Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 39 Issue 12
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HUANG Chun-tao, FAN Dong-ping, LU Ji-fu, LIAO Qi-feng. PREDICTION OF PM2.5 AND PM10 CONCENTRATION IN GUANGZHOU BASED ON DEEP LEARNING MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 135-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112020
Citation: HUANG Chun-tao, FAN Dong-ping, LU Ji-fu, LIAO Qi-feng. PREDICTION OF PM2.5 AND PM10 CONCENTRATION IN GUANGZHOU BASED ON DEEP LEARNING MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 135-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112020

PREDICTION OF PM2.5 AND PM10 CONCENTRATION IN GUANGZHOU BASED ON DEEP LEARNING MODEL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112020
  • Received Date: 2021-05-12
    Available Online: 2022-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
  • Precisely predicting the concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 in air pollution can provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of air pollution. However, in the absence of pollution source emission inventory and visibility data, the prediction accuracy of the existing PM2.5 and PM10 concentration prediction methods are not high. In addition, it is rarely reported that the current deep learning models have been applied successively to PM2.5 and PM10 concentration prediction research. Based on the historical air quality monitoring data and weather monitoring historical data in Guangzhou from June 1, 2015 to January 10, 2018, two traditional machine learning models(random forest model(RF) and XGBoost model) and two deep learning models(short-long-term memory network(LSTM) and gated recurrent unit network(GRU) were constructed respectively, to predict the daily average concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 in Guangzhou. The results showed that the four models could also well predict the daily average concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 in the absence of pollution source emission inventory and visibility data. According to the evaluation metrics, i.e., MSE, RMSE, MAPE, MAE, and R2, the PM2.5 and PM10 prediction effects of the four models were evaluated. The results indicated that the prediction effect of the deep GRU model was the best and the prediction results of the RF model were the worst. Compared with the commonly used RF model, XGBoost model, and LSTM model, the GRU model based on deep learning could better predict PM2.5 and PM10 concentration.
  • loading
  • [1]
    刘佳澍,顾远,马帅帅,等.常州夏冬季PM2.5中无机组分昼夜变化特征与来源解析[J].环境科学,2018,39(3):980-989.
    [2]
    段文娇,郎建垒,程水源,等.京津冀地区钢铁行业污染物排放清单及对PM2.5影响[J].环境科学,2018,39 (4):1445-1454.
    [3]
    余钟奇,瞿元昊,周广强,等.2018年秋冬季长江三角洲区域PM2.5污染来源数值研究[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(10):4237-4246.
    [4]
    黄小刚,邵天杰,赵景波,等.汾渭平原PM2.5浓度的影响因素及空间溢出效应[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(8):3539-3548.
    [5]
    黄小刚,邵天杰,赵景波,等.长江经济带空气质量的时空分布特征及影响因素[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(2):874-884.
    [6]
    陈波,李少宁,杨新兵,等.北京春季PM2.5和PM10污染水平及影响因素研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,39(5):36-44.
    [7]
    肖悦,田永中,许文轩,等.近10年中国空气质量时空分布特征[J].生态环境学报,2017,26(2):243-252.
    [8]
    黄含含,王羽琴,李升苹,等.西安市PM2.5中水溶性离子的季节变化特征[J].环境科学,2020,41(6):2528-2535.
    [9]
    杨文涛,姚诗琪,邓敏,等.北京市PM2.5时空分布特征及其与PM10关系的时空变异特征[J].环境科学,2018,39(2):684-690.
    [10]
    赵雪,侯丽丽,王鑫龙,等.基于LUR模型的2019年北京地区PM2.5与PM10浓度空间分异模拟[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(11):4060-4069.
    [11]
    郭庆元,杨晓春,吴其重,等.基于数值模拟对西安地区冬季一次重污染过程PM2.5区域来源解析[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(9):3103-3111.
    [12]
    YU M F,ZHU Y,LIN C J,et al.Effects of air pollution control measures on air quality improvement in Guangzhou,China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2019,244:127-137.
    [13]
    SHEN L,JACOB D J,MICKLEY L J,et al.Insignificant effect of climate change on winter haze pollution in Beijing [J].Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,2018,18 (23):17489-17496.
    [14]
    李岚淼,李龙国,李乃稳.城市雾霾成因及危害研究进展[J].环境工程,2017,35(12):92-97

    ,104.
    [15]
    雷钦.大气细颗粒物PM2.5的危害及其治理策略[J].低碳世界,2020,10(11):23-24.
    [16]
    ERIC L,ISAC L,MARIANNE H,et al.Ambient ultrafine particle concentration and incidence of childhood cancers[J].Environment International,2020,145:106135.
    [17]
    SOURANGSU C,SAGNIK D,SMITH K R.Ambient PM2.5 exposure and expected premature mortality to 2100 in India under climate change scenarios[J].Nature Communications,2018,9(1).
    [18]
    周广强,谢英,吴剑斌,等.基于WRF-Chem模式的华东区域PM2.5预报及偏差原因[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(8):2251-2259.
    [19]
    CHEN J J,LU J,AVISE J C,et al.Seasonal modeling of PM2.5 in California’s San Joaquin Valley[J].Atmospheric Environment,2014,92:182-190.
    [20]
    康俊锋,黄烈星,张春艳,等.多机器学习模型下逐小时PM2.5预测及对比分析[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(5):1895-1905.
    [21]
    DEUKWOO L,SOOWON L.Hourly prediction of particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration using time series data and random forest[J].KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering,2020,9(4).
    [22]
    黄赫,周勇,刘宇杰,等.基于多源环境变量和随机森林的农用地土壤重金属源解析:以襄阳市襄州区为例[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(12):4548-4558.
    [23]
    史飞飞,周秉荣,颜亮东,等.近32年隆宝高寒湿地时空变化特征及其气候驱动力分析[J].高原气象,2020,39(6):1282-1294.
    [24]
    刘志壮,吕谋,周国升.基于小波组合模型的短期城市用水量预测[J].给水排水,2020,56(10):110-114

    ,131.
    [25]
    郭宇龙,李岚涛,陈伟强,等.基于红边光谱特征和XGBoost算法的冬小麦叶绿素浓度估算研究[J].红外,2020,41(11):33-43.
    [26]
    唐科,秦敏,赵星,等.基于Stacking集成学习模型的气态亚硝酸预测[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(2):582-590.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (521) PDF downloads(25) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return