ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GF-6 AND LANDSAT-8 IN WATER QUALITY MONITORING

LI Hongzhe; WANG Shijie; LI Chengming

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202204028

Volume 40 Issue 4

Apr. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(4): 196-201

LI Hongzhe, WANG Shijie, LI Chengming. ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GF-6 AND LANDSAT-8 IN WATER QUALITY MONITORING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 196-201. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204028

Citation:

LI Hongzhe, WANG Shijie, LI Chengming. ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GF-6 AND LANDSAT-8 IN WATER QUALITY MONITORING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 196-201. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204028

Citation:

PDF( 6525 KB)

ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GF-6 AND LANDSAT-8 IN WATER QUALITY MONITORING

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204028

LI Hongzhe^1,2,3,
WANG Shijie^{1,2,3
,
,},
LI Chengming⁴

1. Faculty of Geomatics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2. National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Technologies and Applications for National Geographic State Monitoring, Lanzhou 730070, China;
3. Gansu Provincial Engineering Laboratory for National Geographic State Monitoring, Lanzhou 730070, China;
4. Chinese Academy of Surveying&Mapping, Beijing 100830, China

Received Date: 2021-04-14
Available Online: 2022-07-06

Abstract

Abstract

In view of the difference between GF-6 and Landsat-8 images in water quality monitoring, the eutrophication assessment of water quality in Chao Lake was taken as the research content, the water quality parameters were inversed, and the water quality assessment model was constructed by using the method of integrated nutritional state index. Using ENVI 5.3 and ArcGIS 10.3 software, the visualization of water quality parameters and TLI was realized. Compared with the measured data, the accuracy of the inversion result was evaluated by using Pearson correlation model. The main conclusions were as follows: the nutrient status of the water quality in Chao Lake at the time of imaging was medium nutrient; the comprehensive nutrient status index TLI derived from GF-6 and Landsat-8 were 42.75 and 42.13 respectively, and there was no significant difference between them, however, the coefficients of GF-6 and Landsat-8 were 0.988 and 0.965, respectively, indicating that GF-6 was more accurate and reliable. The conclusion could provide reference for selecting remote sensing image data in water quality monitoring.
- GF-6,
- Landsat-8,
- Chaohu Lake,
- water quality monitoring,
- difference

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	徐涵秋,唐菲.新一代Landsat系列卫星:Landsat 8遥感影像新增特征及其生态环境意义[J].生态学报,2013,33(11):3249-3257.
[2]	张丽华,武捷春,包玉海,等.基于MODIS数据的乌梁素海水体遥感监测[J].环境工程,2016,34(3):161-165.
[3]	朱利,姚延娟,吴传庆,等.基于环境一号卫星的内陆水体水质多光谱遥感监测[J].地理与地理信息科学,2010,26(2):81-84 ,113.
[4]	朱利,李云梅,赵少华,等.基于GF-1号卫星WFV数据的太湖水质遥感监测[J].国土资源遥感,2015,27(1):113-120.
[5]	汪雨豪,李家国,汪洁,等.基于GF-2影像的苏州市区水质遥感监测[J].科学技术与工程,2020,20(14):5875-5885.
[6]	白开源.基于3S技术的湖泊富营养化监测与评价系统[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2019.
[7]	LEI F, YU Y, ZHANG D, et al. Water remote sensing eutrophication inversion algorithm based on multilayer convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Intelligent&Fuzzy Systems,2020, 39(4):5319-5327.
[8]	刘文雅,邓孺孺,梁业恒,等.基于辐射传输模型的巢湖叶绿素a浓度反演[J].国土资源遥感,2019,31(2):102-110.
[9]	王小平.遥感和三维荧光技术支持的艾比湖流域地表水水质监测研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2018.
[10]	雷添杰,张鹏鹏,胡连兴,等.无人船遥感系统及其应用[J].测绘通报,2021(2):82-86,92.
[11]	BAI S, GAO J, SUN D, et al. Monitoring water transparency in shallow and eutrophic lake waters based on goci observations[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(1):163.
[12]	NAZIROVA K, ALFERYEVA Y, LAVROVA O, et al. Comparison of in situ and remote-sensing methods to determine turbidity and concentration of suspended matter in the estuary zone of the Mzymta river, black sea[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(1):143-143.
[13]	但雨生,周忠发,李韶慧,等.基于Sentinel-2的平寨水库叶绿素a浓度反演[J].环境工程, 2020,38(3):180-185 ,127.
[14]	张东彦,尹勋,佘宝,等.多源卫星遥感数据监测巢湖蓝藻水华爆发研究[J].红外与激光工程,2019,48(7):303-314.
[15]	谭小琴,罗勇,赵铮,等.基于高分遥感的河流水质反演研究:以金马河温江段为例[J].环境生态学,2020,2(7):29-36.

Relative Articles

[1]	BI Xinqi, GONG Zhiwei, MA Jie, ZHOU Lichang, JIANG Jinqi, GUO Gang. EFFECTS OF AEROBIC/ANAEROBIC ENVIRONMENTS ON MICROBIAL DEGRADATION EFFICIENCY OF TYPICAL MICROPLASTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 88-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407009
[2]	ZHOU Youwei, CHEN Jisheng, HE Lei, XING Meiyan. TRANSFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS OF CARBON AND NITROGEN IN SLUDGE-KITCHEN EARTHWORM COMPOST BASED ON LAND USE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 10-22. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402002
[3]	YUAN Shuai, LI Yan, ZHAO Yuxiao, XU Haipeng, CHEN Lei, JIN Fuqiang, HUA Dongliang. INHIBITORY INSTABILITY ANALYSIS OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF KITCHEN WASTE AND MICROECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF DIGESTION EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 184-192. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412022
[4]	LIU Xiaoji, YAN Kun, XU Heng, WANG Yongqun, WANG Zhihua, ZHANG Dejia, CHANG Fengmin. COUPLING H₂-RICH SYNGAS BIOMETHANATION WITH ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE: A PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 131-137. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403016
[5]	HU Mengjie, ZHONG Lei, CAI Xiaoxian, QING Jinwu, SUN Yuru, LI Gaoyuan, RUAN Haihua, CHEN Guanyi. METABOLIC MECHANISM OF MICROBIAL DEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AND ITS RESEARCH PROGRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 234-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302031
[6]	SONG Na, ZHAO Pan, GUAN Weijie, CHEN Liwei, ZHANG Shuang, WANG Qunhui. EFFECT OF ELECTRO-FERMENTATION ON HIGH TEMPERATURE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE AND SPENT MUSHROOM SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 145-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307020
[7]	DING Zizhen, XU Xianbao, OUYANG Chuang, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. EFFECT OF BIOCHAR ON CAPROATE PRODUCTION DURING FOOD WASTE FERMENTATION AND THE MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 29-36. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212005
[8]	WANG Jie, GU Weihua, CHEN Zehui, SONG Erxi, SHENG Nan, YAO Wei, WANG Jingwei, QIAN Yichao. ANALYSIS OF PRACTICAL EFFECTS, PROBLEMS AND COUNTERMEASURES OF DOMESTIC WASTE CLASSIFICATION:A CASE STUDY IN ZHILI TOWN, HUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 188-193. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203028
[9]	ZHANG Tong, ZHANG Liqiu, FENG Li, LIU Yongze, DU Ziwen. ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN CHARACTERISTICS OF KITCHEN WASTE AFTER SORTING AND DOMESTIC WASTE BEFORE SORTING IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 22-28. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212004
[10]	CHANG Yuan, ZHAN Yabin, TAO Xingling, LIU Yongdi, ZHANG Kui, YU Bo, WEI Yuquan, LI Ji. EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS ADDITIVES ON PHOSPHORUS MOBILIZATION IN PHOSPHORUS-RICH COMPOSTING OF KITCHEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 112-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210015
[11]	HU Yadong, FAN Depeng, KONG Weijie, LEI Mingke, DU Qingping, QIAN Weiqiang, WANG Futao, LI Jing. IMPROVEMENT OF FOOD WASTE AEROBIC BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PERFORMANCE BY COMPOUND MICROBIAL AGENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 97-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204014
[12]	LIAO Li-ming, PAN Jia-qi, CHEN Yu, HU Yao-yuan, MO Hui, LU Yu, SU Cheng-yuan. ANALYSIS OF EFFECT OF ADDITION OF CHINESE HERBAL RESIDUE ON FOOD WASTE COMPOSTING BASED ON EEM AND HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 142-147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101022
[13]	LI Xu-sheng, LU Sha-sha, JIANG Yuan-yan, WANG Li-ao. EFFECT AND MECHANISM OF BIOCHAR IN MITIGATING ACIDIFICATION OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS FOR FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 179-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112027
[14]	GUO Zhi-chao, XU Xian-bao, XU Ting-ting, ZHAO Ai-hua, TAI Jun, LIU Ya-nan, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. ANALYSIS ON FERMENTATION PATHWAY AND CAPROATE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE BY DIFFERENT INOCULUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 160-168. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109023
[15]	SONG Cai-hong, QI Hui, WEI Zi-min, XIA Xun-feng. HIGH-SPEED TREATMENT OF FOOD WASTE BY CONTINUOUS HIGH-TEMPERATURE COMPOSTING ENHANCED BY THERMOPHILIC MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 111-117,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105015
[16]	BAI Xiu-jia, ZHANG Hong-yu, GU Jun, ZHANG Qi, WANG Ji-hong. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF STALE REFUSE IN LANDFILL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 116-120,124. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102018
[17]	LIU Hang-yi, YAN Bei-bei, LIN Fa-wei, WANG Yuan, WANG Xu-tong, CHEN Guan-yi. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO KINDS OF FOOD WASTE RECYCLING SCHEMES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LCA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 169-175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109024
[18]	ZHU Xiao-yan, CHEN Ting, ZHAO Ying-ying, QIU Xiao-peng, YIN Jun, FENG Hua-jun, ZHANG Jin-feng. INFLUENCING FACTORS OF THE SCALE OF FOOD WASTE TREATMENT IN CHINA: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 172-177,53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103024
[19]	ZHAN Ya-bin, WEI Yu-quan, LIN Yong-feng, ZHANG A-ke, TAO Xing-ling, REN Jian-guo, SHEN Wei-dong, LI Ji. EFFECTS OF AERATION MODES ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION, DEHYDRATION EFFICIENCY AND NITROGEN LOSS OF KITCHEN WASTE BIO-DRYING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 124-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105017
[20]	SONG Na, REN Yuan-yuan, WANG Wan-qing, ZHANG Li-rong, GUAN Wei-jie, ZHANG Shuang, WANG Qun-hui. MECHANISM ANALYSIS OF BACTERIOSTATIC EFFECT ON FOOD WASTE ANAEROBIC PRESERVATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 41-46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008007

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	薛鲜丽，刘子睦，李娜，郭瑞，王德培. 高效降解高盐高油餐厨垃圾微生物的筛选与应用. 食品与发酵工业. 2023(07): 73-79 .
2.	樊玲嘉，彭鑫，陈硕夫，李慧，刘艳，张嘉超，张立华，黄红丽. 高效降解厨余垃圾复合菌剂的构建及应用. 湖南农业科学. 2023(03): 61-66 .
3.	樊玲嘉，彭鑫，陈硕夫，李慧，刘艳，张嘉超，张立华，黄红丽. 高效降解厨余垃圾复合菌剂的构建及应用（英文）. Agricultural Science & Technology. 2023(03): 29-38 .
4.	巩光禄，赵铎，郭鹏博，张方政，张洪奇，申贵男，晏磊，邱财生，邱化蛟，王伟东. 微生物菌剂对玉米秸秆和餐厨垃圾混合好氧堆肥的影响. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报. 2022(05): 92-98 .
5.	李亚林，刘蕾，关明玥，孙猛，李柳婷，毛瑞月，何海洋. 纳米CaO_2激发餐厨垃圾碳组分合成水凝胶及溶胀性能分析. 化工进展. 2022(11): 6120-6129 .

Other cited types(5)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (164) PDF downloads(2)