Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
WANG Xing-run, LI Lei, YANG Xiang-hua, TIAN Yong-qiang. PROGRESS IN REMEDIATION OF CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 1-8,23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006001
Citation: GUO Zhi-chao, XU Xian-bao, XU Ting-ting, ZHAO Ai-hua, TAI Jun, LIU Ya-nan, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. ANALYSIS ON FERMENTATION PATHWAY AND CAPROATE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE BY DIFFERENT INOCULUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 160-168. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109023

ANALYSIS ON FERMENTATION PATHWAY AND CAPROATE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE BY DIFFERENT INOCULUM

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109023
  • Received Date: 2020-10-26
    Available Online: 2022-01-21
  • Waste activated sludge, granular sludge, distiller's yeast, and vinasse were inoculated in the food waste fermentation for organic acid production. Batch tests were conducted to compare the solubilization, hydrolysis, and acidification processes using four different inoculums during fermentation. Based on the batch test, we investigated the effect of different electron donors on chain elongation to produce caproate. When activated sludge was used as the inoculum of food waste fermentation, the production of L-lactic acid reached 22.2 g COD/L and its optical activity reached 82.3%. It was an effective way to ferment food waste to produce highly optically active L-lactic acid by inoculating activated sludge. Caproate at a concentration of 4.2 g COD/L was produced by inoculating granular sludge during fermentation, indicating the strong capacity of caproate production of granular sludge. When distiller's yeast and vinasse were used as the inoculum, high concentration of butyrate (21.6 g COD/L for distiller's yeast inoculum and 20.4 g COD/L for vinasse inoculum) was obtained, which was the key electron acceptor during chain elongation. The concentration of caproate reached 8.8 g COD/L by inoculating vinasse (lactic acid as the electron donor) and 10.4 g COD/L by inoculating distiller's yeast (ethanol as the electron donor). Microbial community analysis revealed that Streptococcus was the dominant genus, accounting for 80% and 55% by inoculating distiller's yeast and vinasse groups, respectively, showing a strong correlation with the production of high concentration caproate.
  • [1]
    ZHOU M M,YAN B H,WONG J W C,et al.Enhanced volatile fatty acids production from anaerobic fermentation of food waste:a mini-review focusing on acidogenic metabolic pathways[J].Bioresource Technology,2018,248:68-78.
    [2]
    夏旻,毕珠洁,张瑞娜,等.上海市餐厨垃圾理化特性及资源化预处理对策研究[J].环境卫生工程,2013,21(6):1-2.
    [3]
    YAN B H,SELVAM A,WONG J W C.Application of rumen microbes to enhance food waste hydrolysis in acidogenic leach-bed reactors[J].Bioresource Technology,2014,168:64-71.
    [4]
    SHEN F,YUAN H R,PANG Y Z,et al.Performances of anaerobic co-digestion of fruit & vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW):single-phase vs.two-phase[J].Bioresource Technology,2013,144:80-85.
    [5]
    ABREU A A,TAVARES F,ALVES M M,et al.Garden and food waste co-fermentation for biohydrogen and biomethane production in a two-step hyperthermophilic-mesophilic process[J].Bioresource Technology,2019,278:180-186.
    [6]
    OLESKOWICZ-POPIEL P,KADAR Z,HEISKE S,et al.Co-production of ethanol,biogas,protein fodder and natural fertilizer in organic farming:evaluation of a concept for a farm-scale biorefinery[J].Bioresource Technology,2012,104:440-446.
    [7]
    FEI Q,FU R Z,SHANG L A,et al.Lipid production by microalgae Chlorella protothecoides with volatile fatty acids (VFAs) as carbon sources in heterotrophic cultivation and its economic assessment[J].Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering,2015,38(4):691-700.
    [8]
    ZHENG J,GAO M,WANG Q H,et al.Enhancement of L-lactic acid production via synergism in open co-fermentation of Sophora flavescens residues and food waste[J].Bioresource Technology,2017,225:159-164.
    [9]
    WU Q L,BAO X,GUO W Q,et al.Medium chain carboxylic acids production from waste biomass:current advances and perspectives[J].Biotechnology Advances,2019,37(5):599-615.
    [10]
    ZHAO J W,ZHANG C,WANG D B,et al.Revealing the underlying mechanisms of how sodium chloride affects short-chain fatty acid production from the co-fermentation of waste activated sludge and food waste[J].Acs Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering,2016,4(9):4675-4684.
    [11]
    COOK S M,SKERLOS S J,RASKIN L,et al.A stability assessment tool for anaerobic co-digestion[J].Water Research,2017,112:19-28.
    [12]
    CHEN Y G,LUO J Y,YAN Y Y,et al.Enhanced production of short-chain fatty acid by co-fermentation of waste activated sludge and kitchen waste under alkaline conditions and its application to microbial fuel cells[J].Applied Energy,2013,102(S1):1197-1204.
    [13]
    WU S L,SUN J,CHEN X M,et al.Unveiling the mechanisms of medium-chain fatty acid production from waste activated sludge alkaline fermentation liquor through physiological,thermodynamic and metagenomic investigations[J].Water Research,2020,169:1-12.
    [14]
    ZHU X Y,TAO Y,LIANG C,et al.The synthesis of n-caproate from lactate:a new efficient process for medium-chain carboxylates production[J].Scientific Reports,2015,5:14360.
    [15]
    CARVAJAL-ARROYO J M,CANDRY P,ANDERSEN S J,et al.Granular fermentation enables high rate caproic acid production from solid-free thin stillage[J].Green Chemistry,2019,21(6):1330-1339.
    [16]
    YU J N,HUANG Z X,WU P,et al.Performance and microbial characterization of two-stage caproate fermentation from fruit and vegetable waste via anaerobic microbial consortia[J].Bioresource Technology,2019,284:398-405.
    [17]
    GILDEMYN S,MOLITOR B,USACK J G,et al.Upgrading syngas fermentation effluent using Clostridium kluyveri in a continuous fermentation[J].Biotechnology for Biofuels,2017,10:1-15.
    [18]
    TAO Y,ZHU X Y,WANG H,et al.Complete genome sequence of Ruminococcaceae bacterium CPB6:a newly isolated culture for efficient n-caproic acid production from lactate[J].Journal of Biotechnology,2017,259:91-94.
    [19]
    LOWRY O H,ROSEBROUGH N J,FARR A L,et al.Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent[J].The Journal of biological chemistry,1951,193(1):265-275.
    [20]
    GOEL R,MINO T,SATOH H,et al.Enzyme activities under anaerobic and aerobic conditions inactivated sludge sequencing batch reactor[J].Water Research,1998,32(7):2081-2088.
    [21]
    MU H,CHEN Y G.Long-term effect of ZnO nanoparticles on waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion[J].Water Research,2011,45(17):5612-5620.
    [22]
    XU X B,ZHANG W J,GU X,et al.Stabilizing lactate production through repeated batch fermentation of food waste and waste activated sludge[J].Bioresource Technology,2020,300:122709.
    [23]
    NYBROE O,JORGENSEN P E,HENZE M.Enzyme-activities in waste-water and activated-sludge[J].Water Research,1992,26(5):579-584.
    [24]
    ZHANG D P,SPADARO D,VALENTE S,et al.Cloning,characterization,expression and antifungal activity of an alkaline serine protease of Aureobasidium pullulans PL5 involved in the biological control of postharvest pathogens[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2012,153(3):453-464.
    [25]
    LIANG S,GLINIEWICZ K,MENDES-SOARES H,et al.Comparative analysis of microbial community of novel lactic acid fermentation inoculated with different undefined mixed cultures[J].Bioresource Technology,2015,179:268-274.
    [26]
    REDCORN R,ENGELBERTH A S.Identifying conditions to optimize lactic acid production from food waste co-digested with primary sludge[J].Biochemical Engineering Journal,2016,105:205-213.
    [27]
    ANGENENT L T,RICHTER H,BUCKEL W,et al.Chain elongation with reactor microbiomes:open-culture biotechnology to produce biochemicals[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2016,50(6):2796-2810.
    [28]
    ZHANG W J,LI X,ZHANG T,et al.High-rate lactic acid production from food waste and waste activated sludge via interactive control of pH adjustment and fermentation temperature[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2017,328:197-206.
    [29]
    TASHIRO Y,KANEKO W,SUN Y Q,et al.Continuous D-lactic acid production by a novel thermotolerant Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp lactis QU 41[J].Applied Microbiology And Biotechnology,2011,89(6):1741-1750.
    [30]
    BI D X,CHU D Q,ZHU P,et al.Utilization of dry distiller's grain and solubles as nutrient supplement in the simultaneous saccharification and ethanol fermentation at high solids loading of corn stover[J].Biotechnology Letters,2011,33(2):273-276.
    [31]
    COMA M,VILCHEZ-VARGAS R,ROUME H,et al.Product diversity linked to substrate usage in chain elongation by mixed-culture fermentation[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2016,50(12):6467-6476.
    [32]
    KUCEK L A,NGUYEN M,ANGENENT L T.Conversion of L-lactate into n-caproate by a continuously fed reactor microbiome[J].Water Research,2016,93:163-171.
    [33]
    TARASOV A L,BORZENKOV I A,BELYAYEV S S.Investigation of the trophic relations between anaerobic microorganisms from an underground gas repository during methanol utilization[J].Microbiology,2011,80(2):180-187.
    [34]
    CHEN Y,JIANG X,XIAO K,et al.Enhanced volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production in a thermophilic fermenter with stepwise pH increase:investigation on dissolved organic matter transformation and microbial community shift[J].Water Research,2017,112:261-268.
    [35]
    AGLER M T,SPIRITO C M,USACK J G,et al.Chain elongation with reactor microbiomes:upgrading dilute ethanol to medium-chain carboxylates[J].Energy & Environmental Science,2012,5(8):8189-8192.
    [36]
    KIM B C,SEUNG JEON B,KIM S,et al.Caproiciproducens galactitolivorans gen.nov.,sp.nov.,a bacterium capable of producing caproic acid from galactitol,isolated from a wastewater treatment plant[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology,2015,65(12):4902-4908.
    [37]
    AGLER M T,WERNER J J,ITEN L B,et al.Shaping reactor microbiomes to produce the fuel precursorn-butyrate from pretreated cellulosic hydrolysates[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2012,46(18):10229-10238.
    [38]
    KHOR W C,ANDERSEN S,VERVAEREN H,et al.Electricity-assisted production of caproic acid from grass[J].Biotechnol Biofuels,2017,10(1):180-191.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Yating, ZHAO Xinyu, LI Yanhong, ZHANG Chuanyan, DANG Qiuling, XI Beidou. ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR AND RESTORATION PROGRESS OF EMERGING CONTAMINANTS IN CONTAMINATED SITES IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 166-176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401022
    [2]ZHANG Wei, TANG Yifan, WANG Chen, CHAI Senyou, ZUO Qiting. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON SOIL REPLACEMENT MEDIUM IN BIOLOGICAL RETENTION FACILITIES FOR SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 277-285. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308035
    [3]CHEN Zhikang, LIU Liujun, YIN Lipu, YUE Rui, MAO Xuhui. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING FOR SOIL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 224-234,243. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204032
    [4]HUANG Xuan, GUO Bao-man, GU Ai-liang, ZHANG Yun, TIAN Tian, CENG Yue-chun. RESEARCH ADVANCES AND APPLICATION OF HORIZONTAL REMEDIATION WELLS IN SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 262-269. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209035
    [5]HUANG Guoxin, LIU Ruiping, YANG Ruijie, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Qiulei, WANG Xiahui, TIAN Zi, WANG Yipeng. RESEARCH PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL AND THEIR APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FARMLAND SOIL HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 216-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201031
    [6]WU Fan, NIU Dong-jie. REVIEW ON PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 128-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104020
    [7]LENG Guo-qin, TAO Tian-yi, YANG Yi-fan, CHEN Bo-li, SUN Zhi, HUANG Zhao-hui. INDIUM RECOVERY PROCESSES DEVELOPMENT FROM VARIOUS In-CONTAINING WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 142-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105020
    [8]LIANG Jing, WANG Shi-jie, ZHANG Wen-yu, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Yuan, ZOU Hui. REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 173-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026
    [9]HUANG Kai-you, SHEN Ying-jie, WANG Xiao-yan, WANG Xing-run, YUAN Wen-yi, ZHANG Cheng-long, BAI Jian-feng, WANG Jing-wei. REVIEW ON PREPARATION OF BIO-CARBON LOADED NANO ZERO-VALENT IRON AND ITS APPLICATION IN REMEDIATING Cr(Ⅵ)-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 203-210,195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011033
    [10]GUO Li-li, KANG Shao-guo, WANG Qi, XIONG Jing, LI Shu-peng, KONG Jiao-yan. PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION:AN OVERVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 9-15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006002
    [11]YANG Wen-xiao, ZHANG Li, BI Xue, LI Huan-ru, GU Qian. RESEARCH ADVANCEMENT OF STABILIZATION MATERIALS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM(Ⅵ) CONTAMINATED SITE SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 16-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006003
    [12]ZHANG Ruo-shi, TIAN Yong-qiang. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF BIOSORPTION REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 187-195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011031
    [13]SUN Zeng-zhi, YANG Bao-shuai, GUAN Bo-wen, GAO Si-qi, DENG Chen-ji, CHEN Yu-hong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED CONCRETE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 221-227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006036
    [14]FENG Chao, WANG Yu, KONG Ling-rong, YUE Chang-sheng, YAO De-jun, WANG Zhi-qiao. ADVANCES OF SUPERCRITICAL WATER REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ORGANIC POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 140-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010022
    [15]Deng Yirong, Lin Ting, Xiao Rongbo, Zhao Lu, Han Cunliang. RECENT ADVANCES IN THE APPLICATION OF EKR-PRB IN CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 152-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510034
    [16]Yao Yuping Liu Hanxiao Zhu Shaoping, . STUDY ON PARTICULATE MATTER GRAVIMETRIC METHOD AT LOW CONCENTRATION FOR COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 139-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510031
    [17]Zhang Hongzhong, Huo Jing, Ma Chuang, Zhao Jihong, Liu Huanjia. THE PROGRESS OF RESEACH ON THE APPLICATION OF URBAN SLUDGE COMPOST FOR LAWN SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 92-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502020
    [18]Yang Yang Song Naiping Liu Bingru He Tonghui An Hui, . THE CURRENT STATUS AND PROGRESSES OF CHANGES IN LAND USE PATTERN ON AGRO-PASTORAL ECOTONE OF CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 158-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503031
    [19]Yin Zhen, Zhang Junchao, Liao Shulin, Ma Qiang, Wang Qingguo, Zhang Jinfeng. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF THE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 159-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501037
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 于嘉璐,卢美霞,何苗苗,魏玉珍,蔡立群,潘占东,孛永明,李旭春. 生物炭和凹凸棒土负载纳米零价铁去除水中六价铬的性能与机理研究. 环境科学学报. 2024(07): 127-136 .
    2. 王雷,李红霞,崔兴兰,史新悦,郑鹏,孙英春,杨晓莉. 某高原区典型铬污染场地人体健康风险评价. 铜业工程. 2024(06): 18-24 .
    3. 徐汝悦,王子霄,沈禄,吴蓉蓉,姚芳婷,谭中原,刘恒蔚,张文超. Cr(Ⅵ)的生物修复技术研究进展. 生物技术通报. 2023(06): 49-60 .
    4. 邱沙,宋景鹏,陈志国,白鹤,曹文庆,刘艺芸. 原位化学还原技术修复铬污染土壤及其工程应用. 环境科学与技术. 2021(04): 131-139 .

    Other cited types(9)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.0 %FULLTEXT: 9.0 %META: 91.0 %META: 91.0 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.0 %其他: 8.0 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %Japan: 0.1 %Japan: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 5.5 %上海: 5.5 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.1 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.1 %北京: 11.5 %北京: 11.5 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 3.5 %南京: 3.5 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 1.1 %南昌: 1.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通市崇川区: 0.1 %南通市崇川区: 0.1 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台北: 0.3 %台北: 0.3 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 1.2 %合肥: 1.2 %吉林: 0.4 %吉林: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 2.9 %天津: 2.9 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜春: 0.6 %宜春: 0.6 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %宫城: 0.1 %宫城: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %德州: 0.1 %德州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %成都市双流区: 0.1 %成都市双流区: 0.1 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %新乡: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 3.9 %杭州: 3.9 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %株洲: 1.0 %株洲: 1.0 %桂林: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 2.6 %武汉: 2.6 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %河源: 0.1 %河源: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 1.3 %济南: 1.3 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.4 %淄博: 0.4 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %绍兴: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.4 %绵阳: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 4.7 %西宁: 4.7 %西安: 1.5 %西安: 1.5 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %达州: 0.3 %达州: 0.3 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %郑州: 1.7 %郑州: 1.7 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 2.0 %重庆: 2.0 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %锦州: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 3.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %青岛: 2.5 %青岛: 2.5 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.3 %香港特别行政区: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄石: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaJapanSaitamaTuen Mun San HuiUnited States[]上海东莞中山临汾临沂丽水丽江乌兰察布乐山佛山保定信阳兰州凉山彝族自治州北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌南通南通市崇川区厦门台北台州合肥吉林呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨唐山嘉兴大同天津太原威海娄底宁波安庆安康安顺宜昌宜春宝鸡宣城宫城巴中常州常德平顶山广州廊坊延安张家口德州德阳惠州成都成都市双流区扬州抚州拉萨拉贾斯坦邦攀枝花新乡无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州枣庄株洲桂林榆林武汉汕头沈阳河源泸州洛阳济南济源海口淄博淮北深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河潍坊潮州濮阳烟台眉山石家庄福州绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州葫芦岛衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳赣州达州运城遵义邯郸邵阳郑州鄂州重庆金华银川锦州镇江长春长沙长治阜新阳泉陇南青岛韶关香港特别行政区鹰潭黄冈黄石齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (165) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return