Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
SUI Ke-jian, LI Jia-ju, LI Peng-feng, ZHOU Yong, ZHENG Xing-can, SUN Yong-li, SHANG Wei, TANG Li. STUDY ON DEEP DEPHOSPHORIZATION OF EFFLUENT FROM URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT BY DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 66-70,65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007010
Citation: WANG Xuelian, LIU Bo, ZHAO Changsen, HUANG Zhenfang, PAN Xu. STUDY ON CALCULATION METHOD SYSTEM OF POLLUTANT LOAD FROM NON-POINT SOURCE INTO RIVERS IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 166-172,211. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203025

STUDY ON CALCULATION METHOD SYSTEM OF POLLUTANT LOAD FROM NON-POINT SOURCE INTO RIVERS IN BEIJING

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203025
  • Received Date: 2021-01-28
    Available Online: 2022-07-07
  • In this study, the Nansha River Basin in the urban-rural fringe of Beijing was selected, and the inflow concentration of non-point source pollution in the typical area was calculated with traditional export coefficient method and the EcoHat-NPS model method, respectively. The point source and non-point source pollution were separated by using one-dimensional water quality model, and the calculated value of non-point source concentration in each estuary was calculated based on the measured non-point source concentration. The accuracy of the calculation results of the two methods was compared and analyzed. The results showed that:1) there was a plain calculation accuracy in the export coefficient method and a good calculation accuracy in the EcoHat-NPS model simulation method. The average simulation accuracy R2 of the four pollutants (COD, NH3-N, TP, TN) was 0.83, 0.94, 0.94, 0.82, respectively. The simulation effect of NH3-N and TP was better, followed by COD and TN; 2) the inflow COD, NH3-N, TN and TP calculated by export coefficient method was 1110.9, 70.9, 391.8, 5.02 t/a, respectively; while that of the EcoHat-NPS model method was 1403.34, 78, 388.2, 7.3 t/a, respectively; 3) Ecohat-NPS model with the flexible calculation time scale could identify the main non-point source pollution areas, which was more suitable for the estimation of non-point source pollution in Beijing. After the further data refining, it could be extended to the whole city's rivers for the estimation of non-point source pollution in Beijing.
  • [1]
    张丹,杨洪霞,段慧,等.我国非点源污染的基本特征与时空分布规律研究综述[J].四川环境,2014,33(4):140-145.
    [2]
    曹高明,杜强,宫辉力,等.非点源污染研究综述[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2011,9(1):35-40.
    [3]
    谢培,宫健.北京市农业面源污染负荷特征分析及控制分区[J].环境工程技术学报,2020,10(4):613-621.
    [4]
    北京市水务统计年鉴[Z].北京:北京市水务局,2018.
    [5]
    顾晓昀,徐宗学,刘麟菲,等.北京北运河河流生态系统健康评价[J].环境科学,2018,39(6):2576-2587.
    [6]
    王刚,潘涛,齐珺,等.北京市主要水污染物排放特征及水质改善对策[J].中国环境监测,2016,32(2):81-88.
    [7]
    荆红卫.北京市地表水污染原因分析与防治对策[J].城市环境与城市生态,2006(4):17-19.
    [8]
    武淑霞,刘宏斌,刘申,等.农业面源污染现状及防控技术[J].中国工程科学,2018,20(5):23-30.
    [9]
    张瑜英,孙丽云,李占斌.城市非点源污染研究进展与展望[J].人民黄河,2006,28(3):42-43.
    [10]
    薛利红,杨林章.面源污染物输出系数模型的研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(4):755-761.
    [11]
    郝芳华,杨胜天,程红光,等.大尺度区域非点源污染负荷计算方法[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(3):375-383.
    [12]
    夏青.城市径流污染系统分析[J].环境科学学报,1982,2(4):271-278.
    [13]
    朱萱,鲁纪行,边金钟,等.农田径流非点源污染特征及负荷定量化方法探讨[J].环境科学,1985,6(5):6-11.
    [14]
    马立珊.苏南太湖水系农业非点源氮污染及控制对策研究[J].应用生态学报,1992,3(4):346-354.
    [15]
    阎自申,李森林,汪丽.滇池流域非点源污染物(氮、磷)负荷模拟模型研究[J].云南环境科学,1990(4):15-18.
    [16]
    杨勇,张宏伟,王媛,等.天津市非点源污染现状研究[J].环境科技,2007,20(3):1-4.
    [17]
    施为光,凌文州.用实测资料计算流域非点源污染负荷:以四川清平水库为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,1996(3):82-86.
    [18]
    李怀恩,庄咏涛.预测非点源营养负荷的输出系数法研究进展与应用[J].西安理工大学学报,2003,19(4):307-312.
    [19]
    娄和震,吴习锦,郝芳华,等.近三十年中国非点源污染研究现状与未来发展方向探讨[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(5):357-383.
    [20]
    GASSMAN P W,REYES M R,GREEN C H,et al.The soil and water assessment tool:historical development,applications,and future research directions[J].Transactions of the Asabe,2007,50(4):1211-1250.
    [21]
    郝芳华,杨胜天,程红光,等.大尺度区域非点源污染负荷估算方法研究的意义、难点和关键技术[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(3):362-365.
    [22]
    程红光,岳勇,杨胜天,等.黄河流域非点源污染负荷估算与分析[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(3):384-391.
    [23]
    岳勇,程红光,杨胜天,等.松花江流域非点源污染负荷估算与评价[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):231-236.
    [24]
    刘爱华.北京市南沙河流域水环境质量评价研究[J].中国环保产业,2017(6):63-67.
    [25]
    钟雨良,马晓燕.北京地区城乡结合部居住景观现状研究[J].北京农学院学报,2012,27(3):71-73.
    [26]
    毕雪,王晓媛.基于输出系数模型的洞庭湖流域面源污染分析[J].人民长江,2012,43(11):74-77.
    [27]
    刘昌明,杨胜天,温志群,等.分布式生态水文模型EcoHAT系统开发及应用[J].中国科学E辑,2009,39(6):1112-1121.
    [28]
    李重荣,王祥三,窦明.三峡库区香溪河流域污染负荷研究[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2003,36(2):29-32.
    [29]
    TAEBI A,DROSTE R L. Pollution loads in urban runoff and sanitary wastewater[J].Science of the Total Environment,2004,327(1/2/3):175-184.
    [30]
    韩惠.人口数据统计及系统误差探析[J].东方企业文化,2015(21):76.
    [31]
    孙卫.流动人口增长与首都发展相协调问题研究:一个城市规划的视角[J].北京行政学院学报,2009(3):61-66.[32

    ] CHENG X,CHEN L D,SUN R H. Modeling the non-point source pollution risks by combing pollutant sources,precipitation,and landscape structuree[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2019,26(12):11856-11863.[33] ALVAREZ S,ASCI S,VOROTNIKOVA E. Valuing the potential benefits of water quality improvements in watersheds affected by non-point source pollution[J].Water,2016,8(4):112.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]JIN Hongyi, Tang Xueping, Zhuang Mazhan, Gong Chunming, Wu Xiaohai, LI Fei, ZHOU Zhenming. PREPARATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL MATERIAL BY CALCINATION OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE AND RIVER SILT AND ITS PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 209-217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308027
    [2]NIU Yongjian, DONG Kun, NIU Hongliang, XIN Mingxing, LI Weiwei, SUN Hongwei. EFFECT OF FREE AMMONIA ON PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN AN EBPR SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 24-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210004
    [3]JIA Kaixue, XU Shaoqi, WEI Zimin, CHEN Wenjie, ZHAN Yabin, SHI Xiong, LI Ji, WEI Yuquan. REVIEW ON PHOSPHORUS FRACTIONS TRANSFORMATION IN COMPOSTING ENHANCED BY PHOSPHORUS-SOLUBILIZING MICROORGANISMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 89-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212012
    [4]PAN Jun, SUN Bo-yang, WEI Wei, ZHANG Jin, TAN Shuai-chen, LI Rui-fang. EXPERIMENT OF MICRO-POLLUTED WATER TREATMENT BY COMBINED TECHNOLOGY OF MICRO-NANO AERATION-ECOLOGICAL FLOATING WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 49-53,209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005009
    [11]Wang Yadong, Wang Shaopo, Zheng Shasha, Zhang Yan, Sun Liping, Du Jinshan. POLY-P ACCUMULATING MICROORGANISMS AND IDENTIFYING METHODS FOR BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502005
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 蔺鸿涛,龚为进,陶辰瀚,祁超智,黄磊,余正洋. 多金属改性生物炭磷吸附性能和动力学研究. 山东化工. 2025(03): 23-27 .
    2. 蔺鸿涛,龚为进,陶辰瀚,祁超智,黄磊,余正洋. 镧改性市政污泥生物炭制备及磷吸附性能研究. 中原工学院学报. 2025(01): 45-52 .
    3. 王凡滔,陈贇,魏璟馨,李世琦,刘亚佺,冯岩. 城市污水极限除磷研究现状. 工业用水与废水. 2024(04): 7-11 .
    4. 曾伟,吴幼娥,丁嘉培,王伟浩,赵会芳. 贵州某酱香型白酒废水尾水处理工程设计. 天津化工. 2024(05): 106-109 .
    5. 曾超,刘影,陈圆,陈积义,徐菡玲,刘阳,文宇鸿,杨淇椋,古伟,王文明. 某再生水厂两期脱氮除磷工艺设计及效能分析. 中国给水排水. 2024(18): 64-70 .
    6. 葛绍阳,陆宾,花发奇. 气浮工艺在工业废水处理中的应用研究. 山西化工. 2024(11): 265-267 .
    7. 尚雄,李正远,普家和,夏钰,周富聪. 昆明A污水处理厂气浮除磷技术提标改造项目试运行效果浅析. 广州化工. 2023(16): 106-109 .
    8. 陈奇良. 高效气浮在污水厂极限除磷提标设计中的应用. 广州化工. 2022(06): 124-126 .
    9. 杨璐阳,丁冠文,戴浩然,邱慧. 一种水热稳定的金属有机骨架UiO-66高效捕获水中磷酸盐的性能及机理. 环境化学. 2022(05): 1746-1756 .
    10. 吴晓波,雷文江,谭云鹏. 无锡市胡埭污水处理厂提标改造方案研究. 城市道桥与防洪. 2022(04): 119-121+129+17 .
    11. 沈怡,王佳音,陈冠辉. 溶气气浮技术在市政污水深度处理工程设计与应用. 辽宁化工. 2022(09): 1253-1256 .
    12. 谭心,邹晓凤,苏强,于军. 污水处理厂尾水深度除磷技术综述. 山东化工. 2021(16): 277-279 .
    13. 邸超. EBIS工艺在化工污水处理中的应用. 化学工程与装备. 2021(09): 255-256+51 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.8 %FULLTEXT: 7.8 %META: 89.1 %META: 89.1 %PDF: 3.0 %PDF: 3.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.2 %其他: 8.2 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %Canada: 0.5 %Canada: 0.5 %China: 2.5 %China: 2.5 %Czech Republic: 0.4 %Czech Republic: 0.4 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Spain: 0.2 %Spain: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 2.0 %上海: 2.0 %东莞: 2.1 %东莞: 2.1 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %保定: 0.7 %保定: 0.7 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %北京: 6.6 %北京: 6.6 %十堰: 1.2 %十堰: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南充: 0.4 %南充: 0.4 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉安: 1.1 %吉安: 1.1 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大连: 0.9 %大连: 0.9 %天津: 2.7 %天津: 2.7 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.2 %安庆: 0.2 %宣城: 0.7 %宣城: 0.7 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 2.1 %广州: 2.1 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 2.0 %杭州: 2.0 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %漯河: 5.2 %漯河: 5.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %美国: 0.2 %美国: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 20.3 %西宁: 20.3 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.9 %贵阳: 0.9 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %连云港: 0.4 %连云港: 0.4 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.4 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %阳泉: 1.2 %阳泉: 1.2 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他其他CanadaChinaCzech RepublicNetherlandsSpain[]上海东莞临汾保定六安北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌合肥吉安呼伦贝尔呼和浩特嘉兴大同大连天津太原宁波安庆宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口徐州惠州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦新乡无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊石家庄福州秦皇岛美国芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆锡林郭勒盟镇江长春长沙长治阳泉青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (243) PDF downloads(13) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return