CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA

NI Haifeng; DAN Zeng; ZHOU Wenwu; ZHOU Peng; XU Fei; YANG Tao; MENG Dean; CHEN Guanyi

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014

Volume 40 Issue 3

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(3): 89-93,131

NI Haifeng, DAN Zeng, ZHOU Wenwu, ZHOU Peng, XU Fei, YANG Tao, MENG Dean, CHEN Guanyi. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 89-93,131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014

Citation:

NI Haifeng, DAN Zeng, ZHOU Wenwu, ZHOU Peng, XU Fei, YANG Tao, MENG Dean, CHEN Guanyi. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 89-93,131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014

Citation:

NI Haifeng, DAN Zeng, ZHOU Wenwu, ZHOU Peng, XU Fei, YANG Tao, MENG Dean, CHEN Guanyi. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 89-93,131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014

PDF( 1262 KB)

CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014

1. School of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China;
2. Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300072, China

Received Date: 2021-05-25
Available Online: 2022-07-07

Abstract

Abstract

Incineration is the mainstream technology of municipal solid waste treatment. Fly ash, as the main pollutant of waste incineration, has become a key link in waste incineration pollution control. In this study, we collected fly ash samples from waste incineration power plants in Lhasa, and analyzed the heavy metals content and leaching toxicity characteristics, and adopted improved potential risk assessment method and health risk assessment method to evaluate the risk of heavy metals in fly ash. The results showed that the heavy metals content of fly ash in Lhasa was relatively high, and the leaching concentration of Pb obviously exceeded the maximum allowable value of the leaching solution in the Identification Standard for Hazardous Wastes (GB 5085.2-2007). Pollution evaluation results showed that Pb in fly ash had heavy risk of pollution to the environment. The health risk assessment results showed that the carcinogenic risk of heavy metals in fly ash to humans was within an acceptable range, but its non-carcinogenic risk value was higher than the non-carcinogenic risk value recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), indicating had a higher non-carcinogenic risk on human body. Among them, the non-carcinogenic risk values of Pb for adults and children were 3.8975 and 9.7458 respectively, which was the main contributor to the non-carcinogenic risk.
- Lhasa,
- fly ash,
- heavy metals,
- characteristics,
- health risk assessment

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	国家统计局.中国统计年鉴-2020[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2020.
[2]	纪涛,陈阳,徐岗.新形势下生活垃圾焚烧飞灰处置技术现状及建议[J].环境卫生工程, 2018,26(5):34-37.
[3]	刘丽君,韩静磊,钱益斌,等.利用靶器官毒性剂量法(TTD)和证据权重分析法(WOE)评估固化飞灰中重金属非致癌健康风险[J].环境化学, 2019,38(5):1014-1020.
[4]	陈林.焚烧飞灰用于沥青路面中面层污染物溶出规律及风险评估[D].重庆:重庆交通大学, 2016.
[5]	环境保护部.国家危险废物名录[EB/OL].[2016-06-21]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/201606/t20160621_354844.htm.
[6]	张永强,吴卫宏,张海霞,等.基于模糊专家系统的垃圾焚烧底灰重金属污染风险评价[J].环境工程, 2015,33(3):126-130.
[7]	汤莉莉,牛生杰,徐建强,等.外秦淮河疏浚后底泥重金属污染与潜在生态风险评价[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2008,17(3):424-430.
[8]	杨安,邢文聪,王小霞,等.西藏中部河流、湖泊表层沉积物及其周边土壤重金属来源解析及风险评价[J].中国环境科学, 2020,40(10):4557-4567.
[9]	LI R D, SHU T C, LI Y L, et al. Migration characteristics and toxicity evaluation of heavy metals during the preparation of lightweight aggregate from sewage sludge[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019,26(9):9123-9136.
[10]	SHI Y F, LI Y, YUAN X L, et al. Environmental and human health risk evaluation of heavy metals in ceramsites from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2020,42:3779-3794.
[11]	环境保护部.固体废物22种金属元素的测定电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法:HJ 781-2016[S].北京:2016.
[12]	国家环境保护总局.固体废物浸出毒性浸出方法硫酸硝酸法:HJ/T 299-2007[S].北京:2007.
[13]	李洋,张乃明,魏复盛.滇东镉高背景区菜地土壤健康风险评价与基准[J].中国环境科学, 2020,40(10):4522-4530.
[14]	郭彦海,孙许超,张士兵,等.上海某生活垃圾焚烧厂周边土壤重金属污染特征、来源分析及潜在生态风险评价[J].环境科学, 2017,38(12):5262-5271.
[15]	何艳峰,席北斗,王琪,等.垃圾焚烧飞灰熔渣的健康风险评价与豁免管理[J].环境科学研究, 2005(增刊1):13-16.
[16]	罗绒战堆.生命路上的难关:从农牧民感受小议西藏的平均期望寿命[J].中国藏学, 2016(4):112-117.
[17]	张鸣,温汉辉,蔡立梅,等.普宁土壤重金属的生态风险与健康风险评价[J].环境科学与技术, 2019,42(12):202-210.
[18]	杨俊,马斯璐,李苇苇.大冶矿区食品重金属污染及其健康风险影响研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2017,40(12):249-255.
[19]	环境保护部.污染场地风险评估技术导则:HJ 25.3-2014[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2014.
[20]	刘思辰,江长胜,李庆玲,等.重庆市垃圾焚烧飞灰中重金属含量及浸出毒性分析[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,38(1):101-107.
[21]	孟棒棒,田书磊,刘宏博,等.膜浓缩液淋滤飞灰后灰渣重金属热处理特性分析[J].环境工程学报, 2019,13(4):992-999.
[22]	张芝昆,王晶,李浩天,等.城市垃圾焚烧飞灰的水洗脱氯与水泥固化技术[J].科学技术与工程, 2019,19(35):395-401.[23] 李军辉,吴新,刘道洁,等.不同处理方法对硅灰稳固化垃圾焚烧飞灰重金属的影响[J].中国环境科学, 2018,38(11):4198-4204.[24] 国家环境保护总局.危险废物鉴别标准浸出毒性鉴别:GB 5085.3-2007[S].北京:2007.[25] 李朝辉.垃圾焚烧飞灰中重金属的浸出特性及化学稳定研究[D].重庆:重庆大学, 2017.[26] XU T T, WANG L, ZENG Y M, et al. Characterization of typical heavy metals in pyrolysis MSWI fly ash[J]. Environmental technology, 2019,40(26):3502-3511.[27] 缪建冬,郑浩,陈萍,等.杭州地区生活垃圾焚烧飞灰基本特性分析[J].浙江理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,39(5):642-650.[28] 余磊,谢益东,季海冰,等.生活垃圾焚烧飞灰中重金属浸出影响研究[J].环境科学与管理, 2016,41(8):107-110.[29] 旦增,布多.西藏拉萨市市区生活垃圾物理特性分析[J].西藏大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,27(1):20-27.[30] 穷达卓玛,汪晶,周文武,等.拉萨垃圾填埋场渗滤液处理站周边土壤重金属含量分析及评价[J].环境化学, 2020,39(5):1404-1409.[31] 张晶.焚烧飞灰用于沥青路面重金属溶出特性及风险评估[D].青岛:青岛理工大学, 2018.[32] 赵曦,黄艺,李娟,等.大型垃圾焚烧厂周边土壤重金属含量水平、空间分布、来源及潜在生态风险评价[J].生态环境学报, 2015,24(6):1013-1021.[33] 王宇珊,刘成坚,陈晓燕,等.垃圾焚烧厂周边土壤的重金属污染风险评价[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,52(5):57-64.[34] 台凌宇.垃圾焚烧厂周围土壤重金属污染源解析及人体健康风险评价[D].天津:天津大学, 2018.

Relative Articles

[1]	LI Denghui, HUANG Bangjie, ZHANG Zongyao, LIU Xiaochen, DU Hongwei, SUN Hongwei, FANG Huaiyang, FANG Xiaohang. A CASE STUDY ON URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL: THE HUIZHOU CHATING ECOLOGICAL REGULATION POND IN THE SHAHE RIVER BASIN OF THE DONGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 35-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406005
[2]	CUI Hanwu, DU Xiaoli, ZHAO Min, XU Yao, ZHANG Wenping, LIU Jiaming. IMPACT OF EXTERNAL WATER INFLOW ON FLOODING RISK IN URBAN AREAS AND OPTIMIZATION SCHEMES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 150-156. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401020
[3]	GAO Yahong, LIN Bingquan, ZHAO Chen, LIU Yuxuan, AN Xinqi, ZHONG Yin, HU Qian, WANG Zhenbei, QIU Bin, QI Fei, SUN Dezhi. THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INITIAL RAINWATER POLLUTION AND INTERCEPTION AND STORAGE IN HILLY TOWNS IN THE YANGTZE RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 191-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409018
[4]	WANG Yihang, FENG Xiaonan, WANG Zongping, YUAN Jianwei, ZHU Zhihuai, LIANG Mu, MA Jie, GUO Gang, WAN Peng, CHEN Zhenbin, ZUO Liang. SCHEDULING OPTIMIZATION OF DOMESTIC WASTE TRANSFER SYSTEMS BASED ON DIGITAL TWINNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 199-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405025
[5]	DU Jiamin, WEI Yuanyuan, DING Chao, ZHU Haochuan, LIU Weijing, TANG Baiyang, YANG Shiyao, FENG Qian. RESEARCH ON LAYOUT OF INTERCEPTION COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW DETENTION TANKS BASED ON THEIR LIFE CYCLE CARBON EMISSIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 50-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411006
[6]	WU Kunlun, GONG Zhiqi, WU Jia. DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF LAYOUT OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE RECYCLING FACILITIES: A CASE STUDY OF XINING, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 194-201,258. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306026
[7]	YU Feng, WANG Kejia, ZHANG Wenlong, LI Yi. PREDICTION OF COAGULANT DOSAGE FOR IN-SITU TURBIDITY CONTROL IN WATER ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION BASED ON BP NEURAL NETWORK OPTIMIZED BY GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 154-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304022
[8]	PENG Zhouyang, JIN Xi, SANG Wenjiao. OPTIMIZATION OF DESIGN OF TERMINAL FLOW INTERCEPTION AND STORAGE FACILITIES OF COMBINED DRAINAGE SYSTEM BASED ON NSGA-Ⅲ ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 143-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208020
[9]	SUN Zheng, WANG Jian-long, ZHANG Zhang-he, WANG Xue-ting, QIU Rong-ting. DISCUSSION ON PATHWAYS FOR CAPACITY UPGRADING OF STORMWATER DRAINAGE AND FLOODING ALLEVIATION IN DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS BASED ON SWMM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 199-207. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209027
[10]	ZHENG Qiongqi, LIN Yiyuan, YIN Hailong, XU Zuxin, SU Lei, WU Shanshan. SOURCE TRACKING OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE INTO RIVERS USING HYDRODYNAMIC DIFFUSION WAVE MODEL AND GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 63-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206008
[11]	WANG Jian-long, QIN Mei-na, HUANG Tao, TU Nan-nan. SEDIMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICULATE MATTERS IN RUNOFF DETENTION TANK VIA CFD METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 44-50. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112007
[12]	WANG Shi-jing. EFFECT OF THE WHOLE PROCESS WATERLOGGING CONTROL SYSTEM IN ALLEVIATING URBAN WATERLOGGING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 108-113. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004019
[13]	XUE Tong-lai, ZHAO Dong-hui, HAN Fei. SVR WATER QUALITY PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON GA OPTIMIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 123-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003021
[16]	Ren Jinxia Yu Zhiwu You Xin, . MODEL FOR WATER QUALITY EVALUATION BASED ON WAVELET NEURAL NETWORK OF ADAPTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(5): 144-148. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201505031

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	崔瀚武，杜晓丽，赵敏，徐瑶，张文平，刘家铭. 客水汇入对城区内涝风险的影响及优化方案. 环境工程. 2024(01): 150-156 . 本站查看
2.	吕姚，包学才，彭宇，查小红，黄明坤. 基于改进YOLOX的城市河道智能水位测量算法. 南昌工程学院学报. 2024(03): 13-18 .
3.	武俊槟. 枢纽机场防洪排涝体系的构建与对策研究. 市政技术. 2024(12): 39-46+130 .
4.	杜佳岷，魏源源，丁超，朱浩川，刘伟京，唐柏杨，杨诗瑶，冯骞. 基于全生命周期碳排放的截流式合流制调蓄池布局研究. 环境工程. 2024(11): 50-60 . 本站查看
5.	田甜，胡海英，蒋乐欣，程香菊，章宇达. 雨污水管混接及调蓄池对城市内涝的影响分析——以广州市某高校为例. 给水排水. 2024(S1): 381-388 .