Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 9
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(9): 56-62
FU Kun-ming, FU Si-bo, LIU Fan-qi, QIU Fu-guo, CAO Xiu-qin. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CARBON SOURCES ON N2O RELEASE IN DENITRIFICATION PROCESS OF A SBR REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 56-62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109009
Citation: FU Kun-ming, FU Si-bo, LIU Fan-qi, QIU Fu-guo, CAO Xiu-qin. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CARBON SOURCES ON N2O RELEASE IN DENITRIFICATION PROCESS OF A SBR REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 56-62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109009
shu

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CARBON SOURCES ON N2O RELEASE IN DENITRIFICATION PROCESS OF A SBR REACTOR

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109009

  • Sino-Dutch R&D Center for Future Wastewater Treatment Technologies, Key Laboratory of Urban Storm Water System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China

  • Received Date: 2020-10-11
    Available Online: 2022-01-21
    Abstract
  • N2O is a potent greenhouse gas, and releases a lot in wastewater treatment. Understanding the influencing factors of N2O release in wastewater treatment can reduce N2O emissions. Four classical external organic carbon sources, such as sodium acetate, ethanol, glucose and sucrose, were used to study the N2O release process in denitrification process with SBR reactors. The results showed that under the 4 carbon source conditions, the accumulation of N2O showed a trend of first increasing, then decreasing, and finally remaining stable. The maximum accumulation of N2O were 1.59, 1.25, 5.43, 0.66 mg/L, and the maximum conversion rates were 1.61%, 1.36%, 5.44% and 0.67%, respectively. The final accumulation of N2O were 1.02, 0.67, 3.12, 0.49 mg/L, and the final conversion rates were 1.04%, 0.73%, 3.13% and 0.50%, respectively. The N2O release amount and conversion rate in descending order were glucose, sodium acetate, ethanol and sucrose. FNA inhibition, electronic competition of different denitrifying enzymes and differences in microbial community structure were factors affecting N2O release.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(30)
  • [1]
    IPCC.Climate Change 2007:the IPCC Scientific Assessment[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007.
    [2]
    PORTMANN R W,DANIEL J S,RAVISHANKARA A R.Stratospheric ozone depletion due to nitrous oxide:influences of other gases[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,2012,1593(367):1256-1264.
    [3]
    GRUBER W,VILLEZ K,KIPF M,et al.N2O emission in full-scale wastewater treatment:proposing a refined monitoring strategy[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,699:1-24.
    [4]
    刘国华,庞毓旻,齐鲁,等.SBR工艺污水生物脱氮过程中N2O的释放特征[J].环境工程,2020,38(7):51-57.
    [5]
    孙英杰,吴昊,王亚楠.硝化反硝化过程中N2O释放影响因素[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(2):384-388.
    [6]
    毛跃建.废水处理系统中重要功能类群Thauera属种群结构与功能的研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2009.
    [7]
    郭泓利,李鑫玮,任钦毅,等.全国典型城市污水处理厂进水水质特征分析[J].给水排水,2018,54(6):12-15.
    [8]
    付昆明,廖敏辉,王俊安,等.村镇低浓度生活污水现状及处理技术分析[J].环境工程,2019,37(4):48-51.
    [9]
    SONG M J,CHOI S,BAE W B,et al.Identification of primary effecters of N2O emissions from full-scale biological nitrogen removal systems using random forest approach[J].Water Research,2020,184:1-9.
    [10]
    ZHOU Y,LIM M,HARJONO S,et al.Nitrous oxide emission by denitrifying phosphorus removal culture using polyhydroxyalkanoates as carbon source[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2012,24(9):1616-1623.
    [11]
    CAO X S,QIAN D,MENG X Z.Effects of pH on nitrite accumulation during wastewater denitrification[J].Environmental Technology,2013,34(1/2/3/4):45-51.
    [12]
    巩有奎,彭永臻.温度变化对短程生物脱氮及N2O释放影响[J].水处理技术,2020,46(8):110-115.
    [13]
    付昆明,杨宗玥,刘凡奇,等.碳源种类对农村污水反硝化过程脱氮效果的影响[J].环境工程学报,2020,14(9):2331-2338.
    [14]
    国家环保总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
    [15]
    KIMOCHI Y,INAMORI Y,MIZUOCHI M,et al.Nitrogen removal and N2O emission in a full-scale domestic wastewater treatment plant with intermittent aeration[J].Journal of Bioscience & Bioengineering,1998,86(2):202-206.
    [16]
    SHISKOWSKI D M.Nitrous oxide:a powerful greenhouse gas with a wastewater treatment connection[J].Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation,2007,2007(18):1279-1290.
    [17]
    PAN Y,NI B J,BOND P L,et al.Electron competition among nitrogen oxides reduction during methanol-utilizing denitrification in wastewater treatment[J].Water Research,2013,10(47):3273-3281.
    [18]
    ADOUANI N,LIMOUSY L,LENDORMI T,et al.N2O and NO emissions during wastewater denitrification step:influence of temperature on the biological process[J].Comptes Rendus Chimie,2015,18(1):15-22.
    [19]
    付昆明,付巢,王会芳,等.CANON工艺中N2O的释放途径及影响因素[J].中国给水排水,2018,34(2):37-41.
    [20]
    ZHAO Y,MIAO J,REN X,et al.Effect of organic carbon on the production of biofuel nitrous oxide during the denitrification process[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2018,15(2):461-470.
    [21]
    朱莹.Thauera linaloolentis 47Lol菌株nosZ基因不同拷贝的反硝化生理[D].上海:上海交通大学,2017.
    [22]
    LU H,CHANDRAN K,STENSEL D.Microbial ecology of denitrification in biological wastewater treatment[J].Water Research,2014,64(7):237-254.
    [23]
    SHEU S Y,SHIAU Y W,WEI Y T,et al.Gemmobacter lanyuensis sp.nov.,isolated from a freshwater spring[J].Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology,2013,63(Pt 11):4039-4045.
    [24]
    KHAN S T,HIRAISHI A.Diaphorobacter nitroreducens gen.nov.,sp.nov.,a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-degrading denitrifying bacterium isolated from activated sludge[J].Journal of General & Applied Microbiology,2002,6(48):299-308.
    [25]
    BUCHANAN R E,GIBBONS N E.伯杰细菌鉴定手册[M].8版.北京:科学出版社,1984.
    [26]
    张阳,王秀杰,王维奇,等.一株Acinetobacter johnsonii的部分反硝化特性及动力学研究[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(10):4369-4376.
    [27]
    李相昆.反硝化除磷工艺与微生物学研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2006.
    [28]
    汪霞.好氧反硝化菌Enterobacter sp.FL的脱氮及自聚集特性研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2017.
    [29]
    YANG Y W,WU R T,HU J X,et al.Dominant denitrifying bacteria are important hosts of antibiotic resistance genes in pig farm anoxic-oxic wastewater treatment processes[J].Environment International,2020(143):105897.
    [30]
    鄢雨萌.河床沉积物淤积影响下河水入渗带中氧化还原分带研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2020.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Biyun, SUN Ailin, XU Xuehuang. STRATEGIES AND PROJECT CASE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS RENEWAL AND REFORMATION FOR THE DUAL-CARBON GOAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 81-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411009
    [2]WANG Ning, HAN Chengyu, ZHANG Yang, GU Zhaolin. REGIONAL CARBON EMISSION PEAKING BASED ON THRESHOLD-STIRPAT EXTENSION MODEL: A CASE STUDY ON EAST CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 154-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405020
    [3]PAN Siyu, ZHANG Meiling. PREDICTION OF CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION IN GANSU PROVINCE BASED ON BP NEURAL NETWORK AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 61-68,85. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307009
    [4]REN Hongyang, DU Ruolan, XIE Guilin, JIN Wenhui, LI Xi, DENG Yuanpeng, MA Wei, WANG Bing. RESEARCH STATUS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION METHODS OF CARBON EMISSIONS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 195-203,244. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310023
    [5]XIAO Yanghui, LÜ Hui, LÜ Da'e. ANALYSIS OF CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND CARBON REDUCTION POTENTIAL OF CAMPUS BUILDING OPERATION BASED ON STIRPAT MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 117-123. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310015
    [6]XUE Chengjie, FANG Zhanqiang. PATH OF CARBON EMISSION PEAKING AND CARBON NEUTRALITY IN SOIL REMEDIATION INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 231-238. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208033
    [7]XU Chong-ping, YUE Qiang, ZHANG Yu-jie, WANG Huan-yu. EVALUATION OF OPTIMIZATION POTENTIAL OF URBAN METABOLIC SYSTEM DRIVEN BY “ZERO-WASTE CITY”: A CASE STUDY IN PANJIN, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209030
    [8]ZHAO Jinhui, LI Jingshun, WANG Panle, HOU Gaojie. A STUDY ON CARBON PEAKING PATHS IN HENAN, CHINA BASED ON LASSO REGRESSION-BP NEURAL NETWORK MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 151-156,164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212020
    [9]DONG Jin-chi, WENG Hui, PANG Ling-yun, CAI Bo-feng, LIU Hui, WANG Jin-nan, YANG Lu, XIA Chu-yu, CHEN Yang. MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST CURVES AND MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR PETROCHEMICAL AND CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 32-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110005
    [10]YANG Lu, YANG Xiu, LIU Hui, XIA Chu-yu, CAI Bo-feng, DONG Jin-chi, CHEN Yang. CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY SCREENING AND COST STUDY IN BUILDING SECTOR OF CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 41-49. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110006
    [11]DONG Jin-chi, WANG Xu-ying, CAI Bo-feng, WANG Jin-nan, LIU Hui, YANG Lu, XIA Chu-yu, LEI Yu. MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST FOR IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 23-31,40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110004
    [12]LIU Hui, CAI Bo-feng, ZHANG Li, WANG Zhen, CHEN Yang, XIA Chu-yu, YANG Lu, DONG Jin-chi, SONG Xiao-hui. RESEARCH ON CARBON DIOXIDE ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES AND COST IN CHINA'S POWER INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 8-14. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110002
    [13]ZHU Shu-ying, LIU Hui, DONG Jin-chi, CAI Bo-feng, HE Jie, YANG Lu, XIA Chu-yu, TANG Ling. MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST CURVES FOR CEMENT INDUSTRY IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 15-22. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110003
    [14]ZHANG Li, XIE Zi-xuan, CAO Li-bin, WU Qiong, CAI Bo-feng. DISCUSSION ON EVALUATION METHOD ON CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS PEAKING FOR CHINESE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 1-5,43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011001
    [15]CAO Li-bin, LI Ming-yu, ZHANG Li, CAI Bo-feng. RESEARCH ON CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION PEAKING IN THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA URBAN AGGLOMERATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 33-38,59. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011006
    [16]YANG Nan, LI Yan-xia, LV Chen, ZHAO Meng, LIU Zhong-liang, LIU Hao. CARBON EMISSION ACCOUNTING AND PEAK FORECASTING OF IRON & STEEL INDUSTRY IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 44-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011008
    [17]ZHANG Zhe, REN Yi-meng, DONG Hui-juan. RESEARCH ON CARBON EMISSIONS PEAKING AND LOW-CARBON DEVELOPMENT OF CITIES: A CASE OF SHANGHAI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 12-18. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011003
    [18]CUI Xiu-zhen, XU Shao-dong, GAO Han-bo, WANG Jun-xia, CAI Bo-feng. REFERENCE OF URBAN AIR POLLUTANTS EMISSION PATH FOR CARBON EMISSION PEAKING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 39-43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011007
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 柯毅明，郜媛，袁铭，柳伟，刘芳彤. 数据驱动下广东省碳排放时空分异特性及影响因素. 环境科学. 2025(03): 1482-1491 .
    2. 张斌，卫丹琪，丁乙，姜洪涛，尹剑. 基于夜间灯光和土地利用的珠江流域城市碳排放估算及其时空动态特征研究. 地球科学进展. 2024(03): 317-328 .
    3. 尹剑，高杰林，张斌. 珠江流域片相关城市碳排放网络空间复杂特征研究. 人民珠江. 2024(05): 103-111 .
    4. 徐维军，肖宇光. 粤港澳大湾区能源消费碳达峰情景预测研究. 城市观察. 2024(03): 40-67+159-160 .
    5. 尹剑，姜洪涛，焦露，张斌，丁乙，黄嘉瑜. 基于Geodetector和MGWR的贵州工业碳排放效率时空演化及影响因素分析. 地理科学. 2024(07): 1217-1227 .
    6. 尹剑，龙垚垚，姜洪涛. 珠江流域城市工业碳排放效率的空间关联网络特征与影响因素. 环境科学. 2024(12): 6806-6817 .
    7. 蔡贤生，张宇靖，王晶晶. 城市碳达峰路径和实现策略研究. 节能. 2024(11): 81-84 .
    8. 朱潜挺，熊鹏程，张馨月，吴静. 微观创新驱动下京津冀城市群低碳经济转型模型构建. 企业科技与发展. 2023(11): 1-5 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 17.4 %FULLTEXT: 17.4 %META: 80.4 %META: 80.4 %PDF: 2.1 %PDF: 2.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 15.3 %其他: 15.3 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %上海: 1.1 %上海: 1.1 %东莞: 1.8 %东莞: 1.8 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 1.4 %北京: 1.4 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %吉林: 0.4 %吉林: 0.4 %大同: 0.7 %大同: 0.7 %大庆: 0.4 %大庆: 0.4 %大连: 1.1 %大连: 1.1 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %宝鸡: 0.7 %宝鸡: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 1.8 %广州: 1.8 %张家口: 3.2 %张家口: 3.2 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 1.4 %扬州: 1.4 %无锡: 0.7 %无锡: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %武汉: 4.6 %武汉: 4.6 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 10.7 %芒廷维尤: 10.7 %芝加哥: 4.3 %芝加哥: 4.3 %苏州: 1.1 %苏州: 1.1 %茂名: 0.4 %茂名: 0.4 %西宁: 24.2 %西宁: 24.2 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贵阳: 2.5 %贵阳: 2.5 %费利蒙: 0.4 %费利蒙: 0.4 %运城: 1.8 %运城: 1.8 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %郑州: 5.3 %郑州: 5.3 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %银川: 2.1 %银川: 2.1 %长春: 1.1 %长春: 1.1 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %其他其他China上海东莞保定北京南京南昌台州吉林大同大庆大连天津宝鸡常德广州张家口成都扬州无锡昆明晋城杭州武汉沈阳漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州茂名西宁西安贵阳费利蒙运城遵义郑州重庆银川长春长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (248) PDF downloads(10) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return