Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Wang Qiong, Wang Ping, Fu Hongyuan, He Zhongming. ADSORPTION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM IN WASTEWATER BY MODIFIED FLY ASH DOPING PYRITE CINDERFLY ASH DOPING PYRITE CINDERWASTEWATER/WASTE TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 1-4. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510001
Citation: WANG Yiming, MA Zhenhua, YANG Mengqi, DONG Xin, ZENG Siyu. A HYBRID MODELING STRATEGY FOR CONTROL SIMULATOR OF URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS BASED ON DATA-DRIVEN AND MECHANISM-DRIVEN METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 204-211,225. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206026

A HYBRID MODELING STRATEGY FOR CONTROL SIMULATOR OF URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS BASED ON DATA-DRIVEN AND MECHANISM-DRIVEN METHOD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206026
  • Received Date: 2021-12-14
    Available Online: 2022-09-01
  • Publish Date: 2022-09-01
  • A hybrid control modelling method was proposed for optimal control of urban drainage systems,which adopted both data-driven and mechanism-driven simplification strategies.The method divided urban drainage systems into different regions,according to connected degree to the control target.These regions were modeled by LSTM model and Saint Venant equation separately.The method was verified within the service area of a wastewater treatment plant in City A in China.The proposed method established a surrogate control model based on a detailed hydraulic model.Compared with tank model,simulation accuracy in two CSO outfalls was improved by 3.85% and 22.86%,and improved by 5.66% and 3.57% compared to the LSTM model (measured in an average root mean value).The simulation time could be reduced by 98.7% in comparison to the detailed hydraulic model.Due to the advantage in accuracy and efficiency,the modelling strategy can provide references for the implementation of real-time control in urban drainage systems.
  • [1]
    徐智伟.基于强化学习的城市排水系统实时控制策略研究[D].北京:清华大学,2021.
    [2]
    CEMBRANO G, QUEVEDO J, SALAMERO M, et al. Optimal control of urban drainage systems:a case study[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2004, 12(1):1-9.
    [3]
    PLEAU M, COLAS H, LAVALLÉE P, et al. Global optimal real-time control of the Quebec urban drainage system[J]. Environmental Modelling&Software, 2005, 20(4):401-413.
    [4]
    VEZZARO L, CHRISTENSEN M L, THIRSING C, et al. Water quality-based real time control of integrated urban drainage systems:a preliminary study from Copenhagen, Denmark[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 70:1707-1716.
    [5]
    MYO L N, RUTTEN M, TIAN X. Flood mitigation through the optimal operation of a multi-reservoir system by using model predictive control:a case study in Myanmar[J]. Water, 2018, 10(10):1371.
    [6]
    SUN C C, ROMERO L, JOSEPH-DURAN B, et al. Integrated pollution-based real-time control of sanitation systems[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 269:110798.
    [7]
    席裕庚,李德伟,林姝.模型预测控制:现状与挑战[J].自动化学报,2013,39(3):222-236.
    [8]
    SADLER J M, GOODALL J L, BEHL M, et al. Leveraging open source software and parallel computing for model predictive control of urban drainage systems using EPA-SWMM5[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2019, 120:104484.
    [9]
    LEITAO J P, SIMÕES N E, MAKSIMOVIĆ Č, et al. Real-time forecasting urban drainage models:full or simplified networks?[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2010, 62(9):2106-2114.
    [10]
    黄森辰.面向溢流污染削减的城市排水系统集成分层优化控制研究[D].北京:清华大学,2018.
    [11]
    ZHANG D, MARTINEZ N, LINDHOLM G, et al. Manage sewer in-line storage control using hydraulic model and recurrent neural network[J]. Water Resources Management, 2018, 32(6):2079-2098.
    [12]
    冯钧,潘飞.一种LSTM-BP多模型组合水文预报方法[J].计算机与现代化,2018(7):82-85.
    [13]
    殷兆凯,廖卫红,王若佳,等.基于长短时记忆神经网络(LSTM)的降雨径流模拟及预报[J].南水北调与水利科技,2019,17(6):1-9

    ,27.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Zhong, ZHAO Di, XU Gaojie, NING Pengge, ZHAO Yuehong, CAO Hongbin. INFLUENCE OF IMPURITIES ON DISSOLUTION BEHAVIOR OF SODIUM SULFATE IN COAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRY SALINE WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 156-166. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409015
    [2]ZENG Shaogeng, LIU Yao, LIU Zhongyan. DETECTION OF MUSSELS CONTAMINATED WITH CADMIUM BASED ON NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY AND LSPTSVM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 235-242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401030
    [3]HU Yuanxiang, LI Yongli, ZHANG Hongjiang, CAO Yinhuan, GONG Yanzhe, CHEN Xi. ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS CONTENT AND BIOTOXICITY DURING TREATMENT PROCESS OF FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION WASTEWATER IN A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 17-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406003
    [4]TAI Dezhi, YU Jixin, ZHANG Hua, ZENG Honghu, SUN Xiaojie, LU Ze. FULVIC ACID SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS DURING COMPOSTING OF BIOLEACHING SLUDGE AND DIFFERENT MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 119-128. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303016
    [5]WANG Hongliang, XU Yueyang, ZHONG Zhaoping, HAN Lei, HUANG Jiawei, XU Yuanqiang. EFFECT OF DESULFURIZATION WASTEWATER ADDITION ON MERCURY RELEASE CHARACTERISTICS DURING COAL COMBUSTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 69-77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211010
    [6]XU Min, DU Hongyu, GUO Jiaming, ZHAO Xiaodan, LU Wei, SUN Chao, CHEN Yu, ZHOU Zhen. A PILOT-SCALE EXPERIMENT FOR ZERO LIQUID DISCHARGE AND RESOURCE RECOVERY OF FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION WASTEWATER IN COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 169-175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210023
    [7]LI Si-qi, LI Zhen-yang, LIU Lin, JIANG Run, WANG Xiao-hui. THE SCREENING OF LOW-TEMPERATURE NITRIFYING BACTERIA STAINS AND THEIR IMMOBILIZATION AND DENITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 51-58,78. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112008
    [8]LIAO Quan, LUO Hua-yong, RONG Hong-wei, CHEN Bing-wei, LIANG Ying. ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE OF TETRACYCLINE ONTO NANO-ALUMINA MODIFIED GEL BEADS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 36-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009006
    [9]LU Hong-sheng, GAO Yu-ting, ZHANG Xue, SUN Pei-ming, QIU Meng-meng. REMOVAL OF LEAD(Pb2+)FROM SOIL WITH MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 236-240,184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009038
    [10]ZHOU Chuan, WU Qi-rong, YU Jiang-tao, QIN Fu-chu. NUMERICAL SIMULATION FOR FGD WASTEWATER EVAPORATION IN THE FLUE DUCT OF A 2×350 MW COAL-FIRED UNIT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 96-101. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005017
    [19]Kang Haiyan Yang Zhiguang Huang Xiaonan, . REMOVAL OF HEAVY METALS USING NANOSCALE ZERO-VALENT IRON IMMOBILIZED BY SODIUM ALGINATE/β-CYCLODEXTRIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 144-147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506032
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 周菁清,余磊,陈书鑫,陆佳锋,许亚璐,季海冰,张柳芳,刘劲松,王静. 浙江省大气颗粒物PM_(2.5)化学组分污染特征分析. 环境科学. 2023(03): 1297-1309 .
    2. 王成,曹靖原,段小琳,陈浩,闫雨龙,彭林. 山西省四城市冬季PM_(2.5)中碳质组分特征及来源分析. 环境工程. 2021(06): 114-121 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.9 %FULLTEXT: 16.9 %META: 81.9 %META: 81.9 %PDF: 1.3 %PDF: 1.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.9 %其他: 21.9 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %上海: 1.7 %上海: 1.7 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 0.8 %北京: 0.8 %台州: 2.1 %台州: 2.1 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %吉安: 0.4 %吉安: 0.4 %吉隆坡: 0.4 %吉隆坡: 0.4 %咸阳: 0.4 %咸阳: 0.4 %喀什: 0.4 %喀什: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %安庆: 0.8 %安庆: 0.8 %常德: 1.3 %常德: 1.3 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 3.0 %张家口: 3.0 %成都: 2.1 %成都: 2.1 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %武汉: 1.7 %武汉: 1.7 %济南: 0.8 %济南: 0.8 %漯河: 1.7 %漯河: 1.7 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 24.9 %芒廷维尤: 24.9 %芝加哥: 2.5 %芝加哥: 2.5 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 19.4 %西宁: 19.4 %贵阳: 1.7 %贵阳: 1.7 %运城: 2.5 %运城: 2.5 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 1.3 %重庆: 1.3 %黄冈: 0.8 %黄冈: 0.8 %其他其他上海临汾保定北京台州合肥吉安吉隆坡咸阳喀什大同天津安庆常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城武汉济南漯河秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义郑州重庆黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (592) PDF downloads(20) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return