Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
ZHANG Zhi-xuan, SHAN Bao-yan, LIN Qi-kai, CHEN Yan-qiu, YU Xin-wei, ZHU Min. INFLUENCE OF URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE ON PM2.5 CONCENTRATION DISTRIBUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 84-91. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109013
Citation: ZHANG Zhi-xuan, SHAN Bao-yan, LIN Qi-kai, CHEN Yan-qiu, YU Xin-wei, ZHU Min. INFLUENCE OF URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE ON PM2.5 CONCENTRATION DISTRIBUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 84-91. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109013

INFLUENCE OF URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE ON PM2.5 CONCENTRATION DISTRIBUTION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109013
  • Received Date: 2020-11-05
    Available Online: 2022-01-21
  • The urban spatial structure affects the microenvironment such as air circulation, which inevitably has an impact on PM2.5 distribution and dispersion. Studying the relationship between the two has positive significance for urban planning and construction. Based on the construction of the urban spatial structure indicators system, the spatial pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in the central city of Jinan was studied using methods of kriging interpolation, and the influence of urban spatial structure on PM2.5 distribution was investigated based on the whole area and different elevation perspectives using correlation analysis methods. The results showed that:1) PM2.5 concentration was negatively correlated with the average and standard deviation of DEM, the average and standard deviation of absolute building height, and outdoor activity area, and positively correlated with the maximum absolute building height, the sum of building floor area, building density, occupancy ratio, and the sum of building volume. These indicators were important factors affecting the distribution of PM2.5 and should be considered in urban planning and layout. 2) there were spatial and temporal differences in PM2.5 distribution at different elevations and time ranges. the higher the PM2.5 concentration, the more obvious the influence of urban spatial structure indicators on its concentration distribution, the coefficient of variation of PM2.5 concentration spatial distribution increased, and the correlation between PM2.5 concentration and each urban structure indicator became weaker. 3) topographic elevation was an important factor influencing the distribution of PM2.5. As the average elevation increased, the number of months with significant correlation between urban spatial structure indicators and PM2.5 concentrations increased, and the regularity got stronger.
  • [1]
    葛跃,王明新,孙向武,等.基于增强回归树的城市PM2.5日均值变化分析:以常州为例[J].环境科学,2017,38(2):485-494.
    [2]
    李名升,任晓霞,于洋,等.中国大陆城市PM2.5污染时空分布规律[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(3):641-650.
    [3]
    陈凡涛,赵文吉,晏星,等.不对称街谷内PM2.5浓度垂直分布特征及成因[J].环境工程学报,2016,10(3):321-327.
    [4]
    张纯,张世秋.大都市圈的城市形态与空气质量研究综述:关系识别和分析框架[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(9):47-53.
    [5]
    FANG Y Q,QU L Y.Study on the correlation between urban form and air quality[J].Modern Urban Research,2018,8:88-94.
    [6]
    尹杰,刘春霞,李月臣,等.重庆市主城区冬季PM2.5空间分布模拟[J].环境污染与防治,2018,40(12):1352-1358.
    [7]
    牛慧敏,涂建军,姚作林,等.中国城市空气质量时空分布特征[J].河南科学,2016,34(8):1317-1321.
    [8]
    LI X B,LU Q C,LU S J,et al.The impacts of roadside vegetation barriers on the dispersion of gaseous traffic pollution in urban street canyons[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2016,17:80-91.
    [9]
    王蕾,关燕宁,郭杉,等.城市地表要素的地表能量响应特征及其关系研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2016,18(12):1684-1697.
    [10]
    邹佳乐,林尧林,杨薇.中国近年PM2.5污染研究进展[J].环境污染与防治,2019,41(3):357-366.
    [11]
    别淑君,杨凌霄,高颖,等.济南市背景区域大气PM2.5污染特征及其对能见度的影响[J].环境科学,2019(9):3868-3878.
    [12]
    YAN D,LEI Y,SHI Y,et al.Evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in China:a case study from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J].Atmospheric Environment,2018,183(6):225-233.
    [13]
    李茜,宋金平,张建辉,等.中国城市化对环境空气质量影响的演化规律研究[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(9):2402-2411.
    [14]
    秦蒙,刘修岩,仝怡婷.蔓延的城市空间是否加重了雾霾污染:来自中国PM2.5数据的经验分析[J].财贸经济,2016,37(11):146-160.
    [15]
    宋彦,钟邵鹏,章征涛,等.城市空间结构对PM2.5的影响:美国夏洛特汽车排放评估项目的借鉴和启示[J].城市规划,2014,38(5):9-14.
    [16]
    LU C,LIU Y.Effects of China's urban form on urban air quality[J].Urban Studies,2016,53(12):2607-2623.
    [17]
    欧维新,张振,陶宇.长三角城市土地利用格局与PM2.5浓度的多尺度关联分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019(7):11-18.
    [18]
    MCCARTY,JOSHUA,KAZA,et al.Urban form and air quality in the United States[J].Landscape & Urban Planning,2015,139:168-179.
    [19]
    岳小智,尹海伟,孔繁花,等.基于ENVI-met的绿地布局模式对微气候的影响研究:以南京市居住小区为例[J].江苏城市规划,2018,280(3):36-42.
    [20]
    龚珍,胡友健,黎华.城市水体空间分布与地表温度之间的关系研究[J].测绘通报,2015(12):34-36.
    [21]
    GAUR A,EICHENBAUM M K,SIMONOVIC S P.Analysis and modeling of surface Urban Heat Island in 20 Canadian cities under climate and land-cover change[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2018,206(15):145-157.
    [22]
    胡杰,黄经南,黄瑾,等.多中心城市空间结构与家庭碳排放关系研究[J].规划师,2014(11):87-92.
    [23]
    葛亚宁,徐新良,李静,等.北京城市建筑密度分布对热岛效应的影响研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2016,18(12):1698-1706.
    [24]
    陈吉科.顾及三维空间信息的城市地表热环境研究:以南京市主城区为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2019,35(1):126.
    [25]
    乔治,黄宁钰,徐新良,等.2003-2017年北京市地表热力景观时空分异特征及演变规律[J].地理学报,2019,74(3):475-489.
    [26]
    周伟奇,田韫钰.城市三维空间形态的热环境效应研究进展[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):416-427.
    [27]
    BERGER C,ROSENTRETER J,VOLTERSEN M,et al.Spatio-temporal analysis of the relationship between 2D/3D urban site characteristics and land surface temperature[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2017,193:225-243.
    [28]
    阚丽艳.上海市城市林荫道空间结构对NOx和SO2空间分布特征的影响[J].环境科学研究,2020,33(1):18-26.
    [29]
    LIANG D,WANG Y Q,WANG Y J,et al.National air pollution distribution in China and related geographic,gaseous pollutant,and socio-economic factors[J].Environmental Pollution,2019,250(7):998-1009.
    [30]
    冯悦怡,胡潭高,张力小.城市公园景观空间结构对其热环境效应的影响[J].生态学报,2014,34(12):3179-3187.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Haicheng, CHENG Cheng, CHEN Zhenglin, YANG Lixia, LUO Shenglian. SULFIDE ION DOPING PROMOTES EFFICIENT PHOTOCATALYTIC DEGRADATION OF TOLUENE BY WO3 NANOWIRES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 201-210. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409019
    [2]CHEN Acong, WEI Tuo, QIN Zhi, CHEN Yao, XU Rui, WU Haizhen, WEI Chaohai. SHIELDING EFFECT OF ZINC SULFATE ON CYANIDE COMPLEX DURING THIOCYANIDE DETECTION FOR COKING WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 134-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305018
    [3]ZHOU Lichang, LI Zhaoling, CHEN Lei, LIN Ya'nan, GONG Zhiwei, LIN Qingshan, MA Jie, WANG Zongping, GUO Gang. SHORT-TERM EFFECT OF THIOSULFATE ON COMPETITION BETWEEN SULFUR BACTERIA AND GLYCOGEN ACCUMULATING ORGANISMS IN SULFUR-CONTAINING WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 26-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308004
    [4]ZHANG Kui, WANG Xuemei, LI Yuhuan, ZHANG Yu, LIU Mengjuan, JIANG Xueping, JI Hongbing. HIGH EFFICIENCY ADSORPTION OF Hg2+ BY SULFUR-MODIFIED COW MANURE BIOCHAR AND ITS MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 79-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204012
    [5]DONG Wan-tao, WANG Ya-jun, LI Li, ZHANG Xing. REACTION KINETICS STUDY ON H2O2 AND Na2FeO4 REMOVING TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON FROM SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 178-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110025
    [6]WANG Yan, ZOU Lv-xi, MAO Lin-feng, CHEN Ya-li, LI Ji. EFFICIENCY AND MECHANISM OF UV/O3-Na2S2O8 IN TREATING ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION CONDENSATE WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007006
    [11]Zhang Jun, Xu Junyang, Wang Dunqiu, Yang Huiping, Wu Xiaohui. EFFECTS OF TYPES AND CONCENTRATIONS OF SULFUR SUBSTRATE ON BIOLEACHING HEAVY METALS FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 39-43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504009
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 郭磊,黄黎明,韦振祖,刘艇安,王靓,吴玮. 非均匀边界条件下SCR脱硝系统数值模拟及改造效果分析. 洁净煤技术. 2024(S2): 272-278 .
    2. 张起,张福祥,李盛平,景浩林,杨锐涵,董志强,杨祖旺,田桦. 660 MW燃煤机组脱硝系统优化改造. 能源与节能. 2023(02): 99-104 .
    3. 韩冰,李清方,刘海丽,于惠娟,张舒漫,王辉. 百万吨级CO_2捕集烟气集成处理塔流场模拟及优化. 石油工程建设. 2022(04): 7-11+34 .
    4. 封例忠,丛日强,刘怡,齐艳芳. 基于CFD的某330MW燃煤机组SCR脱硝系统混合器优化与验证. 环境工程. 2022(10): 156-161 . 本站查看
    5. 韦振祖,赵宁波,李明磊,刘瑞敬,谢新华,周健,卢承政. 非均匀入口条件下SCR脱硝系统流场优化改造技术研究. 锅炉技术. 2021(04): 74-80 .
    6. 陶莉,肖育军. SCR区域喷氨的NH_3分布与均匀性调整. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(04): 663-669 .
    7. 张云雷,孙仲超,梁大明,熊银伍,李艳芳. 活性焦烟气净化反应器研究进展. 洁净煤技术. 2020(04): 21-30 .
    8. 王为,朱召平,张楚城,陈牧,苏寅彪,郑晓盼. 高温除尘脱硝一体化技术开发及流场模拟研究. 洁净煤技术. 2020(04): 154-161 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 6.5 %FULLTEXT: 6.5 %META: 93.5 %META: 93.5 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.5 %其他: 17.5 %Bulgaria: 0.5 %Bulgaria: 0.5 %Canada: 1.4 %Canada: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %Germany: 0.5 %Germany: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Netherlands: 0.5 %Netherlands: 0.5 %Portugal: 0.9 %Portugal: 0.9 %Saudi Arabia: 0.5 %Saudi Arabia: 0.5 %Sweden: 0.9 %Sweden: 0.9 %United States: 4.1 %United States: 4.1 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %佛罗里达: 0.9 %佛罗里达: 0.9 %保定: 1.4 %保定: 1.4 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %晋城: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %欧文: 0.5 %欧文: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.5 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芝加哥: 3.7 %芝加哥: 3.7 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %萍乡: 0.5 %萍乡: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 5.1 %西宁: 5.1 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 3.7 %运城: 3.7 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他BulgariaCanadaChinaGermanyGreeceItalyNetherlandsPortugalSaudi ArabiaSwedenUnited States临汾佛罗里达保定北京十堰台州大同天津宣城常德广州张家口成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州欧文沈阳泰安济源温州湘潭漯河石家庄纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州萍乡衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铜陵长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (193) PDF downloads(9) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return