Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 12
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(12): 234-242
GUO Yue-hong, WANG Jian-sheng, ZHANG Xue-hong, ZHANG Xing-feng, GAO Bo. EFFECTS OF HUMIC ACID ON CHROMIUM SPECIATION, MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES AND ENZYME ACTIVITIES IN RED SOIL TREATMENT SYSTEM PLANTED WITH LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 234-242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112035
Citation: GUO Yue-hong, WANG Jian-sheng, ZHANG Xue-hong, ZHANG Xing-feng, GAO Bo. EFFECTS OF HUMIC ACID ON CHROMIUM SPECIATION, MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES AND ENZYME ACTIVITIES IN RED SOIL TREATMENT SYSTEM PLANTED WITH LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 234-242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112035
shu

EFFECTS OF HUMIC ACID ON CHROMIUM SPECIATION, MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES AND ENZYME ACTIVITIES IN RED SOIL TREATMENT SYSTEM PLANTED WITH LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112035

  • 1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;

  • 2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;

  • 3. College of Plant and Ecological Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;

  • 4. College of Tourism & Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China

  • Received Date: 2021-01-27
    Available Online: 2022-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
    Abstract
  • The changes of chromium speciation, microbial communities and enzyme activities in red soil treatment system planted with Leersia hexandra Swartz with or without 10 g/kg humic acid were studied. The results showed that residual fraction was dominant in the substrate after humic acid added. The residual fraction was dominant in the stem and leaves while the hydrochloric acid fraction was dominant in the root. The number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycete could be significantly promoted by humic acid, and the maximum number of the three microbial groups was 6.76×107, 4.48×107, 7.71×107 CFU/g. The analysis of enzyme activities showed that humic acid increased the activity of invertase and alkaline phosphatase and decreased the activity of catalase and polyphenol oxidase. The correlation analysis showed that the activities of polyphenol oxidase and catalase were negatively correlated with the number of bacteria and the concentration of humic acid. The number of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes was positively correlated with the concentration of humic acid. The number of bacteria, fungi and actinomyces were positively correlated with the content of chromium in the substrate residual fraction. A negative correlation existed between invertase and the content of chromium fractions in substrate and in Leersia hexandra Swartz. There was a positive correlation between the activity of polyphenol oxidase and most chromium fractions in Leersia hexandra Swartz.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(52)
  • [1]
    DHAL B,THATOI H N,DAS N N,et al.Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste:a review[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2013,250/251:272-291.
    [2]
    GUPTA V K,AGARWALAND S,TAWFIK A S.Chromium removal by combining the magnetic properties of iron oxide with adsorption properties of carbon nanotubes[J].Water Research,2011,45(6):2207-2212.
    [3]
    MATERN K,KLETTI H,MANSFELDT T.Chemical and mineralogical characterization of chromite ore processing residue from two recent Indian disposal sites[J].Chemosphere,2016,155:188-195.
    [4]
    DING W,STEWART D I,HUMPHREYS P N,et al.Role of an organic carbon-rich soil and Fe(Ⅲ) reduction in reducing the toxicity and environmental mobility of chromium(Ⅵ) at a COPR disposal site[J].Science of the Total Environment,2016,541:1191-1199.
    [5]
    ASHRAF A,BIBI I,NIAZI N K,et al.Chromium(Ⅵ) sorption efficiency of acid-activated banana peel over organo-montmorillonite in aqueous solutions[J].International Journal of Phytoremediation,2017,19(7):605-613.
    [6]
    USHARANI B,VASUDEVAN N.Impact of heavy metal toxicity and constructed wetland system as a tool in remediation[J].Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health,2016,71(2):102-110.
    [7]
    PAPAEVANGELOU V A,GIKAS G D,TSIHRINTZIS V A.Chromium removal from wastewater using HSF and VF pilot-scale constructed wetlands:overall performance,and fate and distribution of this element within the wetland environment[J].Chemosphere,2017,168:716-730.
    [8]
    LIU J,ZHANG X H,YOU S H,et al.Cr(Ⅵ) removal and detoxification in constructed wetlands planted with Leersia hexandra Swartz[J].Ecological Engineering,2014,71:36-40.
    [9]
    伍清新,刘杰,靳振江,等.李氏禾人工湿地净化Cr(Ⅵ)污染水体的性能研究[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(2):536-540.
    [10]
    卜永辉,刘杰,游少鸿,等.六种基质的李氏禾湿地系统对Cr(Ⅵ)净化效果的差异[J].工业安全与环保,2017,43(4):64-67

    ,106.
    [11]
    邹德乙.腐植酸的概念与腐植酸分类问题的探讨[J].腐植酸,2011(4):44-48.
    [12]
    KOSTIC I S,ANDJELKOVIC T D,NIKOLIC R S,et al.Comparative study of binding strengths of heavy metals with humic acid[J].Hemijska Industrija,2013,67(5):773-779.
    [13]
    申静秀,顾闽,范梦婕,等.腐植酸在环境治理中的研究及应用进展[J].现代化工,2020,41(1):30-33.
    [14]
    李威,邹立壮,朱书全,等.近十年腐植酸应用研究综述[J].腐植酸,2006(3):3-8.
    [15]
    ZHANG Y,YANG X,ZHANG S,et al.The influence of humic acids on the accumulation of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) in tobacco leaves grown in different soils[J].Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2013,13(1):43-53.
    [16]
    EL-ESWED B,KHALILI F.Adsorption of Cu(Ⅱ) and Ni(Ⅱ) on solid humic acid from the Azraq area,Jordan[J].Journal of Colloid Interface Science,2006,299(2):497-503.
    [17]
    D’AMORE J J,AL-ABED S R,SCHECKEL K G,et al.Methods for Speciation of Metals in Soils[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2005,34(5):1707-1745.
    [18]
    DEGRYSE F,SMOLDERSAND E,PARKER D R.Partitioning of metals (Cd,Co,Cu,Ni,Pb,Zn) in soils:concepts,methodologies,prediction and applications:a review[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2009,60(4):590-612.
    [19]
    王丹,魏威,梁东丽,等.土壤铜、铬(Ⅵ)复合污染重金属形态转化及其对生物有效性的影响[J].环境科学,2011,32(10):3113-3120.
    [20]
    WEIS J S,GLOVER T,WEIS P.Interactions of metals affect their distribution in tissues of Phragmites australis[J].Environmental Pollution,2004,131(3):409-415.
    [21]
    于皓,安益君,金德才,等.铬污染对土壤细菌群落结构及其构建机制的影响[J].环境科学,2020,42(3):1197-1204.
    [22]
    CHUNG H,KIM M J,KO K,et al.Effects of graphene oxides on soil enzyme activity and microbial biomass[J].Science of the Total Environment,2015,514:307-313.
    [23]
    葛艺,徐明明,徐邵辉,等.铜胁迫对小麦根系微域微生物群落的影响[J].环境科学,2020,42(2):996-1003.
    [24]
    DENG L J,ZENG G M,FAN C Z,et al.Response of rhizosphere microbial community structure and diversity to heavy metal co-pollution in arable soil[J].Applied Microbiology Biotechnology,2015,99(19):8259-8269.
    [25]
    ZHANG Y J,OU J L,DUAN Z K,et al.Adsorption of Cr(Ⅵ) on bamboo bark-based activated carbon in the absence and presence of humic acid[J].Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,2015,481:108-116.
    [26]
    武瑞平,薛金辉,王莹.腐殖酸对铅污染土壤理化性质的影响[J].环境科学导刊,2018,37(2):56-61.
    [27]
    GONZALEZ M L,BLANC D,BRAUER de C.Multi-analytical approach and geochemical modeling for mineral trace element speciation in MSWI bottom-ash[J].Waste and Biomass Valorization,2017,10(3):547-560.
    [28]
    林先贵,王一明.腐植酸类物质是土壤健康的重要保障[J].腐植酸,2010,2:1-10.
    [29]
    ZHU Y,ZENG G M,ZHANG P Y,et al.Feasibility of bioleaching combined with Fenton-like reaction to remove heavy metals from sewage sludge[J].Bioresource Technology,2013,142:530-534.
    [30]
    ZHAO T T,GE W Z,NIE Y X,et al.Highly efficient detoxification of Cr(Ⅵ) by brown coal and kerogen:process and structure studies[J].Fuel Processing Technology,2016,150:71-77.
    [31]
    HSU N H,WANG S L,LIN Y C.Reduction of Cr(Ⅵ) by crop-residue-derived black carbon[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2009,43(23):8801-8806.
    [32]
    张杏锋,田超,高波.能源植物皇草对重金属的耐性及修复潜力[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(5):3204-3213.
    [33]
    周桑扬,杨凯,吴晓芙,等.人工湿地植物去除废水中重金属的作用机制研究进展[J].湿地科学,2016,14(5):717-724.
    [34]
    TAN L Q,WANG X X,TAN X L,et al.Bonding properties of humic acid with attapulgite and its influence on U(Ⅵ) sorption[J].Chemical Geology,2017,464:91-100.
    [35]
    LI Y,YUE Q Y,GAO B Y,et al.Adsorption thermodynamic and kinetic studies of dissolved chromium onto humic acids[J].Colloids Surfaces B:Biointerfaces,2008,65(1):25-29.
    [36]
    SANTOSA S J,SISWANTA D,SUDIONO S,et al.Synthesis and utilization of chitin-humic acid hybrid as sorbent for Cr(Ⅲ)[J].Surface Science,2007,601(22):5148-5154.
    [37]
    JIANG W J,CAI Q,XU W,et al.Cr(Ⅵ) adsorption and reduction by humic acid coated on magnetite[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2014,48(14):8078-8085.
    [38]
    靳振江,刘杰,肖瑜,等.处理重金属废水人工湿地中微生物群落结构和酶活性变化[J].环境科学,2011,32(4):1202-1209.
    [39]
    陈素华,孙铁珩,周启星,等.微生物与重金属间的相互作用及其应用研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(2):239-242.
    [40]
    杨良静,何俊瑜,任艳芳,等.Cd胁迫对水稻根际土壤酶活和微生物的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2009,37(3):85-88.
    [41]
    张建林,陆欣,王申贵.有机物料配比施用对土壤碱性磷酸酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2001,32(2):75-79.
    [42]
    蔡少华.土壤Cr(Ⅵ)与土壤生化活性关系研究.陕西:西北农林科技大学,2008.
    [43]
    TRASAR-CEPEDA C,GIL-SOTRES F,LEIROS M C.Thermodynamic parameters of enzymes in grassland soils from Galicia,NW Spain[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2007,39(1):311-319.
    [44]
    闫峰,吴雄平,梁东丽,等.外源重金属Cr、Cu、Se和Zn对土娄土酶活性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008,36(7):91-98.
    [45]
    STPNIEWSKA Z,WOLINSKA A,ZIOMEK J.Response of soil catalase activity to chromium contamination[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2009,21(8):1142-1147.
    [46]
    郝建朝,吴沿友,连宾,等.土壤多酚氧化酶性质研究及意义[J].土壤通报,2006,37(3):470-474.
    [47]
    陈光升,钟章成,齐代华.缙云山常绿阔叶林土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系[J].四川师范学院学报(自然科学版),2002,23(1):19-23.
    [48]
    关荫松.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
    [49]
    韩春梅,王林山,巩宗强,等.土壤中重金属形态分析及其环境学意义[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(12):1499-1502.
    [50]
    李鱼,万晓宇,王晓丽.沉积物内源与外源重金属形态与酶活性的相关性[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(4):10-14.
    [51]
    章智明,黄占斌,单瑞娟.腐植酸对土壤改良作用探讨[J].环境与可持续发展,2013,38(3):109-111.
    [52]
    梁艳茹,和文祥,邢少峰,等.不同价态铬对土壤碱性磷酸酶活性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(5):156-160,166.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIU Xiaoji, YAN Kun, XU Heng, WANG Yongqun, WANG Zhihua, ZHANG Dejia, CHANG Fengmin. COUPLING H2-RICH SYNGAS BIOMETHANATION WITH ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE: A PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 131-137. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403016
    [2]YUE Liangchen, YU Miao, CHENG Jun, LIU Keliang, HUA Junjie, GUO Hao. INFLUENCE OF LIPID CONTENT AND ELECTRIC FERMENTATION VOLTAGE ON METHANE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 200-207. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407022
    [3]LIU Chao, ZHANG Xuemeng, CHEN Chuang, YIN Yue, HUANG Haining, CHEN Yinguang. BIOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF AMMONIA INHIBITION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 156-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309019
    [4]WANG Yanzhao, WU Yang, LIU Yiwei, CHEN Yinguang, ZHENG Xiong. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF CARBON-BASED CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS TO PROMOTE METHANE PRODUCTION FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 146-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309018
    [5]XIANG Yinping, XIONG Weiping, ZHANG Yanru, JIA Meiying, PENG Haihao, YANG Zhaohui. EFFECT OF SLUDGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION ON THE REDUCTION OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 192-202,241. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210026
    [6]TANG Xin-yi, CHEN Xiang-yu, XIAO Ben-yi, LIU Rong-zhan. THERMAL-ALKALINE TREATMENT OF SEWAGE SLUDGE AND ITS ENHANCEMENT ON ANAEROBIC SLUDGE DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 218-226. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205031
    [7]CHEN Yuqi, ZHANG Yanlong, WANG Yuzheng, LI Junxin, CAO Wenzhi. EFFECTS OF TYPICAL ANTIBIOTICS ON METHANOGENESIS EFFICIENCY AND MICROBIAL METABOLITES DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF PIG MANURE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 89-96,120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204013
    [8]GENG Ziqian, DAI Wenting, LI Chao, TANG Jie, DAI Kun, CENG Jianxiong, ZHANG Fang. ENHANCED METHANOGENESIS OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE FERMENTATION BY DOSING AN ALGINATE-DEGRADING CONSORTIUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 90-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208012
    [9]WANG Xu-dong, LI Xian-guo, ZHANG Hai-qing, PAN Kang-hong, ZHANG Da-hai. EFFECT OF MEDIUM AND HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYACRYLAMIDE ON PERFORMANCE OF SLUDGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 82-87. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205012
    [10]TANG Meng-yuan, ZHAO Jia-qi, QIU Chun-sheng, WANG Bing-bing, WANG Ren-jie, ZHONG Liang, SUN Li-ping. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BIOCHAR AND ITS IMPROVEMENT EFFECT ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION EFFICIENCY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 138-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109020
    [11]LI Xu-sheng, LU Sha-sha, JIANG Yuan-yan, WANG Li-ao. EFFECT AND MECHANISM OF BIOCHAR IN MITIGATING ACIDIFICATION OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS FOR FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 179-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112027
    [12]ZHOU Yu-qi, XU Jun-chao, ZHUO Gui-hua, CHEN Jian-yong, LIU Chang-qing. INFLUENCE OF SLUDGE INOCULATION VOLUME ON METHANOGENESIS OF RESIDUE FROM ANAEROBIC FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION USING COMBINED SLUDGE AND FOOD WASTE UNDER MEDIUM TEMPERATURE CONDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 144-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106021
    [13]ZHOU Yu-qi, CAO Qi, XU Jun-chao, LIU Chang-qing, ZHUO Gui-hua, CHEN Jian-yong, ZHENG Yu-yi. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT SOURCE SUBSTRATE SYSTEMS ON METHANOGENESIS OF RESIDUE FROM ANAEROBIC FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION USING COMBINED SLUDGE AND FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 123-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109018
    [14]LIU Xin-yuan, HU Wen-jia, OUYANG Fan, NIE Jia-min, WU Nan, YANG Fan, KONG Si-fang. BIOGAS PRODUCTION AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY SUCCESSION DURING SEQUENCING BATCH ACCLIMATIZATION OF DIGESTED SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 136-141,188. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103019
    [15]CHEN Si-yuan, XIAO Xiang-zhe, TENG Jun, DONG Shan-yan, LIAN Jun-feng, ZHU Yi-chun. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON METHANOGENIC INHIBITION TECHNOLOGY DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF EXCESS SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 137-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106020
    [16]ZHAO Jia-qi, FAN Xiao-dan, QIU Chun-sheng, WANG Chen-chen, LIU Nan-nan, WANG Dong, WANG Shao-po, SUN Li-ping. ANALYSIS ON DIFFICULTY AND CONTROL STRATEGY OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION TREATMENT OF FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 143-148. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012024
    [17]DENG Qing-hua, ZHANG Jian, XIAN-Ping, FANG Qing, MENG Zheng-cheng. IMPROVING ANAEROBIC DIGESTIBILITY OF SLUDGE PRETREATED BY THERMAL HYDROLYSIS AND BANANA STRAW ADDED[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 144-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005025
    [18]ZHOU Yu-han, PAN Yang, ZHANG Rui-liang, ZHENG Chao-ting, ZHI Zhong-xiang, ZHEN Guang-yin. EFFECT OF ACID-ALKALI MICROWAVE COMBINED PRETREATMENT ON RUPTURE OF SLUDGE EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES AND METHANE PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 19-25,31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012004
    [19]WANG Yuan-yuan, QIN Xiao-jie, NIU Lai-chun, FAN Jia-qi. ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF VEGETATION IN EBB ZONE ENHANCED BY CaO FOR METHANE PRODUCTION AND ITS MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 208-212,218. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009033
    [20]Li Wei Liang Meisheng Pei Xuqian Jiang Junjie, . RESEARCH ON APPLICATION OF PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD IN ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 106-109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503022
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 15.4 %FULLTEXT: 15.4 %META: 82.5 %META: 82.5 %PDF: 2.2 %PDF: 2.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.1 %其他: 17.1 %China: 0.9 %China: 0.9 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 1.3 %上海: 1.3 %东莞: 0.9 %东莞: 0.9 %临汾: 0.9 %临汾: 0.9 %公州: 3.9 %公州: 3.9 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %北京: 3.5 %北京: 3.5 %十堰: 0.9 %十堰: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %厦门: 3.5 %厦门: 3.5 %台州: 1.3 %台州: 1.3 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %徐州: 0.4 %徐州: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 1.8 %杭州: 1.8 %武汉: 4.8 %武汉: 4.8 %济源: 0.9 %济源: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %漯河: 3.1 %漯河: 3.1 %烟台: 0.9 %烟台: 0.9 %爱知: 1.3 %爱知: 1.3 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 22.8 %芒廷维尤: 22.8 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 9.6 %西宁: 9.6 %西雅图: 0.4 %西雅图: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 4.4 %运城: 4.4 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %其他China[]上海东莞临汾公州兰州北京十堰南京厦门台州合肥嘉兴天津宣城常德张家口徐州成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源温州漯河烟台爱知石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西雅图贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (156) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return