Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
XING Yutong, ZHANG Yiwei, LU Ping. COMBUSTION AND PYROLYSIS CHARACTERISTICS OF HYDROCHARS BY CO-HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION OF VISCOSE FIBER AND POPLAR WOOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 137-144,168. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308017
Citation: YIN Jingchen, DING Han, LI Zeli, LI Xue, LI Guoguang, WANG Yuqiu. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION SIMULATION BASED ON SPARROW MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 253-260,294. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206032

RESEARCH PROGRESS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION SIMULATION BASED ON SPARROW MODEL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206032
  • Received Date: 2021-11-19
    Available Online: 2022-09-01
  • Publish Date: 2022-09-01
  • With the effective control of point source pollution,non-point source pollution has gradually become the main focus of water environment management in China.However,the source and transport of non-point source pollution are hard to monitor,and models are usually necessary.Based on the comparison of the statistical model and the mechanism model for non-point source pollution simulation,SPARROW (SPAtially referenced regressions on watershed attributes) was proved to be a more practical model between the statistical model and the mechanism model,which is a hybrid (statistical and mechanistic) watershed model,and widely used in many countries and regions.By summarizing the different aspects of the model,such as nutrient transport,scenario analysis,combining with other methods,and the improvement of the model,the following conclusions can be drawn:1) SPARROW model can meet the demand of watershed management in China since it doesn't need huge data and its establishment is not very difficult;2) SPARROW model is spatially explicit,and it could estimate the delivery of pollutants from subbasins towards the outlet,therefore,it can provide sufficient support for the simulation of non-point source pollution;3) SPARROW model can be more widely used by improving uncertainty analysis,temporal resolution,and spatial difference.
  • [1]
    代义彬,郎赟超,王铁军,等. SPARROW模型及其应用研究进展[J].地球与环境, 2019, 47(3):397-404.
    [2]
    于维坤,尹炜,叶闽,等.面源污染模型研究进展[J].人民长江, 2008, 39(23):83-87.
    [3]
    王凯,陈磊,杨念,等.从田块到水体:基于源-流-汇理念的非点源污染全过程核算方法[J].环境科学学报, 2022, 4(1):1-11.
    [4]
    RISSMAN A R, CARPENTER S R. Progress on nonpoint pollution:barriers&opportunities[J]. Daedalus, 2015, 144(3):35-47.
    [5]
    夏军,翟晓燕,张永勇.水环境非点源污染模型研究进展[J].地理科学进展, 2012, 31(7):941-952.
    [6]
    YUAN L F, SINSHAW T, FORSHAY K J. Review of watershed-scale water quality and nonpoint source pollution models[J]. Geosciences, 2020, 10(1):25.
    [7]
    耿润哲,梁璇静,殷培红,等.面源污染最佳管理措施多目标协同优化配置研究进展[J].生态学报, 2019, 39(8):2667-2675.
    [8]
    VEGA M, PARDO R, BARRADO E, et al. Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the quality of river water by exploratory data analysis[J]. Water Research, 1998, 32(12):3581-3592.
    [9]
    BENGRAINE K, MARHABA T F. Using principal component analysis to monitor spatial and temporal changes in water quality[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 100(1/2/3):179-195.
    [10]
    SINGH K P, MALIK A, SINHA S. Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources of Gomti river (India) using multivariate statistical techniques:a case study[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2005, 538(1/2):355-374.
    [11]
    GURJAR S K, TARE V. Spatial-temporal assessment of water quality and assimilative capacity of river Ramganga, a tributary of Ganga using multivariate analysis and QUEL2K[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 222:550-564.
    [12]
    李艳红,葛刚,胡春华,等.基于聚类分析和因子分析的鄱阳湖流域水质时空变化特征及污染源分析[J].南昌大学学报(理科版), 2016, 40(4):360-365.
    [13]
    项颂,庞燕,窦嘉顺,等.不同时空尺度下土地利用对洱海入湖河流水质的影响[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(3):876-885.
    [14]
    张家欣.太湖流域水质空间分布状况与污染源识别[J].江苏科技信息, 2021, 38(10):48-54.
    [15]
    后希康,张凯,段平洲,等.基于APCS-MLR模型的沱河流域污染来源解析[J].环境科学研究, 2021, 34(10):2350-2357.
    [16]
    KHADAM I M, KALUARACHCHI J J. Water quality modeling under hydrologic variability and parameter uncertainty using erosion-scaled export coefficients[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 330(1/2):354-367.
    [17]
    ROBINSON T H, MELACK J M. Modeling nutrient export from coastal california watersheds[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2013, 49(4):793-809.
    [18]
    WORRALL F, DAVIES H, BURT T, et al. The flux of dissolved nitrogen from the UK:evaluating the role of soils and land use[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 434:90-100.
    [19]
    HANRAHAN G, GLEDHILL M, HOUSE W A, et al. Phosphorus loading in the Frome catchment, UK:seasonal refinement of the coefficient modeling approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2001, 30(5):1738-1746.
    [20]
    MATIAS N G, JOHNES P J. Catchment phosphorous losses:an export coefficient modelling approach with scenario analysis for water management[J]. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26(5):1041-1064.
    [21]
    宋大平,左强,刘本生,等.农业面源污染中氮排放时空变化及其健康风险评价研究:以淮河流域为例[J].农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(6):1219-1231.
    [22]
    韦晓雪,李晓琳,郑毅.基于输出系数模型的1998-2016年洱海流域磷素时空变化特征分析[J].农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(1):171-181.
    [23]
    ARNOLD J G, ALLEN P M. Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1996, 176(1):57-77.
    [24]
    张京,郑华,何梦男,等.流域水环境污染模拟及关键源区鉴别:以义乌江流域为例[J].环境工程学报, 2021, 15(4):1167-1177.
    [25]
    da SILVA BURIGATO COSTA C M, MARQUES L D S, ALMEIDA A K, et al. Applicability of water quality models around the world:a review[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(36):36141-36162.
    [26]
    SCHWARZ G, HOOS A B, ALEXANDER R B, et al. Section 3. The SPARROW surface water-quality model:theory, application and user documentation[R]. Reston, VA:U. S. Geological Survey, 2006.
    [27]
    SMITH R A, SCHWARZ G E, ALEXANDER R B. Regional interpretation of water-quality monitoring data[J]. Water Resources Research, 1997, 33(12):2781-2798.
    [28]
    ALEXANDER R B, SMITH R A, SCHWARZ G E. Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico[J]. Nature, 2000, 403(6771):758-761.
    [29]
    HOOS A B, MCMAHON G. Spatial analysis of instream nitrogen loads and factors controlling nitrogen delivery to streams in the southeastern United States using spatially referenced regression on watershed attributes (SPARROW) and regional classification frameworks[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2009, 23(16):2275-2294.
    [30]
    ROBERTSON D M, SAAD D A. Nutrient inputs to the laurentian great lakes by source and watershed estimated using SPARROW watershed models1[J]. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2011, 47(5):1011-1033.
    [31]
    REBICH R A, HOUSTON N A, MIZE S V, et al. Sources and delivery of nutrients to the northwestern gulf of mexico from streams in the south-central united states1[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2011, 47(5):1061-1086.
    [32]
    BROWN J B, SPRAGUE L A, DUPREE J A. Nutrient sources and transport in the Missouri River basin, with emphasis on the effects of irrigation and reservoirs1[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2011, 47(5):1034-1060.
    [33]
    ELLIOTT A H, ALEXANDER R B, SCHWARZ G E, et al. Estimation of nutrient sources and transport for New Zealand using the hybrid mechanistic-statistical model SPARROW[J]. Journal of Hydrology-New Zealand, 2005, 44(1):1-27.
    [34]
    DUAN W L, HE B, TAKARA K, et al. Modeling suspended sediment sources and transport in the Ishikari River basin, Japan, using SPARROW[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2015, 19(3):1293-1306.
    [35]
    BENOY G A, JENKINSON R W, ROBERTSON D M, et al. Nutrient delivery to Lake Winnipeg from the RedAssiniboine River Basin:a binational application of the SPARROW model[J]. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 2016, 41(3):429-447.
    [36]
    LI X, WELLEN C, LIU G X, et al. Estimation of nutrient sources and transport using spatially referenced regressions on watershed attributes:a case study in Songhuajiang River Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(9):6989-7001.
    [37]
    卢诚,李国光,齐作达,等. SPARROW模型的传输过程研究:以新安江流域总氮为例[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2017, 28(1):7-13.
    [38]
    杨中文,张萌,郝彩莲,等.基于源汇过程模拟的鄱阳湖流域总磷污染源解析[J].环境科学研究, 2020, 33(11):2493-2506.
    [39]
    DAI Y B, LANG Y C, WANG T J, et al. Modelling the sources and transport of ammonium nitrogen with the SPARROW model:a case study in a karst basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 592:125763.
    [40]
    NAUMAN T W, ELY C P, MILLER M P, et al. Salinity yield modeling of the upper colorado river basin using 30-m resolution soil maps and random forests[J]. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(6):4954-4973.
    [41]
    WELLEN C C, SHATILLA N J, CAREY S K. Regional scale selenium loading associated with surface coal mining, Elk Valley, British Columbia, Canada[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 532:791-802.
    [42]
    BRAKEBILL J W, ATOR S W, SCHWARZ G E. Sources of suspended-sediment flux in streams of the chesapeake bay watershed:a regional application of the SPARROW model1[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2010, 46(4):757-776.
    [43]
    HERRMANN M, NAJJAR R G, KEMP W M, et al. Net ecosystem production and organic carbon balance of U.S. East Coast estuaries:a synthesis approach[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2015, 29(1):96-111.
    [44]
    ROBERTSON D M, SAAD D A, CHRISTIANSEN D E, et al. Simulated impacts of climate change on phosphorus loading to Lake Michigan[J]. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2016, 42(3):536-548.
    [45]
    ZHANG W S, PUEPPKE S G, LI H P, et al. Modeling phosphorus sources and transport in a headwater catchment with rapid agricultural expansion[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019, 255:113273.
    [46]
    ALAM M J, GOODALL J L, BOWES B D, et al. The impact of projected climate change scenarios on nitrogen yield at a regional scale for the contiguous united states[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2017, 53(4):854-870.
    [47]
    MORALES-MARÍN L A, WHEATER H S, LINDENSCHMIDT K E. Assessment of nutrient loadings of a large multipurpose prairie reservoir[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 550:166-185.
    [48]
    MORALES-MARIN L, WHEATER H, LINDENSCHMIDT K E. Potential changes of annual-averaged nutrient export in the south saskatchewan river basin under climate and land-use change scenarios[J]. Water, 2018, 10(10):1438.
    [49]
    MILLER M P, CAPEL P D, GARCIA A M, et al. Response of nitrogen loading to the chesapeake bay to source reduction and land use change scenarios:a SPARROW-informed analysis[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2020, 56(1):100-112.
    [50]
    MILLER M P, de SOUZA M L, ALEXANDER R B, et al. Application of the RSPARROW modeling tool to estimate total nitrogen sources to streams and evaluate source reduction management scenarios in the Grande River Basin, Brazil[J]. Water, 2020, 12(10):2911.
    [51]
    LI G G, WANG Q X, LIU G H, et al. A successful approach of the first ecological compensation demonstration for crossing provinces of downstream and upstream in China[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(15):1-18.
    [52]
    刘庄,晁建颖,张丽,等.中国非点源污染负荷计算研究现状与存在问题[J].水科学进展, 2015, 26(3):432-442.
    [53]
    杨雯,敖天其,王文章,等.基于输出系数模型的琼江流域(安居段)农村非点源污染负荷评估[J].环境工程, 2018, 36(10):140-144.
    [54]
    ONGLEY E D, ZHANG X L, YU T. Current status of agricultural and rural non-point source pollution assessment in China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2010, 158(5):1159-1168.
    [55]
    王秀娟,刘瑞民,宫永伟,等.香溪河流域土地利用格局演变对非点源污染的影响研究[J].环境工程学报, 2011, 5(5):1194-1200.
    [56]
    QI J Y, ZHANG X S, YANG Q C, et al. SWAT ungauged:water quality modeling in the upper mississippi river basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 584:124601.
    [57]
    PRESTON S D, ALEXANDER R B, SCHWARZ G E, et al. Factors affecting stream nutrient loads:a synthesis of regional SPARROW model results for the Continental United States1[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2011, 47(5):891-915.
    [58]
    薛利红,杨林章.面源污染物输出系数模型的研究进展[J].生态学杂志, 2009, 28(4):755-761.
    [59]
    GASSMAN P W, REYES M R, GREEN C H, et al. The soil and water assessment tool:historical development, applications, and future research directions[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 2007, 50(4):1211-1250.
    [60]
    KIM D K, KALUSKAR S, MUGALINGAM S, et al. A Bayesian approach for estimating phosphorus export and delivery rates with the spatially referenced regression on watershed attributes (SPARROW) model[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2017, 37:77-91.
    [61]
    CHANAT J G, YANG G X. Exploring drivers of regional water-quality change using differential spatially referenced regression:a pilot study in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed[J]. Water Resources Research, 2018, 54(10):8120-8145.
    [62]
    ALEXANDER R B, SCHWARZ G E, BOYER E W. Advances in quantifying streamflow variability across continental scales:1. identifying natural and anthropogenic controlling factors in the USA using a spatially explicit modeling method[J]. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(12):10893-10917.
    [63]
    ALEXANDER R B, SCHWARZ G E, BOYER E W. Advances in quantifying streamflow variability across continental scales:2. improved model regionalization and prediction uncertainties using hierarchical bayesian methods[J]. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(12):11061-11087.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HAO Jingyu, CHEN Shuxian, CHEN Xiang, WANG Xiankai, WANG Hang, HUA Yu, DAI Xiaohu. APPLICATION AND PROSPECTS OF PYROLYSIS CARBONIZATION TECHNOLOGY IN SLUDGE TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 261-275. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409026
    [2]SONG Yuru, SUN Yunan, ZHANG Hongnan, CHEN Guanyi, DAN Zeng, CHENG Zhanjun, YAN Beibei. INCINERATION CHARACTERISTICS AND KINETICS OF PHOTOCURED 3D PRINTING WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 292-300. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409029
    [3]LÜ Wenxin, LUAN Pengpeng, ZHOU Hui, WANG Jinglan, HE Sirong, CHENG Zhanjun, LI Ning, YAN Beibei, CHEN Guanyi. PYROLYSIS CHARACTERISTICS AND KINETIC ANALYSIS OF COMMON PLASTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 110-118. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401015
    [4]YIN Zhitong, LV Hongbing, ZHANG Dongming, XU Jiao, HUANG Qunxing, ZHONG Yiliu, HUANG Pingan, PAN Yuhan. COMBUSTION TEMPERATURE AND EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUE GAS POLLUTANTS OF WASTE TIRES PYROLYSIS OIL RICH IN AROMATICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 105-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210014
    [5]MA Jiayu, JIN Yuqi, XUE Dong, TANG Feng, ZHU Zhongxu, LI Minjie, CHEN Siyu. DIOXIN EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF A NOVEL 30 t/d VILLAGE AND TOWN-SCALE SOLID WASTES GASIFICATION SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 162-168. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210022
    [6]ZHANG Tengyuan, FENG Junxiao, FENG Long. SIMULATION AND ORTHOGONAL OPTIMIZATION ON PYROLYSIS AND GASIFICATION OF MSW BASED ON ASPEN PLUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 113-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202018
    [7]LI Xixi, FENG Junxiao. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PYROLYSIS KINETICS OF ORGANIC WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 215-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210028
    [8]ZHOU Yang, JIN Baosheng. PYROLYSIS PERFORMANCE AND EVOLVED GAS ANALYSIS OF MIXED SEWAGE SLUDGE CONTAINING KITCHEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 80-87,175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210011
    [9]HOU Lintong, YANG Xuezhong, LI Jian, YAN Beibei, CHEN Guanyi. SELF-POWER PROPERTY OF PYROLYSIS OF KITCHEN WASTE: AN INVESTIGATION ON THE MASS AND ENERGY FLOW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 37-45. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212006
    [10]YANG Guodong, LAN Tian, SONG Mengzhu, DU Yufeng, LIU Mengdan, SONG Yingchun, JIANG Jianguo. ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF A DRY-WET PRESS SEPARATION-HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION TECHNOLOGY FOR FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 53-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212008
    [11]HE Zhi-qiao, ZHANG Kang, LU Peng, GUAN Jian, LV Hong-kun, YING Guang-yao, LIU Ying-zu. COMBUSTION BEHAVIOR OF PYROLYSIS CHAR PRODUCED FROM MSW COMPONENTS BASED ON ACTIVITY AND POLLUTANT EMISSION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 172-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112026
    [12]FENG Shi-yu, LI Yang, LI Kai, HU Bin, LIU Ji, LU Qiang. PROGRESS IN PREPARATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES BY THERMAL CATALYSIS OF WASTE PLASTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 107-114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104017
    [13]HU Hua-jun, HUANG Ya-ji, CAO Jian-hua, LIU Ling-qin, QI Er-bing, DING Shou-yi, FAN Cong-hui. PYROLYSIS AND CARBON PRODUCTION OF RICE HUSK IN FLUIDIZED BED UNDER FLUE GAS WITH DIFFERENT CO2/O2 ATMOSPHERES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 117-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101018
    [14]ZHANG Ze, ZHAO Hong-jun, MENG Jie, HONG Chen, LI Yi-fei. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF BIOMASS PYROLYSIS AND BIO OIL UPGRADING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 161-171. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103023
    [15]LIANG Jia-qi, LV Yuan, LU Yin, WANG Xiang-hui, ZHENG min, XU Kang-ning. RECOVERY OF AMMONIUM AND PHOSPHATE FROM CORN PROCESSING WASTEWATER USING MAGNETIC MgO-BIOCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 89-94. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009015
    [16]LV Wen, JIA Jin-wei, ZHANG Shao-fei, ZHANG Fan, SONG Qiang, GU Qiu-xiang, SHU Xin-qian. INFLUENCE OF STEEL SLAG ON PYROLYSIS OF OIL TANK BOTTOM SLUDGE IN BEIJING-TIANJIN-HEBEI REGION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 169-176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010027
    [17]ZHANG Hong-yu, JIANG Tao, ZHANG Yuan-qin. CO-COMBUSTION CHARACTERISTICS AND KINETIC ANALYSIS OF COMBUSTIBLE WASTE AND PULVERIZED COAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 185-189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009029
    [19]Xian Yuanhua, . EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SLAUGHTERHOUSE SLUDGE COMPOST AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 109-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501025
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 赵俊婷,万文卿,白璇,程远松,段志伟,朱哲. 市政污泥水热法制备高值固体燃料研究. 化学研究与应用. 2024(12): 2863-2872 .
    2. 朱光泽,周炜,夏志东,王晓露,李炳毅,郭福,吴玉锋. 有机废弃物热解分析技术现状与展望. 中国塑料. 2023(11): 101-116 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.0 %FULLTEXT: 9.0 %META: 88.0 %META: 88.0 %PDF: 3.0 %PDF: 3.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.5 %其他: 16.5 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %上海: 2.3 %上海: 2.3 %保定: 0.8 %保定: 0.8 %北京: 2.3 %北京: 2.3 %南京: 2.3 %南京: 2.3 %台北: 4.5 %台北: 4.5 %台州: 3.0 %台州: 3.0 %哈尔滨: 0.8 %哈尔滨: 0.8 %大同: 1.5 %大同: 1.5 %天津: 2.3 %天津: 2.3 %宣城: 1.5 %宣城: 1.5 %常德: 1.5 %常德: 1.5 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %弗吉: 0.8 %弗吉: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %无锡: 1.5 %无锡: 1.5 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %杭州: 3.0 %杭州: 3.0 %武汉: 1.5 %武汉: 1.5 %沈阳: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %湘潭: 2.3 %湘潭: 2.3 %漯河: 3.0 %漯河: 3.0 %芒廷维尤: 23.3 %芒廷维尤: 23.3 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %衢州: 1.5 %衢州: 1.5 %西宁: 1.5 %西宁: 1.5 %西安: 2.3 %西安: 2.3 %贵阳: 2.3 %贵阳: 2.3 %运城: 3.8 %运城: 3.8 %遵义: 0.8 %遵义: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 2.3 %重庆: 2.3 %长沙: 3.0 %长沙: 3.0 %其他其他上海保定北京南京台北台州哈尔滨大同天津宣城常德广州弗吉张家口扬州无锡昆明晋城杭州武汉沈阳温州湘潭漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (355) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return