, and this paper conducted a statistical analysis of 455 soil remediation projects since 2005-2019, and preliminarily expounded some characteristics, that is, the number of soil remediation projects is increasing and the main remediation methods are off-site method, accounting for 63% of the total projects. The mainstream remediation technologies are barrier/landfill(29%) and solidification/stabilization(18%). In contrast, in-situ remediation technology(54%) was the mainstream technology for site remediation technologies in the United States from 2005 to 2014, and most of them were soil vapor extraction, physical separation, solidification/stabilization, chemical remediation and bioremediation, among which the application of groundwater extraction treatment technology decreased year by year. Based on the developing tread in the USA, the remediation technologies in China was predicted to be mainly in-situ remediation.
- soil,
- groundwater,
- contaminated sites,
- remediation technology,
- trend

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	骆永明.中国污染场地修复的研究进展、问题与展望[J].环境监测管理与技术,2011,23(3):1-6.
[2]	刘阳生,李书鹏,邢轶兰,等.2019年土壤修复行业发展评述及展望[J].中国环保产业,2020(3):26-30.
[3]	串丽敏,郑怀国,赵同科,等.基于Web of Science数据库的土壤污染修复领域发展态势分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(1):12-20.
[4]	陈卫平,谢天,李笑诺,等.中国土壤污染防治技术体系建设思考[J].土壤学报,2018,55(3):557-568.
[5]	郭媛媛,江河,沈鹏.在我国土壤污染治理中推行"场地修复+"模式的思考与建议[J].环境与可持续发展,2019,44(4):126-129.
[6]	王泓泉.污染场地土壤修复技术对比分析[J].资源节约与环保,2019,8:32-33.
[7]	国家统计局,环境保护部.中国环境年鉴(1996-2010)[M].北京:中国统计出版社.
[8]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.中国城市建设统计年鉴(2007-2016)[M].北京:中国统计出版社.
[9]	环境保护部,国土资源部.全国土壤污染状况调查公报[EB/OL].http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/qt/201404/t20140417_270670.htm.2014-04-17.
[10]	许春娅.工业污染场地土壤修复技术研究[J].资源节约与环保,2019(3):99.
[11]	MAO G Z,SHI T T,ZHANG S,et al.Bibliometric analysis of insights into soil remediation[J].Journal of Soil & Sediments,2018,18(7):2520-2534.
[12]	王艳伟,李书鹏,康绍果,等.中国工业污染场地修复发展状况分析[J].环境工程,2017,35(10):175-178.
[13]	US EPA.Superfund Remedy Report Fifth Edition[M].Washington DC:Office of Land and Emergency Management,2017.
[14]	刘士文,刘阳.污染场地的土壤修复与治理[J].区域治理,2020(1):148-150.
[15]	TENG Y,CHEN W.Soil microbiomes-a promising strategy for contaminated soil remediation:a review[J].Pedosphere,2019,29(3):283-297.
[16]	SHI Z M,LIU J H,TANG Z W,et al.Vermiremediation of organically contaminated soils:concepts,current status,and future perspectives[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2020,147:103377.
[17]	CAROLINE V,ADAN W D S T,ADELI B B,et al.Application of life cycle assessment as a tool for evaluating the sustainability of contaminated sites remediation:a systematic and bibliographic analysis[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,672:893-905.
[18]	ANDERSON R,NORRMAN J,BACK P E,et al.What's the point?The contribution of a sustainability view in contaminated site remediation[J].Science of The Total Environment,2018,630:103-116.
[19]	ADELI B B,ADAN W D S T,CAROLINE V,et al.Relevance of sustainable remediation to contaminated sites manage in developed and developing countries:case of Brazil[J].Land Use Policy,2020,94:104533.
[20]	MA Y,DONG B B,BAI Y Y,et al.Remediation status and practices for contaminated sites in China:survey-based analysis[J].Environmental Science & Pollution Research,2018,25(33):33216-33224.
[21]	KUPPUSAMY S,THAVAMANI P,VENKATESWARLU K,et al.Remediation approaches for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soils:technological constraints,emerging trends and future directions[J].Chemosphere,2017,168:944-968.
[22]	陈卫平,谢天,李笑诺,等.欧美发达国家场地土壤污染防治技术体系概述[J].土壤学报,2018,55(3):527-542.
[23]	US EPA.Superfund Remedy Report Fourth Edition[M].Wangshington DC:Office of Land and Emergency Management,2014.