Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
TU Degang, FENG Tao, YANG Guodong, LUO Weiwei, NIE Beili. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED MACHINERY PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 217-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204031
Citation: TU Degang, FENG Tao, YANG Guodong, LUO Weiwei, NIE Beili. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED MACHINERY PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 217-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204031

POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED MACHINERY PLANT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204031
  • Received Date: 2021-09-16
    Available Online: 2022-07-06
  • In this study, an abandoned machinery plant in Southwestern China was taken as the research object. The pollution characteristics and sources were mainly analyzed by combining the principal component analysis method and the Kriging interpolation method, and Monte Carlo simulation in the health risk assessment was introduced for uncertainty analysis. The result showed that Ni, Pb, As and Co were concentrated distributed, and V was evenly distributed. The main sources of pollution were man-made sources of industrial activities in the factory, natural sources of soil parent material, and atmospheric deposition from surrounding industrial activities. The main hazards factors of non-carcinogenic risks were As and Co, and the main carcinogen factor was As. The principal exposure pathway for adults was skin contact, but for children it was oral ingestion. The probability of the non-carcinogenic risk exceeded the threshold for adults and childrenwas 11.60% and 60.88%, and those for carcinogenic risk exceeded the threshold was 4.36% and 2.31%. The most sensitive parameters for adults and children were skin adhesion coefficient and body weight. The significance of the research was to provide guidance and technical support for risk management or remediation of soil in heavy metal contaminated sites.
  • [1]
    黎子瑜,钱谊,王蒙.某电镀厂搬迁后重金属污染场地的健康风险评价[J].环境工程,2014,32(增刊1):831-835.
    [2]
    吴志远,张丽娜,夏天翔,等.基于土壤重金属及PAHs来源的人体健康风险定量评价:以北京某工业污染场地为例[J].环境科学,2020,41(9):4180-4196.
    [3]
    LI T K, LIU Y, BJERG P L. Prioritization of potentially contaminated sites:a comparison between the application of a solute transport model and a risk-screening method in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2021,281(8):111765.
    [4]
    段宁,方丽婷,张湘泰.基于靶器官的土壤重金属非致癌健康风险评估[J].安全与环境工程,2021,28(4):207-212.
    [5]
    杨国栋,张梦竹,冯涛,等.土壤重金属污染修复技术研究现状及展望[J].现代化工,2020,40(12):50-54.
    [6]
    HOU D Y, O'CONNOR D, NATHANAIL P, et al. Integrated GIS and multivariate statistical analysis for regional scale assessment of heavy metal soil contamination:a critical review[J]. Environmental Pollution,2017,231:1188-1200.
    [7]
    马宏宏,余涛,杨忠芳,等.典型区土壤重金属空间插值方法与污染评价[J].环境科学,2018,39(10):4684-4693.
    [8]
    METAHNI S, COUDERT L, GLOAGUEN E, et al. Comparison of different interpolation methods and sequential Gaussian simulation to estimate volumes of soil contaminated by As, Cr, Cu, PCP and dioxins/furans[J]. Environmental Pollution,2019,252(A):409-419.
    [9]
    HA H, OLSON J R, BIAN L, et al. Analysis of heavy metal sources in soil using kriging interpolation on principal components[J]. Environmental Science&Technology,2014,48(9):4999-5007.
    [10]
    HUANG J L, WU Y Y, SUN J X, et al. Health risk assessment of heavy metal (loid) s in park soils of the largest megacity in China by using Monte Carlo simulation coupled with Positive matrix factorization model[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2021,415:125629.
    [11]
    SAHA N, RAHMAN M S, AHMED M B, et al. Industrial metal pollution in water and probabilistic assessment of human health risk[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2017,185:70-78.
    [12]
    USEPA. Risk assessment guidance for superfund, Volume 1, Human health evaluation manual. Part B[R]. Washington, D.C,2011.
    [13]
    CHEN J W, WANG S L, HSIEH D P H, et al. Carcinogenic potencies of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for back-door neighbors of restaurants with cooking emissions[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2012,417/418:68-75.
    [14]
    YANG S Y, ZHAO J, CHANG S X, et al. Status assessment and probabilistic health risk modeling of metals accumulation in agriculture soils across China:a synthesis[J]. Environment International,2019,128:165-174.
    [15]
    LI Z Y, MA Z W, van DER KUIJP T J, et al. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China:pollution and health risk assessment[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2014,468/469:843-853.
    [16]
    生态环境部.建设用地土壤污染风险评估技术导则:HJ 25.3-2019[S].北京,2019.
    [17]
    环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2013.
    [18]
    QU C S, SUN K R, WANG S, et al. Monte carlo simulation-based health risk assessment of heavy metal soil pollution:a case study in the Qixia Mining Area, China[J]. Human and ecological risk assessment,2012,18(4/6):733-750.
    [19]
    CANADA H. Federal Contaminated Site Risk Assessment in Canada[R]. Ottawa, Canada,2004.
    [20]
    国家环境保护局,中国环境监测总站.中国土壤元素背景值[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990.
    [21]
    生态环境部.土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行) GB 36600-2018[S].北京,2018.
    [22]
    管孝艳,王少丽,高占义,等.盐渍化灌区土壤盐分的时空变异特征及其与地下水埋深的关系[J].生态学报,2012,32(4):198-206.
    [23]
    彭兵,汪亮,龚敏.湖北省某钢铁厂工业区及周边铅污染调查[J].安全与环境工程,2007,14(1):20-23.
    [24]
    CHEN H Y, TENG Y G, LU S J, et al. Contamination features and health risk of soil heavy metals in China[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2015,512/513:143-153.
    [25]
    ZHANG Y, LI S, CHEN Z, et al. A systemic ecological risk assessment based on spatial distribution and source apportionment in the abandoned lead acid battery plant zone, China[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2018,354(jul.15):170-179.
    [26]
    段小丽,王宗爽,李琴,等.基于参数实测的水中重金属暴露的健康风险研究[J].环境科学, 2011,32(5):1329-1339.
    [27]
    陈月芳,孙善伟,段小丽,等.兰州市西固区儿童饮用水重金属暴露及健康风险精细化评估[J].环境科学,2020, 41(1):262-272.
    [28]
    CAO S Z, DUAN X L, ZHAO X G, et al. Health risk assessment of various metal (loid) s via multiple exposure pathways on children living near a typical lead-acid battery plant, China[J]. Environmental Pollution,2015,200(5):16-23.
    [29]
    侯捷,曲艳慧,宁大亮,等.暴露参数对苯污染场地健康风险评价的影响[J].环境科学与技术, 2014,37(11):191-195.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HUANG Junlin, LIU Huangrui, YAN Haihu, XI Yunhao, LI Xiang, ZHU Nengwu. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS AND CHLORIDES IN SOLID WASTE INCINERATION RESIDUES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 134-141. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408016
    [2]LIANG Lichen, YAN Xiaofei, WANG Lili, JIANG Hao, XU Yuanshun. SOIL HEAVY METAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF A SIMPLE DOMESTIC GARBAGE LANDFILL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 177-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410021
    [3]QIAN Jiangbo, CHEN Di, WANG Xiahui, LI Xilin, HUANG Guoxin. RISK DIAGNOSIS OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN REGIONAL SOIL BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 296-303. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312037
    [4]GAO Mengfei, ZHENG Shun'an, LIU Changhua, GAO Yunbing, GAO Ge, ZHAO Ya'nan. RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN FARMLAND SOIL BASED ON MULTI-FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 233-241. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308030
    [5]ZHAO Bin, PENG Tianyue, ZHANG Hao, WANG Liuwei, ZONG Wenjing, HOU Deyi. CHARACTERISTICS IDENTIFICATION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF MERCURY CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 205-212. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304028
    [6]GUO Yake, GAO Yanyan, QIAN Hui, TANG Shunqi, WANG Haike, SHI Xiaoxin. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN THE CHU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 112-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301014
    [7]LI Ganyu, CUI Xingtao. CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY METAL ELEMENTS POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST-FALL IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 278-287. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312035
    [8]WANG Hong, HU Qing, XU Shengbin, WANG Wei, TONG Lizhi. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION RISK PREVENTION AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES FOR SAFE REDEVELOPMENT OF CONSTRUCTION LAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 224-230. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201032
    [9]HUANG Guoxin, LIU Ruiping, YANG Ruijie, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Qiulei, WANG Xiahui, TIAN Zi, WANG Yipeng. RESEARCH PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL AND THEIR APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FARMLAND SOIL HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 216-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201031
    [10]GUO Lin, CAO Shumiao, YUAN Xunfeng, LIU Jun. THE METHOD OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL IN TAILINGS POND BASED ON PHYTO-ELECTROKINETIC OF SIMULATED REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 152-158. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211021
    [11]LU Yifan, LU Yin, CAI Hui, SUN Shoujun, SHI Weilin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FIELD LEFT BY A LEAD-ACID BATTERY FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 135-140,189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201020
    [12]WANG Jinnan, WU Yufeng, LI Liangzhong, YU Lu, YANG Mengchuan, LI Bin, GUO Lianjie. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF BARRIER TECHNOLOGIES FOR SITE COMBINED HEAVY METAL POLLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 244-253. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204034
    [13]ZHENG Ying-yi, LIU Jie, JIANG Ping-ping, YOU Shao-hong, ZHOU Shu-lin, YU Guo. POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS AROUND AN ABANDONED SMELTER IN HECHI, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 238-245. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105033
    [14]LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028
    [15]FANG Qing, XIAN Ping, MENG Zheng-cheng. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF AGRICULTURAL LAND BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 147-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102024
    [16]ZHANG Fu-xiang, CUI Song, ZHU Qian-de, GAO Shang, LI Kun-yang. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTIC AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT OF QIXING RIVER WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 68-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010011
    [17]CUI Yong, BAI Lian-yang, LONG Yue-lin, YANG Kai-qin. ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOILS OF LIANHUA TOWN IN THE SUBURBS OF CHANGSHA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 202-209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005035
    [18]LUO Qing, GU Lei-yan, SHAN Yue, SUN Li-na. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN URBAN TOP SOIL OF SHENYANG BASED ON MONTE CARLO METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 196-201,222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005034
    [20]SIMULATION EXPERIMENT OF SINTERING CEMENT USING HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 91-94. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412016
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 罗思雅,杨国栋,陈浪,袁世杰,喻兆琴. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟的工业遗留地块土壤重金属健康风险评价. 有色金属(中英文). 2025(02): 325-334 .
    2. 刘欣,陶燕东. 典型工业搬迁地块土壤污染状况调查与风险评估. 环保科技. 2024(01): 1-8 .
    3. 杨博,熊健,李伟,谢鹏程,杨崛园,黄瑞卿,吕学斌. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟的拉萨城区土壤重金属健康风险评价. 环境化学. 2024(04): 1339-1352 .
    4. 宋炉生,孙振洲,胡晶,邓清海. 废弃铁矿及下游农田土壤重金属污染特征及来源解析. 环境工程. 2024(10): 155-164 . 本站查看
    5. 李翔,高明亮,陈征. 基于机器学习方法的废弃场地污染特征分析. 黑龙江科学. 2023(12): 1-6 .
    6. 伍海兵,马想,梁晶. 厨余垃圾沼渣堆肥与化学改良剂对城市搬迁地土壤团聚体形成的影响. 土壤. 2023(04): 911-917 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.3 %FULLTEXT: 12.3 %META: 84.7 %META: 84.7 %PDF: 3.0 %PDF: 3.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.8 %其他: 10.8 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 0.7 %上海: 0.7 %东莞: 0.7 %东莞: 0.7 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %丽水: 0.4 %丽水: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 4.5 %北京: 4.5 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 3.0 %南京: 3.0 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 1.1 %呼和浩特: 1.1 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %大连: 1.1 %大连: 1.1 %天津: 1.9 %天津: 1.9 %太原: 1.1 %太原: 1.1 %宣城: 0.7 %宣城: 0.7 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %成都: 2.2 %成都: 2.2 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %无锡: 0.4 %无锡: 0.4 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %榆林: 0.4 %榆林: 0.4 %武汉: 1.9 %武汉: 1.9 %济源: 0.4 %济源: 0.4 %温州: 2.2 %温州: 2.2 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 3.7 %漯河: 3.7 %盐城: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 14.2 %芒廷维尤: 14.2 %芝加哥: 1.5 %芝加哥: 1.5 %苏州: 0.7 %苏州: 0.7 %衡水: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %衢州: 0.7 %衢州: 0.7 %西宁: 23.9 %西宁: 23.9 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 4.1 %运城: 4.1 %连云港: 0.7 %连云港: 0.7 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 2.6 %郑州: 2.6 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %其他[]上海东莞临汾丽水保定北京十堰南京南昌台州呼和浩特嘉兴大连天津太原宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林榆林武汉济源温州湖州漯河盐城石家庄秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水衢州西宁西安贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (226) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return