RESEARCH ON CLASSIFICATION BEHAVIOR OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN THE RECYCLING OF TAKE-OUT PACKAGING

MU Xianzhong; XUE Lian

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202202030

Volume 40 Issue 2

Apr. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(2): 199-205

SHEN Song, LIU Lei, WEN Wei, XING Yi, SU Wei, SUN Jiaqi. POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF CARBON COMPONENTS OF PM2.5 IN BEIJING AND SURROUNDING AREAS IN SUMMER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 71-80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202012

Citation:

MU Xianzhong, XUE Lian. RESEARCH ON CLASSIFICATION BEHAVIOR OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN THE RECYCLING OF TAKE-OUT PACKAGING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 199-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202030

Citation:

PDF( 2004 KB)

RESEARCH ON CLASSIFICATION BEHAVIOR OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN THE RECYCLING OF TAKE-OUT PACKAGING

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202030

MU Xianzhong,
XUE Lian^,

Faculty of Materials and Manufacturing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received Date: 2021-04-17
Available Online: 2022-04-02
Publish Date: 2022-04-02

Abstract

Abstract

The large amount of packaging waste brought by catering take-out industry is threatening the safety of ecological environment in campus, and how to recycle it has become an urgent problem. In this paper, based on the framework of UTAUT theory, we constructed the influence path between four core variables, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, perceived value, and three control variables, gender, educational, frequency. Then, the structural equation model was used to empirically calculate the model path and analyze the influencing factors of college students' intention to participate in the packaging classification. The result showed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy and perceived value had significant positive influence on college students' participation intention, while social influence had no significant influence on college students' participation intention. Moreover, performance expectancy had significant positive influence on college students' participation intention indirectly through the partial mediating effect of effort expectancy and perceived value. The gender, educational background and frequency had a certain moderating effect on the relationship between variables. Finally, scientific suggestions were given on the policy, which are conducive to increase the necycling rate of take-out packaging and construct the Green Campus.
- takeout packaging,
- UTAUT,
- recycling,
- behavior analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	田丹,唐加福,任悦.O2O模式下即时配送服务系统弹性的提升策略优化[J].系统工程理论与实践,2021,41(2):310-318.
[2]	翟青,高玉洁,魏宗财.南京市线上—线下餐饮空间分布格局:以大众点评网和饿了么为例[J].经济地理,2020,40(12):119-127.
[3]	朱强,李丰,钱壮.全国高校食堂堂食浪费概况及其外卖碳足迹研究:基于30省(市)30所高校的9660份问卷调查[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(1):49-55.
[4]	VENKATESH V,MORRIS M G,DAVIS G B,et al.User acceptance of information technology:toward a unified view[J].Mis Quarterly,2003,27(3):425-478.
[5]	王立.基于UTAUT模型的众包平台接包方参与行为影响因素研究[D].南昌:东华理工大学,2017.
[6]	OYE N D,ALAHAD N,RAHIM N.The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians[J].Education and Information Technologies,2014,19(1):251-270.
[7]	何钦.UTAUT模型在我国信息采纳中的研究现状[J].科技信息,2011(11):69-96.
[8]	孙建军,成颖,柯青.TAM模型研究进展——模型演化[J].情报科学,2007(8):1121-1127.
[9]	ALWAHAISHI S,VAICLAV S,SHARMA S.Modeling the determinants affecting consumer acceptance and use of information and communications technology[M].IGI Global,2013.
[10]	MOSWEU O,BWALYA K,MUTSHEWA A.Examining factors affecting the adoption and usage of document workflow management system (DWMS) using the UTAUT model[J].Records Management Journal,2016,26(1):38-67.
[11]	MIN Q,JI S,QU G.Mobile commerce user acceptance study in china:a revised UTAUT model[J].Tsinghua Science and Technology,2008,13(3):257-264.
[12]	BOONCHAI K,SUPASIT P,STUART M.Factors influencing health information technology adoption in thailand's community health centers:applying the UTAUT model[J].International Journal of Medical Informatics,2009,78(6):404-416.
[13]	ZHOU T,LU Y B,WANG B.Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2010,26(4):760-767.
[14]	CHAUHAN S,JAISWAL M.Determinants of acceptance of ERP software training in business schools:empirical investigation using UTAUT model[J].The International Journal of Management Education,2016,14(3):248-262.
[15]	宋婷.基于UTAUT模型的购物APP用户使用行为的影响因素研究[D].济南:山东大学,2017.
[16]	王晶,朱爱红.基于UTAUT模型的包装回收功能快递柜使用意向实证研究[J].包装工程,2019,40(17):131-137.
[17]	WILLIAMS M D,RANA N P,DWIVEDI Y K.The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT):a literature review[J].Journal of Enterprise Information Management,2015,28(3):443-488.
[18]	郭捷,王嘉伟.基于UTAUT视角的众包物流大众参与行为影响因素研究[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(11):1-6.
[19]	马小龙,刘兰娟.基于UTAUT的城镇居民对互联网社交理财产品使用意愿影响因素研究[J].消费经济,2016,32(2):81-85 ,39.
[20]	PRIOLO D,MILHABET I,CODOU O,et al.Encouraging ecological behavior through induced hypocrisy and inconsistency[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2016,4(3):166-180.
[21]	李武,胡泊,季丹.电子书阅读客户端的用户使用意愿研究——基于UTAUT和VAM理论视角[J].图书馆论坛,2018,38(4):103-110.
[22]	HSU C L,LIN C C.Effect of perceived value and social influences on mobile app stickiness and in-app purchase intention[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2016,108(7):42-53.
[23]	邱爱梅,陈铭焜.基于UTAUT修正模型的微信朋友圈广告接受意愿分析[J].统计与决策,2018,34(12):99-102.
[24]	刘佳,邹韵婕,刘泽溪.基于SEM模型的电商直播中消费者购买意愿影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2021,37(7):94-97.
[25]	熊无昧,刘永权.AMOS结构方程模型下开放教育非学习支持服务心理要素分析[J].现代远程教育研究,2017(2):104-112.
[26]	MACKINNON D P,LOCKWOOD C M,WILLIAMS J.Confidence limits for the indirect effect:distribution of the product and resampling methods[J].Multivariate Behavioral Research,2004,39(1):99-128.
[27]	MACKINNON D P,FRITZ M S,WILLIAMS J,et al.Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect:program prodclin[J].Behavior Research Methods,2007,39(3):384-389.
[28]	MACKINNON D P,FAIRCHILD A J,FRITZ M S.Mediation analysis[J].Annual Review of Psychology,2007,58(1):593-614.
[29]	明均仁,郭财强,王鑫鑫.基于UTAUT的移动图书馆用户使用意愿实证研究[J].图书馆学研究,2018(22):81-90.

Relative Articles

[1]	WU Yihao, CUI Yaojia, ZANG Xinzhi, WANG Wenqiang, YE Zhaolian. OXIDATIVE POTENTIAL AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM_2.5 DURING SPRING IN CHANGZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 53-61. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405007
[2]	YANG Zhixuan, LI Lanqing, LIU Huanjia, YANG Ying, XU Mengyuan, JIA Mengke, LIU Hengzhi. SEASONAL VARIATION, SOURCE AND LIGHT EXTINCTION CONTRIBUTION OF WATER-SOLUBLE INORGANIC IONS OF PM_2.5 IN THE NORTHERN SUBURB OF ANYANG, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 71-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406009
[3]	GUO Qianjin. COMPONENTS CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM_2.5 IN AUTUMN AND WINTER IN JINCHENG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 153-161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407017
[4]	XU Yuanqian, FU Guangyu, SHENG Haozhe, YUE Libo, SUN Peng, LUO Yilin, CAO Jiahui, CAO Xia, CHEN Yang. PM_2.5 POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT IN A TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL CITY OF HENAN PROVINCE DURING AUTUMN AND WINTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 136-144. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412017
[5]	WEI Xiangnan, MA Yunfeng, BAO Huiyu, ZHAO Huijie, SUN Xuebin, WANG Shuai, HOU Le. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS OF PM_2.5 AND O₃ POLLUTION IN SHENYANG CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 73-82. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410010
[6]	XU Yang, YAN Yulong, DUAN Xiaolin, WU Jing, PENG Lin, ZHANG Xiangyu, NIU Yueyuan, LIU Zhuocheng, ZHANG Dayu. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF HALOCARBONS IN SUMMER AT HIGH ALTITUDE BACKGROUND SITE OF NAMCO, TIBETAN PLATEAU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 55-62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304008
[7]	ZHANG Yibing, LIANG Yiqun, ZHANG Yuan, FANG Yinxiang, NIU Hongya, FAN Jingsen. SOURCE APPORTIONMENT AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN PM_2.5 IN THE FENGFENG MINING AREA IN 2017—2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 242-250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308031
[8]	LI Hongliang, TAO Jie, LI Lanqing, ZHAO Wenpeng, XU Mengyuan, JIA Mengke, YANG Ying, LIU Huanjia. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF WATER-SOLUBLE IONS IN PM_2.5 IN XINXIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 117-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308015
[9]	LI Yang, LIU Yong-he, WANG Xi-yue, WANG Hai-lin. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PM_2.5 AND PM₁₀ AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS IN JIAOZUO, HENAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 44-53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209006
[10]	ZHAO Hui-jie, MA Yun-feng, WANG Shuai, LIU Qi-yao, WEI Xiang-nan. CAUSE ANALYSIS OF A HEAVY PM_2.5 POLLUTION PROCESS OCCURED IN SHENYANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 33-43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209005
[11]	ZHU Xue-tao, LIN Hai-ying, FENG Qing-ge, ZHAO Bo-han, ZHU Yi-fan, LAN Wen-lu, LI Tian-shen. POLLUTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, SOURCE ANALYSIS OF HEAVY METALS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF BEIBU GULF, GUANGXI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 69-76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108009
[12]	ZHANG Kuo, ZHANG Yong-bin, LI Cheng-ming, DAI Zhao-xin. SEASONAL DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PM_2.5 AND LAND USE: A CASE STUDY OF WEIFANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 72-78. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104012
[13]	YANG Zhi-hua, ZHANG Rui, LIU Qiong-yu, TAO Yuan, JIANG Jun-ting, TAN Jing, CHENG Jin-jun, YE Xun. ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS ON FINE PARTICULATE MATTER SOURCE PROFILE OF OPEN-SOURCES IN WUHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 80-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105011
[14]	SU Ming-wei, ZHANG Wei-feng, ZHENG Run-he. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS OF PM_2.5 BASED ON WAVELET ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 96-103. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105013
[15]	WANG Cheng, CAO Jing-yuan, DUAN Xiao-lin, CHEN Hao, YAN Yu-long, PENG Lin. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCES ANALYSIS OF CARBONACEOUS COMPONENTS IN PM_2.5 IN WINTER IN FOUR CITIES OF SHANXI PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 114-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106017
[16]	ZHAO Bin, LIU Bin. APPLICATION OF STACKING IN GROUND-LEVEL PM_2.5 CONCENTRATION ESTIMATING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002022
[17]	ZHAO Wen-cheng, WANG Fang. ANALYSIS OF URBAN AIR QUALITY INDEX BASED ON MULTISCALE CROSS TREND SAMPLE ENTROPY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 91-98. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002013
[18]	WEI Wen-jing, XIE Bing-geng, ZHOU Kai-chun, LI Xiao-qing. RESEARCH ON TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC PM_2.5 AND PM₁₀ AND THE INFLUENCING FACTORS IN SHANDONG, CHINA DURING 2013—2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 103-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012018
[19]	ZHANG Zhong-di, SHAO Tian-jie, HUANG Xiao-gang, WEI Pei-ru. CHARACTERISTICS AND POTENTIAL SOURCES OF PM_2.5 POLLUTION IN BEIJING-TIANJIN-HEBEI REGION IN 2017[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 99-106,134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002014
[20]	DING Shu-qin, WU Jia-ping, WAN Xue-ping, JIANG Lin, ZHAO Xue-ting, SHA Dan-dan. ANALYZE ON PM_2.5 AND ITS MAIN CHEMICAL COMPOSITION DURING TYPICAL HEAVY AIR POLLUTION IN AUTUMN AND WINTER IN CHANGSHU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 142-147,161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003024

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	王越. 矿化垃圾强化剩余污泥暗发酵产氢. 中国给水排水. 2024(05): 105-110 .
2.	项显超，蔡嘉瑞，甄宗傲，李晓东. 填埋场开采及矿化垃圾资源化利用现状. 环境卫生工程. 2024(03): 16-27 .

Other cited types(0)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (179) PDF downloads(4)