Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 40 Issue 3
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
DENG Jianguo, WANG Dongbin, LIU Tonghao, LI Xue, YANG Shuwen, DUAN Lei, JIANG Jingkun. ORGANIC COMPONENTS IN CONDENSABLE PARTICLE MATTER EMITTED FROM COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS AND STEEL PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 13-17,31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203003
Citation: DENG Jianguo, WANG Dongbin, LIU Tonghao, LI Xue, YANG Shuwen, DUAN Lei, JIANG Jingkun. ORGANIC COMPONENTS IN CONDENSABLE PARTICLE MATTER EMITTED FROM COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS AND STEEL PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 13-17,31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203003

ORGANIC COMPONENTS IN CONDENSABLE PARTICLE MATTER EMITTED FROM COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS AND STEEL PLANTS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203003
  • Received Date: 2021-07-02
    Available Online: 2022-07-07
  • Nowadays, the retrofit of ultra-low emission has been finished in most coal-fired power plants, and are in process in iron and steel plants in China. The concentration of filterable particulate matters (FPM) has been greatly reduced and condensable particulate matters (CPM) have aroused more attention. The fraction of organic matter in CPM emitted from coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) and iron and steel plants remained controversial, which was important to understand the formation mechanism and to promote the emission control of CPM. We collected CPM samples by in-direct dilution method in eight CFPPs and three iron and steel plants (including two sintering and one coke making plants), and specific compositions and fraction of organic matter in CPM were analyzed. The results showed that the concentration of organic compositions from CFPPs was 0.082 mg/m3(0~0.331 mg/m3) and 0.060 mg/m3(0~0.254 mg/m3) at the inlet of flue gas desulfurization and stack, accounting for 4.95% and 10.1% of total CPM content, respectively. For iron and steel plants, the concentration and proportion of organic matter were higher in comparison with those from CFPPs, which were 1.9 mg/m3(0.408~3.98 mg/m3) and 0.382 mg/m3(0.149~0.572 mg/m3) at the inlet of flue gas desulfurization and stack, accounting for 22.2% and 11.1% of total CPM content respectively. Major compositions of organic matter in CPM from CFPPs were esters, whereas alkanes and alkanoic acids were the major composition in CPM from iron and steel plants. In a word, the fractions of organic matter at two kinds of stationary sources were relatively low, more attention should be paid on controlling its inorganic gas precursors.
  • loading
  • [1]
    中国电力企业联合会.中国电力行业年度发展报告2019[M].北京:中国市场出版社,2019.
    [2]
    中国钢铁工业协会[EB/OL].http://www.chinaisa.org.cn/gxportal/xfgl/portal/list.html?columnId=50d99531d5dee68346653ca9548f308764ad38410a091e662834a5ed66770174.
    [3]
    蒋靖坤,邓建国,李振,等.固定污染源排气中PM2.5采样方法综述[J].环境科学, 2014, 35(5):2018-2024.
    [4]
    蒋靖坤,邓建国,段雷,等.基于虚拟撞击原理的固定源PM10/PM2.5采样器的研制[J].环境科学, 2015, 35(10):3639-3643.
    [5]
    李妍菁,邓建国,王刚,等.固定源可凝结颗粒物稀释采样器的设计[J].环境科学学报, 2020, 40(5):1656-1660.
    [6]
    MORINO Y, CHATANI S, TANABE K, et al. Contributions of condensable particulate matter to atmospheric organic aerosol over Japan[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2018, 52(15):8456-8466.
    [7]
    FENG Y P, LI Y Z, CUI L. Critical review of condensable particulate matter[J]. Fuel, 2018, 224(1):801-813.
    [8]
    蒋靖坤,邓建国,王刚,等.固定污染源可凝结颗粒物测量方法研究[J].环境科学, 2019, 40(12):5234-5239.
    [9]
    WANG G, DENG J, ZHANG Y, et al. Evaluating airborne condensable particulate matter measurement methods in typical stationary sources in China[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2020, 54(1):1363-1371.
    [10]
    裴冰.燃煤电厂可凝结颗粒物的测试与排放[J].环境科学, 2015, 36(5):1544-1549.
    [11]
    祁建民,孙和泰,黄治军,等.超低排放燃煤电厂SO3和可凝结颗粒物迁移规律研究[J].热力发电,2021,50(4):72-77.
    [12]
    LI J W, QI Z F, LI M, et al. Physical and chemical characteristics of condensable particulate matter from an ultralow-emission coal-fired power plant[J]. Energy&Fuels, 2017, 31(2):1778-1785.
    [13]
    杨柳,张斌,王康慧,等.超低排放路线下燃煤烟气可凝结颗粒物在WFGD、WESP中的转化特性[J].环境科学, 2019, 40(1):121-125.
    [14]
    邓建国,王刚,张莹,等.典型超低排放燃煤电厂可凝结颗粒物特征和成因[J].环境科学, 2020,41(4):1589-1593.
    [15]
    朱法华,李军状.我国燃煤电厂SO3和可凝结颗粒物控制存在问题与建议[J].环境影响评价, 2019, 41(3):1-5.
    [16]
    YANG H H, LEE K T, HSIEH Y S, et al. Emission characteristics and chemical compositions of both filterable and condensable fine particulate from iron and steel plants[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality research,2015,15(4):1672-1680.
    [17]
    张莹,邓建国,王刚,等.典型钢铁焦化厂可凝结颗粒物排放特征[J].环境工程,2020,38(9):154-158.
    [18]
    CORIO L A, SHERWELL J. In-stack condensable particulate matter measurements and issues[J]. Journal of Air&Waste Management Association, 2000, 50(2):207-218.
    [19]
    邓建国,张莹,王乐冰,等.测量固定源可凝结颗粒物的稀释间接法及系统[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(11):4162-4168.[20] DING X, LI Q, WU D, LIANG Y, et al. Unexpectedly increased particle emissions from the iron and steel industry determined by wet/semidry/dry flue gas desulfurization technologies[J]. Environmental Science&Technology, 2019,53(17):10361-10370.[21] 徐静颖.典型煤种热解与燃烧过程挥发性有机组分生成与排放特性[D].北京:清华大学,2019.[22] HUANG, Y M, HUANG S X, LIN C W, et al. Evaluation of bias in the measurement of condensable particulate matter with Method 202[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2021, 21(1)1-12.[23] 廖继勇,何国强.近五年烧结技术的进步与发展[J],烧结球团, 2018, 43(5):1-11.[24] LI J X, HE X P, PEI B, et al. The ignored emission of volatile organic compounds from iron ore sinter process[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019,77(1):282-290.[25] 王海风,秦松,姜曦,等.钢铁工业烧结过程VOCs减排研究进展[J].钢铁, 2018,53(1):1-7.

    [26] YANG H H, LEE K T, HSIEH Y S, et al. Filterable and condensable fine particulate emissions from stationary sources[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2014, 14(7):2010-2016.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (226) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return