Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 11
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(11): 127-134
GAO Yan-ming, WANG Ting, LI Jie-ling, WEI Shi-cheng, LIU Guang-li, LUO Hai-ping, ZHANG Ren-duo. ELECTRICITY GENERATION PROPERTIES OF MICROBIAL FUEL CELL WITH CORN COB ACID PYROLYSIS SOLUTION AS THE SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 127-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111016
Citation: GAO Yan-ming, WANG Ting, LI Jie-ling, WEI Shi-cheng, LIU Guang-li, LUO Hai-ping, ZHANG Ren-duo. ELECTRICITY GENERATION PROPERTIES OF MICROBIAL FUEL CELL WITH CORN COB ACID PYROLYSIS SOLUTION AS THE SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 127-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111016
shu

ELECTRICITY GENERATION PROPERTIES OF MICROBIAL FUEL CELL WITH CORN COB ACID PYROLYSIS SOLUTION AS THE SUBSTRATE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111016

  • 1. CSG Power Generation Company, Guangzhou 510630, China;

  • 2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China;

  • 3. Environmental Protection Research Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530022, China

  • Received Date: 2021-06-14
    Available Online: 2022-01-26
    Abstract
  • The aim of this study is to explore the electricity generation properties in the single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cell (MFC) with corn cob acid pyrolysis solution as the substrate. The optimized conditions for the pretreatment of corn cob with oxalic acid pyrolysis were as follows:reaction temperature of 160℃, reaction time of 90 min, oxalic acid dosage of 2% (by mass percentage). Under the optimized condition, the concentration of reducing sugar was 0.44 g/g corn cob and the solid digestibility was about 58%. Fed by the 20 times diluted solution of acid pyrolysis, the MFC could produce the maximum power density of 278 mW/m2. The period of electricity generation in the MFC was about 120 h. The COD removal rate in the MFC fed by different concentrations of corn cob acid pyrolysis solution reached more than 90.0%. With the decrease of the diluted factor, the coulombic efficiency (CE) of MFC decreased from 18.6% to 9.72%. Under different concentrations of corn cob hydrolysate, the highest relative abundance of Geobacter, a typical electrically active bacteria (EAB), was 3.40% in the bacterial community in the anodic biofilm of MFC at the genus level. The relative abundance of Klebsiella reached 41.6% under 20 times diluted corn cob acid pyrolysis solution. The results provided a scientific basis for the effective utilization of corn cob in MFC.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(33)
  • [1]
    贾启华,时雅滨,许晓娟,等.改性玉米芯在污水处理中的应用研究进展[J].化工新型材料,2020,48(7):34-37.
    [2]
    RANGABHASHIYAM S, BALASUBRAMANIAN P. The potential of lignocellulosic biomass precursors for biochar production:performance, mechanism and wastewater application:a review[J]. Industrial Crops & Products, 2019, 128:405-423.
    [3]
    张立秋,王登敏,李淑更,等.固体碳源生物膜SND处理实际低碳源城市污水[J].工业水处理,2019,39(8):19-22

    ,106.
    [4]
    卢家磊,兰燕月,张饮江,等.基于异构载体的海产品暂养水的协同处理[J].环境工程学报,2020,14(5):1191-1200.
    [5]
    PÉREZ J, MUÑOZ-DORADO J, RUBIA D L T, et al. Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin:an overview[J]. International Microbiology, 2002, 5(2):53-63.
    [6]
    LIU W, WANG B, HOU Q X, et al. Effects of fibrillation on the wood fibers' enzymatic hydrolysis enhanced by mechanical refining[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 206:99-103.
    [7]
    鹿钦礼, 李亮, 刘金亮,等. 微生物燃料电池的应用研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(8):95-100.
    [8]
    闫荣, 雷欣, 慕玉洁, 等. 后续碳源强化ANAMMOX-MFC系统脱氮产电调控策略[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 37(8):1-9.
    [9]
    XU H, SONG H L, SINGH R P, et al. Simultaneous reduction of antibiotics leakage and methane emission from constructed wetland by integrating microbial fuel cell[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 320(Pt A):124285.
    [10]
    SAEED T, JIHAD M M. Organic matter and nutrient removal in tidal flow-based microbial fuel cell constructed wetlands:media and flood-dry period ratio[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 411(prepublish):128507.
    [11]
    MAHIDHARA G, GUPTA D, SASIKALA C,et al. Insights into discrepancy in power generation among glucose and malate grown Rubrivivax benzoatilyticus Ja2 microbial fuel cells[J]. Internation Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(4):3090-3104.
    [12]
    WANG X, FENG Y J, WANG H M, et al. Bioaugmentation for electricity generation from corn stover biomass using microbial fuel cells[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(15):6088-6093.
    [13]
    HASSAN S H A, GAD EL-RAB S M F, RAHIMNEJAD M, et al. Electricity generation from rice straw using a microbial fuel cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(17):9490-9496.
    [14]
    卞爱琴,远野,张璐璐,等.热碱-分步酶水解-厌氧消化工艺处理秸秆畜粪混合物料及其甲烷高值化条件[J].环境科学,2019,40(2):1003-1010.
    [15]
    杨义,骆仲泱,李国翔,等.纤维素催化热解定向调控制取不含氧烃类液体燃料[J].燃烧科学与技术,2020,26(2):113-119.
    [16]
    程懿斐,王琦.基于组分分析的农业废弃物类生物质热裂解机理研究[J].中国计量大学学报,2019,30(1):44-50.
    [17]
    LI X, LU Y B, LUO H P, et al. Microbial stratification structure within cathodic biofilm of the microbial fuel cell using the freezing microtome method[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 241:384-390.
    [18]
    XU G F, ZHENG X Y, LU Y B, et al. Development of microbial community within the cathodic biofilm of single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cell[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 665:641-648.
    [19]
    LI X, LU Y b, LUO H p, et al. Effect of ph on bacterial distributions within cathodic biofilm of the microbial fuel cell with maltodextrin as the substrate[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 265:129088.
    [20]
    QIN B Y, LUO H P, LIU G L, et al. Nickel ion removal from wastewater using the microbial electrolysis cell[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 121:458-461.
    [21]
    LUO H P, YU S X, LIU G L, et al. Effect of in-situ immobilized anode on performance of the microbial fuel cell with high concentration of sodium acetate[J]. Fuel, 2016, 182:732-739.
    [22]
    LIU G L, ZHOU Y, LUO H P, et al. A comparative evaluation of different types of microbial electrolysis desalination cells for malic acid production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 198:87-93.
    [23]
    LAN J, REN Y X, LU Y B, et al. Combined microbial desalination and chemical-production cell with fenton process for treatment of electroplating wastewater nanofiltration concentrate[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 359:1139-1149.
    [24]
    CUI W J, LU Y B, ZENG C P, et al. Hydrogen production in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell under high applied voltages[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 780:146597.
    [25]
    CUSICK R D, BRYAN B, PARKER D S, et al. Performance of a pilot-scale continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell fed winery wastewater[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 89(6):2053-2063.
    [26]
    LIU G L, YATES M D, CHENG S A, et al. Examination of microbial fuel cell start-up times with domestic wastewater and additional amendments[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(15):7301-7306.
    [27]
    SUN Y, CHENG J J. Dilute acid pretreatment of rye straw and bermudagrass for ethanol production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(14):1599-1606.
    [28]
    REDDING A P, WANG Z Y, KESHWANI D R, et al. High temperature dilute acid pretreatment of coastal bermuda grass for enzymatic hydrolysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(2):1415-1424.
    [29]
    ZHOU N, ZHANG Y M, WU X B, et al. Hydrolysis of chlorella biomass for fermentable sugars in the presence of hcl and mgcl 2[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(21):10158-10161.
    [30]
    ASENSIO Y, FERNANDEZ-MARCHANTE M C, LOBATO J, et al. Influence of the fuel and dosage on the performance of double-compartment microbial fuel cells[J]. Water Research, 2016, 99:16-23.
    [31]
    KOÓK L, RÓZSENBERSZKI T, NEMESTÓTHY N, et al. Bioelectrochemical treatment of municipal waste liquor in microbial fuel cells for energy valorization[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112:4406-4412.
    [32]
    SAMSUDEEN N, RADHAKRISHNAN T K, MATHESWARAN M. Performance comparison of triple and dual chamber microbial fuel cell using distillery wastewater as a substrate[J]. Environmental Progress Sustain Energy, 2015, 34(2):589-594.
    [33]
    ZHANG L X, ZHOU S G, ZHUANG L, et al. Microbial fuel cell based on Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm[J]. Electrochemisty Communications, 2008, 10(10):1641-1643.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]BI Xinqi, GONG Zhiwei, MA Jie, ZHOU Lichang, JIANG Jinqi, GUO Gang. EFFECTS OF AEROBIC/ANAEROBIC ENVIRONMENTS ON MICROBIAL DEGRADATION EFFICIENCY OF TYPICAL MICROPLASTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 88-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407009
    [2]ZHOU Youwei, CHEN Jisheng, HE Lei, XING Meiyan. TRANSFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS OF CARBON AND NITROGEN IN SLUDGE-KITCHEN EARTHWORM COMPOST BASED ON LAND USE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 10-22. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402002
    [3]YUAN Shuai, LI Yan, ZHAO Yuxiao, XU Haipeng, CHEN Lei, JIN Fuqiang, HUA Dongliang. INHIBITORY INSTABILITY ANALYSIS OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF KITCHEN WASTE AND MICROECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIGESTION EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 184-192. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412022
    [4]LIU Xiaoji, YAN Kun, XU Heng, WANG Yongqun, WANG Zhihua, ZHANG Dejia, CHANG Fengmin. COUPLING H2-RICH SYNGAS BIOMETHANATION WITH ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE: A PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 131-137. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403016
    [5]HU Mengjie, ZHONG Lei, CAI Xiaoxian, QING Jinwu, SUN Yuru, LI Gaoyuan, RUAN Haihua, CHEN Guanyi. METABOLIC MECHANISM OF MICROBIAL DEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AND ITS RESEARCH PROGRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 234-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302031
    [6]SONG Na, ZHAO Pan, GUAN Weijie, CHEN Liwei, ZHANG Shuang, WANG Qunhui. EFFECT OF ELECTRO-FERMENTATION ON HIGH TEMPERATURE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE AND SPENT MUSHROOM SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 145-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307020
    [7]DING Zizhen, XU Xianbao, OUYANG Chuang, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. EFFECT OF BIOCHAR ON CAPROATE PRODUCTION DURING FOOD WASTE FERMENTATION AND THE MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 29-36. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212005
    [8]WANG Jie, GU Weihua, CHEN Zehui, SONG Erxi, SHENG Nan, YAO Wei, WANG Jingwei, QIAN Yichao. ANALYSIS OF PRACTICAL EFFECTS, PROBLEMS AND COUNTERMEASURES OF DOMESTIC WASTE CLASSIFICATION:A CASE STUDY IN ZHILI TOWN, HUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 188-193. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203028
    [9]ZHANG Tong, ZHANG Liqiu, FENG Li, LIU Yongze, DU Ziwen. ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN CHARACTERISTICS OF KITCHEN WASTE AFTER SORTING AND DOMESTIC WASTE BEFORE SORTING IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 22-28. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212004
    [10]CHANG Yuan, ZHAN Yabin, TAO Xingling, LIU Yongdi, ZHANG Kui, YU Bo, WEI Yuquan, LI Ji. EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS ADDITIVES ON PHOSPHORUS MOBILIZATION IN PHOSPHORUS-RICH COMPOSTING OF KITCHEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 112-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210015
    [11]HU Yadong, FAN Depeng, KONG Weijie, LEI Mingke, DU Qingping, QIAN Weiqiang, WANG Futao, LI Jing. IMPROVEMENT OF FOOD WASTE AEROBIC BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PERFORMANCE BY COMPOUND MICROBIAL AGENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 97-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204014
    [12]LIAO Li-ming, PAN Jia-qi, CHEN Yu, HU Yao-yuan, MO Hui, LU Yu, SU Cheng-yuan. ANALYSIS OF EFFECT OF ADDITION OF CHINESE HERBAL RESIDUE ON FOOD WASTE COMPOSTING BASED ON EEM AND HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 142-147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101022
    [13]LI Xu-sheng, LU Sha-sha, JIANG Yuan-yan, WANG Li-ao. EFFECT AND MECHANISM OF BIOCHAR IN MITIGATING ACIDIFICATION OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS FOR FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 179-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112027
    [14]GUO Zhi-chao, XU Xian-bao, XU Ting-ting, ZHAO Ai-hua, TAI Jun, LIU Ya-nan, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. ANALYSIS ON FERMENTATION PATHWAY AND CAPROATE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE BY DIFFERENT INOCULUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 160-168. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109023
    [15]SONG Cai-hong, QI Hui, WEI Zi-min, XIA Xun-feng. HIGH-SPEED TREATMENT OF FOOD WASTE BY CONTINUOUS HIGH-TEMPERATURE COMPOSTING ENHANCED BY THERMOPHILIC MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 111-117,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105015
    [16]BAI Xiu-jia, ZHANG Hong-yu, GU Jun, ZHANG Qi, WANG Ji-hong. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF STALE REFUSE IN LANDFILL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 116-120,124. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102018
    [17]LIU Hang-yi, YAN Bei-bei, LIN Fa-wei, WANG Yuan, WANG Xu-tong, CHEN Guan-yi. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO KINDS OF FOOD WASTE RECYCLING SCHEMES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LCA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 169-175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109024
    [18]ZHU Xiao-yan, CHEN Ting, ZHAO Ying-ying, QIU Xiao-peng, YIN Jun, FENG Hua-jun, ZHANG Jin-feng. INFLUENCING FACTORS OF THE SCALE OF FOOD WASTE TREATMENT IN CHINA: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 172-177,53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103024
    [19]ZHAN Ya-bin, WEI Yu-quan, LIN Yong-feng, ZHANG A-ke, TAO Xing-ling, REN Jian-guo, SHEN Wei-dong, LI Ji. EFFECTS OF AERATION MODES ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION, DEHYDRATION EFFICIENCY AND NITROGEN LOSS OF KITCHEN WASTE BIO-DRYING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 124-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105017
    [20]SONG Na, REN Yuan-yuan, WANG Wan-qing, ZHANG Li-rong, GUAN Wei-jie, ZHANG Shuang, WANG Qun-hui. MECHANISM ANALYSIS OF BACTERIOSTATIC EFFECT ON FOOD WASTE ANAEROBIC PRESERVATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 41-46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008007
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 薛鲜丽，刘子睦，李娜，郭瑞，王德培. 高效降解高盐高油餐厨垃圾微生物的筛选与应用. 食品与发酵工业. 2023(07): 73-79 .
    2. 樊玲嘉，彭鑫，陈硕夫，李慧，刘艳，张嘉超，张立华，黄红丽. 高效降解厨余垃圾复合菌剂的构建及应用. 湖南农业科学. 2023(03): 61-66 .
    3. 樊玲嘉，彭鑫，陈硕夫，李慧，刘艳，张嘉超，张立华，黄红丽. 高效降解厨余垃圾复合菌剂的构建及应用（英文）. Agricultural Science & Technology. 2023(03): 29-38 .
    4. 巩光禄，赵铎，郭鹏博，张方政，张洪奇，申贵男，晏磊，邱财生，邱化蛟，王伟东. 微生物菌剂对玉米秸秆和餐厨垃圾混合好氧堆肥的影响. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报. 2022(05): 92-98 .
    5. 李亚林，刘蕾，关明玥，孙猛，李柳婷，毛瑞月，何海洋. 纳米CaO_2激发餐厨垃圾碳组分合成水凝胶及溶胀性能分析. 化工进展. 2022(11): 6120-6129 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040246810
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.3 %FULLTEXT: 12.3 %META: 80.9 %META: 80.9 %PDF: 6.8 %PDF: 6.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.9 %其他: 11.9 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %China: 3.8 %China: 3.8 %[]: 1.3 %[]: 1.3 %上海: 2.1 %上海: 2.1 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %丽水: 0.8 %丽水: 0.8 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %北京: 4.7 %北京: 4.7 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 2.5 %南京: 2.5 %南通: 0.8 %南通: 0.8 %台州: 2.1 %台州: 2.1 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %呼伦贝尔: 0.8 %呼伦贝尔: 0.8 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %宜昌: 3.4 %宜昌: 3.4 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %廊坊: 2.5 %廊坊: 2.5 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %济源: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %濮阳: 0.4 %濮阳: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.4 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 27.1 %芒廷维尤: 27.1 %芜湖: 0.4 %芜湖: 0.4 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %衢州: 1.7 %衢州: 1.7 %西宁: 3.8 %西宁: 3.8 %贵阳: 2.5 %贵阳: 2.5 %运城: 4.2 %运城: 4.2 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 2.1 %郑州: 2.1 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %铁岭: 0.4 %铁岭: 0.4 %银川: 0.4 %银川: 0.4 %长沙: 1.7 %长沙: 1.7 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %黄石: 0.4 %黄石: 0.4 %龙岩: 0.4 %龙岩: 0.4 %其他其他China[]上海临汾丽水佛山北京十堰南京南通台州合肥呼伦贝尔天津宜昌宣城常德广州廊坊成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沈阳济源湖州漯河潍坊濮阳福州美国伊利诺斯芝加哥芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铁岭银川长沙长治黄石龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (166) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return