Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
HE Shengjie, ZHOU Li, ZHU Jia, GAO Jingsi. SIMULATION OF IMPACT OF LOW B/C SEWAGE ON AN A2/O PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 81-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203013
Citation: HE Shengjie, ZHOU Li, ZHU Jia, GAO Jingsi. SIMULATION OF IMPACT OF LOW B/C SEWAGE ON AN A2/O PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 81-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203013

SIMULATION OF IMPACT OF LOW B/C SEWAGE ON AN A2/O PROCESS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203013
  • Received Date: 2021-05-29
    Available Online: 2022-07-07
  • Based on the A2/O process of a sewage plant in Shenzhen and its on-line monitoring data of influent and effluent, the A2/O simulation model was established and corrected by using GPS-X. The reliability of the model was demonstrated. Two impact simulation schemes, continuous impact simulation and random impact simulation, were proposed to simulate two ways of low B/C sewage impact on A2/O process due to the increase of proportion of dissolved inert component (frsi) in total COD. Simulation results showed that TN, TP and COD concentration of effluent exceeded the standard in turn when A2/O was impacted by low B/C sewage, and adding carbon source could reduce the exceeding rate of TN and TP. Reducing the dissolved oxygen concentration in aerobic tank could save carbon source dosage and the minimum exceeding rate of TN and TP was less than COD. When taking the over-standard rate of COD of 5% during the simulation time as the threshold, A2/O process could withstand the continuous impact of sewage with frsi=0.133 and B/C=0.332 for 31 days, or the random impact of sewage with frsi=0.136 and B/C=0.330 for 25 days, sewage with frsi=0.143 and B/C=0.328 for 20 days, sewage with frsi=0.151 and B/C=0.324 for 15 days, sewage with frsi=0.161 and B/C=0.319 for 10 days, and sewage with frsi=0.189 and B/C=0.308 for 5 days, namely.
  • [1]
    仙光,张光明,刘毓璨,等.Fenton法处理电镀有机废水[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(4):1007-1012.
    [2]
    段祥斌,曹诗扬,彭继成.污泥热解合成气冷凝洗涤废水水质特性分析[C]//《环境工程》2019年全国学术年会论文集(下册),2019:4.
    [3]
    JI B X, ZHANG H N, ZHOU L,et al. Effect of the rapid increase of salinity on anoxic-oxic biofilm reactor for treatment of high-salt and high-ammonia-nitrogen wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology,2021,337:125363.
    [4]
    郑怀礼,蒋君怡,万鑫源,等.磁性纳米材料吸附处理工业废水的研究进展[J].中国环境科学,2021,41(8):3555-3566.
    [5]
    周振,吴志超,王志伟,等.基于批式呼吸计量法的溶解性COD组分划分[J].环境科学,2009,30(1):75-79.
    [6]
    HENZE M,GUJER W,MINO T,et al.Activated sludge models ASM1,ASM2,ASM2d and ASm3[R].London:IAW Publishing,2000.
    [7]
    ROELEVELD P J, van LOOSDERCHT M C M.Experience with guidelines for wastewater characterization in the Netherlands[J].Water Science&Technology,2002,45(6):77-87.
    [8]
    周振,吴志超,王志伟,等.污水中溶解性惰性有机物含量的测定方法及其研究进展[J].工业水处理,2010,30(10):17-20.
    [9]
    BAEZA J A, GABRIEL D, LAFUENTE J. Improving the nitrogen removal efficiency of an A2/O based WWTP by using an on-line Knowledge Based Expert System[J]. Water Research, 2002, 36(8):2109-2123.
    [10]
    张淼,彭永臻,张建华,等.进水C/N对A2/O-BCO工艺反硝化除磷特性的影响[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(5):1366-1375.
    [11]
    高春娣,张娜,韩徽,等.碳源对膨胀污泥微生物多样性的影响研究[J].北京工业大学学报,2021,47(2):169-178.
    [12]
    吴悦颖,王洪臣,孙娟,等.我国城镇污水处理设施脱氮除磷能力现状分析及对策建议[J].给水排水,2014,50(增刊1):118-122.
    [13]
    周国标,周鹏飞,雷睿,等.传统A2/O城市污水处理中存在的工艺问题及其优化控制策略[J].水处理技术,2017,43(6):11-17

    ,23.
    [14]
    冯红利,赵梦月,丁舒喆.城市污水厂A2/O工艺生物脱氮过程优化控制[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(6):102-106.
    [15]
    韦政,杨燕梅,翁蕊,等.高排放标准下我国城镇污水厂A2/O工艺升级改造研究进展[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021(4):55-63.
    [16]
    ABBASI N,AHMADI M,NASERI M. Quality and cost analysis of a wastewater treatment plant using GPS-X and CapdetWorks simulation programs[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2021,284:111993.
    [17]
    CAO J S,YANG E,XU C Z,et al. Model-based strategy for nitrogen removal enhancement in full-scale wastewater treatment plants by GPS-X integrated with response surface methodology[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,769:144851.
    [18]
    刘阔.水解酸化-IFAS工艺处理屠宰废水研究及工程调试运行[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2020.
    [19]
    魏忠庆,上官海东,叶均磊,等.基于GPS-X模拟的污水处理厂提标工艺优化[J].中国给水排水,2018,34(19):81-84.
    [20]
    谢楠. ASM2d耦合曝气模型对多段多级AO工艺的模拟与实验研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2020.
    [21]
    邵袁.基于WEST软件模拟的城市污水厂的优化运行研究[D].南京:东南大学,2019.
    [22]
    王磊,于广平,苑明哲.污水处理过程模型参数校正方法研究及应用[J].科学技术与工程,2013,13(21):6354-6359.
    [23]
    邵袁,王华成,覃榴滨,等.乡镇污水处理厂仿真模拟及优化运行研究[J].水处理技术,2020,46(9):90-97.
    [24]
    陈玉新.基于ASM2D模型的A2/O工艺强化脱氮除磷控制策略研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2016.
    [25]
    杭晨,牛涛,孙立柱,等.基于BioWin的城市污水处理厂全流程处理工艺模拟与优化[J].给水排水,2018,54(7):134-140.
    [26]
    梁跃武,林琼芳,宋瑞琨.残差分析在回归模型诊断中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,1991(2):49-51.
    [27]
    李炳荣,曹特特,王林,等.低氧条件下A2/O工艺对城市污水脱氮处理的中试研究[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(1):134-140.
    [28]
    邢丽贞,寇知辉,吴毅晖,等.对某城市污水处理厂技术性能的综合评价[J].中国给水排水,2017,33(3):87-92.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]SUN Shujing, GUO Yibing, GUO Siyan, ZHAO Yan, LIN Lin. A SIMULATION MODEL OF EMERGENCY MONITORING LINKAGE AND JOINT DEFENSE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EMERGENCIES BASED ON PETRI NET[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 167-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408020
    [2]BAI Yangyang, HE Chao, LI Jiaqiang, ZHAO Longqing, LI Ju, XU Jiachen, CHEN Zhenyu. SPATIOTEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS OF HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL TRUCK EMISSIONS BASED ON GPS DATA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 63-70,100. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304009
    [3]GU Xiao-dan, HUANG Yong, DING Yong-wei, HUANG Ji-hui. DIAGNOSIS AND ANALYSIS BASED ON MATHEMATICAL MODEL ON PROBLEMS IN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IN VILLAGES AND TOWNS WITH LOW LOAD OPERATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 9-15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105002
    [4]YUAN Jian-ye, NAN Xin-yuan, CAI Xin, LI Cheng-rong. GARBAGE IMAGE CLASSIFICATION BY LIGHTWEIGHT RESIDUAL NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 110-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102017
    [5]HUANG Tao, WANG Jian-long, SHI De-wen, JIANG Qi-gui, LI Xiao-ning. EFFECT OF RUNOFF FLOW PATH ON WATER QUANTITY CONTROL EVALUATION BY SWMM MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 170-175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004030
    [6]GAO Shang, HU Peng, CUI Song, ZHANG Zu-lin, XING Zhen-xiang, ZHANG Fu-xiang. NUMERICA SIMULATION AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF SURFACE RUNOFF IN NAOLI RIVER BASIN BASED ON SWAT MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 83-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010013
    [17]Zhang Jing, Zou Ping, Chen Zhengyao, Zhao Siqi, Sun Peishi, Bi Xiaoyi, Wang Yanru, Wang Xingchun, Wang Jie. ENHANCEMENT RESEARCH ON MICROBIAL PURIFICATION EFFICIENCY OF NO AND NOx IN SIMULATED FLUE GAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 84-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506019
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 岳崇峰,李桂姣,许江城. 改良AAO+深床反硝化滤池工艺用于污水处理厂提标改造. 城市道桥与防洪. 2024(06): 163-168+22 .
    2. 唐白石,胡轶波,江海鑫. 人工智能与活性污泥仿真软件在污水处理中的协同应用. 净水技术. 2024(10): 48-56+85 .
    3. 赵林,李燚佩,付军,杨永奎. 工业园区水环境系统全流程管控优化研究. 工业水处理. 2023(11): 1-6 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.5 %FULLTEXT: 13.5 %META: 82.2 %META: 82.2 %PDF: 4.3 %PDF: 4.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 19.7 %其他: 19.7 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %北京: 1.0 %北京: 1.0 %南京: 1.0 %南京: 1.0 %合肥: 2.9 %合肥: 2.9 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋城: 1.0 %晋城: 1.0 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 1.0 %杭州: 1.0 %武汉: 1.0 %武汉: 1.0 %江门: 0.5 %江门: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %潍坊: 1.0 %潍坊: 1.0 %石家庄: 2.4 %石家庄: 2.4 %芒廷维尤: 39.9 %芒廷维尤: 39.9 %芝加哥: 1.4 %芝加哥: 1.4 %蚌埠: 0.5 %蚌埠: 0.5 %衢州: 1.0 %衢州: 1.0 %西宁: 6.3 %西宁: 6.3 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 4.3 %运城: 4.3 %遵义: 1.0 %遵义: 1.0 %郑州: 1.9 %郑州: 1.9 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %其他[]上海临汾保定北京南京合肥天津太原常德广州张家口成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉江门济源深圳漯河潍坊石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥蚌埠衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义郑州长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (170) PDF downloads(9) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return