CHARACTERISTICS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN MAJOR URAN GROUPS OF CHINA BASED ON EMISSION FACTOR METHOD

QIU Dezhi; CHEN Chun; GUO Li; LIU Dan; MA Jiahui; LEI Miao; LI Tianning; XU Keke; YAN Xu

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202206015

Volume 40 Issue 6

Sep. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(6): 116-122

QIU Dezhi, CHEN Chun, GUO Li, LIU Dan, MA Jiahui, LEI Miao, LI Tianning, XU Keke, YAN Xu. CHARACTERISTICS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN MAJOR URAN GROUPS OF CHINA BASED ON EMISSION FACTOR METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 116-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206015

Citation:

QIU Dezhi, CHEN Chun, GUO Li, LIU Dan, MA Jiahui, LEI Miao, LI Tianning, XU Keke, YAN Xu. CHARACTERISTICS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN MAJOR URAN GROUPS OF CHINA BASED ON EMISSION FACTOR METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 116-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206015

Citation:

QIU Dezhi, CHEN Chun, GUO Li, LIU Dan, MA Jiahui, LEI Miao, LI Tianning, XU Keke, YAN Xu. CHARACTERISTICS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN MAJOR URAN GROUPS OF CHINA BASED ON EMISSION FACTOR METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 116-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206015

PDF( 9438 KB)

CHARACTERISTICS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN MAJOR URAN GROUPS OF CHINA BASED ON EMISSION FACTOR METHOD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206015

QIU Dezhi^1,2,
CHEN Chun³,
GUO Li³,
LIU Dan³,
MA Jiahui²,
LEI Miao²,
LI Tianning²,
XU Keke²,
YAN Xu^{2
,
,}

1. Xinyang College, Xinyang 464000, China;
2. Henan Key Laboratory for Environmental Pollution Control, Key Laboratory for Yellow River and Huai River Water Environment and Pollution Control, Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China;
3. Henan Environmental Monitoring Center, Zhengzhou 450046, China

Received Date: 2021-12-20
Available Online: 2022-09-01
Publish Date: 2022-09-01

Abstract

Abstract

The issue of greenhouse gases (GHGs) production is one of the problems to be solved for the wastewater treatment industry under the background of "carbon neutrality" .An accurate grasp of the production characteristics and variations of China's major urban areas is the prerequisite of formulation reduction policies on GHGs emissions.The emission factor method based on the treated sewage amount was used to establish the emission inventory of GHGs of carbon dioxide (CO₂),methane (CH₄),and nitrous oxide (N₂O) from municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) of five major urban groups in China during 2015-2019 in this article,and the temporal and spatial distribution and influencing factors of GHGs were analyzed.The results showed that the GHGs emission amount from MWWTPs of the five major urban groups increased during the five years.The highest emission amount was observed in the Yangtze River Delta urban group with the value of 2042.78 Gg CO₂-eq in 2019,and the lowest was observed in Fenwei Plain urban group.The Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration had the highest per capita GHGs emission amounts,with a value of 20.36 kg/person in 2019.Correlation analysis showed that GHGs emission from MWWTPs were significantly positively correlated with the factors of population,GDP,wastewater treatment capacity,and wastewater treatment rate.
- municipal wastewater treatment plant,
- greenhouse gas,
- urban group,
- temporal and spatial distribution,
- influencing factor

FullText(HTML)

References(40)

References

[1]	LIU Y, TANG H Y, MUHAMMAD A, et al. Emission mechanism and reduction countermeasures of agricultural greenhouse gases:a review[J]. Greenhouse Gases:Science and Technology, 2019, 9(2):160-174.
[2]	YUE X L, GAO Q X. Contributions of natural systems and human activity to greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2018, 9(4):243-252.
[3]	CHEN K H, WANG H C, PÉREZ B V, et al. Optimal control towards sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on multi-agent reinforcement learning[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 279:1-12.
[4]	NAYEB H, MIRABI M, MOTIEE H, et al. Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from Iran's domestic wastewater sector and modeling the emission scenarios by 2030[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 236:1-13.
[5]	YAN X, QIU D Z, ZHENG S K, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of greenhouse gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants in China from 2005 to 2014[J]. Earth's Future, 2019, 7(4):340-350.
[6]	翟萌,邵越,徐福军.西安污水处理厂温室气体排放及减排对策研究[J].环境工程, 2016, 34(2):23-26.
[7]	邓乂寰,吴坤,阳平坚,等.我国城镇污水处理厂发展历程及技术建议[J].工业用水与废水, 2021, 52(4):1-5.
[8]	中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社. 2016-2020.
[9]	LU C, LI W. A comprehensive city-level GHGs inventory accounting quantitative estimation with an empirical case of Baoding[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 651:601-613.
[10]	宋晓伟,郝永佩,朱晓东.长三角城市群机动车污染物排放清单建立及特征研究[J].环境科学学报, 2020, 40(1):90-101.
[11]	周兴,郑有飞,吴荣军,等. 2003-2009年中国污水处理部门温室气体排放研究[J].气候变化研究进展, 2012, 8(2):131-136.
[12]	DING T, NING Y D, ZHANG Y. Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions in China 1990-2013[J]. Greenhouse Gases Science&Technology, 2017, 7(6):1097-1115.
[13]	DU M X, ZHU Q A, WANG X G, et al. Estimates and predictions of methane emissions from wastewater in China from 2000 to 2020[J]. Earths Future, 2018, 6(2):252-263.
[14]	石春力,田永英,黄海伟,等.我国城镇污水处理碳排放核算方法研究综述[J].建筑科技, 2021(11):39-43.
[15]	陈伟,修春亮.新时期城市群理论内涵的再认知[J].地理科学进展, 2021, 40(5):848-857.
[16]	闫章美,周德成,张良侠.我国三大城市群地区城市和农业用地地表热环境效应对比研究[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(22):8870-8881.
[17]	林文鹏,郭欣瞳.中国城市群臭氧时空分布特征分析[J/OL].中国环境科学. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20220207.002.
[18]	李爱,王雅楠,李梦,等.碳排放的空间关联网络结构特征与影响因素研究:以中国三大城市群为例[J].环境科学与技术, 2021, 44(6):186-193.
[19]	LIU S H, TIAN H Z, LUO L N, et al. Health impacts and spatiotemporal variations of fine particulate and its typical toxic constituents in five urban agglomerations of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022,806:151459.
[20]	IPCC. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[R]. Japan:IPCC,2006.
[21]	国家统计局.数据查询[EB/OL]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/, 2021.10.9.
[22]	河南省统计局.河南统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2016-2020.
[23]	山西省统计局.山西统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2016-2020.
[24]	陕西省统计局.陕西统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2016-2020.
[25]	YAN X, LI L, LIU J X. Characteristics of greenhouse gas emission in three full-scale wastewater treatment processes[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 26(2):256-263.
[26]	BAO Z Y, SUN S C, SUN D Z. Characteristics of direct CO₂ emissions in four full-scale wastewater treatment plants[J]. Desalination&Water Treatment, 2015, 54(4/5):1070-1079.
[27]	亓鹏玉,张建,王金鹤,等.城市污水处理厂甲烷的释放通量[J].环境工程学报, 2012, 6(3):843-847.
[28]	BAO Z Y, SUN S C, SUN D Z. Assessment of greenhouse gas emission from A/O and SBR wastewater treatment plants in Beijing, China[J]. International Biodeterioration&Biodegradation, 2016, 108:108-114.
[29]	LIU Y, CHENG X, LUN X X, et al. CH₄ emission and conversion from A²O and SBR processes in full-scale wastewater treatment plants[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 26(1):224-230.
[30]	WANG J H, ZHANG J, XIE H J, et al. Methane emissions from a full-scale A/A/O wastewater treatment plant[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(9):5479-5485.
[31]	REN Y G, WANG J H, LI H F, et al. Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from different treatment processes in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants[J]. Environmental Technology, 2013, 34(21):2917-2927.
[32]	王金鹤,张建.城镇污水处理厂SBR工艺中N₂O的释放通量研究[J].山东建筑大学学报, 2012, 27(1):43-54.
[33]	WANG J H, ZHANG J, WANG J, et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from a typical northern Chinese municipal wastewater treatment plant[J]. Desalination&Water Treatment, 2011, 32(1):145-152.
[34]	LI H J, PENG D C, LIU W B, et al. N₂O generation and emission from two biological nitrogen removal plants in China[J]. Desalination&Water Treatment, 2016, 57(25):11800-11806.
[35]	IPCC. Climate change 2014:synthesis report[R]. Copenhagen:IPCC, 2014.
[36]	闫旭,邱德志,郭东丽,等.中国城镇污水处理厂温室气体排放时空分布特征[J].环境科学, 2018, 39(3):1256-1263.
[37]	刘国华,庞毓旻,齐鲁,等. SBR工艺污水生物脱氮过程中N₂O的释放特征[J].环境工程, 2020, 38(7):51-57.
[38]	邓玉娇,王捷纯,徐杰,等.广东省NDVI时空变化特征及其对气候因子的响应[J].生态环境学报, 2021, 30(1):37-43.
[39]	王亚宜,周东,赵伟,等.污水生物处理实际工艺中氧化亚氮的释放:现状与挑战[J].环境科学学报, 2014, 34(5):1079-1088.
[40]	蔡博峰,高庆先,李中华,等.中国污水处理厂甲烷排放研究[J].中国环境科学, 2015, 35(12):3810-3816.

Relative Articles

[1]	KOU Xingxia, PENG Zhen, ZHANG Meigen, MIAO Shiguang, CHEN Min, ZHAO Xiujuan. RESEARCH PROGRESS IN URBAN AND REGIONAL-SCALE ATMOSPHERIC INVERSIONS OF CARBON SOURCES AND SINKS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 209-217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410024
[2]	GANG Qinyan, MA Xiaoqian, LIU Chao, WANG Han, WANG Yayi. RESEARCH ON CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION LEACHATE TREATMENT SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 31-39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404004
[3]	XUAN Gan, TANG Baiyang, LI Yuting, ZHANG Xitong, LIU Weijing, CAO Jiashun, LUO Jingyang, FENG Qian. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON MONITORING METHODS OF DIRECT CARBON EMISSIONS FROM URBAN SEWAGE COLLECTING SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 13-21. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411002
[4]	ZHANG Yili, LIU Hui, QIAN Xiaoyong. N₂O EMISSION FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS: EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROL STRATEGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 9-21. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404002
[5]	HE Zihao, YI Mengting, ZHONG Qiumeng, LIANG Sai. INFLUENCING FACTORS OF SYNERGY DEGREE FOR INDUSTRIAL POLLUTANT AND CARBON REDUCTIONS IN CHINESE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 206-214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401027
[6]	LIU Yuxin, ZENG Lingwu, FANG Zheng, SUN Dezhi. COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE REACHES OF THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 34-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412005
[7]	LIU Yueting, ZHANG Qiang, JIANG Xiaohui, JI Yajun, YUAN Xiaohong, XIE Wenhao, ZHENG Lielong, LUO Jiaxin. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CARBON EMISSIONS IN URBAN SEWAGE SYSTEM IN XI’AN AND ITS DOMINANT DRIVING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 40-49. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411005
[8]	SHEN Yaohui, KANG Caixia, WU Mingwei, LIU Yurun, TONG Zhengong, WANG Liyuan. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF CONVERTIBLE NITROGEN IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE POYANG LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 18-27. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405003
[9]	NING Lizhe, ZHANG Zhe, CAI Bofeng, ZHOU Caihua. RESEARCH ON CHINA'S REGIONAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTRICITY GHG EMISSION FACTORS IN 2020[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 222-228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303030
[10]	WANG Qinyi, SHENG Yangyue, SONG Ningning, ZHANG Junqi, ZENG Songxi, QIAN Xiaoyong, QIU Kaipei, LIU Qizhen. PROGRESS OF CH₄ AND N₂O MONITORING IN FULL-SCALE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 51-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310008
[11]	WU Qixian, XIE Xinyan, CHEN Yun, JIN Ziyi. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN RAIL TRANSIT PROJECTS BASED ON PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 133-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310017
[12]	YUAN Ye, GAO Jun, ZHANG Lulu, CHEN Tianming, DING Cheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON INFLUENCING FACTORS AND THEIR PREDICTION MODELS OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE GENERATION IN MUNICIPAL SEWAGE PIPELINES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 69-77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311013
[13]	MA Yan, ZHANG Dading, ZHANG Fan, CHENG Lu, MA Yue, GUO Jianda. INFLUENTING FACTORS OF CHITOSAN-MODIFIED ZEOLITE AND ITS STABILIZATION EFFECT ON MULTI METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 94-101,116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201014
[14]	CHEN Weidong, WEN Donghui. ADVANCES IN SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION AND ASSEMBLY MECHANISMS OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 1-13,39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208001
[15]	ZHOU Yi-xin, LI Ji, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, WANG Xiao-fei, ZHI Yao. REASON ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT MEASURES FOR LOW POLLUTANTS CONCENTRATION OF INFLUENT WATER OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 25-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112004
[16]	ZHENG Kai-kai, ZHOU Zhen, ZHOU Yuan, WANG Yan, ZHOU Jian-chun, LI Ji. A QUANTITIVE STUDY ON PROPORTION OF GROUNDWATER, RIVER WATER AND RAINWATER IN INFLUENT OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 75-80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007012
[17]	LI Ji, WANG Yan, LUO Guo-bing, LI Bing-bing. OPERATION EVALUATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IMPLEMENTING GRADE I-A STANDARD AND ANALYSIS ON EMPASSIS AND DIFFICULTIES IN UPGRADING THE STANDARD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 1-12. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007001
[18]	LI Jia-ju, ZHENG Xing-can, LI Peng-feng, LI Ji, HE Ling-jun, SUI Ke-jian, LV Zhen, SUN Yong-li, WANG Yan, YANG Min, GAO Chen-chen, GUO Ya-qiong, CHEN Tian-fang, ZHANG Yue, WANG Yi-da. RESEARCH SCHEME AND PROBLEMS IDENTIFICATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS BASED ON NEW LOCAL STANDARD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 13-18. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007002
[19]	LIU Xing, LIU Wen-li, JIANG Xia, GUO Ji-feng, HUANG Wei, LIU Rui, ZHANG Cong. ANALYSIS OF TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE AND STATUS OF TREATMENT FACILITIES IN PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012007
[20]	HUANG Chou, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, WANG Shuo, LI Ji. THE INFLUENCING FACTORS AND OPTIMAL OPERATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 58-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007009

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(16)

1.	方奕，汤琳，吴晓蔚. 基于实测优化的超大城市城镇污水处理厂碳排放特征研究. 中国环境监测. 2025(01): 10-19 .
2.	王天娇，李敏，王乾，苗宪宝，徐林，李义华. 生活垃圾焚烧、填埋及污水处理中长时间碳排放水平研究. 环境卫生工程. 2024(02): 75-84 .
3.	张亦藜，刘辉，钱晓雍. 城镇污水处理厂N_2O排放:排放特征及控制措施. 环境工程. 2024(04): 9-21 . 本站查看
4.	马泽宇. 污水处理厂温室气体排放特征与减排技术研究. 中国资源综合利用. 2024(08): 215-218 .
5.	王振坤，樊静雨，常英贤，王鹏，穆聪聪. 基于IPCC方法学的“电-碳”碳排放测算模型. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2024(10): 101-105 .
6.	杨清雯，陈惠鑫，石磊，程荣，郑祥. 渗滤液处理过程碳排放核算及减碳路径探索. 环境科学研究. 2024(11): 2444-2452 .
7.	王碧云，孙艾林，许雪煌. “双碳”目标下海南地区污水处理厂更新改造对策分析及工程实例. 环境工程. 2024(11): 81-89 . 本站查看
8.	刘跃廷，张强，蒋晓辉，姬亚军，原晓红，谢文豪，郑烈龙，罗嘉昕. 西安市城镇污水系统碳排放时空特征及其主要驱动因素. 环境工程. 2024(11): 40-49 . 本站查看
9.	张志红，尚振欣，蔡辰，刘佳，黄翔峰. 南方典型城市污水处理厂碳排放特征及降碳策略研究. 环境工程. 2024(11): 72-80 . 本站查看
10.	谭丽琼，朱正，于亚男，索思雨，赵梦云，梁文艳. 再生水湿地中氮和多环芳烃污染特征及其耦合修复机制. 环境科学研究. 2024(12): 2710-2721 .
11.	Fang Yu，Qian Yuan，Xuerou Sheng，Mengyue Liu，Leping Chen，Xueliang Yuan，Dantong Zhang，Shuqi Dai，Zhinan Hou，Qingsong Wang，Qiao Ma. Understanding carbon footprint: An evaluation criterion for achieving sustainable development. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment. 2024(04): 367-375 .
12.	陈哲红，孟园，丁重勋，沈鹏飞，杨梦霞，蒋建国. 市政污泥的高温热解处理及产物特性研究. 当代化工研究. 2023(03): 42-45 .
13.	王彬，周文和，王佳，沈浩，史成波，滕峰，刘勇，杨成慰. 地下污水厂污泥间气流组织及其除臭效果数值分析. 科学技术与工程. 2023(17): 7589-7596 .
14.	金欢，刘贺，马丽然. 城镇污水处理厂污泥固废属性核查分析. 清洗世界. 2023(08): 55-57 .
15.	张海亚，李思琦，黎明月，段亮，张洪伟，秦伟，赵立伟，刘鹏，吕云龙，王玉龙. 城镇污水处理厂碳排放现状及减污降碳协同增效路径探讨. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(06): 2053-2062 .
16.	刘冰蕊，魏艳丽，江思远，徐文，程修文. 某石化污水处理厂碳排放量核算及预测. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(06): 735-739 .