Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
FANG Li, HE Lijuan, HAO Run, NIE Lei, WANG Hailin. PRIMARY STUDY ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND CONTROL MEASURES OF FUGITIVE COAL DUST DURING RAILWAY TRANSPORTATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 123-127,147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201018
Citation: LU Yifan, LU Yin, CAI Hui, SUN Shoujun, SHI Weilin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FIELD LEFT BY A LEAD-ACID BATTERY FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 135-140,189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201020

POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FIELD LEFT BY A LEAD-ACID BATTERY FACTORY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201020
  • Received Date: 2021-02-01
    Available Online: 2022-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
  • Taking the contaminated land left by a lead-acid battery factory in Suzhou as the research object, the types of pollutants, pollution degree and health risk in the site soil were analyzed and evaluated by using Nemero comprehensive pollution index method and human health risk assessment model, and the spatial distribution of human health risk was analyzed by Kriging interpolation method in surfer. The results showed that the main heavy metal pollutants in the plot soil were lead and arsenic. The polluted level of the metal lead(Pb) reached a heavy degree, while metal arsenic(As) was at light pollution level. Through the risk assessment of pollutants on human health, it was found that the CR value of As' s carcinogenic risk for children and adults exceeded the acceptable value of 10-6, thus there was a certain carcinogenic risk for human body. In addition, the probability of children's blood lead concentration exceeding 10 μg/dL calculated by ieubk model was as high as 68.6%, which was much higher than the safety probability limit of 5%. It was concluded that there were high health risks of heavy metals lead and As in the site, and it was necessary to repair the site soil before redevelopment and utilization.
  • [1]
    张建荣,沈桢,许伟.场地污染土壤调查及评估探讨[J].环境监测管理与技术,2011(2):8-10,14.
    [2]
    陈辉,陈扬,邵春岩.重金属污染场地治理管理模式及分级方法[J].中国环保产业,2008(4):49-53.
    [3]
    范日东,杜延军,刘松玉.城市工业污染场地修复技术研究现状与发展趋势[C]//中国地质学会工程地质专业委员会.第九届全国工程地质大会论文集.全国工程地质大会.北京:2012.
    [4]
    薛诚,毕俊.某铅冶炼厂卫生防护距离的估算[J].中国预防医学杂志,2010,11(2):159-161.
    [5]
    韦友欢,黄秋婵.铅对人体健康的危害效应及其防治途径[J].微量元素与健康研究,2008,25(4):62-64.
    [6]
    李仁声.重金属在水环境多相共存体系中再分配的研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2008.
    [7]
    刘霞,裴飞.浅析儿童玩具中的化学危害[J].标准科学,2014(4):6.
    [8]
    MARI M,NADAL M,SCHUNMACHER M,et al.Exposure to heavy metals and PCDD/Fs by the population living in the vicinity of a hazardous waste landfill in Catalonia,Spain:health risk assessment[J].Environment International,35(2009):1034-1039.
    [9]
    MAPANDA F,MANGWAYANA E N,NYAMANGARA J,et al.The effect of long-term irrigation using wastewater on heavy metal contents of soils under vegetables in Harare,Zimbabwe[J].Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2005,107(2/3):151-165.
    [10]
    房吉敦,杜晓明,李政,等.某复合型化工遗留场地分地层健康风险评估[J].环境工程技术学报,2013,3(5):451-457.
    [11]
    陈海滨.基于人体健康风险评估的污染场地管理与修复研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2009.
    [12]
    GB 36600—2018 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)[S].
    [13]
    HJ 25.2—2014 场地环境监测技术导则[S].
    [14]
    赵振乾,刘阳,孙春意,等.沂河山东段水体中重金属的分布与污染评价[J].安徽农业科学,2014(8):2429-2431.
    [15]
    GULSON B,TAYLOR A,STIFELMAN M.Lead exposure in young children over a 5-year period from urban environments using alternative exposure measures with the US EPA IEUBK model[J].Environmental Research,2018,5(2):261-264.
    [16]
    单爱琴,张威,周洪英.徐州市不同功能区重金属污染与健康风险评价[J].环境工程,2016,34(9):125-129.
    [17]
    胡佳,陈建伟,周宜开.IEUBK模型的应用概况及其本土化的初步探讨[J].环境与健康杂志,2013,30(7):655-658.
    [18]
    徐松.IEUBK模型结合流行病学调查的儿童环境铅暴露健康风险评估研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2010.
    [19]
    US EPA.Risk assessment guidance for superfund,Vol.1:Human health evaluation manual(Part A)[R].Washington,DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,1989.
    [20]
    US EPA.Risk assessment guidance for superfund,Vol.1:Human health evaluation manual(Part B,Development of risk-based preliminary remediation goals)[R].Washington,DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,1991.
    [21]
    US EPA.Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites[R].Washington,DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,2002.
    [22]
    US EPA.Risk assessment guidance for superfund(RAGS),vol.1:Human health evaluation manual(Part E,Supplemental guidance from dermal risk assessment) interim[R].Washington,DC:Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,2004.
    [23]
    环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2013.
    [24]
    FERREIRA-BAPTISTA L,DE MIGUEL E.Geochemistry and risk assessment of street dust in Luanda,Angola:A tropical urban environment[J].Atmosphere Environment,2005,39(25):4501-4512.
    [25]
    陈洁.苏州市某电镀遗留场地重金属健康风险评价[D].苏州:苏州科技大学,2018.
    [26]
    段小丽,王宗爽,李琴,等.基于参数实测的水中重金属暴露的健康风险研究[J].环境科学,2011,32(5):1329-1339.
    [27]
    徐猛,颜增光,贺萌萌,等.不同国家基于健康风险的土壤环境基准比较研究与启示[J].环境科学,2013,34(5):1667-1678.
    [28]
    杨彦,于云江,等.基于IEUBK模型的电子废弃物拆解区环境铅污染对儿童血铅影响的研究[J].环境与健康,2013,30(9):781-785.
    [29]
    葛佳.铅污染场地的人类健康风险评估及应用实例[J].上海国土资源,2018,39(4):35-37.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]GU Xuedian, LIU Dongmei, LI Yuting, ZHANG Shangjun, CHEN Yidi, FENG Yujie, REN Nanqi. RESEARCH ON GREEN AND LOW CARBON TREATMENT PATH OF URBAN WATER POLLUTION IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 27-33. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412004
    [2]WU Jie, YUE Changsheng, LU Guanghua, LIU Changbo, XIA Chun, LIU Shicheng, KANG Yining. CONFORMATION OF HEAVY METAL SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF AN IN-PRODUCTION ENTERPRISE IN HUNAN BASED ON VOXLER SIMULATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 178-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406021
    [3]WANG Yongdong, YUAN Ye, LIU Xinyuan, LI Mengting, LIU Qian, WANG Jinhua, MA Jianhong. PPy-MODIFIED ELECTRODE ENHANCING MFC-DRIVEN ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATION OF URANIUM CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 182-191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402022
    [4]WU Mengli, ZHANG Xianghan, WANG Hongyu, XU Dongjian, CHEN Wufen. APPLICATION OF WATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY JOINT CONTROL MODEL IN QIANSHAN RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 160-164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311025
    [5]LI Anna, WANG Hui, LIU Qiangnan, LI Taiping. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL POLLUTANTS IN AN EXPLOSION SITE OF A CHEMICAL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 189-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211027
    [6]QIU Fuguo, TONG Shiyu, WANG Xiaoqian. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON OCCURRENCE STATUS AND ECOLOGICAL HAZARDS OF MICROPLASTICS IN WATER ENVIRONMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 221-228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203032
    [7]CAO Feishu, CHEN Jianping, XIE Dongyan, YAN Depeng, LIAO Changjun, SONG Hainong, ZHU Hongxiang, CHEN Guanyi. APPLICATION OF SLURRY BIOREACTOR IN SOIL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 174-181,201. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204025
    [8]WEI Chao-hai, GUAN Xiang-hong, WEI Geng-rui, LI Ze-min, WEI Tuo, CHEN A-cong. THE NEXUS IMPORTANCE OF AQUEOUS SOLUTION PROPERTIES AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PROCESSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 28-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111003
    [9]WEI Wen-jing, XIE Bing-geng, ZHOU Kai-chun, LI Xiao-qing. RESEARCH ON TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC PM2.5 AND PM10 AND THE INFLUENCING FACTORS IN SHANDONG, CHINA DURING 2013—2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 103-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012018
    [10]HU Qing, TONG Li-zhi, WANG Hong, GUO Rui-cheng, YANG Gang-ting, XU Sheng-bin. FIELD RAPID SCREENING TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN SOIL SAMPLING OPTIMIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 163-167,172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012027
    [11]XU Wei-tong, WANG Jian-long, WU Yan-jie, LV Yun-jie. ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ON THERMAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS, LOAD ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL MEASURES OF URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 26-31,58. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004006
    [14]Xu Wei Li Yong Tang Chuanxiang Chen Xiangbin Li Huijuan Xiong Daowen Yu Shaoqin, . EXPERIMENT OF A NEW AERATION SYSTEM USED IN MBR INTEGRATION EQUIPMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 10-14. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510003
    [15]Wang Yayan, Zhang Jiangang, Ni Pengping, Li Mengying, Yu Yingjie, Zhang Lingling, Xu Yuliang, Cai Cong, Xie Liqun. APPLICATION RESEARCHES ON IN-SITU ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TECHNOLOGY IN POLLUTED URBAN RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 11-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503003
    [16]Liu Peiya, Li Yujiao, Hu Pengjie, Dong Changxun. COLUMN LEACHING OF CADMIUM AND LEAD FROM A CONTAMINATED SOIL USING COMPOSITE LEACHING AGENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 163-167. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501038
    [18]VARIATION ANALYSIS OF NOISE IN XI'AN FUNCTIONAL AREA FOR YEARS AND RESEARCH ON CONTROL COUNTERMEASURE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 117-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412020
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 赵亚龙,曹瑞. 包神铁路集团煤炭运输抑尘质量提升对策研究. 铁道货运. 2023(08): 37-42 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.2 %FULLTEXT: 14.2 %META: 80.3 %META: 80.3 %PDF: 5.6 %PDF: 5.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.9 %其他: 8.9 %其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %中卫: 0.3 %中卫: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %信阳: 0.3 %信阳: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 3.3 %北京: 3.3 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %天津: 1.9 %天津: 1.9 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %张家口: 2.2 %张家口: 2.2 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %榆林: 0.3 %榆林: 0.3 %武汉: 1.1 %武汉: 1.1 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.6 %洛阳: 0.6 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %漯河: 1.1 %漯河: 1.1 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 59.2 %芒廷维尤: 59.2 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 1.7 %西宁: 1.7 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 3.1 %运城: 3.1 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 1.7 %郑州: 1.7 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %其他其他[]上海中卫临汾保定信阳兰州北京十堰南京南昌台州哈尔滨天津常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州榆林武汉沈阳洛阳济源深圳湖州漯河石家庄福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (249) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return