Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
MA Xiao-qian, ZHANG Zhe, LIU Chao, WANG Jun-jie, WANG Jia-lin, YU Yi, CAO Rui-jie, SHI Zhi-li, WANG Ya-yi. TREATMENT OF LEACHATE FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION PLANT BY COMBINED ANAMMOX PROCESS: NITROGEN REMOVAL AND MICROBIAL MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 110-118. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111014
Citation: MA Xiao-qian, ZHANG Zhe, LIU Chao, WANG Jun-jie, WANG Jia-lin, YU Yi, CAO Rui-jie, SHI Zhi-li, WANG Ya-yi. TREATMENT OF LEACHATE FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION PLANT BY COMBINED ANAMMOX PROCESS: NITROGEN REMOVAL AND MICROBIAL MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 110-118. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111014

TREATMENT OF LEACHATE FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION PLANT BY COMBINED ANAMMOX PROCESS: NITROGEN REMOVAL AND MICROBIAL MECHANISM

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111014
  • Received Date: 2021-07-14
    Available Online: 2022-01-26
  • Leachate from municipal solid waste incineration plants is a kind of refractory wastewater with a high concentration of ammonia nitrogen and organic matter. Multi-stage nitrification and denitrification process is often used for biological denitrification of leachate, which has the disadvantages of high energy consumption and low efficiency. In this study, a continuous flow three-stage process of anaerobic digestion-partial nitrification-anammox was establish to treat the leachate with the anammox process as the key technology, and its biological denitrification effect, changes of organic matters, functional microbial activity and composition analysis of leachate from waste incineration plant were investigated. The results showed that when the influent NH4+-N and COD concentrations were 900~1800 mg/L and 3000~20000 mg/L, respectively, and the total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) and COD removal efficiency reached 85% and 77%, respectively. Specifically, the COD removal efficiency was about 45% in the anaerobic digestion reactor. The accumulation rate of NO2--N in the partial nitrification reactor remained 97% above, and the removal efficiency of total inorganic nitrogen was about 85% in the Anammox reactor; heterotrophic denitrification also had occurred in the system. The activity of ammonia oxidizing bacteria and anammox bacteria in the autotrophic nitrogen removal system decreased in varying degrees after the leachate added. The results of metagenomics combined with 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing analysis showed that the relative abundance of heterotrophic denitrifiers in the partial nitrification and Anammox reactors increased, due to the high concentration of organic matters in the leachate. Specially, Anammox was inhibited by refractory organics, among which Candidatus_Kuenenia was adaptable. Nevertheless, after a long-term acclimation, the anammox bacteria could still maintain a high nitrogen removal efficiency.
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[R]. 2020.
    [2]
    杨静,黄丹. 垃圾发电厂渗沥液处理中存在的问题剖析[J]. 水处理技术, 2020, 46(3):135-137.
    [3]
    叶杰旭,穆永杰,严显超,等. 生活垃圾焚烧厂沥滤液处理技术研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2012, 35(增刊1):134-139.
    [4]
    YE J J, LIU J Y, YE M, et al. Towards advanced nitrogen removal and optimal energy recovery from leachate:a critical review of anammox-based processes[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 50(6):612-653.
    [5]
    蒋海涛,周恭明,高廷耀. 城市垃圾填埋场渗滤液的水质特性[J]. 环境保护科学, 2002,28(3):11-13.
    [6]
    环境保护部.生活垃圾填埋场污染控制标准:GB 16889-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
    [7]
    张庆,贺敏鹏,谭光之. 垃圾焚烧厂渗滤液处理工艺问题改进及展望[J]. 山东化工, 2020, 49(16):256-258.
    [8]
    袁维芳,王浩,汤克敏,等. 垃圾渗滤液处理技术及工程化发展方向[J]. 环境保护科学, 2020, 46(1):76-83.
    [9]
    余崑. 垃圾渗滤液处理技术的方法及成本分析[J]. 中国设备工程, 2020(16):198-199.
    [10]
    WANG W G, YAN Y, SONG C K, et al. The microbial community structure change of an anaerobic ammonia oxidation reactor in response to decreasing temperatures[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(35):35330-35341.
    [11]
    MA B, WANG S Y, CAO S B, et al. Biological nitrogen removal from sewage via anammox:recent advances[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 200:981-990.
    [12]
    黄奕亮,张立秋,李淑更,等. 短程硝化厌氧氨氧化联合处理实际垃圾渗滤液[J]. 工业水处理, 2018, 3(38):37-41.
    [13]
    范茂军. 基于厌氧氨氧化技术处理垃圾渗滤液的研究综述[J]. 广东化工, 2019, 46(22):96-97.
    [14]
    VÁZQUEZ-PADÍN J R, POZO M J, JARPA M, et al. Treatment of anaerobic sludge digester effluents by the CANON process in an air pulsing SBR[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166(1):336-341.
    [15]
    ZHANG M, TAY J H, QIAN Y, et al. Coke plant wastewater treatment by fixed biofilm system for COD and NH3-N removal[J]. Water Research, 1998, 32(2):519-527.
    [16]
    王涛. CLR-A2O-MBR耦合工艺处理生活垃圾焚烧厂渗滤液的优化运行及效能研究[D]. 无锡:江南大学, 2018.
    [17]
    WANG W G, XIE H C, WANG H, et al. Organic compounds evolution and sludge properties variation along partial nitritation and subsequent anammox processes treating reject water[J]. Water Research, 2020, 184:116197.
    [18]
    樊宇菲,谢弘超,周慧,等. 高氨氮废水半短程硝化控制及曝气经济性运行优化[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(4):1275-1282.
    [19]
    住房和城乡建设部.城镇污水水质标准检验方法:CJ/T 51-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
    [20]
    ZHANG F Z, PENG Y Z, MIAO L, et al. A novel simultaneous partial nitrification Anammox and denitrification (SNAD) with intermittent aeration for cost-effective nitrogen removal from mature landfill leachate[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 313:619-628.
    [21]
    邓佳. 游离氨和游离亚硝酸对硝化过程的影响研究[D]. 成都:西华大学, 2020.
    [22]
    张斌. 盐分和腐殖酸对厌氧氨氧化脱氮效能的影响及强化机制研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2020.
    [23]
    王俊杰,张姚,刘清华,等. 连续/间歇曝气下MBBR-亚硝化生物膜特性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(1):261-268.
    [24]
    汪涛,袁路子,罗正,等. 短程硝化工艺强化方法研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2020, 40(7):1-5.
    [25]
    苗蕾,王凯,王淑莹,等. 垃圾渗滤液中有机物对其厌氧氨氧化的影响[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 5(44):999-1004.
    [26]
    XIAO K K, ABBT-BRAUN G, HORN H. Changes in the characteristics of dissolved organic matter during sludge treatment:a critical review[J]. Water Research, 2020, 187:116441.
    [27]
    李海青,刘欣艳,孙宇,等. 生活垃圾焚烧厂渗滤液处理过程有机物特性分析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(7):154-159.
    [28]
    ALBERS S, MEYER B H. The archaeal cell envelope[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2011, 9(6):414-426.
    [29]
    KRAIEM K, WAHAB M A, KALLALI H, et al. Effects of short- and long-term exposures of humic acid on the Anammox activity and microbial community[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(19):19012-19024.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]YANG Jiani, ZHAO Baowei, YANG Maoying, SUO Jinmiao, ZHU Zhengyu, DENG Aiqin. PREPARATION OF Fe/C CATALYST BASED ON FERRIC CITRATE AND ITS ACTIVATION PERFORMANCE ON PEROXYDISULFATE TO DEGRADE SULFADIAZINE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 116-123,251. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307016
    [2]YUAN Mingzhu, DING Lei, LI Shuang, LI Yonglian. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON REMOVAL OF ARSENIC AND ANTIMONY FROM SPENT EDTA SOIL WASHING SOLUTION BY IRON/ALUMINUM COAGULATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 121-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204017
    [3]HUO Jiajia, LUO Shengxu, WANG Yanshi, WANG Xinwei, DENG Qin, LI Jinying. PASSIVATION OF LEAD IN SOIL BY FULVIC ACID-NANO-ZERO-VALENT IRON COMPLEX[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 112-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204016
    [4]WU Qi-hao, JIANG Xin-quan, MA Xiao-li, CHEN Ping, CHEN Jing-run. CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION AND MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY IN SOIL OF A SEWAGE IRRIGATION AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 231-235,174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009037
    [13]Luo Ting, Jiang Zhenmao, Ren Zhijie, Zhou Meizhu, Zhou Hongguang. PREPARATION AND PERFORMANCE OF RESIN BASED NANOSCALE ZERO VALENT IRON COMPOSITES FOR REMOVAL OF Pb( Ⅱ) IN WATER SOLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(5): 1-4. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201505001
    [14]Liu Peiya, Li Yujiao, Hu Pengjie, Dong Changxun. COLUMN LEACHING OF CADMIUM AND LEAD FROM A CONTAMINATED SOIL USING COMPOSITE LEACHING AGENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 163-167. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501038
    [16]RESEARCH PROGRESS ON IMMOBILIZATION AND REMOVAL OF HEAVY METALS FROM MUNICIPAL SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 82-86. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412014
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.9 %FULLTEXT: 8.9 %META: 83.6 %META: 83.6 %PDF: 7.6 %PDF: 7.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 19.3 %其他: 19.3 %China: 0.9 %China: 0.9 %临汾: 0.9 %临汾: 0.9 %乌鲁木齐: 0.9 %乌鲁木齐: 0.9 %伊犁: 0.9 %伊犁: 0.9 %佳木斯: 1.8 %佳木斯: 1.8 %北京: 8.3 %北京: 8.3 %南京: 3.7 %南京: 3.7 %南昌: 0.9 %南昌: 0.9 %台州: 1.8 %台州: 1.8 %合肥: 0.9 %合肥: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %天津: 1.8 %天津: 1.8 %宜昌: 3.7 %宜昌: 3.7 %宜春: 1.8 %宜春: 1.8 %广州: 2.8 %广州: 2.8 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %武汉: 1.8 %武汉: 1.8 %淄博: 1.8 %淄博: 1.8 %淮安: 4.6 %淮安: 4.6 %湖州: 2.8 %湖州: 2.8 %漯河: 5.5 %漯河: 5.5 %绥化: 1.8 %绥化: 1.8 %芒廷维尤: 10.1 %芒廷维尤: 10.1 %芝加哥: 4.6 %芝加哥: 4.6 %苏州: 1.8 %苏州: 1.8 %衡水: 0.9 %衡水: 0.9 %衢州: 0.9 %衢州: 0.9 %西宁: 1.8 %西宁: 1.8 %重庆: 0.9 %重庆: 0.9 %金华: 2.8 %金华: 2.8 %银川: 1.8 %银川: 1.8 %阳泉: 1.8 %阳泉: 1.8 %其他China临汾乌鲁木齐伊犁佳木斯北京南京南昌台州合肥嘉兴天津宜昌宜春广州扬州杭州武汉淄博淮安湖州漯河绥化芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水衢州西宁重庆金华银川阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (185) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return