Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 8
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(8): 211-216
HAN Xu, CHEN Jie, SUN Shou-jun, XU Xiao-lu, SHI Wei-lin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH RISK IN THE RESIDUAL SITE OF DYE FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 211-216. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108029
Citation: HAN Xu, CHEN Jie, SUN Shou-jun, XU Xiao-lu, SHI Wei-lin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH RISK IN THE RESIDUAL SITE OF DYE FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 211-216. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108029
shu

POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH RISK IN THE RESIDUAL SITE OF DYE FACTORY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108029

  • 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China;

  • 2. Suzhou Yifante Environmental Co., Ltd, Suzhou 215101, China;

  • 3. Suzhou Science and Technology City Technology Innovation Service Center, Suzhou 215163, China;

  • 4. College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 310015, China

  • Received Date: 2020-03-18
    Available Online: 2022-01-18
    Abstract
  • Taking the leftover plot after the relocation of an abandoned dye factory in Jiangsu Province as the research object, the Nemero comprehensive pollution index method was used to assess the pollution degree of organic pollutants on the site, and the kriging interpolation method in Surfer software was used to simulate and analyze the spatial distribution of health risks of organic pollution factors. The results showed that the main pollutants exceeding standard in this site were chloroform and benzo (a) pyrene. The production workshop was the main polluted area. The maximum depth exceeding the standard was 12 m. Benzo (a) pyrene had a high carcinogenic risk to the exposed people in 1.5 m and 3.0 m deep soils, and chloroform had a high carcinogenic risk in 6 m and 12 m deep soils, but their hazard quotients in each layer were less than 1, so the site soil needed to be repaired before development and utilization.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(22)
  • [1]
    周友亚,颜增光,周光辉,等.制定场地土壤风险评价筛选值中关注污染物的预筛选方法[J].环境工程技术学报,2011,1(3):264-269.
    [2]
    郭观林,王世杰,施烈焰,等.某废弃化工场地VOC/SVOC污染土壤健康风险分析[J].环境科学,2010,31(2):397-402.
    [3]
    CHEN M F.Analytical integration procedures for the derivation of risk-based generic assessment criteria for soil[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment:an International Journal,2010,16(6):1295-1317.
    [4]
    KHILLARE P S,HASAN A,SARKAR S.Accumulation and risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and trace metals in tropical urban soils[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2014,186(5):2907-2923.
    [5]
    张浩,王济,曾希柏,等.城市土壤重金属污染及其生态环境效应[J].环境监测管理与技术,2010,22(2):11-18.
    [6]
    沈桢,张建荣,郑家传.某化工厂致癌有机污染物分层健康风险评估[J].环境监测管理与技术,2015,27(2):31-34

    ,66.
    [7]
    房吉敦,杜晓明,李政,等.某复合型化工污染场地分地层健康风险评估[J].环境工程技术学报,2013,3(5):451-457.
    [8]
    史开宇,颜湘华,范琴,等.铬污染场地渣土混合物的化学还原修复[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(4):213-218.
    [9]
    李亚娇,张静玉,李家科.有机污染场地微生物修复研究进展[J].环境监测管理与技术,2019,31(2):1-5.
    [10]
    沈宗泽,陈有鑑,李书鹏,等.异位热脱附技术与设备在我国污染场地修复工程中的应用[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(9):2060-2073.
    [11]
    张倩,谷庆宝.工业企业搬迁遗留场地环境风险管理对策[J].环境影响评价,2015(1):10-14.
    [12]
    生态环境部.土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 36600-2018[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2018.
    [13]
    YU H Y,LI T J,LIU Y,et al.Spatial distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in urban soil of China[J].Chemosphere,2019,230:498-509.
    [14]
    国家环境保护总局.土壤环境监测技术规范:HJ/T 166-2004[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2005.
    [15]
    唐功政,刘国栋,高润青,等.利用单因子污染指数与内梅罗综合指数进行土壤重金属污染程度评级[J].科技风,2019(13):125-126.
    [16]
    生态环境部.建设用地土壤污染风险评估技术导则:HJ 25.3-2019[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2019.
    [17]
    陈静,王学军,陶澍,等.天津地区土壤多环芳烃在剖面中的纵向分布特征[J].环境科学学报,2004,24(2):286-290.
    [18]
    Risk assessment in the federal government:managing the process[Z].Washington,D.C:National Academy,1983.
    [19]
    徐剑生.某医药工业污染场地健康风险评估研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2019.
    [20]
    翟进乾.克里金(kriging)插值方法在煤层分布检测中的应用研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2008.
    [21]
    林永燊.基于地球物理多信息的三维城市地质与环境数据库的建立[D].武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2008.
    [22]
    罗飞,宋静,潘云雨,等.典型滴滴涕废弃生产场地污染土壤的人体健康风险评估研究[J].土壤学报,2012,49(1):26-35.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Guiyun, SANG Chunhui, XIAO Meng, NIE Yuxin, YANG Xintong, ZHANG Hongzhen, LI Xianglan. Environmental footprint analysis for contaminated soil remediation in paper mill based on SEFA tool[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 80-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501009
    [2]HE Guofu, CHEN Min, GU Jiayan, CAI Jingli, XIE Liping, XUE Wenjin, HU Yingying. Research progress of carbon capture technology in sewage treatment based on CiteSpace metrological analysis[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 70-79. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501008
    [3]NIU Jianmin, ZANG Chong, WANG Zhenghua, ZHOU Min, PAN Wenjie, LI Hongyan. ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF ENHANCED ROOM TEMPERATURE DESORPTION IN REMEDIATION OF SOIL CONTAMINATED BY CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 107-113. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405014
    [4]WANG Biyun, SUN Ailin, XU Xuehuang. STRATEGIES AND PROJECT CASE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS RENEWAL AND REFORMATION FOR THE DUAL-CARBON GOAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 81-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411009
    [5]MA Yuanyuan, WU Yang, WANG Puchun, CHEN Yinguang, ZHENG Xiong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON ANAEROBIC CO-FERMENTATION OF WASTE-ACTIVATED SLUDGE TO PRODUCE ACID UNDER THE GOAL OF LOW CARBON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 102-109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401014
    [6]LI Shefeng, DU Shaoxia, BAO Shenxu, YAN Shuiping, LIU Ziyang. BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT TREND DISCUSSION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY IN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 329-336,342. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312041
    [7]CHEN Wenhao, YUAN Huizhou, KE Shuizhou, LIU Xiaoming. ANALYSIS OF CARBON OFFSET AND ENERGY RECOVERY POTENTIAL OF DIFFERENT FOOD WASTE RESOURCE DISPOSAL METHODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 37-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307006
    [8]XIE Chengcheng, LIU Gang. ROAD MAP FOR CUSTRUCTING CARBON NEUTRAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 181-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309022
    [9]DING Yi, YIN Jian, JIANG Hongtao, XIA Ruici, WEI Danqi, LUO Xinyuan. SYSTEM DYNAMICS PREDICTION OF CARBON PEAKING IN PEARL RIVER DELTA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 22-29. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307004
    [10]REN Hongyang, DU Ruolan, XIE Guilin, JIN Wenhui, LI Xi, DENG Yuanpeng, MA Wei, WANG Bing. RESEARCH STATUS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION METHODS OF CARBON EMISSIONS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 195-203,244. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310023
    [11]CHEN Zhikang, LIU Liujun, YIN Lipu, YUE Rui, MAO Xuhui. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING FOR SOIL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 224-234,243. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204032
    [12]WU Baimiao, ZHANG Yimei, LI Shuai, GUO Wenjin, GUO Xiaoqian, WANG Senyao, LIANG Xi, GENG Xuewen. COMPREHENSIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON CARBON NEUTRALIZATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS BASED ON HYBRID LCA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 130-137. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206017
    [13]WANG Mu, SONG Junjie, XIE Ronghuan, LI Weiping, LIU Guijian. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF H2O2 OXIDATION COUPLED WITH CHEMICAL WASHING TO REMEDY CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED CLAYED SOIL FROM AN ELECTROPLATE FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 125-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208017
    [14]ZHAO Jinhui, LI Jingshun, WANG Panle, HOU Gaojie. A STUDY ON CARBON PEAKING PATHS IN HENAN, CHINA BASED ON LASSO REGRESSION-BP NEURAL NETWORK MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 151-156,164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212020
    [15]DONG Jin-chi, WANG Xu-ying, CAI Bo-feng, WANG Jin-nan, LIU Hui, YANG Lu, XIA Chu-yu, LEI Yu. MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST FOR IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 23-31,40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110004
    [16]LIU Hui, CAI Bo-feng, ZHANG Li, WANG Zhen, CHEN Yang, XIA Chu-yu, YANG Lu, DONG Jin-chi, SONG Xiao-hui. RESEARCH ON CARBON DIOXIDE ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES AND COST IN CHINA'S POWER INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 8-14. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110002
    [17]HUANG Kai-you, SHEN Ying-jie, WANG Xiao-yan, WANG Xing-run, YUAN Wen-yi, ZHANG Cheng-long, BAI Jian-feng, WANG Jing-wei. REVIEW ON PREPARATION OF BIO-CARBON LOADED NANO ZERO-VALENT IRON AND ITS APPLICATION IN REMEDIATING Cr(Ⅵ)-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 203-210,195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011033
    [18]CUI Xiu-zhen, XU Shao-dong, GAO Han-bo, WANG Jun-xia, CAI Bo-feng. REFERENCE OF URBAN AIR POLLUTANTS EMISSION PATH FOR CARBON EMISSION PEAKING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 39-43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011007
    [19]YANG Nan, LI Yan-xia, LV Chen, ZHAO Meng, LIU Zhong-liang, LIU Hao. CARBON EMISSION ACCOUNTING AND PEAK FORECASTING OF IRON & STEEL INDUSTRY IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 44-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011008
    [20]Luo Chengcheng Zhang Huanzhen Bi Lusha Zhu Hong, . PROGRESS ON REHABILITATING OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL BY SVE METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 158-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510035
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 吴泉泉，孙泽文，钟乙琪，吴庆，林子捷，高康泰，李建龙，黄虹，马志飞，吴代赦. 异形除尘滤芯对撞脉冲喷吹清灰性能研究. 环境工程. 2024(03): 108-114 . 本站查看
    2. 郑清月，尹茜茜，刘东，林龙沅. 上部开口诱导引流装置对卧式长滤筒清灰性能的影响. 环境工程学报. 2023(02): 580-588 .
    3. 唐巾洁，王璐琰，杨晓光，鄢恒飞，程怀玉，龙新平. 滤筒形状对脉冲清灰过程影响的数值模拟研究. 武汉大学学报(工学版). 2023(06): 733-740 .
    4. 孟冬，许学瑞，赵颖，解洪波，王飞，李建龙. 基于扩散器与文氏管的除尘滤筒脉冲喷吹清灰性能改进. 煤矿安全. 2023(06): 54-59 .
    5. 杨光辉，周美伊柏，林涛，黄琬岚，谢智宇，林龙沅，陈海焱. 圆周式脉冲喷吹对滤筒清灰均匀性的影响. 中国粉体技术. 2023(06): 125-133 .
    6. 苏正通，林子捷，李建龙，邱俊，吴泉泉，吴代赦. 文丘里喷嘴改进金锥滤筒脉喷清灰性能的数值模拟. 环境工程学报. 2022(01): 220-229 .
    7. 刘佳莹，任玲，林小嘉，郑清月，宋戊春，林龙沅. 脉冲清灰喷吹气流偏斜的优化研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2022(01): 195-200 .
    8. 薛峰，李朋，黄琬岚，胡敏，颜翠平，陈海焱，杨刚. 喷嘴型式对滤筒脉冲定阻清灰效果的影响. 中国粉体技术. 2022(05): 48-56 .
    9. 郗元，姜文文，代岩，王国际，闫志刚，任福良，牛凤娟. 基于CFD的锥形散射器强化清灰特性数值模拟及优化. 轻工机械. 2021(01): 98-103 .
    10. 陈强，林子捷，李建龙，吴代赦，邱俊. 扩散喷嘴改善金锥滤筒脉喷清灰性能的数值模拟. 环境工程学报. 2021(05): 1634-1644 .
    11. 王素洁，刘东，余洪浪，张情，胥海伦. 基于散射结构的脉冲流场与清灰压力动态特性分析. 环境工程. 2021(05): 89-95 . 本站查看
    12. 邱俊，林子捷，李建龙，吴泉泉，吴代赦. 滤筒脉喷清灰过程中尘饼剥离对喷吹性能的影响. 环境工程. 2021(08): 113-118 . 本站查看
    13. 艾子昂，吴泉泉，孙燕，苏正通，李建龙，吴代赦. 气流隔板改善滤筒脉喷清灰性能的数值模拟. 南昌大学学报(工科版). 2021(04): 384-391 .
    14. 司凯凯，陈运法，刘庆祝，熊瑞，孙广超，刘开琪. 陶瓷膜过滤器内流场及热致损毁机理模拟分析. 过程工程学报. 2020(11): 1329-1335 .

    Other cited types(20)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.7 %FULLTEXT: 9.7 %META: 83.1 %META: 83.1 %PDF: 7.1 %PDF: 7.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.6 %其他: 14.6 %其他: 1.0 %其他: 1.0 %上海: 2.3 %上海: 2.3 %东京都: 0.2 %东京都: 0.2 %东营: 0.2 %东营: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %北京: 6.8 %北京: 6.8 %南京: 5.6 %南京: 5.6 %南昌: 0.7 %南昌: 0.7 %台北: 1.4 %台北: 1.4 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %合肥: 1.2 %合肥: 1.2 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %威海: 0.2 %威海: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.5 %宜昌: 0.5 %宿州: 0.2 %宿州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广安: 0.2 %广安: 0.2 %广州: 3.0 %广州: 3.0 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 3.3 %杭州: 3.3 %榆林: 0.2 %榆林: 0.2 %武威: 0.2 %武威: 0.2 %武汉: 1.7 %武汉: 1.7 %比勒费尔德: 0.2 %比勒费尔德: 0.2 %济南: 1.4 %济南: 1.4 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.9 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %漳州: 0.5 %漳州: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %舟山: 0.2 %舟山: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 30.1 %芒廷维尤: 30.1 %芝加哥: 1.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 4.2 %西宁: 4.2 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 2.1 %运城: 2.1 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 1.7 %郑州: 1.7 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %铜陵: 0.2 %铜陵: 0.2 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %青岛: 1.2 %青岛: 1.2 %黄冈: 0.3 %黄冈: 0.3 %黄石: 0.5 %黄石: 0.5 %其他其他上海东京都东营中山临汾北京南京南昌台北台州合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨嘉兴太原威海宜昌宿州常州常德广安广州廊坊张家口惠州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州榆林武威武汉比勒费尔德济南济源淄博深圳温州湖州湛江漯河漳州石家庄福州舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铜陵长沙长治青岛黄冈黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (174) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(34)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return