Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 1
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2022  >  40(1): 141-147
FU Xiaoyan, LI Zhenguo, LI Xiangyu, YANG Meng, LIU Lianlian, XIA Ying, SUN Zhen, LI Zhiyuan. ANTIBIOTIC POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF WATER BODIES AROUND LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BREEDING IN DALIAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 164-169. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304023
Citation: LI Huaxiang, ZHAO Xiujun, LIU Yinghua, LUO Zhiji. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TUNGSTEN POLLUTION OF SOIL IN A SMELTING SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 141-147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201021
shu

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TUNGSTEN POLLUTION OF SOIL IN A SMELTING SITE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201021

  • Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center of Henan Province, Nanyang 450000, China

  • Received Date: 2021-05-13
    Available Online: 2022-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
    Abstract
  • Due to the less attention to the emerging pollutant tungsten in soil, this study focused on the soil of a tungsten smelting site in Luoyang, Henan province, and used the methods of spatial interpolation, single factor index, Nemerow index and potential ecological risk index to emphatically discuss the spatial distribution characteristics and potential ecological risk of tungsten in soil. The results showed that the soil tungsten contents in S10, S05 and S06 were higher than that in other functional areas; the enrichment degree of tungsten in soil layers Ⅰ and Ⅱ was much higher than that in soil layers Ⅲ and IV; with the increasing of soil depth, the areas of S01, S02, S04, S08, S10 and S12 reflected deep enriching tungsten, while S05, S06, S07 and S11 showed an surface enriching, and S03 and S09 showed an middle enriching; except for S01 and S12, the Pi of tungsten in surface and middle layer soil were minor and mild, the Pi of tungsten in the other areas of the site reached medium level; the tungsten composite indexes(PN) of each soil layer showed that the whole soil layer was heavily polluted by tungsten; except for the surface soil tungsten in S05 area, the soil tungsten(Ei) in the other areas of the site was with a mild ecological risk; the comprehensive potential ecological risk(RI) of soil tungsten in each layer showed that the ecological risks of soil tungsten in Ⅰ and Ⅱ layers were moderate, and those in Ⅲ and IV layers were mild.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(29)
  • [1]
    杜辉辉,刘新,李杨,等.土壤中钨的环境行为与潜在风险:研究进展与展望[J/OL].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20210207.1059.002.html.2021-05-13.
    [2]
    王素芳,贺铭.我国土壤中钼、钨的环境背景值及分布规律[J].土壤通报,1991(6):252-253.
    [3]
    KOUTSOSPYROS A,BRAIDA W,CHRISTODOULATOS C,et al.A review of tungsten:from environmental obscurity to scrutiny[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2006,136(1):1-19.
    [4]
    CLAUSEN J L,KORTE N.Environmental fate of tungsten from military use[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2009,407(8):2887-2893.
    [5]
    DATTA S,VERO S E,HETTIARACHCHI G M,et al.Tungsten contamination of soils and sediments:current state of science[J].Current Pollution Reports,2017,3(1):55-64.
    [6]
    WILSON B,PYATT F B.Bio-availability of tungsten in the vicinity of an abandoned mine in the English Lake District and some potential health implications[J].The Science of the Total Environment,2006,370(2/3):401-408.
    [7]
    SHEPPARD P R,SPEAKMAN R J,RIDENOUR G,et al.Temporal variability of tungsten and cobalt in fallon,Nevada[J].Environmental Health Perspectives,2007,115(5):715-719.
    [8]
    STRIGUL N,KOUTSOSPYROS A,ARIENTI P,et al.Effects of tungsten on environmental systems[J].Chemosphere,2005,61(2):248-258.
    [9]
    董志询,陈素华,李中浤.江西某废弃钨冶炼厂场地土壤重金属污染特征与风险评价[J].南昌航空大学学报(自然科学版),2019,33(3):105-110.
    [10]
    刘静静.西南地区某钨锡矿区土壤重金属污染状况及健康风险评价研究[J].环境科学与管理,2017,42(3):178-181.
    [11]
    邬光海,王晨昇,陈鸿汉.内蒙古废弃钨钼矿区周围土壤重金属污染生态环境评价及成因分析[J].中国地质,2020,47(6):1838-1852.
    [12]
    ZHENG X J,CHEN M,WANG J F,et al.Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the vicinity of tungsten mining areas,southern Jiangxi province[J].Soil and Sediment Contamination,2020,38(2):1-15.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部.建设用地土壤污染状况调查技术导则HJ 25.1—2019[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2019.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部.建设用地土壤污染风险管控和修复监测技术导则HJ 25.2—2019[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2019.
    [15]
    王凯.场地土壤重金属污染特征及健康风险评估研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2019.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部.土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 36600—2018[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2018.
    [17]
    朱静,侯耀宗,邹书成等.武汉集中式饮用水源地土壤重金属的时空分布特征及生态风险评价[J/OL].https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202010196.2021-05-13.
    [18]
    孟晓飞,郭俊娒,杨俊兴,等.河南省典型工业区周边农田土壤重金属分布特征及风险评价[J].环境科学,2021,42(2):900-908.
    [19]
    邱坤艳,赵阳,赵林林,等.铅冶炼区土壤剖面重金属污染特征及风险评价[J].环境保护科学,2020,46(6):155-159.
    [20]
    韩术鑫,王利红,赵长盛.内梅罗指数法在环境质量评价中的适用性与修正原则[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(10):2153-2160.
    [21]
    MAZUREK R,KOWALSKA J,GASIOREK M.Assessment of heavy metals contamination in surface layers of Roztocze National Park forest soils (SE Poland) by indices of pollution[J].Chemosphere,2017,168:839-850.
    [22]
    郑影怡,刘杰,蒋萍萍等.河池市某废弃冶炼厂周边农田土壤重金属污染特征及风险评价[J].环境工程,2021,39(5):8.
    [23]
    徐争启,倪师军,庹先国,等.潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算[J].环境科学与技术,2008,31(2):112-115.
    [24]
    KAMANI H,NEZAM M,MANSOUR G,et al.Concentration and ecological risk of heavy metal in street dusts of Eslamshahr,Iran[J].Risk Assess,2018,24:961-970.
    [25]
    温鹏翀,温汉辉,蔡立梅,等.典型产业承接区土壤砷含量的空间分布特征及影响因素[J].环境化学,2021,40(1):204-212.
    [26]
    范拴喜.宝鸡市长青镇冶炼厂周围土壤重金属污染与健康风险评估[J].环境工程,2015,33(4):121-127.
    [27]
    PHILIP P E.Variability of soil properties related to vegetation cover in a tropical rainforest landscape[J].Journal of Geography and Regional Planning,2010,3(7):177-184.
    [28]
    奚旦立.环境监测[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,1995.
    [29]
    蒋慧豪.大型有色冶炼区土壤重金属污染特征及健康风险评价[D].西安:长江大学,2020.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 谢作杰，董鹏宇，尹苗，邓永涛，陈希文. 微生态制剂的作用机制及其在家禽健康养殖中的应用. 黑龙江畜牧兽医. 2025(01): 15-19 .
    2. 赵悦，王春霞，赵梅云. 生态养殖模式在畜禽养殖中的应用. 现代农村科技. 2025(02): 77-78 .
    3. 董堃，唐宇坤，周欣雨，黄浩宇，王敦球，李海翔. 桂林市青狮潭水库沉积物抗生素污染特征及风险评估. 农业环境科学学报. 2024(01): 143-151 .
    4. 陈进，王亚娟，陶红，张锐. 规模化养殖园区土壤中抗生素污染特征和生态风险评价. 环境科学. 2024(07): 4302-4311 .
    5. 徐春燕，凌海波，张姝，向罗京，李苇苇，明德，易川. 湖北省四湖流域典型抗生素分布特征及生态风险评估. 安全与环境工程. 2023(05): 213-221 .
    6. 张亚萍，拓田田，李金金. 抗生素在多介质中污染现状研究进展. 山西化工. 2023(09): 50-52 .
    7. 张文斌，赵晶，张秀，王俭，刘灿，杨海蓉. 重庆市水环境中抗生素的污染特征及其风险评价. 生态毒理学报. 2023(06): 314-324 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.6 %FULLTEXT: 14.6 %META: 82.6 %META: 82.6 %PDF: 2.8 %PDF: 2.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.8 %其他: 11.8 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %China: 3.1 %China: 3.1 %上海: 3.8 %上海: 3.8 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %云浮: 0.3 %云浮: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %北京: 0.7 %北京: 0.7 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 2.8 %南京: 2.8 %南宁: 2.1 %南宁: 2.1 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %台州: 2.1 %台州: 2.1 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.7 %哈尔滨: 0.7 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大连: 4.2 %大连: 4.2 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %常德: 1.0 %常德: 1.0 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %张家口: 5.9 %张家口: 5.9 %惠州: 1.4 %惠州: 1.4 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.7 %杭州: 2.8 %杭州: 2.8 %格兰特县: 1.0 %格兰特县: 1.0 %武汉: 2.1 %武汉: 2.1 %沈阳: 1.0 %沈阳: 1.0 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %甘南: 0.3 %甘南: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 8.3 %芒廷维尤: 8.3 %芝加哥: 6.9 %芝加哥: 6.9 %苏州: 2.4 %苏州: 2.4 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %西宁: 19.1 %西宁: 19.1 %西安: 0.7 %西安: 0.7 %贵阳: 1.4 %贵阳: 1.4 %运城: 2.4 %运城: 2.4 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %银川: 0.7 %银川: 0.7 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %其他其他China上海临汾云浮保定北京十堰南京南宁南昌台州合肥哈尔滨大同大连天津常德广州张家口惠州成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉沈阳温州甘南芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆金华银川青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (246) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return