Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 12
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(12): 206-211,219
LIU Yu-cheng, CHEN Wen-bo, CHEN Yuan-yuan, CHEN Ming-yan. EFFECT OF CEMENT KILN CO-PROCESSING EXTRACTED RAFFINATE CUTTINGS ON PERFORMANCE OF THE CEMENT CLINKER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 157-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011026
Citation: JIN Xiao-dan, TIAN Yong-qiang, WU Hao, CHEN He-xiao, WANG Xing-run, CHENG Jin-ping. CHARACTERISTICS OF CHROMIUM POLLUTION AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS IN LEATHER INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 206-211,219. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112031
shu

CHARACTERISTICS OF CHROMIUM POLLUTION AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS IN LEATHER INDUSTRY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112031

  • 1. China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China;

  • 2. Environmental Protection Research Institute of Guangxi, Nanning 530022, China;

  • 3. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China;

  • 4. Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;

  • 5. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012,China

  • Received Date: 2020-02-19
    Available Online: 2022-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
    Abstract
  • In order to understand the soil Cr(Ⅵ) pollution and distribution characteristics in the sludge and soil of tanning site, soil and sludge samples of three typical site in China were selected to analyze the soil Cr(Ⅵ) pollution characteristics of tanning industry. The results showed that the highest content of soil Cr(Ⅵ) in the investigated type Ⅰ tanning enterprise's site was 48 mg/kg, which exceeded the screening value of the standard of soil pollution risk control for construction land(GB 36600—2018). There was pollution and environmental risk in Cr(Ⅵ). The investigated type Ⅱ tanning enterprise's site had complete environmental protection facilities, and the content of soil Cr(Ⅵ) was generally low, lower than the screening value of GB 36600—2018, with a lower environmental risk. The total chromium content of sludge in the temporary storage room of hazardous waste in type Ⅱ tanning enterprises' s site was as high as 85377 mg/kg, and the highest Cr(Ⅵ) content was 1455 mg/kg. The total chromium content of soil mixture in type Ⅲ tanning enterprise's site investigated ranged from 1564 to 28000 mg/kg, and the highest Cr(Ⅵ) content was 250 mg/kg. Compared with type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ tanning sites, it was seriously polluted. In general, Cr(Ⅲ) was the main form of soil chromium in tanning sites, and Cr(Ⅵ) accounted for less than 1%.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    周林艳,曾丽璇,李晨.皮革行业实施清洁生产途径的可持续发展研究[J].生态经济,2012(4):122-126.
    [2]
    RELIGA P,KOWALIK A,GIERYCZ P.Application of nanofiltration for chromium concentration in the tannery wastewater[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,186(1):288-292.
    [3]
    BRINDHA K,ELANGO L.SHINWARI.Impact of tanning industries on groundwater quality near a metropolitan city in india[J].Water Resour Manage,2012(26):1747-1761.
    [4]
    王宇峰,刘磊,汪俊玉,等.典型制革企业退役场地污染特征研究[J].中国资源综合利用,2019,37(6):153-155.
    [5]
    CHEN H,AROCENA J M,LI J,et al.Mobility and storage sinks for chromium and other metals in soils impacted by leather tannery wastes[J].Journal of Environmental Monitoring,2012,14(12):3240-3248.
    [6]
    孔祥科,黄国鑫,韩占涛,等.制革污泥堆存场地典型土壤剖面中污染物的垂向分布特征[J].南水北调与水利科技,2017,15(6):96-100.
    [7]
    BINI C,MALECI L,ROMANIN A.The chromium issue in soils of the leather tannery district in Italy[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2008,96(2/3):194-202.
    [8]
    GOWD S S,REDDY M R,GOVIL P K.Assessment of heavy metal contamination in soils at Jajmau (Kanpur) and Unnao industrial areas of the Ganga Plain,Uttar Pradesh,India[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,174(1/2/3):113-121.
    [9]
    ALI Z,MALIK R N,SHINWARI Z K,et al.Enrichment,risk assessment,and statistical apportionment of heavy metals in tannery-affected areas[J].International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2015,12 (2):537-550.
    [10]
    SAADIA R T,MUNIR H S,SHAHEEN N,et al.Multivariate analysis of trace metal levels in tannery effluents in relation to soil and water:a case study from Peshawar,Pakistan[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2006,79 (1):20-29.
    [11]
    MAKDISI R S.Tannery wastes definition,risk assessment and cleanup options,Berkeley,California[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,1991,29 (1):79-96.
    [12]
    TARCAN G,AKINCI G,DANIŞMAN M A.Assessment of the pollution from tannery effluents upon waters and soils in and around Kula vicinity,Turkey[J].Water,Air,& Soil Pollution,2010,213(1/2/3/4):199-210.
    [13]
    BINI C,MALECI L,ROMANIN A.The chromium issue in soils of the leather tannery district in Italy[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2008,96 (2/3):194-202.
    [14]
    SHI J J,CHEN H L,JOSELITO M,et al.Elemental sulfur amendment decreases bio-available Cr-Ⅵ in soils impacted by leather tanneries[J].Environmental Pollution,2016,212:57-64.
    [15]
    李健康.江门市制革行业固体废物处理处置出路探讨[J].资源节约与环保,2019(5):87-88.
    [16]
    MEGHARAJ M,AVUDAINAYAGAM S,NAIDU R.Toxicity of hexavalent chromium and its reduction by bacteria isolated from soil contaminated with tannery waste[J].Current Microbiology,2003,47(1):51-54.
    [17]
    SINGH R,MISRA V,SINGH R P.Removal of Cr(Ⅵ) by nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) from soil contaminated with tannery wastes[J].Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,2012,88(2):210-214.
    [18]
    ZEESHANUR R,VED P S.Cr(Ⅵ) reduction by Enterobacter sp.DU17 isolated from the tannery waste dump site and characterization of the bacterium and the Cr(Ⅵ) reductase[J].International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation,2014,91:97-103.
    [19]
    SCOTT E.Fendorf.Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters[J].Geoderma,1995,67(1):55-71.
    [20]
    AJOUYED O,HUREL C,AMMARI M,et al.Sorption of Cr(Ⅵ) onto natural iron and aluminum (oxy)hydroxides:effects of pH,ionic strength and initial concentration[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,174(1/2/3):616-622.
    [21]
    JOHNSTON C P,CHRYSOCHOOU M.Mechanisms of chromate adsorption on boehmite[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2015,281:56-63.
    [22]
    APTE A D,VERMA S,TARE V,et al.Oxidation of Cr(Ⅲ) in tannery sludge to Cr(Ⅵ):field observations and theoretical assessment[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2005,121(1/2/3):215-222.
    [23]
    MARIA C DIMITRIS D,DENNIS G G,et al.Importance of mineralogy in the geoenvironmental characterization and treatment of chromite ore processing residue,2010,136(3):510-521.
    [24]
    CHEN H L,AROCENA J M,LI J B,et al.Mobility and storage sinks for chromium and other metals in soils impacted by leather tannery wastes[J].Journal of Environmental Monitoring:JEM,2012,14(12):3240-3248.
    [25]
    杨斌,张刚,李欲如,等.浙江省制革和电镀行业铬污染现状调研及治理对策[J].中国给水排水,2016,32(8):22-28.
    [26]
    XU T,NAN F,JIANG X F,et al.Effect of soil pH on the transport,fractionation,and oxidation of chromium (Ⅲ)[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2020,195:110459.
    [27]
    MONDAL N C,SINGH V P.Hydrochemical analysis of salinization for a tannery belt in Southern India[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,5:235-247.
    [28]
    ANDREA E,ANNA M,MAURIZIO B.Chromium in Agricultural Soils and Crops:A Review[J].Water Air Soil Pollut,2017,228:190.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HAN Jianjun, CHAI Lujun, WANG Guojin, ZHANG Yu, QIN Kangjia, ZHOU Man, LIANG Xuejie, HAO Junpeng, WANG Hui. ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF A NEW SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIUM AND ITS IN SITU REMEDIATION EFFECT OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 192-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402023
    [2]CHEN Yilin, XIN Wencai, CHEN Meng, CHEN Shi, FU Weiliang, ZHANG Chengzhen, ZHANG Xukun, XING Pu. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF SLUDGE TRANSPORTATION THROUGH PIPELINE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 248-252. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207034
    [3]CHE Kai, HAN Zhongge, YU Jinxing, CHEN Chongming, LIU Songtao, GU Xingjia. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MICROWAVE DESORPTION OF SOIL CONTAMINATED BY INSULATING OIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 127-131,138. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202020
    [4]LI Anna, WANG Hui, LIU Qiangnan, LI Taiping. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL POLLUTANTS IN AN EXPLOSION SITE OF A CHEMICAL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 189-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211027
    [5]CHE Kai, YU Jinxing, LIU Kecheng, YANG Peng, FAN Hui, WEI Minglei, NIU Xiangnan, HOU Haiping. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT TOXICITY EVALUATION MODELS ON HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF PAHS IN SOIL OF TYPICAL SUBSTATION SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201019
    [6]NIU Zhenru, LI Feifei, ZHANG Youjun, QU Weigui, CONG Hui, LIU Shigang, ZHANG Jia. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND CAUSES OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS POLLUTION IN SOIL IN A TYPICAL CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 94-101,228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203015
    [7]LI Huaxiang, ZHAO Xiujun, LIU Yinghua, LUO Zhiji. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TUNGSTEN POLLUTION OF SOIL IN A SMELTING SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 141-147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201021
    [8]LI Sheng-hong, ZHU Fen-fen. COMPARISON AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BIOCHAR BY SLUDGE AND DEGREASING-SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 154-159,192. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109022
    [9]LIANG Jing, WANG Shi-jie, ZHANG Wen-yu, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Yuan, ZOU Hui. REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 173-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026
    [10]WANG Zhi-pu, REZEYE Rehemitu-li, ZHANG Da-wang, LIU Dan, ZHAO Qing-ying, SHU Xin-qian. EFFECT AND POSSIBLE MECHANISM OF IMMOBILIZATION OF CHROMIUM IN THE SOIL AMENDED BY BIOCHAR DERIVED FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 178-183. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105025
    [11]ZHANG Hua, YANG Xue-feng, GU Chao-yang, SUN Zhi-chao, ZHAO Guang-jun, XUE Fang-qin. RESEARCH AND AN ENGINEERING DEMONSTRATION OF SLUDGE DEWATERING TECHNOLOGY FOR DYEING INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 152-156. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011025
    [12]LI Qiang, GAO Cun-fu, CAO Ying, HE Lian-sheng, LIU Xiao-xue. COMPARISON AND VERIFICATION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM DETECTION METHODS IN SOLID SAMPLES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 47-51. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006008
    [13]XI Dong-dong, LI Xiao-min, XIONG Zi-xuan, JIANG Zhi, ZHANG Xiao-ming, YANG Wei-chun. SYNERGISTIC REMOVAL OF Cu, Co, Ni AND Cr FROM CONTAMINATED SOIL BY BIOCHAR-SUPPORTED NANOSCALE ZERO-VALENT IRON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 58-66. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006010
    [14]LAI Dong-lin, ZHANG Qi, CHEN Ting-ting, CHEN Hui-xia, TONG Xue-jiao, XU Hong-bin, LIU Xing-hai, ZHAO Cai-yun. REMEDIATION PRACTICE OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM AND CYANIDE CONTAMINATED SOIL AT THE ORIGINAL SITE OF A MACHINERY PLANT IN ZHANGJIAKOU,CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 75-80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006012
    [15]YANG Wen-xiao, ZHANG Li, BI Xue, LI Huan-ru, GU Qian. RESEARCH ADVANCEMENT OF STABILIZATION MATERIALS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM(Ⅵ) CONTAMINATED SITE SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 16-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006003
    [17]Liu Xiao'er. POLLUTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY EVALUATION FOR SOIL IN THE OIL PRODUCTION ZONES OF AN OIL FIELD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 126-129. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502028
    [18]Li Yanni Luo Zhaohui Liu Shan Li Jie Huang Jingjing, . GROUNDWATER POLLUTION RISK ASSESSMENT ON ASH FIELD IN GUIZHOU: TAKING THE YIJIAZHAI ASH FIELD AS AN EXAMPLE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 120-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501028
    [19]Liu Zengjun, Xia Xu, Zhang Xu, Li Guanghe, Jiang Lin. STUDY OF REMEDIATION AND LONG-TERM EFFECT OF AGENTS ON CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 160-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502036
    [20]Zhao Ligang, Pu Shengyan, Yang Jinyan, Yu Jing, Wang Youle. THE Cr( VI) POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUNDWATER AND SOIL IN THE SURROUNDINGS OF A CHROMIUM SLAG SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 117-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502026
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 宋海旺，李子浩，秦显祥，周琳，程丽华，毕学军. 紫外/次氯酸钠预处理对超滤膜污染的影响. 青岛理工大学学报. 2023(06): 123-130 .
    2. 周琳，李子浩，李沛卓，杨强，高爱丽，程丽华，毕学军. UV-NaClO顺序消毒对污水中大肠菌群的灭活效果. 环境工程学报. 2022(10): 3213-3220 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 20.6 %FULLTEXT: 20.6 %META: 78.6 %META: 78.6 %PDF: 0.8 %PDF: 0.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.0 %其他: 14.0 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %China: 1.6 %China: 1.6 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %云浮: 0.3 %云浮: 0.3 %佛山: 0.5 %佛山: 0.5 %信阳: 0.3 %信阳: 0.3 %北京: 2.4 %北京: 2.4 %南昌: 1.3 %南昌: 1.3 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %吉安: 0.3 %吉安: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %延安: 0.3 %延安: 0.3 %张家口: 2.1 %张家口: 2.1 %徐州: 0.3 %徐州: 0.3 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 1.3 %昆明: 1.3 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %桂林: 0.8 %桂林: 0.8 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沧州: 0.3 %沧州: 0.3 %济南: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 33.0 %芒廷维尤: 33.0 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %茂名: 0.5 %茂名: 0.5 %衡水: 0.8 %衡水: 0.8 %衢州: 0.8 %衢州: 0.8 %西宁: 16.6 %西宁: 16.6 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 1.6 %运城: 1.6 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %鄂州: 1.1 %鄂州: 1.1 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.5 %阳泉: 0.5 %龙岩: 0.5 %龙岩: 0.5 %其他其他China[]上海东莞临汾乌鲁木齐云浮佛山信阳北京南昌厦门台州合肥吉安哈尔滨唐山嘉兴天津太原常德广州延安张家口徐州成都无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林武汉沈阳沧州济南济源湖州漯河石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州茂名衡水衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州鄂州重庆金华长春长沙阳泉龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (298) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return