Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 1
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LU Yifan, LU Yin, CAI Hui, SUN Shoujun, SHI Weilin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FIELD LEFT BY A LEAD-ACID BATTERY FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 135-140,189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201020
Citation: LU Yifan, LU Yin, CAI Hui, SUN Shoujun, SHI Weilin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FIELD LEFT BY A LEAD-ACID BATTERY FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 135-140,189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201020

POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FIELD LEFT BY A LEAD-ACID BATTERY FACTORY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201020
  • Received Date: 2021-02-01
    Available Online: 2022-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
  • Taking the contaminated land left by a lead-acid battery factory in Suzhou as the research object, the types of pollutants, pollution degree and health risk in the site soil were analyzed and evaluated by using Nemero comprehensive pollution index method and human health risk assessment model, and the spatial distribution of human health risk was analyzed by Kriging interpolation method in surfer. The results showed that the main heavy metal pollutants in the plot soil were lead and arsenic. The polluted level of the metal lead(Pb) reached a heavy degree, while metal arsenic(As) was at light pollution level. Through the risk assessment of pollutants on human health, it was found that the CR value of As' s carcinogenic risk for children and adults exceeded the acceptable value of 10-6, thus there was a certain carcinogenic risk for human body. In addition, the probability of children's blood lead concentration exceeding 10 μg/dL calculated by ieubk model was as high as 68.6%, which was much higher than the safety probability limit of 5%. It was concluded that there were high health risks of heavy metals lead and As in the site, and it was necessary to repair the site soil before redevelopment and utilization.
  • loading
  • [1]
    张建荣,沈桢,许伟.场地污染土壤调查及评估探讨[J].环境监测管理与技术,2011(2):8-10,14.
    [2]
    陈辉,陈扬,邵春岩.重金属污染场地治理管理模式及分级方法[J].中国环保产业,2008(4):49-53.
    [3]
    范日东,杜延军,刘松玉.城市工业污染场地修复技术研究现状与发展趋势[C]//中国地质学会工程地质专业委员会.第九届全国工程地质大会论文集.全国工程地质大会.北京:2012.
    [4]
    薛诚,毕俊.某铅冶炼厂卫生防护距离的估算[J].中国预防医学杂志,2010,11(2):159-161.
    [5]
    韦友欢,黄秋婵.铅对人体健康的危害效应及其防治途径[J].微量元素与健康研究,2008,25(4):62-64.
    [6]
    李仁声.重金属在水环境多相共存体系中再分配的研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2008.
    [7]
    刘霞,裴飞.浅析儿童玩具中的化学危害[J].标准科学,2014(4):6.
    [8]
    MARI M,NADAL M,SCHUNMACHER M,et al.Exposure to heavy metals and PCDD/Fs by the population living in the vicinity of a hazardous waste landfill in Catalonia,Spain:health risk assessment[J].Environment International,35(2009):1034-1039.
    [9]
    MAPANDA F,MANGWAYANA E N,NYAMANGARA J,et al.The effect of long-term irrigation using wastewater on heavy metal contents of soils under vegetables in Harare,Zimbabwe[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2005,107(2/3):151-165.
    [10]
    房吉敦,杜晓明,李政,等.某复合型化工遗留场地分地层健康风险评估[J].环境工程技术学报,2013,3(5):451-457.
    [11]
    陈海滨.基于人体健康风险评估的污染场地管理与修复研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2009.
    [12]
    GB 36600—2018 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)[S].
    [13]
    HJ 25.2—2014 场地环境监测技术导则[S].
    [14]
    赵振乾,刘阳,孙春意,等.沂河山东段水体中重金属的分布与污染评价[J].安徽农业科学,2014(8):2429-2431.
    [15]
    GULSON B,TAYLOR A,STIFELMAN M.Lead exposure in young children over a 5-year period from urban environments using alternative exposure measures with the US EPA IEUBK model[J].Environmental Research,2018,5(2):261-264.
    [16]
    单爱琴,张威,周洪英.徐州市不同功能区重金属污染与健康风险评价[J].环境工程,2016,34(9):125-129.
    [17]
    胡佳,陈建伟,周宜开.IEUBK模型的应用概况及其本土化的初步探讨[J].环境与健康杂志,2013,30(7):655-658.
    [18]
    徐松.IEUBK模型结合流行病学调查的儿童环境铅暴露健康风险评估研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2010.
    [19]
    US EPA.Risk assessment guidance for superfund,Vol.1:Human health evaluation manual(Part A)[R].Washington,DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,1989.
    [20]
    US EPA.Risk assessment guidance for superfund,Vol.1:Human health evaluation manual(Part B,Development of risk-based preliminary remediation goals)[R].Washington,DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,1991.
    [21]
    US EPA.Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites[R].Washington,DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,2002.
    [22]
    US EPA.Risk assessment guidance for superfund(RAGS),vol.1:Human health evaluation manual(Part E,Supplemental guidance from dermal risk assessment) interim[R].Washington,DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,2004.
    [23]
    环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2013.
    [24]
    FERREIRA-BAPTISTA L,DE MIGUEL E.Geochemistry and risk assessment of street dust in Luanda,Angola:A tropical urban environment[J].Atmosphere Environment,2005,39(25):4501-4512.
    [25]
    陈洁.苏州市某电镀遗留场地重金属健康风险评价[D].苏州:苏州科技大学,2018.
    [26]
    段小丽,王宗爽,李琴,等.基于参数实测的水中重金属暴露的健康风险研究[J].环境科学,2011,32(5):1329-1339.
    [27]
    徐猛,颜增光,贺萌萌,等.不同国家基于健康风险的土壤环境基准比较研究与启示[J].环境科学,2013,34(5):1667-1678.
    [28]
    杨彦,于云江,等.基于IEUBK模型的电子废弃物拆解区环境铅污染对儿童血铅影响的研究[J].环境与健康,2013,30(9):781-785.
    [29]
    葛佳.铅污染场地的人类健康风险评估及应用实例[J].上海国土资源,2018,39(4):35-37.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (223) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return