ANAEROBIC BIOGAS PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY OF FOOD WASTE AT THE MEDIUM TEMPERATURE AND INTERMEDIATE TEMPERATURE ZONE

GONG Yabin; YAO Jiangang; TAN Jing

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202203020

Volume 40 Issue 3

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(3): 132-138

GONG Yabin, YAO Jiangang, TAN Jing. ANAEROBIC BIOGAS PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY OF FOOD WASTE AT THE MEDIUM TEMPERATURE AND INTERMEDIATE TEMPERATURE ZONE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 132-138. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203020

Citation:

GONG Yabin, YAO Jiangang, TAN Jing. ANAEROBIC BIOGAS PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY OF FOOD WASTE AT THE MEDIUM TEMPERATURE AND INTERMEDIATE TEMPERATURE ZONE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 132-138. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203020

Citation:

PDF( 9090 KB)

ANAEROBIC BIOGAS PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY OF FOOD WASTE AT THE MEDIUM TEMPERATURE AND INTERMEDIATE TEMPERATURE ZONE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203020

Hangzhou Energy&Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310020, China

Received Date: 2021-07-22
Available Online: 2022-07-07

Abstract

Abstract

This paper took the food waste as the research object, and conducted the continuous dynamic fermentation experiment to explore the biogas production and microbial distribution of the food waste in the transition zone between medium and high temperature. The results showed that under the same organic load, the biogas yield, methane concentration and key parameters of fermentation broth were significantly better than those of the fermentation system under the medium temperature (38℃) fermentation temperature, with higher biogas yield and more stable fermentation parameters. Through high-throughput microbial sequencing, it was found that there were significant differences in bacterial community structure and richness between 44℃ and 38℃ fermentation system, while there were no significant differences in archaea community structure and richness, which indicated that the main reason why the fermentation temperature of food waste at 44℃ was better than that at 38℃, was that more abundant fermentative bacteria promoted hydrolysis stage and acid production stage. That was conducive to the digestion and utilization of methane microorganism.
- food waste,
- anaerobic fermentation,
- intermediate temperature zone,
- microbial community

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	刘荣厚,王远远,孙辰.温度对蔬菜废弃物沼气发酵特性的影响[J].农业机械学报,2009(9):116-121.
[2]	HASHIMOTO A G. Ammonia inhibition of methanogenesis from cattle wastes[J]. Agricultural Wastes,1986,17(4):241-261.
[3]	邓怡国,王金丽,孙伟生,等.温度对菠萝叶渣厌氧发酵产气特性的影响[J].广东农业科学,2010,37(12):107-109 ,129.
[4]	白娜,梅自力,符征鸽,等.三种秸秆在不同温度下发酵产气特性研究[J].中国沼气,2011,29(1):16-21.
[5]	宫亚斌,陈智远,姚建刚,等.200 t/d餐厨垃圾厌氧产沼工程调试与运行分析[J].可再生能,2017,35(10):1443-1447.
[6]	常燕青,朱丽可,张乐乐,等.典型餐厨垃圾处理实用技术探讨[J].山西建筑,2021,47(12):1-3.
[7]	陈祥.餐厨垃圾两相厌氧发酵氨氮特性与控制方法研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2014.
[8]	张天益,王琬,吕沿霖,等.餐厨垃圾厌氧消化性能提高研究进展[J].应用化工,2021,50(4):1087-1093.
[9]	王暾.油脂和盐分对餐厨垃圾单级厌氧消化影响的试验研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2008.
[10]	维尔利环保科技集团股份有限公司.一种提升中温和高温过渡区厌氧发酵效率的方法:CN202011113273.9[P].2021-01-29.
[11]	李月中,宫亚斌,谭婧,等.提升中温和高温过渡区厌氧发酵效率的试验研究及工程验证[J].中国沼气, 2021, 39(2):51-56.
[12]	张知非.餐厨垃圾的高效厌氧发酵产沼性能研究[D].北京:北京化工大学,2014.
[13]	张庆芳,杨林海,陈吉祥,等.餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵连续运行中有机负荷对其他参数的影响研究[J].中国沼气,2014,32(3):27-31.
[14]	BOONE D R. Effects of pH, temperature, and nutrients on propionate degradation by a methanogenic enrichment culture[J]. Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 1987, 53.
[15]	KIM M, SPEECE R E. Comparative process stability and efficiency of mesophilic anaerobic digestion[J]. Environmental Technology,2002, 23(6):631-642.
[16]	SIEGERT I, BANKS C. The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobic digestion of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(11):3412-3418.
[17]	CHAO A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 1984,11:265-270.
[18]	SHANNON C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal,1948,27:379-423.
[19]	SHANNON C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal,1948, 27:623-656.
[20]	GOOD I J. The population frequency of species and theestimation of the population parameters[J]. Biometrics,1958,40:237-246.
[21]	SIMPSON E H. Measurement of diversity[J]. Nature,1949,163:688.
[22]	DESANTIS T Z, HUGENHOLTZ P, LARSEN N, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,2016,72:5069-5072.
[23]	BOKULICH N A, KAEHLER B D, RAM R J, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with qiime 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin[J]. Microbiome,2018, 6(1):90.
[24]	CHEN H,CHANG S. Dissecting methanogenesis for temperature-phased anaerobic digestion:impact of temperature on community structure, correlation, and fate of methanogens[J].Bioresource Technology,2020,306:1-10.
[25]	NURUOL S M, LI B, HAMEED A, et al.Anaerobic Digestion at 45℃ for sludge treatment:a trade-off between performances and capability in producing class a biosolids[J].International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2016,7(6):399-405.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	朱燕云，靳红梅，龙玉娇，朱宁，王欣，冯彦房，曹云，张晶. 水热炭基纳米硒对猪粪中温和中高温产甲烷及砷去除的影响. 农业工程学报. 2025(01): 258-267 .
2.	田启欢，高彦达，宫亚斌，杜睿，王立伦，姚建刚. 厨余垃圾中高温高效厌氧产沼中试研究. 环境卫生工程. 2024(02): 39-45 .
3.	习彦花，王馨芝，李旭，魏帅强，孙立博，吕亚天，程辉彩. 高温强化牛粪高浓度厌氧发酵协同抗生素抗性基因削减. 中国沼气. 2024(03): 22-28 .
4.	强敬雯，王晚晴，唐曼玉，张娜，武双，华威，邵恒煊，程艳玲. 厨余垃圾厌氧消化对沼气微生物及环境的影响. 中国农业科技导报. 2024(06): 159-169 .
5.	唐周利，李蕾，叶文杰，韩林沛，袁荣焕，王小铭，彭绪亚. 温度对厨余垃圾厌氧消化系统启动及性能的影响. 环境科学学报. 2024(07): 281-292 .
6.	王甜甜，王兰，叶璐，周倩，王罗春，楼紫阳，昌启惠，吴万鸿，郭家俊，蔡紫祎. 餐厨垃圾压榨液厌氧发酵的温度效应及微生物. 环境科学与技术. 2024(06): 163-170 .
7.	廖杰，谢威，刘超翔，范洪勇. 初始碱度和温度对养猪废水厌氧发酵过程的影响特征. 环境工程. 2023(02): 53-59+65 . 本站查看
8.	唐素琴，孟波，彭治儒，陆苗苗. DB33/T 1180-2019《餐厨垃圾资源化利用技术规程》的应用分析. 中国标准化. 2021(S2): 114-117 .