Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
SUI Ke-jian, LI Jia-ju, LI Peng-feng, ZHOU Yong, ZHENG Xing-can, SUN Yong-li, SHANG Wei, TANG Li. STUDY ON DEEP DEPHOSPHORIZATION OF EFFLUENT FROM URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT BY DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 66-70,65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007010
Citation: MA Yong-shuang, ZHAN Ju-hong, WANG Hui-jiao, WANG Yu-jue. STUDY ON ABATEMENT OF ACETAMIPRID BY ELECTRO-PEROXONE PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 107-113,187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112016

STUDY ON ABATEMENT OF ACETAMIPRID BY ELECTRO-PEROXONE PROCESS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112016
  • Received Date: 2020-12-30
    Available Online: 2022-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
  • The abatement kinetics and mechanism of acetamiprid were studied by ozonation, ultraviolet/ozone(UV/O3), and electro-peroxone(EP) in the groundwater and surface water. The electrical energy demands per order removal(EEO) of acetamiprid abatement by these processes were compared in two real water matrices. The second-order rate constants for the reaction of acetamiprid with ozone and hydroxyl radical(·OH) at pH of 7 were determined to be(0.05±0.01) mol/(L·s) and(2.8±0.2)×109 mol/(L·s), respectively. After 6 min ozone oxidation, the removal rates of acetamiprid in groundwater and surface water were only 26% and 64%. In contrast, UV/O3 and EP technology can completely remove acetamiprid from groundwater and surface water. The energy demands for 90% removal efficiency of acetamiprid were 0.11~0.27, 1.22~1.24, and 0.12~0.24 kW·h/m3 for ozonation, UV/O3, and EP processes, respectively. The results showed that the EP process was an energy-efficient alternative for the abatement of acetamiprid in water treatment.
  • [1]
    MORRISSEY C A,MINEAU P,DEVRIES J H,et al.Neonicotinoid contamination of global surface waters and associated risk to aquatic invertebrates:a review[J].Environment International,2015,74:291-303.
    [2]
    BARBOSA M O,MOREIRA N F,EIBEIRO A R,et al.Occurrence and removal of organic micropollutants:an overview of the watch list of EU Decision 2015/495[J].Water Research,2016,94:257-279.
    [3]
    SHI J L,ZHANG R N,PEI Y L,et al.Exposure to acetamiprid influences the development and survival ability of worker bees (Apis mellifera L.) from larvae to adults[J].Environmental Pollution,2020,266(Pt 2):115345.
    [4]
    LU Z T,LI M X,FANG Y L,et al.The mechanism of damage to the posterior silk gland by trace amounts of acetamiprid in the silkworm,Bombyx mori[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2020,170:104676.
    [5]
    KOCAMAN A Y,TOPAKTAS M.In vitro evaluation of the genotoxicity of acetamiprid in human peripheral blood lymphocytes[J].Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis,2007,48(6):483-490.
    [6]
    SADARIA A M,SUPOWIT S D,HALDEN R U.Mass balance assessment for six neonicotinoid insecticides during conventional wastewater and wetland treatment:nationwide reconnaissance in united states wastewater[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2016,50(12):6199-6206.
    [7]
    VON SONNTAG C,VON GUNTEN U.Chemistry of ozone in water and wastewater treatment:from basic principles to applications[M].2012,London:Iwa Publishing.,1-303.
    [8]
    WANG H J,ZHAN J H,GAO L W,et al.Kinetics and mechanism of thiamethoxam abatement by ozonation and ozone-based advanced oxidation processes[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2020,390:122180.
    [9]
    YUAN S,LI Z X,WANG Y J.Effective degradation of methylene blue by a novel electrochemically driven process[J].Electrochemistry Communications,2013,29:48-51.
    [10]
    YAO W K,WANG X F,YANG H W,et al.Removal of pharmaceuticals from secondary effluents by an electro-peroxone process[J].Water Research,2016,88:826-835.
    [11]
    LI Y K,SHEN W H,FU S J,et al.Inhibition of bromate formation during drinking water treatment by adapting ozonation to electro-peroxone process[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2015,264:322-328.
    [12]
    LIN Z R,YAO W K,WANG Y,et al.Perchlorate formation during the electro-peroxone treatment of chloride-containing water:effects of operational parameters and control strategies[J]. Water Research,2016,88:691-702.
    [13]
    FIKIRDESICI-ERGEN S,AKSU P,ALTINDAG A.Effects of ozone treatment on the degradation and toxicity of several pesticides in different groups[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sci-Tarim Bili,2018,24(2):245-255.
    [14]
    CHEN L W,CAI T M,CHENG C,et al.Degradation of acetamiprid in UV/H2O2 and UV/persulfate systems:a comparative study[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2018,351:1137-1146.
    [15]
    GONZALEZ T,DOMINGUEZ J R,CORREIA S.Neonicotinoids removal by associated binary,tertiary and quaternary advanced oxidation processes:synergistic effects,kinetics and mineralization[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,261:110156.
    [16]
    FASNABI P A,MADHU G,SOLOMAN P A.Removal of acetamiprid from wastewater by Fenton and Photo-Fenton processes-optimization by response surface methodology and kinetics[J].Clean-Soil,Air,Water,2016,44(6):728-737.
    [17]
    WANG Y J,LI X Y,ZHEN L M,et al.Electro-Fenton treatment of concentrates generated in nanofiltration of biologically pretreated landfill leachate[J].Journal of Hazard Mater,2012,229/230:115-121.
    [18]
    BADER H,HOIGNE J.Determination of ozone in water by the indigo method[J].Water Research,1981,15(4):449-456.
    [19]
    HUBER M M,CANONICA S,PARK G Y,et al.Oxidation of pharmaceuticals during ozonation and advanced oxidation processes[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2003,37(5):1016-1024.
    [20]
    LEE Y,GERRITY D,LEE M,et al.Prediction of micropollutant elimination during ozonation of municipal wastewater effluents:use of kinetic and water specific information[J].Environmental Science Technology,2013,47(11):5872-5881.
    [21]
    ROSENFELDT E J,LINDEN K G,CANONICA S,et al.Comparison of the efficiency of center dot OH radical formation during ozonation and the advanced oxidation processes O3/H2O2 and UV/H2O2[J].Water Research,2006,40(20):3695-3704.
    [22]
    CRUZ-ALCALDE A,SANS C,ESPLUGAS S.Priority pesticides abatement by advanced water technologies:the case of acetamiprid removal by ozonation[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017,599:1454-1461.
    [23]
    PPDB.Pesticide Properties DataBase[EB/OL].http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/index.htm,2012.
    [24]
    DELL’ARCIPRETE M L.Reactivity of hydroxyl radicals with neonicotinoid insecticides:mechanism and changes in toxicity[J].Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences,2009,8(7):1016-1023.
    [25]
    HAN W C,TIAN Y,SHEN X M.Human exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides and the evaluation of their potential toxicity:an overview[J].Chemosphere,2018,192:59-65.
    [26]
    VON SONNTAG C,VON GUNTEN U.Chemistry of ozone in water and wastewater treatment.From Basic Principles to Applications[M].IWA Publishing,2012.
    [27]
    FRANGOS P,WANG H,SHEN W,et al.A novel photoelectro-peroxone process for the degradation and mineralization of substituted benzenes in water[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2016,286:239-248.
    [28]
    WANG H J,ZHAN J H,YAO W K,et al.Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation,peroxone (O3/H2O2),and an electro-peroxone process[J].Water Research,2018,130:127-138.
    [29]
    WANG Y X,ZHONG Z,MUHAMMAD Y,et al.Defect engineering of NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) using different monodentate ligands for enhancement of photo-Fenton catalytic performance of acetamiprid degradation[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2020,398:125684.
    [30]
    CHEN L W,CAI T M,CHENG C,et al.Degradation of acetamiprid in UV/H2O2 and UV/persulfate systems:a comparative study[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2018,351:1137-1146.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]JIN Hongyi, Tang Xueping, Zhuang Mazhan, Gong Chunming, Wu Xiaohai, LI Fei, ZHOU Zhenming. PREPARATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL MATERIAL BY CALCINATION OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE AND RIVER SILT AND ITS PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 209-217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308027
    [2]NIU Yongjian, DONG Kun, NIU Hongliang, XIN Mingxing, LI Weiwei, SUN Hongwei. EFFECT OF FREE AMMONIA ON PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN AN EBPR SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 24-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210004
    [3]JIA Kaixue, XU Shaoqi, WEI Zimin, CHEN Wenjie, ZHAN Yabin, SHI Xiong, LI Ji, WEI Yuquan. REVIEW ON PHOSPHORUS FRACTIONS TRANSFORMATION IN COMPOSTING ENHANCED BY PHOSPHORUS-SOLUBILIZING MICROORGANISMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 89-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212012
    [4]PAN Jun, SUN Bo-yang, WEI Wei, ZHANG Jin, TAN Shuai-chen, LI Rui-fang. EXPERIMENT OF MICRO-POLLUTED WATER TREATMENT BY COMBINED TECHNOLOGY OF MICRO-NANO AERATION-ECOLOGICAL FLOATING WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 49-53,209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005009
    [11]Wang Yadong, Wang Shaopo, Zheng Shasha, Zhang Yan, Sun Liping, Du Jinshan. POLY-P ACCUMULATING MICROORGANISMS AND IDENTIFYING METHODS FOR BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502005
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 蔺鸿涛,龚为进,陶辰瀚,祁超智,黄磊,余正洋. 多金属改性生物炭磷吸附性能和动力学研究. 山东化工. 2025(03): 23-27 .
    2. 蔺鸿涛,龚为进,陶辰瀚,祁超智,黄磊,余正洋. 镧改性市政污泥生物炭制备及磷吸附性能研究. 中原工学院学报. 2025(01): 45-52 .
    3. 王凡滔,陈贇,魏璟馨,李世琦,刘亚佺,冯岩. 城市污水极限除磷研究现状. 工业用水与废水. 2024(04): 7-11 .
    4. 曾伟,吴幼娥,丁嘉培,王伟浩,赵会芳. 贵州某酱香型白酒废水尾水处理工程设计. 天津化工. 2024(05): 106-109 .
    5. 曾超,刘影,陈圆,陈积义,徐菡玲,刘阳,文宇鸿,杨淇椋,古伟,王文明. 某再生水厂两期脱氮除磷工艺设计及效能分析. 中国给水排水. 2024(18): 64-70 .
    6. 葛绍阳,陆宾,花发奇. 气浮工艺在工业废水处理中的应用研究. 山西化工. 2024(11): 265-267 .
    7. 尚雄,李正远,普家和,夏钰,周富聪. 昆明A污水处理厂气浮除磷技术提标改造项目试运行效果浅析. 广州化工. 2023(16): 106-109 .
    8. 陈奇良. 高效气浮在污水厂极限除磷提标设计中的应用. 广州化工. 2022(06): 124-126 .
    9. 杨璐阳,丁冠文,戴浩然,邱慧. 一种水热稳定的金属有机骨架UiO-66高效捕获水中磷酸盐的性能及机理. 环境化学. 2022(05): 1746-1756 .
    10. 吴晓波,雷文江,谭云鹏. 无锡市胡埭污水处理厂提标改造方案研究. 城市道桥与防洪. 2022(04): 119-121+129+17 .
    11. 沈怡,王佳音,陈冠辉. 溶气气浮技术在市政污水深度处理工程设计与应用. 辽宁化工. 2022(09): 1253-1256 .
    12. 谭心,邹晓凤,苏强,于军. 污水处理厂尾水深度除磷技术综述. 山东化工. 2021(16): 277-279 .
    13. 邸超. EBIS工艺在化工污水处理中的应用. 化学工程与装备. 2021(09): 255-256+51 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.8 %FULLTEXT: 7.8 %META: 89.1 %META: 89.1 %PDF: 3.0 %PDF: 3.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.2 %其他: 8.2 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %Canada: 0.5 %Canada: 0.5 %China: 2.5 %China: 2.5 %Czech Republic: 0.4 %Czech Republic: 0.4 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Spain: 0.2 %Spain: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 2.0 %上海: 2.0 %东莞: 2.1 %东莞: 2.1 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %保定: 0.7 %保定: 0.7 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %北京: 6.6 %北京: 6.6 %十堰: 1.2 %十堰: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南充: 0.4 %南充: 0.4 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉安: 1.1 %吉安: 1.1 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大连: 0.9 %大连: 0.9 %天津: 2.7 %天津: 2.7 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.2 %安庆: 0.2 %宣城: 0.7 %宣城: 0.7 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 2.1 %广州: 2.1 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 2.0 %杭州: 2.0 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %漯河: 5.2 %漯河: 5.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %美国: 0.2 %美国: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 20.3 %西宁: 20.3 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.9 %贵阳: 0.9 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %连云港: 0.4 %连云港: 0.4 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.4 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %阳泉: 1.2 %阳泉: 1.2 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他其他CanadaChinaCzech RepublicNetherlandsSpain[]上海东莞临汾保定六安北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌合肥吉安呼伦贝尔呼和浩特嘉兴大同大连天津太原宁波安庆宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口徐州惠州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦新乡无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊石家庄福州秦皇岛美国芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆锡林郭勒盟镇江长春长沙长治阳泉青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (152) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return