Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
MA Yong-shuang, ZHAN Ju-hong, WANG Hui-jiao, WANG Yu-jue. STUDY ON ABATEMENT OF ACETAMIPRID BY ELECTRO-PEROXONE PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 107-113,187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112016
Citation: MA Yong-shuang, ZHAN Ju-hong, WANG Hui-jiao, WANG Yu-jue. STUDY ON ABATEMENT OF ACETAMIPRID BY ELECTRO-PEROXONE PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 107-113,187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112016

STUDY ON ABATEMENT OF ACETAMIPRID BY ELECTRO-PEROXONE PROCESS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112016
  • Received Date: 2020-12-30
    Available Online: 2022-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
  • The abatement kinetics and mechanism of acetamiprid were studied by ozonation, ultraviolet/ozone(UV/O3), and electro-peroxone(EP) in the groundwater and surface water. The electrical energy demands per order removal(EEO) of acetamiprid abatement by these processes were compared in two real water matrices. The second-order rate constants for the reaction of acetamiprid with ozone and hydroxyl radical(·OH) at pH of 7 were determined to be(0.05±0.01) mol/(L·s) and(2.8±0.2)×109 mol/(L·s), respectively. After 6 min ozone oxidation, the removal rates of acetamiprid in groundwater and surface water were only 26% and 64%. In contrast, UV/O3 and EP technology can completely remove acetamiprid from groundwater and surface water. The energy demands for 90% removal efficiency of acetamiprid were 0.11~0.27, 1.22~1.24, and 0.12~0.24 kW·h/m3 for ozonation, UV/O3, and EP processes, respectively. The results showed that the EP process was an energy-efficient alternative for the abatement of acetamiprid in water treatment.
  • [1]
    MORRISSEY C A,MINEAU P,DEVRIES J H,et al.Neonicotinoid contamination of global surface waters and associated risk to aquatic invertebrates:a review[J].Environment International,2015,74:291-303.
    [2]
    BARBOSA M O,MOREIRA N F,EIBEIRO A R,et al.Occurrence and removal of organic micropollutants:an overview of the watch list of EU Decision 2015/495[J].Water Research,2016,94:257-279.
    [3]
    SHI J L,ZHANG R N,PEI Y L,et al.Exposure to acetamiprid influences the development and survival ability of worker bees (Apis mellifera L.) from larvae to adults[J].Environmental Pollution,2020,266(Pt 2):115345.
    [4]
    LU Z T,LI M X,FANG Y L,et al.The mechanism of damage to the posterior silk gland by trace amounts of acetamiprid in the silkworm,Bombyx mori[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2020,170:104676.
    [5]
    KOCAMAN A Y,TOPAKTAS M.In vitro evaluation of the genotoxicity of acetamiprid in human peripheral blood lymphocytes[J].Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis,2007,48(6):483-490.
    [6]
    SADARIA A M,SUPOWIT S D,HALDEN R U.Mass balance assessment for six neonicotinoid insecticides during conventional wastewater and wetland treatment:nationwide reconnaissance in united states wastewater[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2016,50(12):6199-6206.
    [7]
    VON SONNTAG C,VON GUNTEN U.Chemistry of ozone in water and wastewater treatment:from basic principles to applications[M].2012,London:Iwa Publishing.,1-303.
    [8]
    WANG H J,ZHAN J H,GAO L W,et al.Kinetics and mechanism of thiamethoxam abatement by ozonation and ozone-based advanced oxidation processes[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2020,390:122180.
    [9]
    YUAN S,LI Z X,WANG Y J.Effective degradation of methylene blue by a novel electrochemically driven process[J].Electrochemistry Communications,2013,29:48-51.
    [10]
    YAO W K,WANG X F,YANG H W,et al.Removal of pharmaceuticals from secondary effluents by an electro-peroxone process[J].Water Research,2016,88:826-835.
    [11]
    LI Y K,SHEN W H,FU S J,et al.Inhibition of bromate formation during drinking water treatment by adapting ozonation to electro-peroxone process[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2015,264:322-328.
    [12]
    LIN Z R,YAO W K,WANG Y,et al.Perchlorate formation during the electro-peroxone treatment of chloride-containing water:effects of operational parameters and control strategies[J]. Water Research,2016,88:691-702.
    [13]
    FIKIRDESICI-ERGEN S,AKSU P,ALTINDAG A.Effects of ozone treatment on the degradation and toxicity of several pesticides in different groups[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sci-Tarim Bili,2018,24(2):245-255.
    [14]
    CHEN L W,CAI T M,CHENG C,et al.Degradation of acetamiprid in UV/H2O2 and UV/persulfate systems:a comparative study[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2018,351:1137-1146.
    [15]
    GONZALEZ T,DOMINGUEZ J R,CORREIA S.Neonicotinoids removal by associated binary,tertiary and quaternary advanced oxidation processes:synergistic effects,kinetics and mineralization[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,261:110156.
    [16]
    FASNABI P A,MADHU G,SOLOMAN P A.Removal of acetamiprid from wastewater by Fenton and Photo-Fenton processes-optimization by response surface methodology and kinetics[J].Clean-Soil,Air,Water,2016,44(6):728-737.
    [17]
    WANG Y J,LI X Y,ZHEN L M,et al.Electro-Fenton treatment of concentrates generated in nanofiltration of biologically pretreated landfill leachate[J].Journal of Hazard Mater,2012,229/230:115-121.
    [18]
    BADER H,HOIGNE J.Determination of ozone in water by the indigo method[J].Water Research,1981,15(4):449-456.
    [19]
    HUBER M M,CANONICA S,PARK G Y,et al.Oxidation of pharmaceuticals during ozonation and advanced oxidation processes[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2003,37(5):1016-1024.
    [20]
    LEE Y,GERRITY D,LEE M,et al.Prediction of micropollutant elimination during ozonation of municipal wastewater effluents:use of kinetic and water specific information[J].Environmental Science Technology,2013,47(11):5872-5881.
    [21]
    ROSENFELDT E J,LINDEN K G,CANONICA S,et al.Comparison of the efficiency of center dot OH radical formation during ozonation and the advanced oxidation processes O3/H2O2 and UV/H2O2[J].Water Research,2006,40(20):3695-3704.
    [22]
    CRUZ-ALCALDE A,SANS C,ESPLUGAS S.Priority pesticides abatement by advanced water technologies:the case of acetamiprid removal by ozonation[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017,599:1454-1461.
    [23]
    PPDB.Pesticide Properties DataBase[EB/OL].http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/index.htm,2012.
    [24]
    DELL’ARCIPRETE M L.Reactivity of hydroxyl radicals with neonicotinoid insecticides:mechanism and changes in toxicity[J].Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences,2009,8(7):1016-1023.
    [25]
    HAN W C,TIAN Y,SHEN X M.Human exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides and the evaluation of their potential toxicity:an overview[J].Chemosphere,2018,192:59-65.
    [26]
    VON SONNTAG C,VON GUNTEN U.Chemistry of ozone in water and wastewater treatment.From Basic Principles to Applications[M].IWA Publishing,2012.
    [27]
    FRANGOS P,WANG H,SHEN W,et al.A novel photoelectro-peroxone process for the degradation and mineralization of substituted benzenes in water[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2016,286:239-248.
    [28]
    WANG H J,ZHAN J H,YAO W K,et al.Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation,peroxone (O3/H2O2),and an electro-peroxone process[J].Water Research,2018,130:127-138.
    [29]
    WANG Y X,ZHONG Z,MUHAMMAD Y,et al.Defect engineering of NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) using different monodentate ligands for enhancement of photo-Fenton catalytic performance of acetamiprid degradation[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2020,398:125684.
    [30]
    CHEN L W,CAI T M,CHENG C,et al.Degradation of acetamiprid in UV/H2O2 and UV/persulfate systems:a comparative study[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2018,351:1137-1146.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]YAO Haiqian, GUO Xinchao, FU Fengman, YANG Hao, GUO Xiang, ZHANG Fanghong. Mn-Fe-Ce/GAC CATALYZED OZONE OXIDATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ANILINE WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 28-34. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405004
    [2]ZHANG Jianqiao, CHI Huizhong, LI Linyu. ANALYSIS OF VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF AIR QUALITY IN LUOHU DISTRICT OF SHENZHEN IN 2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 152-160. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402018
    [3]YANG Quan, LIU Sha, JIANG Chaochao, LIU Rongrong, ZHANG Peng, QIN Caihong. DEGRADATION OF CHLOROBENZENE BY NONTHERMAL PLASMA COUPLED LIQUID PHASE Fe-C CATALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 85-94. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401012
    [4]FAN Maoqing, WU Qiao, ZHAO Fang, ZENG Ming, GU Huiwen, WANG Yushang. ANALYSIS OF OZONE POLLUTION SITUATION, CAUSES AND COUNTERMEASURES IN CHANGSHA IN 2019—2021[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 115-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403014
    [5]ZHOU Jianguo, WANG Jianyu, WEI Siti. PREDICTION OF PM2.5 AND OZONE CONCENTRATION BASED ON VMD-CEEMD DECOMPOSITION AND LSTM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 157-165,221. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306021
    [6]WANG Gang, ZHANG Xiayao, WANG Feifeng, SUN Qiyuan. EFFECT OF FULVIC ACID WITH DIFFERENT MOLECULAR WEIGHT ON UV DEGRADATION OF MICROCYSTINS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 32-37. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201006
    [7]DU Minghui, BI Yingying, DONG Li, WANG Yong, SUN Xiaoming. INFLUENCE MECHANISM OF ACTIVATED CARBON PARTICLE SIZE ON O3-AC TREATMENT OF ORGANIC WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 22-28. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204004
    [8]CHEN Li, LI Jia-bin, FU Wan-yi, ZHANG Xi-hui. EFFECT OF CERAMIC MEMBRANE COMBINED PROCESS IN TREATMENT OF SLUDGE WATER FROM DRINKING WATER TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 80-87,12. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107009
    [9]CHEN Jun-wei, LI Li-li, FANG Zhi-huang, YE Ling-fen, ZHENG Jia-hui, WANG Fei-feng. DEGRADATION OF HUMIC ACID IN WATER BY ULTRAVIOLET PHOTOCATALYSIS OF TiO2/GO COMPOSITE NANOMATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 89-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008015
    [10]SHAN Wei, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, LI Ji. TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ON COD REMOVAL UPGRADING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS FOR HIGH PROPORTION OF INDUSTRY WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 32-37,24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007005
    [11]ZHOU Sheng, HUANG Bao-yuan, CHEN Hui-ying, LIN Shao-xiong. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF PM2.5 AND O3 IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA AND THE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF VOCs COMPONENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 42-47,92. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001006
    [15]Ma Wenjing, Zhang Chengzhong, Han Deming, Li Mingqian, Han Jing, Li Wentao. ANALYSIS ON VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATION IN URBAN AREA OF XI'AN IN SUMMER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 47-49. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510011
    [16]Li Zhenyan, Chen Bing. PHOTOCATALYTIC OXIDATION OF NAPHTHALENE AND FLUORINE IN OILFIELD PRODUCED WATER AND FACTORS AND CONDITIONS OPTIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF THE HYDROXYL RADICAL OXIDATION DEGRADATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 31-34. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510007
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.2 %FULLTEXT: 11.2 %META: 85.4 %META: 85.4 %PDF: 3.4 %PDF: 3.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 15.2 %其他: 15.2 %China: 0.6 %China: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %信阳: 0.6 %信阳: 0.6 %北京: 1.1 %北京: 1.1 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %台州: 6.2 %台州: 6.2 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %弗吉: 0.6 %弗吉: 0.6 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %成都: 1.7 %成都: 1.7 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %晋城: 1.1 %晋城: 1.1 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %杭州: 4.5 %杭州: 4.5 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %海口: 0.6 %海口: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %漯河: 1.7 %漯河: 1.7 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %石河子: 0.6 %石河子: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 23.0 %芒廷维尤: 23.0 %苏州: 5.6 %苏州: 5.6 %衢州: 3.4 %衢州: 3.4 %西宁: 6.2 %西宁: 6.2 %西安: 2.2 %西安: 2.2 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 5.1 %运城: 5.1 %遵义: 0.6 %遵义: 0.6 %邢台: 1.1 %邢台: 1.1 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 3.9 %郑州: 3.9 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长春: 0.6 %长春: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %其他China[]上海东莞临汾信阳北京南京南昌台州天津常德弗吉张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源海口温州漯河石家庄石河子芒廷维尤苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邢台邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (151) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return