Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
WANG hui, ZHANG Si-yong, WANG Ya-jun. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON TREATMENT EFFECT OF PAC ENHANCED MBR PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 147-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008025
Citation: NI Haifeng, DAN Zeng, ZHOU Wenwu, ZHOU Peng, XU Fei, YANG Tao, MENG Dean, CHEN Guanyi. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 89-93,131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014

CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014
  • Received Date: 2021-05-25
    Available Online: 2022-07-07
  • Incineration is the mainstream technology of municipal solid waste treatment. Fly ash, as the main pollutant of waste incineration, has become a key link in waste incineration pollution control. In this study, we collected fly ash samples from waste incineration power plants in Lhasa, and analyzed the heavy metals content and leaching toxicity characteristics, and adopted improved potential risk assessment method and health risk assessment method to evaluate the risk of heavy metals in fly ash. The results showed that the heavy metals content of fly ash in Lhasa was relatively high, and the leaching concentration of Pb obviously exceeded the maximum allowable value of the leaching solution in the Identification Standard for Hazardous Wastes (GB 5085.2-2007). Pollution evaluation results showed that Pb in fly ash had heavy risk of pollution to the environment. The health risk assessment results showed that the carcinogenic risk of heavy metals in fly ash to humans was within an acceptable range, but its non-carcinogenic risk value was higher than the non-carcinogenic risk value recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), indicating had a higher non-carcinogenic risk on human body. Among them, the non-carcinogenic risk values of Pb for adults and children were 3.8975 and 9.7458 respectively, which was the main contributor to the non-carcinogenic risk.
  • [1]
    国家统计局.中国统计年鉴-2020[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2020.
    [2]
    纪涛,陈阳,徐岗.新形势下生活垃圾焚烧飞灰处置技术现状及建议[J].环境卫生工程, 2018,26(5):34-37.
    [3]
    刘丽君,韩静磊,钱益斌,等.利用靶器官毒性剂量法(TTD)和证据权重分析法(WOE)评估固化飞灰中重金属非致癌健康风险[J].环境化学, 2019,38(5):1014-1020.
    [4]
    陈林.焚烧飞灰用于沥青路面中面层污染物溶出规律及风险评估[D].重庆:重庆交通大学, 2016.
    [5]
    环境保护部.国家危险废物名录[EB/OL].[2016-06-21]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/201606/t20160621_354844.htm.
    [6]
    张永强,吴卫宏,张海霞,等.基于模糊专家系统的垃圾焚烧底灰重金属污染风险评价[J].环境工程, 2015,33(3):126-130.
    [7]
    汤莉莉,牛生杰,徐建强,等.外秦淮河疏浚后底泥重金属污染与潜在生态风险评价[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2008,17(3):424-430.
    [8]
    杨安,邢文聪,王小霞,等.西藏中部河流、湖泊表层沉积物及其周边土壤重金属来源解析及风险评价[J].中国环境科学, 2020,40(10):4557-4567.
    [9]
    LI R D, SHU T C, LI Y L, et al. Migration characteristics and toxicity evaluation of heavy metals during the preparation of lightweight aggregate from sewage sludge[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019,26(9):9123-9136.
    [10]
    SHI Y F, LI Y, YUAN X L, et al. Environmental and human health risk evaluation of heavy metals in ceramsites from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2020,42:3779-3794.
    [11]
    环境保护部.固体废物22种金属元素的测定电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法:HJ 781-2016[S].北京:2016.
    [12]
    国家环境保护总局.固体废物浸出毒性浸出方法硫酸硝酸法:HJ/T 299-2007[S].北京:2007.
    [13]
    李洋,张乃明,魏复盛.滇东镉高背景区菜地土壤健康风险评价与基准[J].中国环境科学, 2020,40(10):4522-4530.
    [14]
    郭彦海,孙许超,张士兵,等.上海某生活垃圾焚烧厂周边土壤重金属污染特征、来源分析及潜在生态风险评价[J].环境科学, 2017,38(12):5262-5271.
    [15]
    何艳峰,席北斗,王琪,等.垃圾焚烧飞灰熔渣的健康风险评价与豁免管理[J].环境科学研究, 2005(增刊1):13-16.
    [16]
    罗绒战堆.生命路上的难关:从农牧民感受小议西藏的平均期望寿命[J].中国藏学, 2016(4):112-117.
    [17]
    张鸣,温汉辉,蔡立梅,等.普宁土壤重金属的生态风险与健康风险评价[J].环境科学与技术, 2019,42(12):202-210.
    [18]
    杨俊,马斯璐,李苇苇.大冶矿区食品重金属污染及其健康风险影响研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2017,40(12):249-255.
    [19]
    环境保护部.污染场地风险评估技术导则:HJ 25.3-2014[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2014.
    [20]
    刘思辰,江长胜,李庆玲,等.重庆市垃圾焚烧飞灰中重金属含量及浸出毒性分析[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,38(1):101-107.
    [21]
    孟棒棒,田书磊,刘宏博,等.膜浓缩液淋滤飞灰后灰渣重金属热处理特性分析[J].环境工程学报, 2019,13(4):992-999.
    [22]
    张芝昆,王晶,李浩天,等.城市垃圾焚烧飞灰的水洗脱氯与水泥固化技术[J].科学技术与工程, 2019,19(35):395-401.[23] 李军辉,吴新,刘道洁,等.不同处理方法对硅灰稳固化垃圾焚烧飞灰重金属的影响[J].中国环境科学, 2018,38(11):4198-4204.[24] 国家环境保护总局.危险废物鉴别标准浸出毒性鉴别:GB 5085.3-2007[S].北京:2007.[25] 李朝辉.垃圾焚烧飞灰中重金属的浸出特性及化学稳定研究[D].重庆:重庆大学, 2017.[26] XU T T, WANG L, ZENG Y M, et al. Characterization of typical heavy metals in pyrolysis MSWI fly ash[J]. Environmental technology, 2019,40(26):3502-3511.[27] 缪建冬,郑浩,陈萍,等.杭州地区生活垃圾焚烧飞灰基本特性分析[J].浙江理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,39(5):642-650.[28] 余磊,谢益东,季海冰,等.生活垃圾焚烧飞灰中重金属浸出影响研究[J].环境科学与管理, 2016,41(8):107-110.[29] 旦增,布多.西藏拉萨市市区生活垃圾物理特性分析[J].西藏大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,27(1):20-27.[30] 穷达卓玛,汪晶,周文武,等.拉萨垃圾填埋场渗滤液处理站周边土壤重金属含量分析及评价[J].环境化学, 2020,39(5):1404-1409.[31] 张晶.焚烧飞灰用于沥青路面重金属溶出特性及风险评估[D].青岛:青岛理工大学, 2018.[32] 赵曦,黄艺,李娟,等.大型垃圾焚烧厂周边土壤重金属含量水平、空间分布、来源及潜在生态风险评价[J].生态环境学报, 2015,24(6):1013-1021.[33] 王宇珊,刘成坚,陈晓燕,等.垃圾焚烧厂周边土壤的重金属污染风险评价[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,52(5):57-64.[34] 台凌宇.垃圾焚烧厂周围土壤重金属污染源解析及人体健康风险评价[D].天津:天津大学, 2018.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HUANG Junlin, LIU Huangrui, YAN Haihu, XI Yunhao, LI Xiang, ZHU Nengwu. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS AND CHLORIDES IN SOLID WASTE INCINERATION RESIDUES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 134-141. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408016
    [2]LIANG Lichen, YAN Xiaofei, WANG Lili, JIANG Hao, XU Yuanshun. SOIL HEAVY METAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF A SIMPLE DOMESTIC GARBAGE LANDFILL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 177-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410021
    [3]ZHAO Chutong, GUAN Yanyan, ZHANG Ze, WANG Xiaona, GAO Ming, WU Chuanfu, WANG Qunhui. EFFECT OF FLY ASH INCORPORATION ON HYDRATION MECHANISM AND HEAVY METAL SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION EFFECT ON SLAG-BASED BACKFILLFING CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 213-220,189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312026
    [4]LI Ganyu, CUI Xingtao. CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY METAL ELEMENTS POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST-FALL IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 278-287. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312035
    [5]GUO Yake, GAO Yanyan, QIAN Hui, TANG Shunqi, WANG Haike, SHI Xiaoxin. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN THE CHU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 112-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301014
    [6]LU Yifan, LU Yin, CAI Hui, SUN Shoujun, SHI Weilin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FIELD LEFT BY A LEAD-ACID BATTERY FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 135-140,189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201020
    [7]TU Degang, FENG Tao, YANG Guodong, LUO Weiwei, NIE Beili. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED MACHINERY PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 217-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204031
    [8]LIU Chuanliang. PERFORMANCE OF ATOMIZED SPRAYING SUSPENDED DESULFURIZATION OF FLY ASH IN CFB BOILER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 81-87. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207012
    [9]MIAO Fangfang, ZHANG Yimei, LI Yu, LIN Qianguo. ANALYSIS OF SOIL POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 94-100. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207014
    [10]LI Mei, HE Xuelian, FENG Yanping, LIU Jian. RECOVERY OF CALCIUM CARBONATE AFTER EXTRACTING CALCIUM SALT FROM FLY ASH OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 182-188,198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211026
    [11]MA Yi, ZHENG Ren-dong, ZHOU Zhi-hao, JIANG Jia-hao, WANG Guo-bin, YAN Mi. BOTTLENECK OF APPLICATION OF DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR FLY ASH FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 237-243. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205033
    [12]ZHANG Yuchen, CHEN Xiaoduo, GUI Si, SU Hua, ZHANG Weifang, LIU Changqing, WU Chunshan, ZHENG Yuyi. MINERAL COMPONENTS AND HEAVY METAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN FUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 102-109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208014
    [13]MA Tao, SONG Jiang-min, LIU Qun-qun, SHENG Yan-qing. COMPARISON OF ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN DREDGED SEDIMENT TREATED BY DIFFERENT METHODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 141-146,152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102023
    [14]LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028
    [15]WANG Xiao-na, GAO Ming, RAO Yi, WANG Ying, WU Chuan-fu, WANG Qun-hui. EFFECT OF LACTIC ACID FERMENTATION BROTH OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE WASTE ON REMOVAL OF CHLORINE AND HEAVY METALS FROM FLY ASH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 188-192. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112028
    [16]SUN Jin, TAN Xin, ZHANG Shu-guang, JI Tao. COMPOSITION AND MELTING CHARACTERISTICS OF FLY ASH FROM 14 MSWI PLANTS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 124-128. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110017
    [17]XU Si-han, WANG Min-yan, ZHANG Jin, DIAO Han-jie, LI Yan-ming, SHAN Sheng-dao, CAO Yu-cheng. EFFECT OF PYROLYSIS TIME ON CHARACTERISTICS AND HEAVY METAL ECOLOGICAL RISKS IN BIOCHAR MADE FROM WASTEWATER SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 162-167. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003027
    [18]WU Xiang-yu, WANG Yi-tian, ZHANG Han, XU Hong-yong, CAI Lan-kun. LEACHING ENVIRONMENTAL RISK EVALUATION OF Pb IN SOLIDIFIED/STABILIZED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH UNDER WETTING AND DRYING INTERMITTENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 135-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011022
    [20]Fan Shuanxi. POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL AROUND A SMELTER IN CHANGQING TOWN OF BAOJI CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 121-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504026
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 刘雅娟. 浸没式PAC-AMBRs系统中PAC缓解膜污染的研究进展. 化工进展. 2023(01): 457-468 .
    2. 钟招煌,李新冬,李海柯,欧阳果仔,李浪,蔡勐. MBR技术在垃圾渗滤液处理中的应用. 人民珠江. 2022(03): 45-53+76 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 17.9 %FULLTEXT: 17.9 %META: 81.0 %META: 81.0 %PDF: 1.1 %PDF: 1.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.9 %其他: 17.9 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 1.1 %上海: 1.1 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 1.5 %北京: 1.5 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %台州: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 0.7 %太原: 0.7 %宁波: 1.1 %宁波: 1.1 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.7 %广州: 0.7 %弗吉: 0.4 %弗吉: 0.4 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %日喀则: 0.4 %日喀则: 0.4 %昆明: 1.8 %昆明: 1.8 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 2.6 %杭州: 2.6 %武汉: 1.5 %武汉: 1.5 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济源: 0.7 %济源: 0.7 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %湖州: 1.5 %湖州: 1.5 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %珠海: 0.4 %珠海: 0.4 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 28.9 %芒廷维尤: 28.9 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %葫芦岛: 0.4 %葫芦岛: 0.4 %衢州: 1.5 %衢州: 1.5 %西宁: 13.9 %西宁: 13.9 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %赣州: 0.7 %赣州: 0.7 %运城: 3.7 %运城: 3.7 %遵义: 1.1 %遵义: 1.1 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %镇江: 1.1 %镇江: 1.1 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %马尔默: 1.1 %马尔默: 1.1 %其他[]上海临汾保定北京十堰南京台州合肥哈尔滨天津太原宁波常州常德广州弗吉张家口成都日喀则昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济南济源海口温州湖州漯河潍坊珠海石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥葫芦岛衢州西宁贵阳赣州运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙长治马尔默

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (221) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return