WATER PURIFICATION EFFICIENCY OF SHALE GAS FLOWBACK WATER BY COAGULATION-OZONE/ADSORPTION-UF-RO COMBINED PROCESS

BAI Yu-hua; SUN Yu; WU Ming-huo; ZHOU Yun; TANG Huai-bin; ZENG Yan; LIU Bai-cang

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202107015

Volume 39 Issue 7

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2021 > 39(7): 122-127

BAI Yu-hua, SUN Yu, WU Ming-huo, ZHOU Yun, TANG Huai-bin, ZENG Yan, LIU Bai-cang. WATER PURIFICATION EFFICIENCY OF SHALE GAS FLOWBACK WATER BY COAGULATION-OZONE/ADSORPTION-UF-RO COMBINED PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 122-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107015

Citation:

BAI Yu-hua, SUN Yu, WU Ming-huo, ZHOU Yun, TANG Huai-bin, ZENG Yan, LIU Bai-cang. WATER PURIFICATION EFFICIENCY OF SHALE GAS FLOWBACK WATER BY COAGULATION-OZONE/ADSORPTION-UF-RO COMBINED PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 122-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107015

Citation:

BAI Yu-hua, SUN Yu, WU Ming-huo, ZHOU Yun, TANG Huai-bin, ZENG Yan, LIU Bai-cang. WATER PURIFICATION EFFICIENCY OF SHALE GAS FLOWBACK WATER BY COAGULATION-OZONE/ADSORPTION-UF-RO COMBINED PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 122-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107015

PDF( 1665 KB)

WATER PURIFICATION EFFICIENCY OF SHALE GAS FLOWBACK WATER BY COAGULATION-OZONE/ADSORPTION-UF-RO COMBINED PROCESS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107015

1. Infrastructure Construction Department, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China;
2. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;
3. Safety and Environmental Protection Quality Supervision and Testing Research Institute, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Co., Ltd, Guanghan 618300, China;
4. School of Ocean Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;
5. Chengdu Drainage Co., Ltd, Chengdu 610052, China

Received Date: 2020-12-03
Available Online: 2022-01-18

Abstract

Abstract

Some low molecular weight organics, such as dimethylbenzylamine(DMBA), indoline and 6-methylquinoline are difficult to remove from shale gas flowback water(SGFW). The combined process of coagulation-ozonation/adsorption-UF-RO was used to treat the SGFW to explore organic and inorganic components' removal efficiency. The results showed that:the removal rates of ions by coagulation-ozone-UF-RO combination process were 96.7~99.86%, the removal rates of DOC and UV₂₅₄ were 98.7% and 99.13%, and the removal rates of DMBA, indoline and 6-methylquinoline were 82.02%, 98.02% and 97.67%; the removal rates of ions by coagulation-adsorption-UF-RO combination process were 95.99~99.86%, and the removal rates of DOC and UV₂₅₄ were 95.99%~99.86%, the removal rates of DMBA, indoline and 6-methylquinoline were 70.19%, 94.70% and 87.93%. Coagulation-ozonation/adsorption-UF-RO process could effectively remove ions, DOC and UV₂₅₄ in the effluent, and has significant removal effect on DMBA, indoline and 6-methylquinoline. The combined process could effectively ensure the external reuse of SGFW.
- shale gas flowback water,
- coagulation-ozone/adsorption-UF-RO combined process,
- water quality parameters,
- organic compounds

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	KARGBO D M,WILHELM R G,CAMPBELL D J.Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale:challenges and potential opportunities[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2010,44:5679-5684.
[2]	QIN Y,EDWARDS R,TONG F,et al.Can Switching from Coal to Shale Gas Bring Net Carbon Reductions to China?[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(5):2554-2562.
[3]	SHAFFER D L,CHAVEZ L H A,BEN-SASSON M,et al.Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water:drivers,technologies,and future directions[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2013,47(17):9569-9583.
[4]	JACKSON R B,VENGOSH A,CAREY J W,et al.The environmental costs and benefits of fracking[J].Annual Review of Environment and Resources,2014,39:327-362.
[5]	OLSSON O,WEICHGREBE D,ROSENWINKEL K H.Hydraulic fracturing wastewater in Germany:composition,treatment,concerns[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,70(8):3895-3906.
[6]	ESTRADA J M,BHAMIDIMARRI R.A review of the issues and treatment options for wastewater from shale gas extraction by hydraulic fracturing[J].Fuel,2016,182:292-303.
[7]	BARBOT E,VIDIC N S,GREGORY K B,et al.Spatial and temporal correlation of water quality parameters of produced waters from Devonian-Age shale following hydraulic fracturing[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2013,47(6):2562-2569.
[8]	ROSENBLUM J,THURMAN E M,FERRER I,et al.Organic chemical characterization and mass balance of a hydraulically fractured well:from fracturing fluid to produced water over 405 days[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(23):14006-14015.
[9]	KONG F X,CHEN J F,WANG H M,et al.Application of coagulation-UF hybrid process for shale gas fracturing flowback water recycling:performance and fouling analysis[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2017,524:460-469.
[10]	BUTKOVSKYI A,BRUNING H,KOOLS S A E,et al.Organic pollutants in shale gas flowback and produced waters:identification,potential ecological impact,and implications for treatment strategies[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(9):4740-4754.
[11]	HE C,WANG X H,LIU W S,et al.Microfiltration in recycling of Marcellus Shale flowback water:solids removal and potential fouling of polymeric microfiltration membranes[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2014,462:88-95.
[12]	GREGORY K B,VIDIC R D,DZOMBAK D A.Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing[J].Elements,2009,7(3):181-186.
[13]	PIEMONTEA V,PRISCIANDAROB M,MASCISA L,et al.Reverse osmosis membranes for treatment of produced water:a process analysis[J].Desalination and Water Treatment,2015,55(3):565-574.
[14]	XIONG B,ZYDNEY A L,KUMAR M.Fouling of microfiltration membranes by flowback and produced waters from the Marcellus shale gas play[J].Water Research,2016,99:162-170.
[15]	BUTKOVSKYI A,FABER A H,WANG Y,et al.Removal of organic compounds from shale gas flowback water[J].Water Research,2018,138:47-55.
[16]	LESTER Y,FERRER I,THURMAN E M,et al.Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado:implications for water treatment[J].Science of The Total Environment,2015,512/513:637-644.
[17]	CHANG H Q,LIU B C,YANG B X,et al.An integrated coagulation-ultrafiltration-nanofiltration process for internal reuse of shale gas flowback and produced water[J].Separation and Purification Technology,2019,211:310-321.
[18]	HAO H W,HUANG X,GAO C J,et al.Application of an integrated system of coagulation and electrodialysis for treatment of wastewater produced by fracturing[J].Desalination and Water Treatment,2014,55(8):2034-2043.
[19]	JIANG Q Y,RENTSCHLER J,PERRONE R,et al.Application of ceramic membrane and ion-exchange for the treatment of the flowback water from Marcellus shale gas production[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2013,431:55-61.
[20]	GUO C,CHANG H Q,LIU B C,et al.A combined ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis process for external reuse of Weiyuan shale gas flowback and produced water[J].Environmental Science:Water Research & Technology,2018,4(7):942-955.
[21]	SHANG W,TIRAFERRI A,HE Q,et al.Reuse of shale gas flowback and produced water:effects of coagulation and adsorption on ultrafiltration,reverse osmosis combined process[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,689:47-56.
[22]	TANG P,LIU B C,ZHANG Y L,et al.Sustainable reuse of shale gas wastewater by pre-ozonation with ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2020,392:123743.
[23]	CHANG H Q,QU F S,LIU B C,et al.Hydraulic irreversibility of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acid:effects of membrane properties and backwash water composition[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2015,493:723-733.
[24]	WANG J L,BAI Z Y.Fe-based catalysts for heterogeneous catalytic ozonation of emerging contaminants in water and wastewater[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2017,312:79-98.
[25]	BELLONA C,DREWES J E,XU P,et al.Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment:a literature review[J].Water Research,2004,38(12):2795-2809.

Relative Articles

[1]	XU Jiarui, LIU Hao, LUAN Weihao, WANG Chao, LIU Changqing, YANG Yandong. ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER BY IRON-MODIFIED ACTIVATED CARBON FROM SECONDARY EFFLUENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 67-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403008
[2]	HU Yuanxiang, LI Yongli, ZHANG Hongjiang, CAO Yinhuan, GONG Yanzhe, CHEN Xi. ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS CONTENT AND BIOTOXICITY DURING TREATMENT PROCESS OF FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION WASTEWATER IN A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 17-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406003
[3]	SUN Lihua, DENG Si, ZHU Junyao, WANG Chunfang, ZHANG Muxi. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF OPPORTUNISTIC PATHOGENS AND ORGANIC MATTERS IN SECONDARY EFFLUENT BY SLOW FILTRATION WITH BIOFILM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 17-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403002
[4]	LI Xuxia, WANG Yudong, XIAO Youpeng, XU Xu, WANG Haipeng, CHEN Yimeng, LIN Junchuan, HUANG Guisong, HUANG Zhenguo, SUN Ping, MAI Youquan, YANG Shangbo, XU Wang. QUALITY MONITORING OF SHENZHEN’S COASTAL WATERS BY SATELLITE AND ITS SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 243-252. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401031
[5]	CHEN Zhengrui, ZHANG Shi, XIAO Mengyuan, YIN Linlin, DONG Jiankai, ZHANG Jun, WANG Shutao. MINERALIZATION MECHANISM OF ORGANIC MATTER IN THE PROCESS OF HEAP FERMENTATION IN A WASTE STORAGE PIT OF AN INCINERATION POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 92-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305013
[6]	XU Ziqi, YAN Zhong, GE Yanju, WEI Quanyuan, HUANG Bo. OPTIMIZATION OF TECHNICAL PARAMETERS OF MECHANICAL ENHANCED RAPID COMPOSTING TECHNOLOGY FOR ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 159-163,142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208022
[7]	LEI Ruo-yuan, LIU Yu, YU Wan-ning, MOU Jing-qiu, GAI Xin-lei. KINETICS OF ATMOSPHERIC AQUEOUS-PHASE OXIDATION OF REPRESENTATIVE PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS EMITTED FROM BIOMASS BURNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 54-62,172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209007
[8]	LI Anna, WANG Hui, LIU Qiangnan, LI Taiping. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL POLLUTANTS IN AN EXPLOSION SITE OF A CHEMICAL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 189-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211027
[9]	ZHANG Qiuying, LI Liang, BIAN Di. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTERS ON ANAMMOX REACTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 190-195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201028
[10]	LIU Shuai, ZHANG Ya-ni, XUE Ming, CUI Xiang-yu, LI Bing, LI Jun-hua. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON ADSORPTION MATERIALS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 79-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106013
[16]	Zhu Dongbo, Li Lingmi, Li Xinhong, Liu Yupeng, Sun Guogang, Zhou Xin. RESEARCH ON ADSORPTION OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS BY HYDROPHOBIC SiO2 AEROGEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 25-28. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503006
[17]	Liu Qiang, Zhao Taixin, Zhao Changshuang, Yan Meng. MICRO-POLLUTED LAKE WATER TREATMENT BY A FLOTATION/POROUS BALL/MEMBRANE INTEGRATED PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 11-14. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501003