Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 9
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(9): 69-75
WANG Xin-wen, LIU Zi-qi, GUO Qiong-qiong, LI Yuan, LI Kai-ping, ZHANG Chen-yue. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION SOURCE EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE HUANGZHOUHE RIVER BASIN, GUIZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 69-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109011
Citation: WANG Xin-wen, LIU Zi-qi, GUO Qiong-qiong, LI Yuan, LI Kai-ping, ZHANG Chen-yue. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION SOURCE EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE HUANGZHOUHE RIVER BASIN, GUIZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 69-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109011
shu

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION SOURCE EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IN THE HUANGZHOUHE RIVER BASIN, GUIZHOU

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109011

  • 1. School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China;

  • 2. State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China

  • Received Date: 2020-09-11
    Available Online: 2022-01-21
    Abstract
  • The Huangzhouhe River is one of the important rivers in the Shibing Karst Word Natural Heritage Site. In order to know the water quality characteristics of the Huangzhouhe River, single factor water quality identification index, mean-type comprehensive pollution index, cluster analysis and principal component analysis were used to analyze and evaluate the river water quality characteristics, based on 8 sample points, 7 monitoring indicators and 12-month monitoring data. The results showed that TN to excessive emission standard was severe in the river, and TP excessive potential was strong. Water quality in heritage site's core area didn't meet the class I standard, and that in the buffer zone was inferior to class Ⅲ water quality standard. The water quality was worse in high water period and better in low water period. TP, NTU and NH3-N were the main controlling factors in the wet season. CODMn, Chl-a and DO were the main control factors in the leveling period. The main controlling factor in the dry season was NH3-N. The main form of pollution in the basin was agricultural non-point source pollution. The current situation of heavy pollution of the monitoring point, Y1 and Y2 were caused by the domestic water of residents in the upstream and midstream buffer zones and pollution discharge of livestock and poultry excrement in rural areas. Moreover, the pollution will migrate with the river and enter the core area of the natural heritage site.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(32)
  • [1]
    ADRIANO B,RITA T,WILLIAM J W.A water quality index applied to an international shared river basin:the case of the Douro River[J].Environmental Management,2006,38(6):910-920.
    [2]
    LI B,YANG G S,WAN R R,et al.Using fuzzy theory and variable weights for water quality evaluation in Poyang Lake,China[J].Chinese.Geographical Science,2017,27(1):39-51.
    [3]
    XIA R,CHEN Z.Integrated water-quality assessment of the Huai River Basin in China[J].Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,2015,20(2):5014018.
    [4]
    王薇,王中玉,白小晶,等.北方典型城市不同类型河流的水质空间分布与相关性分析[J].环境工程,2019,37(9):50-56.
    [5]
    HELENA B,PARDO R,VEGA M,et al.Temporal evolution of groundwater composition in an alluvial aquifer (Pisuerga river,Spain) by principal component analysis[J].Water Research,2000,34:807-816.
    [6]
    SINGH K P,MALIK A,MOHAN D,et al.Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India):a case study[J].Water Research,2004,38:3980-3992.
    [7]
    SHRESTHA S,KAZAMA F.Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques:a case study of the Fuji river basin,Japan[J].Environmental Modelling & Software,2007,22(4):464-475.
    [8]
    赵建国,李洪波,李霄宇,等.永定河怀来段水质污染特征及污染源解析[J].环境科学与技术,2018,41(增刊1):299-306.
    [9]
    林涛,徐盼盼,钱会,等.黄河宁夏段水质评价及其污染源分析[J].环境化学,2017,36(6):1388-1396.
    [10]
    张涛,陈求稳,易齐涛,等.太湖流域上游平原河网区水质空间差异与季节变化特征[J].湖泊科学,2017,29(6):1300-1311.
    [11]
    何江湖,肖时珍,曾成,等.湿润亚热带典型白云岩流域的化学剥蚀速率:以贵州施秉黄洲河流域为例[J].地球与环境,2018,46(3):274-281.
    [12]
    陈品冬,肖时珍.施秉世界自然遗产地景观美学特征及价值提升研究[J].中国地名,2019(7):51-53.
    [13]
    顾秉谦,周明忠,肖时珍,等.贵州施秉世界自然遗产地喀斯特地貌的地质控制研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(10):132-138.
    [14]
    贵州省住房和城乡建设厅.国家遗产预备名录:自然遗产-施秉喀斯特[R].2009.
    [15]
    张尘月,刘子琦,刘肇军,等.喀斯特地区平水期水质污染综合分析:以贵州省白云岩喀斯特世界自然遗产地为例[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):253-259.
    [16]
    楼文高,熊聘.长江水系水质综合评价、预测的投影寻踪建模与实证研究[J].地球环境学报,2014,5(5):344-352.
    [17]
    胡必彬.欧盟水环境标准体系[J].环境科学研究,2005,18(1):45-48.
    [18]
    徐祖信.我国河流单因子水质标识指数评价方法研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(3):321-325.
    [19]
    吴旌滔,安艳玲,吴起鑫,等.贵州三岔河水质时空分布特征与评价[J].环境与健康杂志,2016,33(3):229-231.
    [20]
    刘贤梅,周忠发,张昊天,等.基于主成分分析的喀斯特山区河流水质评价及水质时空特征分析:以贵州省张维河为例[J].环境工程,2019,37(10):49-54

    ,132.
    [21]
    黄健平,宋新山,李海华.环境影响评价[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2013.
    [22]
    OBST U.Strategies of maintaining the natural purification potential of rivers and lakes[J].Environmental Science & Pollution Research International,2003,10:251-255.
    [23]
    SEITZINGER S P,STYLES R V,BOYER E W,et al.Nitrogen retention in rivers:model development and application to water-sheds in the northeastern U.S.A[J].Biogeochemistry,2002,57/58:199-237.
    [24]
    VAGNETTI R,MIANA P,FABRIS M,et al.Self-purification ability of a resurgence stream[J].Chemosphere,2003,52:1781-1795.
    [25]
    ZHOU S,XIA C,HUANG T,et al.Seasonal variation of potential denitrification rate and enhanced denitrification performance via water-lifting aeration technology in a stratified reservoir:a case study of Zhoucun reservoir[J].Chemosphere,2018,211:1123-1136.
    [26]
    徐华山,徐宗学,唐芳芳,等.漳卫南运河流域水质时空变化特征及其污染源识别[J].环境科学,2012,33(2):359-369.
    [27]
    SU S L,ZHI J J,LOU L P,et al.Spatio-temporal patterns and source apportionment of pollution in Qiantang River (China) using neural-based modeling and multivariate statistical techniques[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2011,36(9/10/11/12):379-386.
    [28]
    JARVIE H P,WHITTON B A,NEAL C.Nitrogen and phosphorus in east-coast British rivers:speciation,sources and biological significance[J].Science of the Total Environment,1998,S210/211(1/6):79-109.
    [29]
    BOYACIOGLU H,BOYACIOGLU H.Water pollution sources assessment by multivariate statistical methods in the Tahtali Basin,Turkey[J].Environmental Geology,2008,54(2):275-282.
    [30]
    DAI Q H,LIU Z T,SHAO H B,et al.Karst bare slope soil erosion and soil quality:a simulation case study[J].Solid Earth,2015,6:985-995.
    [31]
    DAI Q H,PENG X D,YANG Z,et al.Runoff and erosion processes on bare slopes in the karst rocky desertification area[J].Catena,2017,152:218-226.
    [32]
    张宜松,曹国良,张萌.基于主成分分析法的陕北地区可持续发展对比研究[J].环境工程,2017,35(5):136-140.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Guofu, CHEN Min, GU Jiayan, CAI Jingli, XIE Liping, XUE Wenjin, HU Yingying. Research progress of carbon capture technology in sewage treatment based on CiteSpace metrological analysis[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 70-79. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501008
    [2]WANG Jianhui, LIAO Wanshan, LI Huimin, FENG Dong, GUO Zhiwei, Mohamed S. Mahmoud, ZHANG Bing, GAO Xu, SHEN Yu, CHEN Youpeng. A DATA ENHANCEMENT METHOD FOR SUPPORTING INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT OF WWTPs UNDER DATA DEFICIENCY CONDITIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406018
    [3]QIAO Yiwen, REN Lehui, WANG Zhiwei. RECENT ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR MEMBRANE-AERATED BIOFILM REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 243-254. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303033
    [4]ZHAO Congcong, ZHAO Yunfei, REN Ziyan. APPLICATION OF WATER IOT MONITORING TECHNOLOGY IN PROBLEM DIAGNOSIS OF DRAINAGE NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 34-38,45. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311007
    [5]LU Huimin, CHEN Zhuo, NI Xinye, WU Yinhu, HU Hongying. ANALYSIS OF WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE IN JAPAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 237-242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303032
    [6]ZHAO Jialong, FENG Heping, HU Shuguo, ZHOU Fengran, LI Jian, WANG Defa, LIU Zhiyong, ZHANG Tiqiang. DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF STABLE GASEOUS ISOTOPE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE IN ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT MONITORING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 20-29,44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310004
    [7]Chen Shi, PENG Lai, XU Yifeng, LIANG Chuanzhou, NI Bingjie. RECENT ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF NITROUS OXIDES EMISSION DURING BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL FROM WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 97-106,122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206013
    [8]ZHANG Jiao, XIAO Kang, LIANG Shuai, HUANG Xia. MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGIES FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND RECLAMATION IN CHINA:APPLICATION AND CHALLENGES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 1-6,153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203001
    [9]RUI Dongni, MA Yanyan, YE Lin. APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 145-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206019
    [10]XUE Zhaoxia, FENG Qian, FANG Fang, LUO Jingyang, CAO Jiashun, XU Runze. EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND MECHANISMS OF METHANE IN MUNICIPAL SEWER SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 123-129,193. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206016
    [11]XU Runze, CAO Jiashun, FANG Fang. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON N2O RECYCLING AND DATA-DRIVEN MODELING IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 107-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206014
    [12]WANG Qian, DENG Qiaosi, WU Wei, AI Fangyi, DU Junli, ZHANG Yuanhe, BAI Fan, LEI Mingming, QU Ruihua, GAN Yang, DU Weiwei. OPERATION DIAGNOSIS AND CARBON SOURCE OPTIMIZATION OF YONGCHUAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT USING PROCESS MODELING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 219-225. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206028
    [13]YIN Fengjun, XU Zeyu, LIU Hong. THINKING ON CONSTRUCTING AN INTELLIGENT CONTROL SCHEME OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT BASED ON THE COMBINATION OF MECHANISM AND DATA-DRIVEN MODELS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 138-144. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206018
    [14]XU Ao, WU Yin-hu, CHEN Zhuo, CUI Qi, BAI Yu, LI Kui-xiao, SHI Yu-long, GAO Qiang, HU Hong-ying. MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION IN BEIJING:STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE POTENTIAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 1-6,47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109001
    [15]QU Xuan, YIN An-wei, FANG Ai-lun, LI Chun-yan, FENG Dong-lei, LI Ang. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY OF REFRACTORY POLYMER-CONTAINING OILFIELD PRODUCED WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 46-51. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111005
    [16]XU Yi, YANG Shi-hong, YOU Guo-xiang, HOU Jun. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS AND TOXICITY EFFECT OF NANOCERIA IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 7-13,75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109002
    [17]GU Xiao-dan, HUANG Yong, DING Yong-wei, HUANG Ji-hui. DIAGNOSIS AND ANALYSIS BASED ON MATHEMATICAL MODEL ON PROBLEMS IN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IN VILLAGES AND TOWNS WITH LOW LOAD OPERATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 9-15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105002
    [18]ZHANG Shuang, YANG Qing, LIU Xiu-hong, CUI Bin, LIU Zhi-bin. RESEARCH PROGRASS ON STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLICATION OF EXPERT SYSTEM IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 25-31,99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007004
    [19]LI Rui-cheng. ANALYSIS ON DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS OF A LARGE-SCALE SEMI-UNDERGROUND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 109-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007017
    [20]Zhang Wenfen, Luo Zhouquan, Xu Shimin. BUILDING OF MATHEMATICAL MODEL ABOUT SAFETY EARLY WARNING INDEX IN INDUSTRY AND TRADE SECTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 141-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501033
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 贺德强，王一博，靳震震，陆立海，洪雷. 废水处理中水质监测参数的实时预测研究. 安全与环境学报. 2024(02): 732-738 .
    2. 陈其楠. 污水泵站恶臭气体排放预测模型研究. 环境科学与管理. 2024(04): 124-127 .
    3. 王建辉，廖万山，李慧敏，冯东，郭智威，Mohamed S.Mahmoud，张冰，高旭，申渝，陈猷鹏. 数据缺陷条件下支持污水处理厂智能管理的数据增强方法. 环境工程. 2024(06): 153-159 . 本站查看
    4. 张凯，赵虎，张皓翔. 环氧污水处理工程实例. 清洗世界. 2024(07): 16-18 .
    5. 龙文丽. 环保工程中污水处理工艺及方法探究. 皮革制作与环保科技. 2023(03): 13-15 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.6 %FULLTEXT: 7.6 %META: 84.7 %META: 84.7 %PDF: 7.6 %PDF: 7.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.8 %其他: 11.8 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Perth Amboy: 0.4 %Perth Amboy: 0.4 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 3.3 %上海: 3.3 %东莞: 4.8 %东莞: 4.8 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %北京: 6.1 %北京: 6.1 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 2.9 %南京: 2.9 %南充: 0.1 %南充: 0.1 %南宁: 0.9 %南宁: 0.9 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %厦门: 0.4 %厦门: 0.4 %台州: 1.6 %台州: 1.6 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %宿州: 0.1 %宿州: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.4 %密蘇里城: 0.4 %巴音郭楞: 0.4 %巴音郭楞: 0.4 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.4 %平顶山: 0.4 %广州: 1.9 %广州: 1.9 %开封: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %成都: 1.9 %成都: 1.9 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %无锡: 1.2 %无锡: 1.2 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 2.7 %昆明: 2.7 %晋中: 0.9 %晋中: 0.9 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %景德镇: 0.1 %景德镇: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 2.2 %杭州: 2.2 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %楚雄: 0.1 %楚雄: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 3.8 %武汉: 3.8 %汕头: 0.6 %汕头: 0.6 %江门: 0.1 %江门: 0.1 %沈阳: 1.7 %沈阳: 1.7 %济南: 1.3 %济南: 1.3 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %淮安: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %深圳: 1.4 %深圳: 1.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %滨州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %盐城: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 6.9 %芒廷维尤: 6.9 %芝加哥: 1.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %莆田: 0.3 %莆田: 0.3 %蚌埠: 0.3 %蚌埠: 0.3 %衡水: 0.3 %衡水: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 10.0 %西宁: 10.0 %西安: 1.3 %西安: 1.3 %许昌: 0.4 %许昌: 0.4 %贵阳: 1.0 %贵阳: 1.0 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %遂宁: 0.1 %遂宁: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %重庆: 1.9 %重庆: 1.9 %金华: 0.4 %金华: 0.4 %铁岭: 0.3 %铁岭: 0.3 %银川: 0.3 %银川: 0.3 %镇江: 0.6 %镇江: 0.6 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 1.3 %长沙: 1.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %陵水: 0.6 %陵水: 0.6 %青岛: 1.2 %青岛: 1.2 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaPerth Amboy[]上海东莞中山临汾九江佛山保定六安兰州内江北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌南通厦门台州合肥哈尔滨大连天津太原宁波安康宿州密蘇里城巴音郭楞常州常德平顶山广州开封张家口徐州成都扬州新乡无锡日照昆明晋中晋城景德镇朝阳杭州枣庄楚雄榆林武汉汕头江门沈阳济南济源海口淄博淮北淮安深圳温州湖州滨州漯河潍坊珠海盐城眉山石家庄福州秦皇岛绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥莆田蚌埠衡水衡阳衢州西宁西安许昌贵阳运城遂宁遵义邯郸郑州重庆金华铁岭银川镇江长春长沙长治陵水青岛马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (167) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return