Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
WANG Xing-run, LI Lei, YANG Xiang-hua, TIAN Yong-qiang. PROGRESS IN REMEDIATION OF CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 1-8,23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006001
Citation: LIU Hang-yi, YAN Bei-bei, LIN Fa-wei, WANG Yuan, WANG Xu-tong, CHEN Guan-yi. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO KINDS OF FOOD WASTE RECYCLING SCHEMES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LCA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 169-175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109024

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO KINDS OF FOOD WASTE RECYCLING SCHEMES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LCA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109024
  • Received Date: 2020-11-18
    Available Online: 2022-01-21
  • In recent years, harmless and resource utilization of food waste are advocated researching and developing directions, which also play important role in public health and sustainable development. This paper selected two food waste treatment plants in Tangshan and Xiamen for investigation, representing two typical food waste treatment modes in China. The characterization, standardization, and normalization were conducted by method IMPACT2002+ in Simapro software. In addition, their economic benefits were briefly evaluated. The results demonstrated that case 1(Tangshan) dominated the environmental impact results of 13 midpoint indicators, such as aquatic ecotoxicity, non-renewable resources, and terrestrial ecotoxicity. The total potential environmental impacts of co-production of case 1(Tangshan) and case 2(Xiamen) were -26mpt and 22.7mpt, respectively. Thus, the environmental benefits of case 1 predominated. Comparing to case1, case2 has a shorter payback period and better economic benefits.
  • [1]
    李游,刘喜,赵石铁,等.餐厨垃圾资源化处理预处理方案对比分析[J].环境与发展,2019,31(11):218-219

    ,222.
    [2]
    周俊,王梦瑶,王改红,等.餐厨垃圾资源化利用技术研究现状及展望[J].生物资源,2020,42(1):87-96.
    [3]
    ZENG H R,YAN Y J,LIBERTI F,et al.Technical and economic feasibility analysis of an anaerobic digestion plant fed with canteen food waste[J].Energ Convers Manage,2019,180:938-948.
    [4]
    胡新军,张敏,余俊锋,等.中国餐厨垃圾处理的现状、问题和对策[J].生态学报,2012,32(14):4575-4584.
    [5]
    SPYRIDON A,VASILEIOS A,GERRIT J,et al.A Technological Overview of Biogas Production from Biowaste[J].Engineering,2017,3(3):299-307.
    [6]
    赵元浩,张力小,梁赛,等.生命周期视角下废弃餐饮油脂炼制生物柴油的环境效益分析[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(3):1006-1012.
    [7]
    鲁厚芳,史国强,刘颖颖,等.生物柴油生产及性质研究进展[J].化工进展,2011.,30(1):126-136.
    [8]
    沈超青.广州市餐厨垃圾的资源化利用研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2013.
    [9]
    徐艳,张培栋.基于Simapro利用废弃餐饮油脂炼制生物柴油的生命周期环境影响评价[J].可再生能源,2013,31(6):79-84

    ,89.
    [10]
    ORTNER MARIA E,MUELLER WOLFGANG,SCHNEIDER IRENE,et al.Environmental assessment of three different utilization paths of waste cooking oil from households[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2016,106:59-67.
    [11]
    COUR JANSEN J L A,BERNSTAD A.Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems-current status and potential improvements.Waste Manage,2012,32(12):2439-2455.
    [12]
    INGUANZO M,DOMINGUEZ A,A MENÉNDEZ J,et al.On the pyrolysis of sewage sludge:the influence of pyrolysis conditions on solid,liquid and gas fractions[J].Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis,2002,63(1):209-222.
    [13]
    PIETRO B,MAURO Z,FEDERICA L,et al.LCA analysis of food waste co-digestion[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,709:136-187.
    [14]
    全国环境管理标准化技术委员会.环境管理生命周期评价要求与指南:GB/T 24044-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
    [15]
    FAVA J.A technical framework for life-cycle assessment[Z].SETAC,1991,FL:Pensacola,.
    [16]
    黄先玉,刘沛然.生命周期评价[J].广州环境科学,1999,14(3):1-3.
    [17]
    姜金龙,吴玉萍,马军,等.生命周期评价的技术框架及研究进展[J].兰州理工大学学报,2005,31(4)::23-26.
    [18]
    NOAKES T J.CFCs,their replacements,and the ozone layer[J].Journal of Aerosol Medicine,1995,8(1):S3-S7.
    [19]
    于志强.冶金法多晶硅及其光伏系统并网发电的生命周期评价研究[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2017.
    [20]
    李姣.基于生命周期评价方法的固体废弃物能源化环境影响分析[D].天津:天津大学,2018.
    [21]
    CHICAIZA O,CRISTHIAN D.Comparison of MSW incineration and gasification by life cycle analysis:influence on greenhouse gas emissions and potential application in ecuador[D].Tianjin:Tianjin University,2019.
    [22]
    MARGNI M,CHARLES R,HUMBERT S,et al.IMPACT2002+:a new life cycle impact assessment methodology[J].International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2003,8(6):324-330.
    [23]
    陈福仲,刘杰,陈晶晶.餐厨垃圾沼气热电联产经济分析[J].能源研究利用,2020(2):30-33.
    [24]
    高唱.基于LCA的再生混凝土环境影响评价研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2020.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Yating, ZHAO Xinyu, LI Yanhong, ZHANG Chuanyan, DANG Qiuling, XI Beidou. ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR AND RESTORATION PROGRESS OF EMERGING CONTAMINANTS IN CONTAMINATED SITES IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 166-176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401022
    [2]ZHANG Wei, TANG Yifan, WANG Chen, CHAI Senyou, ZUO Qiting. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON SOIL REPLACEMENT MEDIUM IN BIOLOGICAL RETENTION FACILITIES FOR SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 277-285. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308035
    [3]CHEN Zhikang, LIU Liujun, YIN Lipu, YUE Rui, MAO Xuhui. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING FOR SOIL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 224-234,243. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204032
    [4]HUANG Xuan, GUO Bao-man, GU Ai-liang, ZHANG Yun, TIAN Tian, CENG Yue-chun. RESEARCH ADVANCES AND APPLICATION OF HORIZONTAL REMEDIATION WELLS IN SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 262-269. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209035
    [5]HUANG Guoxin, LIU Ruiping, YANG Ruijie, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Qiulei, WANG Xiahui, TIAN Zi, WANG Yipeng. RESEARCH PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL AND THEIR APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FARMLAND SOIL HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 216-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201031
    [6]WU Fan, NIU Dong-jie. REVIEW ON PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 128-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104020
    [7]LENG Guo-qin, TAO Tian-yi, YANG Yi-fan, CHEN Bo-li, SUN Zhi, HUANG Zhao-hui. INDIUM RECOVERY PROCESSES DEVELOPMENT FROM VARIOUS In-CONTAINING WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 142-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105020
    [8]LIANG Jing, WANG Shi-jie, ZHANG Wen-yu, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Yuan, ZOU Hui. REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 173-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026
    [9]HUANG Kai-you, SHEN Ying-jie, WANG Xiao-yan, WANG Xing-run, YUAN Wen-yi, ZHANG Cheng-long, BAI Jian-feng, WANG Jing-wei. REVIEW ON PREPARATION OF BIO-CARBON LOADED NANO ZERO-VALENT IRON AND ITS APPLICATION IN REMEDIATING Cr(Ⅵ)-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 203-210,195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011033
    [10]GUO Li-li, KANG Shao-guo, WANG Qi, XIONG Jing, LI Shu-peng, KONG Jiao-yan. PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION:AN OVERVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 9-15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006002
    [11]YANG Wen-xiao, ZHANG Li, BI Xue, LI Huan-ru, GU Qian. RESEARCH ADVANCEMENT OF STABILIZATION MATERIALS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM(Ⅵ) CONTAMINATED SITE SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 16-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006003
    [12]ZHANG Ruo-shi, TIAN Yong-qiang. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF BIOSORPTION REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 187-195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011031
    [13]SUN Zeng-zhi, YANG Bao-shuai, GUAN Bo-wen, GAO Si-qi, DENG Chen-ji, CHEN Yu-hong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED CONCRETE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 221-227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006036
    [14]FENG Chao, WANG Yu, KONG Ling-rong, YUE Chang-sheng, YAO De-jun, WANG Zhi-qiao. ADVANCES OF SUPERCRITICAL WATER REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ORGANIC POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 140-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010022
    [15]Deng Yirong, Lin Ting, Xiao Rongbo, Zhao Lu, Han Cunliang. RECENT ADVANCES IN THE APPLICATION OF EKR-PRB IN CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 152-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510034
    [16]Yao Yuping Liu Hanxiao Zhu Shaoping, . STUDY ON PARTICULATE MATTER GRAVIMETRIC METHOD AT LOW CONCENTRATION FOR COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 139-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510031
    [17]Zhang Hongzhong, Huo Jing, Ma Chuang, Zhao Jihong, Liu Huanjia. THE PROGRESS OF RESEACH ON THE APPLICATION OF URBAN SLUDGE COMPOST FOR LAWN SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 92-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502020
    [18]Yang Yang Song Naiping Liu Bingru He Tonghui An Hui, . THE CURRENT STATUS AND PROGRESSES OF CHANGES IN LAND USE PATTERN ON AGRO-PASTORAL ECOTONE OF CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 158-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503031
    [19]Yin Zhen, Zhang Junchao, Liao Shulin, Ma Qiang, Wang Qingguo, Zhang Jinfeng. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF THE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 159-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501037
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 于嘉璐,卢美霞,何苗苗,魏玉珍,蔡立群,潘占东,孛永明,李旭春. 生物炭和凹凸棒土负载纳米零价铁去除水中六价铬的性能与机理研究. 环境科学学报. 2024(07): 127-136 .
    2. 王雷,李红霞,崔兴兰,史新悦,郑鹏,孙英春,杨晓莉. 某高原区典型铬污染场地人体健康风险评价. 铜业工程. 2024(06): 18-24 .
    3. 徐汝悦,王子霄,沈禄,吴蓉蓉,姚芳婷,谭中原,刘恒蔚,张文超. Cr(Ⅵ)的生物修复技术研究进展. 生物技术通报. 2023(06): 49-60 .
    4. 邱沙,宋景鹏,陈志国,白鹤,曹文庆,刘艺芸. 原位化学还原技术修复铬污染土壤及其工程应用. 环境科学与技术. 2021(04): 131-139 .

    Other cited types(9)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.0 %FULLTEXT: 9.0 %META: 91.0 %META: 91.0 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.0 %其他: 8.0 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %Japan: 0.1 %Japan: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 5.5 %上海: 5.5 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.1 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.1 %北京: 11.5 %北京: 11.5 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 3.5 %南京: 3.5 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 1.1 %南昌: 1.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通市崇川区: 0.1 %南通市崇川区: 0.1 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台北: 0.3 %台北: 0.3 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 1.2 %合肥: 1.2 %吉林: 0.4 %吉林: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 2.9 %天津: 2.9 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜春: 0.6 %宜春: 0.6 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %宫城: 0.1 %宫城: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %德州: 0.1 %德州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %成都市双流区: 0.1 %成都市双流区: 0.1 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %新乡: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 3.9 %杭州: 3.9 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %株洲: 1.0 %株洲: 1.0 %桂林: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 2.6 %武汉: 2.6 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %河源: 0.1 %河源: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 1.3 %济南: 1.3 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.4 %淄博: 0.4 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %绍兴: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.4 %绵阳: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 4.7 %西宁: 4.7 %西安: 1.5 %西安: 1.5 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %达州: 0.3 %达州: 0.3 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %郑州: 1.7 %郑州: 1.7 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 2.0 %重庆: 2.0 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %锦州: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 3.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %青岛: 2.5 %青岛: 2.5 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.3 %香港特别行政区: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄石: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaJapanSaitamaTuen Mun San HuiUnited States[]上海东莞中山临汾临沂丽水丽江乌兰察布乐山佛山保定信阳兰州凉山彝族自治州北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌南通南通市崇川区厦门台北台州合肥吉林呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨唐山嘉兴大同天津太原威海娄底宁波安庆安康安顺宜昌宜春宝鸡宣城宫城巴中常州常德平顶山广州廊坊延安张家口德州德阳惠州成都成都市双流区扬州抚州拉萨拉贾斯坦邦攀枝花新乡无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州枣庄株洲桂林榆林武汉汕头沈阳河源泸州洛阳济南济源海口淄博淮北深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河潍坊潮州濮阳烟台眉山石家庄福州绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州葫芦岛衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳赣州达州运城遵义邯郸邵阳郑州鄂州重庆金华银川锦州镇江长春长沙长治阜新阳泉陇南青岛韶关香港特别行政区鹰潭黄冈黄石齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (247) PDF downloads(14) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return