Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 4
Apr.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2022  >  40(4): 209-216
YANG Zi-jian, LIU Yang-sheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WATER-BASED DRILLING SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 143-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110020
Citation: ZHAO Rui, LIU Jie, ZHOU Yuyu, YANG Linchuan. RISK PERCEPTION TOWARDS ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT BASED ON TEXT DATA MINING OF PUBLIC OPINIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 209-216. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204030
shu

RISK PERCEPTION TOWARDS ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT BASED ON TEXT DATA MINING OF PUBLIC OPINIONS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204030

  • 1. Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China;

  • 2. School of Architecture and Design, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

  • Received Date: 2021-07-29
    Available Online: 2022-07-06
    Abstract
  • According to the public opinions on air quality during the period of 2015—2019, big data mining and analysis techniques were used to identify the factors influencing the public’s risk perception, establish a risk perception indicator system, and investigate the temporal and spatial characteristics regarding risk perception level. The results showed that: 1) The primary factor affecting public risk perception was the worry of individual health impact, followed by the impact of environmental quality change. 2) The level of risk perception had significant temporal and spatial differences. It fluctuated and raised in the defined time period. From a spatial perspective, the level of risk perception was high in the north and low in the south, while high in the east and low in the west. 3) The risk perception level in Henan Province and Sichuan Province was the highest in the defined time period, and the risk perception had apparently spatial spillover effect.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(41)
  • [1]
    HANKEY S, MARSHALL J D. Urban form, air pollution, and health[J]. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2017, 4(4):491-503.
    [2]
    WANG M C, ZHANG B B. Examining the impact of polycentric urban form on air pollution:evidence from China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(34):43359-43371.
    [3]
    SONG C B, WU L, XIE Y C, et al. Air pollution in China:status and spatiotemporal variations[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 227:334-347.
    [4]
    SLOVIC P. Perception of risk[J]. Science, 1987, 236(4799):280-285.
    [5]
    WWI J C, ZHAN W L, GUO X M, et al. Public attention to the great smog event:a case study of the 2013 smog event in Harbin, China[J]. Natural Hazards, 2017, 89(2):923-938.
    [6]
    张海燕,葛怡,李凤英,等.环境风险感知的心理测量范式研究述评[J].自然灾害学报, 2010,19(1):78-83.
    [7]
    BRENKERT-SMITH H, DICKINSON K L, CHAMP P A, et al. Social amplification of wildfire risk:the role of social interactions and information sources[J]. Risk Analysis:An International Journal, 2013, 33(5):800-817.
    [8]
    LIU X S, VEDLITZ A, SHI L. Examining the determinants of public environmental concern:evidence from national public surveys[J]. Environmental Science&Policy, 2014, 39:77-94.
    [9]
    HUANG L, RAO C, KUIJP T J, et al. A comparison of individual exposure, perception, and acceptable levels of PM2.5 with air pollution policy objectives in China[J]. Environmental Research, 2017, 157:78-86.
    [10]
    PU S S, SHAO Z J, FANG M R, et al. Spatial distribution of the public's risk perception for air pollution:a nationwide study in China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 655:454-462.
    [11]
    QIAN X J, XU G Z, LI L, et al. Knowledge and perceptions of air pollution in Ningbo, China[J]. BMC Public Health, 2016, 16(1):1138.
    [12]
    JIANG L, HILTUNEN E, HE X L, et al. A questionnaire case study to investigate public awareness of smog pollution in China's rural areas[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(11):1111.
    [13]
    RAJPER S A, ULLAH S, LI Z Q. Exposure to air pollution and self-reported effects on Chinese students:a case study of 13 megacities[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3):e0194364.
    [14]
    赵锐,闵雪峰,孟祥雨.基于SEM的城市地铁建设公众风险感知研究[J].工业安全与环保, 2019, 45(8):18-21.
    [15]
    ZHANG J J, MU Q. Air pollution and defensive expenditures:evidence from particulate-filtering facemasks[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2018, 92(11):517-536.
    [16]
    LIU T, HE G J, LAU A, et al. Avoidance behavior against air pollution:evidence from online search indices for anti-PM2.5 masks and air filters in Chinese cities[J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2018, 20(2):325-363.
    [17]
    LU Y L, WANG Y, ZUO J, et al. Characteristics of public concern on haze in China and its relationship with air quality in urban areas[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 637/638:1597-1606.
    [18]
    DONG D X, XU X W, XU W, et al. The relationship between the actual level of air pollution and residents'concern about air pollution:evidence from Shanghai, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(23):4784.
    [19]
    SUN X, YANG W T, SUN T, et al. Negative emotion under haze:an investigation based on the microblog and weather records of Tianjin, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(1):86.
    [20]
    QIN Y, ZHU H J, et al. Run away?Air pollution and emigration interests in China[J]. Journal of Population Economics, 2018, 31(1):235-266.
    [21]
    KAHN M E, KOTCHEN M J. Business cycle effects on concern about change:the chilling effect of recession[J]. Climate Change Economics, 2011, 2(3):257-273.
    [22]
    易善君,李君轶,李秀琴,等.基于微博大数据的空气质量与居民情感相关性对比研究:以西安市和上海市为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(5):39-44.
    [23]
    丁晓阳,王兰成.网络论坛文本特征词权重计算优化方法研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(5):187-192.
    [24]
    ALAM S, YAO N M, DALIAN U T. Big data analytics, text mining and modern English language[J]. Journal of Grid Computing, 2019, 17(2):357-366.
    [25]
    WU K J, LIAO C J, TSENG M L, et al. Toward sustainability:using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142:663-676.
    [26]
    李勇,丛怡,贾佳.基于熵权法的汾渭平原城市空气质量模糊综合评价[J].环境工程, 2020, 38(8):236-243.
    [27]
    JOHNSON B B, DECIS R. Experience with urban air pollution in Paterson, New Jersey and implications for air Pollution communication[J]. Risk Analysis:An International Journal, 2012, 32(1):39-53.
    [28]
    PALMIOTTO M, FATTORE E, PAIANO V, et al. Influence of a municipal solid waste landfill in the surrounding environment:toxicological risk and odor nuisance effects[J]. Environment International, 2014, 68:16-24.
    [29]
    GUO Y, LI Y W. Online amplification of air pollution risk perception:the moderating role of affect in information[J]. Information, Communication&Society, 2018, 21(1):80-93.
    [30]
    殷俊,胡登全,邓若伊.我国受众风险感知情况及对策研究:基于媒介使用的视角[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2014, 36(3):41-45.
    [31]
    WANG Y G, YING Q, HU J L, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of six criteria air pollutants in 31 provincial capital cities in China during 2013-2014[J]. Environment International, 2014, 73:413-422.
    [32]
    YANG L X, CHENG S H, WANG X F, et al. Source identification and health impact of PM2.5 in a heavily polluted urban atmosphere in China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 75:265-269.
    [33]
    于振东,许为.汾渭平原焦化行业大气污染控制现状及控制对策[J].环境工程, 2021, 39(1):111-116.
    [34]
    李名升,任晓霞,于洋,等.中国大陆城市PM2.5污染时空分布规律[J].中国环境科学, 2016, 36(3):641-650.
    [35]
    于彩霞,石春娥,凌新锋,等.基于综合观测的中国中东部地区一次严重污染过程分析[J].环境科学学报, 2020, 40(7):2346-2355.
    [36]
    史聆聆,李小敏,刘静,等.河南省大气污染现状及其控制对策分析[J].环境工程, 2015, 33(5):104-108.
    [37]
    肖丹华,王式功,张莹,等.四川盆地城市群6种大气污染物的时空分布[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 54(5

    ):662-669.
    [38]
    罗昕,支庭荣.中国网络社会治理研究报告(2019)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.
    [39]
    王东,范龙,王彬洁,等.四川2010-2019年突发环境事件时空分布特征分析[J].四川环境, 2021, 40(2):204-207.
    [40]
    虢清伟,邴永鑫,陈思莉,等.我国突发环境事件演变态势、应对经验及防控建议[J].环境工程学报, 2021, 15(7):2223-2232.
    [41]
    杨阳,王杰.情绪因素影响下的突发事件网络舆情演化研究[J].情报科学, 2020, 38(3):35-41

    ,69.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LU Fanghai, CHAI Hongyun, HE Haijun, WEI Zhuangqiang, SHU Ya, CHEN Xiaohu, LONG Xianze. RESOURCE REUTILIZATION FOR PHOSPHOGYPSUM AND RED MUD THOUGH CO-TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 156-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403019
    [2]LIU Junwu, CAI Jingju, FANG Yingchun, CAO Jingxiao, ZHU Jian, WANG Ping, JIANG Xiaxin, ZHU Shanshan, ZHANG Jinjin. SYNCHRONOUS REMOVAL OF MOISTURE AND ORGANIC POLLUTANTS IN DREDGING SEDIMENT BY ELECTRO-FENTON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 76-81,108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306011
    [3]WANG Xinlong, SUN Pinghe, ZHAO Mingzhe, XING Shikuan, FENG Deshan, TANG Lei. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT CONSOLIDATION FACTORS ON MOISTURE CONTENT AND PERMEABILITY OF WASTE SLURRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 84-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208011
    [4]GUO Li-heng, GUAN Xiao-hong, LIU Hui-ling, DAI Xiao-hu. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON HARMLESS AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF FERMENTATION RESIDUE OF STEROIDAL DRUGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 244-250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205034
    [5]XIN Wen-cai, CHEN Meng, CHEN Yi-lin, CHEN Shi, FU Wei-liang, ZHANG Cheng-zhen, ZHANG Xu-kun. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF DRYING AND REDUCTION EQUIPMENT FOR HIGH-HUMIDITY AND HIGH-VISCOSITY SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 178-182. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103025
    [6]XIANG Hong-lin, JIANG Jian-guo, GAO Yu-chen, MENG Yuan, XU Yi-wen, AIKELAIMU Aihemaiti, JU Tong-yao, HAN Si-yu, GUO Yan-ran. EFFECT OF AIR-FLOW RATE ON BIO-DRYING OF ORGANIC WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002017
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 杨延梅，徐鸿飞，侯蒙蒙，杨金忠，黄启飞，杨玉飞. 西北地区水基岩屑污染特征及其铺垫道路环境风险评估. 环境污染与防治. 2025(02): 82-87 .
    2. 常利娜，沈川. 基于中国知网文献计量视角下固体废弃物的研究热点与发展趋势分析. 环境生态学. 2025(02): 139-147+158 .
    3. 孙峰，夏嵩，李惠，刘斯琪，徐炳科，谢倩雯，史春艳. 水基钻井岩屑样品快速消解测定六种重金属元素. 油气田环境保护. 2025(01): 39-44 .
    4. 李金雨，王新刚，亓秋燕，王宗金，奚家米，艾子涵，李彦君，王昊宇，辜超颖. 钻井法泥浆用于陕北榆林地区矿山生态修复资源化利用试验研究. 西北地质. 2025(02): 197-208 .
    5. 王兵，孙越，商佳俭，陶建，李爽，任宏洋. BAP/O_3复合氧化体系对SMP的降解性能. 环境工程学报. 2024(02): 335-342 .
    6. 曹智鹏，田相友，于丙鑫，马蒸钊，谢江浩. 海上废弃钻井岩屑淋洗污染实验研究. 当代化工. 2024(02): 372-375+380 .
    7. 周晓娟. 固体废物对土壤环境的污染分析与无害化处理技术研究. 环境科学与管理. 2024(04): 81-85 .
    8. 何焱，何鑫，唐庆，杨嵌，李世伟，余世杰. 水基钻井岩屑细集料取代率对水泥混凝土性能影响研究. 四川建筑科学研究. 2024(04): 56-62 .
    9. 张建甲，单通，宁阳，程超. 油气田钻井固（危）废处置与利用综合解决方案探讨. 资源节约与环保. 2024(07): 123-126+144 .
    10. 王菲，赵彤，杨金忠，刘宏博，杨玉飞. 聚磺岩屑和还原土中钡的毒性物质含量鉴别方法研究. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(06): 1969-1976+1945 .
    11. 周奇，姚光远，包为磊，孙英杰，黄启飞. 油气田开采钻井岩屑分类利用处置现状及环境管理. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(02): 785-792 .
    12. 孙显根，李碧峰，韩桂成. 节能环保下农村固体废弃物污染防治技术研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(03): 55-60 .
    13. 湛峰，程全，刘慧敏，宋光明，诸林，孙勇，赵志越. 废弃水基钻井泥浆的固液分离研究——以四川蓬深X井为例. 天然气与石油. 2023(03): 95-102 .
    14. 唐雷，何瑜瑞，孙平贺，宋建恒，侯凯，胡凌云，黄兴海，冯德山. 基础工程废弃泥浆环境化学效应的实验研究. 环境工程. 2023(S2): 533-537 . 本站查看
    15. 李凤娟，张存社，李小龙，孙培，邵国彪. 废弃水基泥浆处理技术研究进展. 精细与专用化学品. 2023(11): 26-28 .
    16. 徐贵勤，谢水祥，任雯，张明栋，潘莉芳，刘国宇，岳长涛，李松辉. 废弃聚磺钻井液固相资源化绿色处理剂. 石油钻采工艺. 2023(06): 683-689 .
    17. 张景红，王志民. 渤海地区海上平台钻采固废管理现状及建议. 资源节约与环保. 2022(08): 81-83 .
    18. 王心龙，孙平贺，赵明哲，邢世宽，冯德山，唐雷. 不同固结因素对废弃泥浆含水率及渗透性的影响. 环境工程. 2022(08): 84-89 . 本站查看
    19. 刘莉，李诗雨，陆朝晖，田君竹，李昊宸. 页岩气油基岩屑处置及资源化利用方案比选. 中国矿业. 2022(10): 62-67 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.3 %FULLTEXT: 12.3 %META: 85.7 %META: 85.7 %PDF: 1.9 %PDF: 1.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.5 %其他: 8.5 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %东莞: 1.9 %东莞: 1.9 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 1.0 %乌鲁木齐: 1.0 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %内江: 0.7 %内江: 0.7 %北京: 4.4 %北京: 4.4 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南充: 1.9 %南充: 1.9 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %吕梁: 0.4 %吕梁: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 1.4 %呼和浩特: 1.4 %咸阳: 0.7 %咸阳: 0.7 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %塔城: 0.4 %塔城: 0.4 %大庆: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 3.6 %天津: 3.6 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %威海: 0.4 %威海: 0.4 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.6 %巴音郭楞: 0.6 %常州: 1.2 %常州: 1.2 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %广安: 0.1 %广安: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.1 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %惠州: 0.7 %惠州: 0.7 %成都: 6.8 %成都: 6.8 %承德: 0.1 %承德: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 1.9 %昆明: 1.9 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %株洲: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %榆林: 0.4 %榆林: 0.4 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.7 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %潜江: 0.1 %潜江: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.3 %濮阳: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绵阳: 1.1 %绵阳: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 25.9 %芒廷维尤: 25.9 %芝加哥: 3.2 %芝加哥: 3.2 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %西宁: 1.2 %西宁: 1.2 %西安: 3.9 %西安: 3.9 %西雅图: 1.0 %西雅图: 1.0 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 1.8 %运城: 1.8 %遂宁: 0.7 %遂宁: 0.7 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %鄂州: 0.3 %鄂州: 0.3 %重庆: 3.3 %重庆: 3.3 %铜川: 0.1 %铜川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阿克苏: 0.1 %阿克苏: 0.1 %雷德蒙德: 0.1 %雷德蒙德: 0.1 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %黄山: 0.1 %黄山: 0.1 %其他其他[]上海东莞临汾乌鲁木齐乐山佛山保定六安内江北京南京南充南宁吕梁呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨塔城大庆大连天津太原威海宝鸡巴彦淖尔巴音郭楞常州常德广安庆阳张家口惠州成都承德无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州株洲榆林武汉汕头沈阳济南济源深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河潜江濮阳烟台盘锦石家庄纽约绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城遂宁遵义邯郸郑州鄂州重庆铜川银川长沙长治阿克苏雷德蒙德青岛黄山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (249) PDF downloads(7) Cited by(24)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return