Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
GAO Jia-le, LE Hao, GE Xin-lei. MOBILE MEASUREMENT OF AMBIENT VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN THE JIANGBEI CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL PARK OF NANJING, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 89-95,100. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101013
Citation: DENG Yun, WANG Fei. EXTRACTION OF HUMIC ACID AND BLACK CARBON AND THEIR ADSORPTION BEHAVIORS FOR PHENANTHRENE AND PYRENE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 88-92,107. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108011

EXTRACTION OF HUMIC ACID AND BLACK CARBON AND THEIR ADSORPTION BEHAVIORS FOR PHENANTHRENE AND PYRENE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108011
  • Received Date: 2020-09-27
    Available Online: 2022-01-18
  • In this study, humic acid and black carbon were firstly extracted from river sediments, then characterized and analyzed by element analyzer, total organic carbon meter, scanning electron microscope and Zeta potential meter. The distribution behaviors of phenanthrene and pyrene, representative substances of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on humic acid and black carbon were studied, and their distribution coefficients were determined, as well as the influence of Ca2+ concentration on the adsorption of phenanthrene and pyrene were investigated. The results showed that the main elemental composition of humic acid and black carbon extracted from river sediments were carbon and oxygen, both of which contained relatively rich aromatic hydrocarbon components; aquatic plants were the main contributors of the source of humic acid and black carbon; humic acid had a foamed floc structure, and black carbon had a microporous structure; the negative charge on the surface of black carbon particles was relatively less than that of humic acid, so the repulsive force between the black carbon and pollutants was weaker. The above characterization results correspondingly provided theoretical basis for the adsorption capacity of black carbon higher than that of humic acid. The logarithmic value (lg Kd) of the partition coefficient of phenanthrene and pyrene on humic acid were 3.55 and 4.55, respectively, and that on black carbon were 4.57 and 5.35, respectively, which showed that the absorption amount of pyrene on unit mass of humic acid or black carbon was higher than that of phenanthrene; the adsorption amount of phenanthrene and pyrene on the humic acid and black carbon also showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing with the increase of Ca2+ concentration.
  • [1]
    付绪金,贾克力,史小红,等.乌梁素海沉积物腐殖质的组成及分布特征[J].湖泊科学,2013,25(4):489-496.
    [2]
    CORNELISSEN G,GUSTAFSSON O,BUCHELI T D,et al.Extensive sorption of organic compounds to black carbon,coal,and kerogen in sediments and soils:mechanisms and consequences for distribution,bioaccumulation,and biodegradation[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2005,39:6881-6895.
    [3]
    陈利芳,仇鑫,王炼,等.富里酸对黑炭吸附去除水溶液中Cr(Ⅵ)的影响研究[J].广州化工,2019,47(20):90-92

    ,95.
    [4]
    LIAN F,XING B S.Black carbon (biochar) in water/soil environments:molecular structure,sorption,stability,and potential risk[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(23):13517-13532.
    [5]
    陈利芳,王炼,朱强,等.水中Cr(Ⅵ)在不同性质黑炭上的吸附行为研究[J].广州化工,2020,48(3):66-68

    ,105.
    [6]
    张康.污泥腐植酸对Cd2+和Pb2+的吸附性能研究[D].兰州:兰州交通大学,2019.
    [7]
    林薇.黑炭负载零价铁耦合铬还原菌修复铬污染土壤[D].包头:内蒙古科技大学,2019.
    [8]
    王山,王翠萍,吴国强,等.金纳米膜顶空固相萃取-表面增强拉曼光谱法快速检测挥发性多环芳烃[J].分析试验室,2020,39(8):880-884.
    [9]
    阳杰,杜保森.活化过硫酸钠修复多环芳烃污染土壤效果研究[J].广州化工,2020,48(14):88-90.
    [10]
    胡高峰,蔡克周,李雨竹,等.食品加工过程中多环芳烃生成的影响因素及控制研究进展[J].食品研究与开发,2020,41(14):196-201.
    [11]
    蓝家程,孙玉川,王尊波,等.重庆典型岩溶地区地下水多环芳烃污染水平及健康风险[J].环境监测管理与技术,2020,32(4):29-33.
    [12]
    SONG J Z,PENG P A,HUANG W L.Black carbon and kerogen in soils and sediments.1.Quantification and characterization[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2002,36:3960-3967.
    [13]
    CHEN Y T,ZHAO J P,YIN L Q,et al.Quantification,morphology and source of humic acid,kerogen and black carbon in offshore marine sediments from Xiamen Gulf,China[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2013,25:287-294.
    [14]
    罗固源,朱虹,许晓毅,等.嘉陵江重庆段沉积物中腐植酸的特性研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2011,31(6):1663-1669.
    [15]
    BELZILE N,JOLY H A,LI H B.Characterization of humic substances extracted from Canadian lake sediments[J].Canadian Journal of Chemistry,1997,75(1):14-27.
    [16]
    MEYERS P A,ISHIWATARI R.Lacustrine organic geochemistry:an overview of indicators of organic matter sources and diagenesis in lake sediments[J].Organic Geochemistry,1993,20:867-900.
    [17]
    XU D P,ZHU S Q,CHEN H,et al.Structural characterization of humic acids isolated from typical soils in China and their adsorption characteristics to phenanthrene[J].Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,2006,276(1/2/3):1-7.
    [18]
    XIAO X M,LIU D D,YAN Y J,et al.Preparation of activated carbon from Xinjiang region coal by microwave activation and its application in naphthalene,phenanthrene,and pyrene adsorption[J].Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers,2015,53:160-167.
    [19]
    JIE B,GABRIEL L,CHUANDAYANI G G,et al.Desulfurization of diesel fuels by selective adsorption on activated carbons:Competitive adsorption of polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2011,166:207-217.
    [20]
    CHEN J Y,ZHU D Q,SUN C.Effect of heavy metals on the sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds to wood charcoal[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2007,41(7):2536-2541.
    [21]
    罗雪梅,刘昌明.离子强度对土壤与沉积物吸附多环芳烃的影响研究[J].生态环境学报,2006,15(5):983-987.
    [22]
    LEE C L,KUO L J,WANG H L,et al.Effects of ionic strength on the binding of phenanthrene and pyrene to humic substances:three-stage variation model[J].Water Research,2003,37:4250-4258.
    [23]
    李在钟,孙群,朱虹,等.嘉陵江底泥对多环芳烃的吸附行为及其影响因素研究[J].三峡环境与生态,2012,34(1):31-36.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]GUO Xiang, GUO Xinchao, XIONG Jiaqing, ZHOU Jiajia. Effect of DO and C/N on nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiency of A2/O-MBR at low temperature[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 118-124. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501013
    [2]LI Zhenhua. AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON HIGH EFFICIENCY INTERCEPTION AND PURIFICATION FOR URBAN RAINWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 108-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412014
    [3]XU Huayi, LI Shanwei, WEI Jing, ZHOU Xiangtong, WU Zhiren. STUDY ON OXYGEN SUPPLY CONDITION AND INFLUENCE OF ALGAL IN PARTIAL NITRIFICATION PROCESS IN A BACTERIA AND ALGAE SYMBIOTIC SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 42-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405006
    [4]WANG Xiaoyan, LIANG Meisheng, ZHANG Tong, CHEN Xi, LI Long. IN-SITU PREPARATION OF Cu/Al MODIFIED MCM-41 MOLECULAR SIEVE CATALYST AND ITS DEOXYGENATION PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 192-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307026
    [5]SHI Xiaobei. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON IRON ENHANCED ANAEROBIC AMMONIA OXIDATION REACTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 231-236. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305030
    [6]ZHANG Qi, WANG Ya'e, LI Jie, XIE Huina, LI Yuanyi. EFFECT OF DISSOLVED OXYGEN ON CORROSION OF SPONGE IRON IN BIOLOGICAL SPONGE IRON SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 60-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302009
    [7]LI Geng, LI Haibo, LI Yinghua, CHEN Xi. SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION OF As IN SOIL USING BIOCHAR LOADED WITH FERRIC MANGANESE BINARY OXIDES(FMBO)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 118-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203018
    [8]JING Yu-shu, MOU Run-zhi, JIANG Yi-ming, LIU Zhang-qing, YANG Yan-dong. REDUCING ENERGY AND CHEMICALS CONSUMPTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS BY ACCURATE AERATION CONTROL: A CASE STUDY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 141-145,165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205020
    [9]CHEN Yanxu, CHENG Yan, HE Huijun, ZHU Zongqiang, ZHANG Lihao, ZHU Yinian. ATRAZINE REMOVAL FROM WATER BY MOSO BAMBOO BASED Fe-Co/C COMPOSITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 38-44,73. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203007
    [10]LIU Si-xuan, LI Yi-ping, ZHU Ya, TANG Chun-yan, WEI Yao, LI Rong-hui, CHEN Gang. MIGRATION OF IRON, MANGANESE AND SULFIDE IN BLACK RESERVOIR WATER IN SOUTH CHINA: A CASE STUDY OF TIANBAO RESERVOIR, NANNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 78-84. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110011
    [11]LI Pei-pei, ZHOU Yu-zhou, XIANG Yu-jia, ZHOU Yao-yu, ZHU Hong-mei, RONG Xiang-min. ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE OF P-ARSANILIC ACID IN AQUEOUS SOLUTION BY BIOCHAR SUPPORTED MANGANESE FERRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 75-79,86. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001011
    [12]CHEN Mei-feng, LI Xin-li, YANG Pei-lin, LUO Qian, QIN Fan-xin. STABILIZATION OF AS CONTAMINATED SOILS BY MODIFIED NANO-TITANIUM DIOXIDE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 222-227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010035
    [18]INFLUENCES OF DO AND AERATION TIME ON DENITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE OF AEROBIC DENITRIFYING BACTERIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 62-64. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412010
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 常喜萍,薛一刚,童立信,刘安宁. 涂装尾气沸石转轮吸附+CO催化燃烧系统. 设备管理与维修. 2024(01): 174-176 .
    2. 张艳艳,郭进,陆建华. 大型船舶涂装车间VOCs排放控制数值模拟. 化工管理. 2024(15): 69-72 .
    3. 张嘉妮,肖海麟,刘鹏,黄皓旻,范丽雅,叶代启. 挥发性有机物治理技术评估与展望. 环境工程. 2023(09): 54-60 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.6 %FULLTEXT: 8.6 %META: 88.6 %META: 88.6 %PDF: 2.7 %PDF: 2.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.4 %其他: 21.4 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东莞: 0.9 %东莞: 0.9 %保定: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %信阳: 1.4 %信阳: 1.4 %北京: 1.4 %北京: 1.4 %十堰: 3.2 %十堰: 3.2 %南京: 3.6 %南京: 3.6 %南宁: 0.9 %南宁: 0.9 %南通: 0.5 %南通: 0.5 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %合肥: 0.9 %合肥: 0.9 %大同: 0.9 %大同: 0.9 %大连: 0.9 %大连: 0.9 %天津: 4.5 %天津: 4.5 %宜春: 0.5 %宜春: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 1.4 %常德: 1.4 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 2.7 %张家口: 2.7 %成都: 1.4 %成都: 1.4 %扬州: 2.7 %扬州: 2.7 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %湛江: 1.8 %湛江: 1.8 %漯河: 4.1 %漯河: 4.1 %玉溪: 0.5 %玉溪: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芝加哥: 2.7 %芝加哥: 2.7 %衡阳: 0.9 %衡阳: 0.9 %西宁: 8.2 %西宁: 8.2 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 1.8 %贵阳: 1.8 %资阳: 1.4 %资阳: 1.4 %运城: 2.3 %运城: 2.3 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 1.4 %重庆: 1.4 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %其他其他上海东莞保定信阳北京十堰南京南宁南通台州合肥大同大连天津宜春常州常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州温州湛江漯河玉溪石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥衡阳西宁西安贵阳资阳运城遵义郑州重庆长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (120) PDF downloads(4) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return