Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
JING Yu-shu, MOU Run-zhi, JIANG Yi-ming, LIU Zhang-qing, YANG Yan-dong. REDUCING ENERGY AND CHEMICALS CONSUMPTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS BY ACCURATE AERATION CONTROL: A CASE STUDY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 141-145,165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205020
Citation: JING Yu-shu, MOU Run-zhi, JIANG Yi-ming, LIU Zhang-qing, YANG Yan-dong. REDUCING ENERGY AND CHEMICALS CONSUMPTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS BY ACCURATE AERATION CONTROL: A CASE STUDY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 141-145,165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205020

REDUCING ENERGY AND CHEMICALS CONSUMPTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS BY ACCURATE AERATION CONTROL: A CASE STUDY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205020
  • Received Date: 2021-08-05
    Available Online: 2022-07-02
  • As the main energy consumer in wastewater treatment plants(WWTPs), aeration system has a high potential for energy saving. In this study, an air distribution and control system was introduced into Zhangcunhe WWTP, Qingdao. The efficiency of this system was tested, and its effects on the effluent quality and energy consumption were investigated. The results showed that the dissolved oxygen(DO) concentration in the aeration tank could be maintained within ±0.3 mg/L of the setpoint for longer than two-thirds of the running time. By applying the accurate aeration control, the average concentration of effluent chemical oxygen demand(COD) decreased from 19.6 mg/L to 16.7 mg/L, while those of ammonium and total nitrogen(TN) decreased from 0.37 mg/L to 0.28 mg/L, and from 8.48 mg/L to 7.36 mg/L, respectively. The proportion of days with effluent TN<10 mg/L increased from 79% to 100%, indicating a more stable effluent quality. Besides, the power consumption of the aeration system was reduced by 24.8% while the sodium acetate dosing decreased by 15.1%. Therefore, accurate aeration control is an effective approach to reduce the energy and chemical consumption of WWTPs.
  • [1]
    曲久辉.建设面向未来的中国污水处理概念厂[N].中国环境报,2014-01-07(10).
    [2]
    曹业始,郑兴灿,刘智晓,等.中国城市污水处理的瓶颈、缘由及可能的解决方案[J].北京工业大学学报,2021,47(11):1292-1302.
    [3]
    孙慧,王佳伟,吕竹明,等.北京某大型城市污水处理厂节能降耗途径和效果分析[J].中国给水排水,2019,35(16):31-34.
    [4]
    王硕,徐巧,李伟光,等.浅谈精确曝气控制研究与应用现状[J].环境科学与技术,2016,39(增刊2):321-325.
    [5]
    谢小明.精确曝气控制在污水处理厂中的应用和探索[J].中国给水排水,2016,32(6):24-27.
    [6]
    梁锐振,谈振娇,胡金财,等.VACOMASS曝气气体精确分配与控制系统的应用[J].中国给水排水,2011,27(21):89-92.
    [7]
    杨岸明,常江,孟春霖,等.DO精确控制技术在A2O工艺中的应用研究[J].中国给水排水,2013,29(23):5-7

    ,13.
    [8]
    唐鑫伟,傅坚亮,任亚英.精准曝气系统在提高AAO+MBR工艺总氮去除率中的应用[J].净水技术,2020,39(增刊1):133-137.
    [9]
    GÓMEZ M A,HONTORIA E,GONZÁLEZ-LÓPEZ J.Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on nitrate removal from groundwater using a denitrifying submerged filter[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2002,90(3):267-278.
    [10]
    高廷耀,周增炎,朱晓君.生物脱氮工艺中的同步硝化反硝化现象[J].给水排水,1998,24(12):6-9.
    [11]
    王世平,王艺霖.A2/O中精确曝气控制的节能分析与评估[J].水处理技术,2016,42(11):113-117.
    [12]
    常江,杨岸明,甘一萍,等.城市污水处理厂能耗分析及节能途径[J].中国给水排水,2011,27(4):33-36.
    [13]
    王迁,李江伟,王志刚,等.城市污水处理厂关键设备能耗分析及节能降耗途径研究[J].给水排水,2018,54(10):44-47.
    [14]
    彭永臻,郭建华,王淑莹,等.低溶解氧污泥微膨胀节能理论与方法的发现、提出及理论基础[J].环境科学,2008,29(12):3342-3347.
    [15]
    BOCK E,SCHMIDT I,STUVEN R,et al.Nitrogen loss caused by denitrifying Nitrosomonas cells using ammonium or hydrogen as electron donors and nitrite as electron acceptor[J].Archives of Microbiology,1995,163(1):16-20.
    [16]
    崔有为,金常林.好氧迁移外源有机物转变成内源聚合物驱动内源反硝化[J].北京工业大学学报,2020,46(3):320-328.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LE Jihang, WANG Wenlong, WU Qianyuan, CHEN Zhuo, WU Yinhu, JIA Haifeng, LIU Fanghua, WANG Fang, HU Hongying. Quality and risk characteristics of effluent from wastewater treatment plants in central area of Luzhou[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 135-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501015
    [2]ZHANG Li, HE Shanshan, ZHEN Xianghua, XIE Pengchao, WAN Nianhong, LIU Haiyan. ORGANIC EMERGING CONTAMINANTS REMOVAL PROCESS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS AND PROSPECT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 15-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407002
    [3]XU Huayi, LI Shanwei, WEI Jing, ZHOU Xiangtong, WU Zhiren. STUDY ON OXYGEN SUPPLY CONDITION AND INFLUENCE OF ALGAL IN PARTIAL NITRIFICATION PROCESS IN A BACTERIA AND ALGAE SYMBIOTIC SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 42-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405006
    [4]LI Yunong, WEN Donghui. IMPACTS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS EFFLUENT ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY OF RECEIVING WATER BODIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 167-179. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409016
    [5]LI Feifei, SU Zhiguo, CAO Feng, MU Qinglin, HUANG Bei, CHEN Lüjun, WEN Donghui. CONTRIBUTION OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE FROM SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS TO ANTIBIOTIC POLLUTION IN COASTAL WATER: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU BAY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 1-8. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404001
    [6]LIU Yuxin, ZENG Lingwu, FANG Zheng, SUN Dezhi. COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE REACHES OF THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 34-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412005
    [7]WANG Xiaoyan, LIANG Meisheng, ZHANG Tong, CHEN Xi, LI Long. IN-SITU PREPARATION OF Cu/Al MODIFIED MCM-41 MOLECULAR SIEVE CATALYST AND ITS DEOXYGENATION PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 192-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307026
    [8]WANG Shuo, LU Yunping, LIU Shuyang, CHEN Kangli. CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN AND INDUSTRIAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS OF SUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 173-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310021
    [9]XIE Chengcheng, LIU Gang. ROAD MAP FOR CUSTRUCTING CARBON NEUTRAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 181-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309022
    [10]LIU Sixuan, LI Yiping, ZHU Ya, WEI Yao, LI Ronghui, WANG Can, CHEN Yu, PENG Yanli, LIANG Dan. INFLUENCE OF WATER LEVEL DESCENDING OF LAYERED RESERVOIRS ON WATER QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS IN SOUTH CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 179-186,194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305024
    [11]ZHANG Qi, WANG Ya'e, LI Jie, XIE Huina, LI Yuanyi. EFFECT OF DISSOLVED OXYGEN ON CORROSION OF SPONGE IRON IN BIOLOGICAL SPONGE IRON SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 60-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302009
    [12]YU Huaixing, YUAN Ding, HE Zihao. APPLICATION OF SHORT-RANGE PRECISION AERATION AND INTELLIGENT CONTROL SYSTEM IN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 165-171. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311026
    [13]MENG Xiaojun, HAN Yong, HUANG Zhigui, GONG Xiaosong. CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS OF ANAMMOX IN MAINSTREAM WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 203-214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210027
    [14]LI Wen-gang, SUN Yao-sheng, YAO Qiang, CHEN Fang, LIU Jing-yi. REVIEW ON POLLUTION STATUS AND ADVANCED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES OF EMERGING ORGANIC POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 77-87. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108010
    [15]HE Yuan-pu, FAN Hai-tao, LIU Guo-hua, QI Lu, XU Xiang-long, SHAO Yu-ting, WANG Hong-chen. STATUS AND TREND OF AERATION CONTROL STRATEGY DURING BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 34-41,121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106006
    [16]YU Yong, YU Sheng-hua, CHEN Da-gang. PRACTICE AND REFLECTION ON CLEAN EMISSION TECHNOLOGY TRANSFORMATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IN ZHEJIANG PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 19-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007003
    [17]SHEN Jie, JIN Wei. REVIEW ON EFFECT OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT ON RECEIVING WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 92-98,115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003016
    [18]SHAN Wei, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, LI Ji. TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ON COD REMOVAL UPGRADING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS FOR HIGH PROPORTION OF INDUSTRY WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 32-37,24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007005
    [20]INFLUENCES OF DO AND AERATION TIME ON DENITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE OF AEROBIC DENITRIFYING BACTERIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 62-64. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412010
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 窦娜莎,孙治国,付友先,刘克琼,盛祥涛,杜欣然,牛亚婷,卞荣星,赵旭. 北方某渗滤液生化处理系统水质变化特征及节能降耗对策研究. 山东化工. 2025(02): 267-271 .
    2. 肖梅. 基于神经网络的污水处理鼓风机曝气控制方法. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2025(02): 116-120 .
    3. 于金旗,孙磊,刘然彬,薛松,杨童,张鹤清. 污水处理厂减污降碳技术探讨. 水处理技术. 2024(04): 18-25 .
    4. 王兴斌. 城镇污水处理厂碳减排技术研究和应用. 绿色矿冶. 2024(03): 88-93+98 .
    5. 丁万杰,刘钊,王孝红. 石化废水处理溶解氧浓度优化控制研究进展. 现代化工. 2024(S1): 16-20 .
    6. 龚洁,郝森舰,芦川,冯立辉,邹曦,朱利明. 苦草-附着生物复合系统对水体磺胺降解的贡献评估. 水生态学杂志. 2023(05): 142-148 .
    7. 朱文秀. 污水处理中技术创新与节能降耗研究. 科技创新与应用. 2022(27): 174-177 .
    8. 高新磊,邱颉,黄睿,房睿. 精准曝气技术在污水处理中的研究进展. 资源节约与环保. 2022(10): 93-96 .
    9. 楚金喜,付根深,王小玲,高静,赵晓娟. 基于改良UCT工艺的精确曝气技术的应用. 净水技术. 2022(11): 70-75 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.9 %FULLTEXT: 10.9 %META: 83.3 %META: 83.3 %PDF: 5.8 %PDF: 5.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.8 %其他: 6.8 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 3.5 %上海: 3.5 %东莞: 1.3 %东莞: 1.3 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丽水: 0.4 %丽水: 0.4 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 5.9 %北京: 5.9 %十堰: 1.0 %十堰: 1.0 %南京: 2.9 %南京: 2.9 %南宁: 1.5 %南宁: 1.5 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %厦门: 0.4 %厦门: 0.4 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 1.4 %合肥: 1.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.1 %宣城: 1.3 %宣城: 1.3 %崇左: 0.1 %崇左: 0.1 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %弗吉: 0.4 %弗吉: 0.4 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 4.3 %杭州: 4.3 %株洲: 0.5 %株洲: 0.5 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %武汉: 1.3 %武汉: 1.3 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %江门: 0.8 %江门: 0.8 %池州: 0.1 %池州: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济宁: 0.4 %济宁: 0.4 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %深圳: 1.1 %深圳: 1.1 %温州: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 6.6 %漯河: 6.6 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %百色: 0.1 %百色: 0.1 %盐城: 1.1 %盐城: 1.1 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %肇庆: 0.3 %肇庆: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 17.7 %芒廷维尤: 17.7 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 1.0 %苏州: 1.0 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %西宁: 8.7 %西宁: 8.7 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.5 %郑州: 1.5 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %镇江: 2.4 %镇江: 2.4 %长沙: 1.5 %长沙: 1.5 %阜阳: 0.1 %阜阳: 0.1 %青岛: 1.9 %青岛: 1.9 %其他其他Central DistrictChina[]上海东莞临汾丽水佛山保定兰州北京十堰南京南宁南通厦门台州合肥哈尔滨嘉兴天津安庆宜宾宣城崇左常州常德广州弗吉张家口徐州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州株洲桂林武汉汕头江门池州沈阳济南济宁济源深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊百色盐城眉山石家庄福州绍兴肇庆芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莆田菏泽蚌埠衡阳西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙阜阳青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (657) PDF downloads(48) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return