Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 10
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(10): 143-149
YANG Zi-jian, LIU Yang-sheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WATER-BASED DRILLING SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 143-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110020
Citation: YANG Zi-jian, LIU Yang-sheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WATER-BASED DRILLING SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 143-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110020
shu

RESEARCH PROGRESS ON TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WATER-BASED DRILLING SOLID WASTE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110020

  • Beijing Key Laboratory for Solid Waste Utilization and Management, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

  • Received Date: 2020-11-01
    Available Online: 2022-01-26
    Abstract
  • As environmental protection policies has become stricter in oil and gas fields and the large output and low disposal rate of water-based drilling waste, how to effectively deal with solid waste from water-based drilling has become an urgent problem in the industry. In this paper, characteristics of water-based drilling waste were introduced. On this basis, advantages and disadvantages of treatment and disposal methods of drilling fluid and cuttings or dried mud were summarized and compared, including solidification or stabilization, solid-liquid separation, microbial treatment, incineration and landfill, etc. This paper puts forward four problems existing in disposal of water-based drilling waste in China, including attaching importance to oil-based waste rather than water-based waste, insufficient solid waste disposal capacity, lack of specifications and standards, and difficulty in treatment of some water-based drilling systems. On the basis of these problems, the future research focus is forecasted.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(48)
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国自然资源部. 2019年度全国石油天然气资源勘查开采通报[EB/OL]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202007/t20200729_2534777.

    html,2020-07-28.
    [2]
    王彩林. 废弃钻井泥浆随钻无害化处理[D]. 天津:天津工业大学, 2017.
    [3]
    于真真. 钻井废弃泥浆无害化处理实验研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2009.
    [4]
    蒋云云, 范代娣, 贾汉忠, 等. 新疆油田废弃水基钻井泥浆固化处理技术研究[J]. 石油化工应用,2015, 34(6):88-90

    ,98.
    [5]
    夏海帮, 包凯, 王玉海, 等. 涪陵页岩气田平桥南区块钻井岩屑综合利用技术[J]. 石油钻探技术,2019, 47(2):63-67.
    [6]
    DASHTIAN H, BAKHSHIAN S, PAIAMAN A M, et al. A Review on Impacts of Drilling Mud Disposal on Environment and Underground Water Resources in South of Iran[C]//Middle East Drilling Technology Conference & Exhibition, 2009:8.
    [7]
    LI B, WEI S, ZHEN Y W. An effective recycling direction of water-based drilling cuttings and phosphogypsum co-processing in road cushion layer[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(14):17420-17424.
    [8]
    黄鸣宇. 废弃钻井液固化处理技术研究[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学, 2011.
    [9]
    李斌. 油田水基含油废弃钻井液化学脱水工艺研究[J]. 化学工程师,2016, 30(9):46-49.
    [10]
    周礼. 废弃水基钻井液无害化处理技术研究及应用[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2014.
    [11]
    陈曦, 郭丽梅, 喻可喆, 等. 钻井废泥浆絮凝脱水固化处理研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2017, 7(4):495-499.
    [12]
    SAINT-Fort R, ASHTANI S. Effect of a water-based drilling waste on receiving soil properties and plants growth[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part a-Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 2014, 49(1):10-17.
    [13]
    沈晓莉, 杨金忠, 徐天有, 等. 典型地区油气田水基钻井岩屑污染特征研究[J]. 环境污染与防治,2017, 39(5):480-483.
    [14]
    高昊辰, 张春, 张思兰, 等. 中国西南地区页岩气田水基钻屑理化性状与污染物分析[J]. 土壤,2019, 51(6):1168-1172.
    [15]
    KUJAWSKA J, PAWŁOWSKA M. Earthworms as bio-indicators of chemical pollution in soils with drilling waste[C]//E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2017, 17:00048.
    [16]
    JAGWANI D, KULKARNI A, SHUKLA P, et al. PAH composition of water based drilling mud and drill cuttings in the offshore region, east coast of india[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2011, 87(5):550-555.
    [17]
    黄慧, 聂志强, 孟棒棒, 等. 不同处理工艺页岩气钻井岩屑的污染特性[J]. 环境科学研究,2020, 33(3):777-782.
    [18]
    王茂仁. 新疆油田钻井水基固液废弃物不落地处理技术研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2017.
    [19]
    AL-HAMEEDI A T T, ALKINANI H H, DUNN-NORMAN S, et al. Full-set measurements dataset for a water-based drilling fluid utilizing biodegradable environmentally friendly drilling fluid additives generated from waste[J]. Data in Brief, 2020, 28:104945.
    [20]
    费立, 陈礼仪. 废泥浆固化处理与粉煤灰的利用[J]. 探矿工程-岩土挖掘工程,2001(增刊1):287.
    [21]
    尹亚君, 谢海燕, 王博远, 等. 塔河油田钻井废弃泥浆无害化处理技术研究[J]. 环境科学与管理,2014, 39(1):90-93.
    [22]
    MISHRA S, JYOT J, KUHAD R C, et al. In situ bioremediation potential of an oily sludge-degrading bacterial consortium[J]. Current Microbiology, 2001, 43(5):328-335.
    [23]
    KRIIPSALU M, MARQUES M, NAMMARI D R, et al. Bio-treatment of oily sludge:the contribution of amendment material to the content of target contaminants, and the biodegradation dynamics[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 148(3):616-622.
    [24]
    王斐, 唐景春, 林大明, 等. 牛粪强化高含油污泥堆肥生物处理及评价[J]. 生态学杂志,2013, 32(1):164-170.
    [25]
    AYOTAMUNO M J, OKPARANMA R N, NWENEKA E K, et al. Bio-remediation of a sludge containing hydrocarbons[J]. Applied Energy, 2007, 84(9):936-943.
    [26]
    周立辉, 任建科, 张海玲, 等. 使用撬装式生物反应器处理含油污泥的现场试验[J]. 干旱环境监测,2011, 25(4):242-244

    ,249.
    [27]
    何长明, 李俊华, 王佳. 废弃钻井液无害化处理技术的研究[J]. 应用化工,2016, 45(9):1792-1794.
    [28]
    肖早早, 吴家全, 张力鸥. 复合絮凝剂处理钻井废泥浆的研究[J]. 精细石油化工,2019, 36(4):6-10.
    [29]
    陈明明, 张琦, 杨灿, 等. 废弃钻井液无害化处理技术在岐139×1井的应用[J]. 中国资源综合利用,2017, 35(9):50-51.
    [30]
    HU K, CHEN X, HUANG W, et al. Novel sequential treatment methodology for disposal of water-based waste drilling mud[J]. 2012, 29(7):669-676.
    [31]
    ZOU J, ZHU H, WANG F H, et al. Preparation of a new inorganic-organic composite flocculant used in solid-liquid separation for waste drilling fluid[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 171(1):350-356.
    [32]
    常晓峰. 废弃水基钻井液清洁处理剂的研究与应用[D]. 西安:西安石油大学, 2018.
    [33]
    李厚铭, 李学军, 张福铭, 等. 国外油田钻井废弃物回注处理技术进展[J]. 科学技术与工程,2012, 12(28):7318-7325.
    [34]
    KUNZE K R, ROMERO E E, DUCK S. Colorado Drill-Cuttings-Injection Pilot Results[J]. Spe Drilling & Completion, 2013, 28(1):65-74.
    [35]
    牟顺泉, 董怀荣, 丁希军, 等. 钻屑随钻处理技术研究[J]. 石油矿场机械,2012, 24(6):77-80.
    [36]
    郑婷婷, 涂妹, 刘莎丽, 等. 含油钻屑热解析及焚烧处理技术研究[J]. 化工管理,2015(4):146-147.
    [37]
    AYATI B, MOLINEUX C, NEWPORT D, et al. Manufacture and performance of lightweight aggregate from waste drill cuttings[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 208:252-260.
    [38]
    宋玲, 陈集, 高建林, 等. 用废弃钻井液制备废水处理吸附剂[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2009, 26(4):86-88

    ,96.
    [39]
    魏美涛, 陈集, 王滟, 等. 用添加铝盐焙烧法处理废弃钻井泥浆[J]. 精细石油化工进展,2007,8(10):44-47.
    [40]
    刘雅雪. 页岩气含油钻屑降解菌的选育及降解技术研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2019.
    [41]
    何焕杰, 单海霞, 马雅雅, 等. 油基钻屑常温清洗-微生物联合处理技术[J]. 天然气工业,2016, 36(5):122-127.
    [42]
    万书宇, 余思源, 何天鹏, 等. 微生物处理水基钻井固废技术应用[J]. 油气田环境保护,2019, 29(2):33-36

    ,61.
    [43]
    何焕杰, 张淑侠, 王爱华, 等. 气田深井聚磺钻井液废液复合固化处理技术研究[J]. 环境工程学报,2010, 4(11):2489-2493.
    [44]
    LEONARD S A, STEGEMANN J A. Stabilization/solidification of petroleum drill cuttings[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 174(1/2/3):463-472.
    [45]
    LEONARD S A, ROY A D, STEGEMANN J A. Stabilization/solidification of petroleum drill cuttings:thermal and microstructural studies of binder hydration products[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2010, 27(10):889-903.
    [46]
    蔡浩, 姚晓, 华苏东, 等. 页岩气井油基钻屑固化处理技术[J]. 环境工程学报,2017, 11(5):3120-3127.
    [47]
    FILIPPOV L, THOMAS F, FILIPPOVA I, et al. Stabilization of NaCl-containing cuttings wastes in cement concrete by in situ formed mineral phases[J]. Journal of Hazardous materials, 2009, 171(1/2/3):731-738.
    [48]
    徐亚红, 彭熙, 蒋灶, 等. 机械力活化固硫灰固化处理含油钻屑[J]. 环境科学与技术,2017, 40(2):139-142.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LU Fanghai, CHAI Hongyun, HE Haijun, WEI Zhuangqiang, SHU Ya, CHEN Xiaohu, LONG Xianze. RESOURCE REUTILIZATION FOR PHOSPHOGYPSUM AND RED MUD THOUGH CO-TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 156-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403019
    [2]LIU Junwu, CAI Jingju, FANG Yingchun, CAO Jingxiao, ZHU Jian, WANG Ping, JIANG Xiaxin, ZHU Shanshan, ZHANG Jinjin. SYNCHRONOUS REMOVAL OF MOISTURE AND ORGANIC POLLUTANTS IN DREDGING SEDIMENT BY ELECTRO-FENTON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 76-81,108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306011
    [3]WANG Xinlong, SUN Pinghe, ZHAO Mingzhe, XING Shikuan, FENG Deshan, TANG Lei. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT CONSOLIDATION FACTORS ON MOISTURE CONTENT AND PERMEABILITY OF WASTE SLURRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 84-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208011
    [4]GUO Li-heng, GUAN Xiao-hong, LIU Hui-ling, DAI Xiao-hu. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON HARMLESS AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF FERMENTATION RESIDUE OF STEROIDAL DRUGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 244-250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205034
    [5]XIN Wen-cai, CHEN Meng, CHEN Yi-lin, CHEN Shi, FU Wei-liang, ZHANG Cheng-zhen, ZHANG Xu-kun. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF DRYING AND REDUCTION EQUIPMENT FOR HIGH-HUMIDITY AND HIGH-VISCOSITY SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 178-182. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103025
    [6]XIANG Hong-lin, JIANG Jian-guo, GAO Yu-chen, MENG Yuan, XU Yi-wen, AIKELAIMU Aihemaiti, JU Tong-yao, HAN Si-yu, GUO Yan-ran. EFFECT OF AIR-FLOW RATE ON BIO-DRYING OF ORGANIC WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002017
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 杨延梅，徐鸿飞，侯蒙蒙，杨金忠，黄启飞，杨玉飞. 西北地区水基岩屑污染特征及其铺垫道路环境风险评估. 环境污染与防治. 2025(02): 82-87 .
    2. 常利娜，沈川. 基于中国知网文献计量视角下固体废弃物的研究热点与发展趋势分析. 环境生态学. 2025(02): 139-147+158 .
    3. 孙峰，夏嵩，李惠，刘斯琪，徐炳科，谢倩雯，史春艳. 水基钻井岩屑样品快速消解测定六种重金属元素. 油气田环境保护. 2025(01): 39-44 .
    4. 李金雨，王新刚，亓秋燕，王宗金，奚家米，艾子涵，李彦君，王昊宇，辜超颖. 钻井法泥浆用于陕北榆林地区矿山生态修复资源化利用试验研究. 西北地质. 2025(02): 197-208 .
    5. 王兵，孙越，商佳俭，陶建，李爽，任宏洋. BAP/O_3复合氧化体系对SMP的降解性能. 环境工程学报. 2024(02): 335-342 .
    6. 曹智鹏，田相友，于丙鑫，马蒸钊，谢江浩. 海上废弃钻井岩屑淋洗污染实验研究. 当代化工. 2024(02): 372-375+380 .
    7. 周晓娟. 固体废物对土壤环境的污染分析与无害化处理技术研究. 环境科学与管理. 2024(04): 81-85 .
    8. 何焱，何鑫，唐庆，杨嵌，李世伟，余世杰. 水基钻井岩屑细集料取代率对水泥混凝土性能影响研究. 四川建筑科学研究. 2024(04): 56-62 .
    9. 张建甲，单通，宁阳，程超. 油气田钻井固（危）废处置与利用综合解决方案探讨. 资源节约与环保. 2024(07): 123-126+144 .
    10. 王菲，赵彤，杨金忠，刘宏博，杨玉飞. 聚磺岩屑和还原土中钡的毒性物质含量鉴别方法研究. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(06): 1969-1976+1945 .
    11. 周奇，姚光远，包为磊，孙英杰，黄启飞. 油气田开采钻井岩屑分类利用处置现状及环境管理. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(02): 785-792 .
    12. 孙显根，李碧峰，韩桂成. 节能环保下农村固体废弃物污染防治技术研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(03): 55-60 .
    13. 湛峰，程全，刘慧敏，宋光明，诸林，孙勇，赵志越. 废弃水基钻井泥浆的固液分离研究——以四川蓬深X井为例. 天然气与石油. 2023(03): 95-102 .
    14. 唐雷，何瑜瑞，孙平贺，宋建恒，侯凯，胡凌云，黄兴海，冯德山. 基础工程废弃泥浆环境化学效应的实验研究. 环境工程. 2023(S2): 533-537 . 本站查看
    15. 李凤娟，张存社，李小龙，孙培，邵国彪. 废弃水基泥浆处理技术研究进展. 精细与专用化学品. 2023(11): 26-28 .
    16. 徐贵勤，谢水祥，任雯，张明栋，潘莉芳，刘国宇，岳长涛，李松辉. 废弃聚磺钻井液固相资源化绿色处理剂. 石油钻采工艺. 2023(06): 683-689 .
    17. 张景红，王志民. 渤海地区海上平台钻采固废管理现状及建议. 资源节约与环保. 2022(08): 81-83 .
    18. 王心龙，孙平贺，赵明哲，邢世宽，冯德山，唐雷. 不同固结因素对废弃泥浆含水率及渗透性的影响. 环境工程. 2022(08): 84-89 . 本站查看
    19. 刘莉，李诗雨，陆朝晖，田君竹，李昊宸. 页岩气油基岩屑处置及资源化利用方案比选. 中国矿业. 2022(10): 62-67 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.3 %FULLTEXT: 12.3 %META: 85.7 %META: 85.7 %PDF: 1.9 %PDF: 1.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.5 %其他: 8.5 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %东莞: 1.9 %东莞: 1.9 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 1.0 %乌鲁木齐: 1.0 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %内江: 0.7 %内江: 0.7 %北京: 4.4 %北京: 4.4 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南充: 1.9 %南充: 1.9 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %吕梁: 0.4 %吕梁: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 1.4 %呼和浩特: 1.4 %咸阳: 0.7 %咸阳: 0.7 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %塔城: 0.4 %塔城: 0.4 %大庆: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 3.6 %天津: 3.6 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %威海: 0.4 %威海: 0.4 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.6 %巴音郭楞: 0.6 %常州: 1.2 %常州: 1.2 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %广安: 0.1 %广安: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.1 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %惠州: 0.7 %惠州: 0.7 %成都: 6.8 %成都: 6.8 %承德: 0.1 %承德: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 1.9 %昆明: 1.9 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %株洲: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %榆林: 0.4 %榆林: 0.4 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.7 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %潜江: 0.1 %潜江: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.3 %濮阳: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绵阳: 1.1 %绵阳: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 25.9 %芒廷维尤: 25.9 %芝加哥: 3.2 %芝加哥: 3.2 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %西宁: 1.2 %西宁: 1.2 %西安: 3.9 %西安: 3.9 %西雅图: 1.0 %西雅图: 1.0 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 1.8 %运城: 1.8 %遂宁: 0.7 %遂宁: 0.7 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %鄂州: 0.3 %鄂州: 0.3 %重庆: 3.3 %重庆: 3.3 %铜川: 0.1 %铜川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿克苏: 0.1 %阿克苏: 0.1 %雷德蒙德: 0.1 %雷德蒙德: 0.1 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %黄山: 0.1 %黄山: 0.1 %其他其他[]上海东莞临汾乌鲁木齐乐山佛山保定六安内江北京南京南充南宁吕梁呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨塔城大庆大连天津太原威海宝鸡巴彦淖尔巴音郭楞常州常德广安庆阳张家口惠州成都承德无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州株洲榆林武汉汕头沈阳济南济源深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河潜江濮阳烟台盘锦石家庄纽约绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城遂宁遵义邯郸郑州鄂州重庆铜川银川长沙长治阿克苏雷德蒙德青岛黄山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (617) PDF downloads(16) Cited by(24)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return