Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
XIAO Wangsong, WANG Huawei, SUN Yingjie, GONG Zhaoguo, WANG Yanan, FU Youxian, LIU Keqiong, SUN Zhiguo. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF Ca2+, Mg2+ FROM CONCENTRATED LEACHATE IN LANDFILL USING NaOH SOLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 55-61. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208007
Citation: XIAO Wangsong, WANG Huawei, SUN Yingjie, GONG Zhaoguo, WANG Yanan, FU Youxian, LIU Keqiong, SUN Zhiguo. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF Ca2+, Mg2+ FROM CONCENTRATED LEACHATE IN LANDFILL USING NaOH SOLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 55-61. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208007

REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF Ca2+, Mg2+ FROM CONCENTRATED LEACHATE IN LANDFILL USING NaOH SOLUTION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208007
  • Received Date: 2021-09-08
  • Publish Date: 2022-11-08
  • In order to reduce and alleviate the corrosion and scaling of equipment during the evaporation process of concentrated leachate, the removal efficiency of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in concentrated leachate was investigated by the combination of alkali solution and compound reagents. The chemical composition and mineral characteristics of precipitates were analyzed by various methods. The influence of water quality parameters and scaling amount during the removal of Ca2+ and Mg2+ were also explored. The results showed that: 1) when the volume addition ratio of 7.5 mol/L NaOH was 3%, the Ca2+ and Mg2+ were effectively removed after 60 min of reaction, and the removal efficiencies were 89.49% and 98.45% respectively, but the sedimentation performance was poor under this condition; 2) when NaOH combined with diatomite and Ca(OH)2 was used, the sedimentation performance of precipitates was significantly improved, and the removal efficiency of Ca2+ and Mg2+ were not significantly affected. The sedimentation ratio was 36.84% when 1% Ca(OH)2 was added, significantly lower than single NaOH solution of 75.61%. 3) according to the analysis of chemical composition and mineral characteristics of precipitates, the main minerals were Mg(OH)2, Mg5(CO3)4(OH)2·4H2O, NaCl and KCl; 4)the simulated experiment for evaporation of raw concentrated leachate and supernatant showed that the amount of scaling after alkali treatment was lower than that of raw concentrated leachate when pH was adjusted to 5.0.
  • [1]
    DING Y,ZHAO J,LIU J W,et al.A review of China's municipal solid waste (MSW) and comparison with international regions:management and technologies in treatment and resource utilization[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,293:126144.
    [2]
    CHEN W M,GU Z P,RAN G,et al.Application of membrane separation technology in the treatment of leachate in China:a review[J].Waste Management,2021,121:127-140.
    [3]
    ZHANG Q Q,TIAN B H,ZHANG X,et al.Investigation on characteristics of leachate and concentrated leachate in three landfill leachate treatment plants[J].Waste Management,2013,33(11):2277-2286.
    [4]
    MORELLO L,COSSU R,RAGA R,et al.Recirculation of reverse osmosis concentrate in lab-scale anaerobic and aerobic landfill simulation reactors[J].Waste Management,2016,56:262-270.
    [5]
    WANG H W,WANG Y N,LI X Y,et al.Removal of humic substances from reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) concentrated leachate using continuously ozone generation-reaction treatment equipment[J].Waste Management,2016,56:271-279.
    [6]
    LONG Y Y,XU J,SHEN D S,et al.Effective removal of contaminants in landfill leachate membrane concentrates by coagulation[J].Chemosphere,2017,167:512-519.
    [7]
    关键.垃圾渗滤液反渗透浓缩液的蒸发浓缩试验研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2017.
    [8]
    XU Y D,YUE D B,ZHU Y,et al.Fractionation of dissolved organic matter in mature landfill leachate and its recycling by ultrafiltration and evaporation combined processes[J].Chemosphere,2006,64(6):903-911.
    [9]
    巩梦,文方,谢海燕.几种药剂对高盐废水中钙镁离子的去除性能研究[J].新疆环境保护,2020,42(3):1-8.
    [10]
    HE F,SIRKAR K K,GILRON J.Studies on scaling of membranes in desalination by direct contact membrane distillation:CaCO3 and mixed CaCO3/CaSO4 systems[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2009,64(8):1844-1859.
    [11]
    TIJING L D,WOO T C,CHOI J S,et al.Fouling and its control in membrane distillation-a review[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2015,475:215-244.
    [12]
    SHI J Y,DANG Y,QU D,et al.Effective treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate from incineration leachate using direct contact membrane distillation coupled with a NAOH/PAM pre-treatment process[J].Chemosphere,2019,220:195-203.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Jin, YU Zhonghua, WANG Yajuan, HU Shanshan, GAO Li, TAO Hong. STRESS RESPONSE OF DIFFERENT PLANTS TO DOXYCYCLINE CONTAMINATION AND THEIR REMEDIATION POTENTIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 250-257. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404029
    [2]LI Yuping, FAN Baoyun, DONG Kangran, WAN Jinzhong, AI Yingbo, WANG Baotian. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THERMAL REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 242-249. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404028
    [3]ZHANG Xiaogang, QI Tian, SONG Shuxiang, CHEN Binrong, ZHANG Yufei, CHEN Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Le, LI Cihua, LI Yiming. A CASE ANALYSIS OF EXCAVATION OF THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 90-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405012
    [4]WANG Zhijie, QI Cheng, LOU Ziyang, WANG Luochun, WANG Chuan. EXPLORING THE RISK OF POLLUTANT TRANSMISSION THROUGH BIRD FORAGING IN LANDFILLS: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 48-57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404006
    [5]LI Shuijiang, ZHANG Xiaogang, TAN Qiang, CHEN Xiaoqiang, LI Yaohuang, LIU Jinhai, ZHANG Le, ZHANG Nan. A PILOT-SCALE STUDY OF DIRECT EXCAVATION AND CO-INCINERATION OF EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN A LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 196-201. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308025
    [6]YANG Yiqing, ZHANG Yuxiang, ZHANG Yufei, LI Yaohuang, WU Mingyu, ZHANG Nan, CHEN Xiaoqiang. GAS PRODUCTION AND LEACHATE PROPERTIES OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE WITH CONTINUOUS INJECTION OF CONCENTRATED NF LEACHATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 148-154. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303020
    [7]WEN Yizheng, ZHENG Chaoqun, ZHENG Jie, LEI Xianyan, CAO Deju, SUN Xiang. THE FORMATION OF AEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE INDUCED BY Ca2+, Mg2+ AND Fe2+ AND ITS SEWAGE TREATMENT EFFECT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 40-46,190. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208005
    [8]ZHANG Ke, LONG Jisheng, LIU Yihang, WANG Xianghui, LOU Ziyang. CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND REDUCTION FROM LANDFILL THROUGH FORCED AEROBIC STABILIZATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 17-21,60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212003
    [9]XU Wenjun, HUANG Dandan, LIANG Mingshen, XU Qiyong. EFFECT OF HYDROGEN SUFIDE ON METHANE OXIDATION OF BIOCHAR-AMENDED LANDFILL COVER SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 120-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202019
    [10]JIANG Shu-wen, WEI Shi-cheng, WANG Ting, LU Yao-bin, LIU Guang-li, LUO Hai-ping, ZHANG Ren-duo. PREPARATION OF A FENTON-LIKE Cu-Co-Fe METALLIC OXIDE CATALYST AND ITS DEGRADATION PERFORMANCE ON TYPICAL REFRACTORY ORGANICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 77-82,118. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111009
    [11]BAI Xiu-jia, ZHANG Hong-yu, GU Jun, ZHANG Qi, WANG Ji-hong. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF STALE REFUSE IN LANDFILL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 116-120,124. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102018
    [12]LIU Xing, LIU Wen-li, JIANG Xia, GUO Ji-feng, HUANG Wei, LIU Rui, ZHANG Cong. ANALYSIS OF TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE AND STATUS OF TREATMENT FACILITIES IN PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012007
    [13]LI Ya-feng, ZHANG Ce, SHAN Lian-bin, ZHANG Lei. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON TREATMENT OF PHENOL WASTEWATER BY THREE-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRODE FENTON METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 1-5. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009001
    [14]ZHOU Wen-wu, CHEN Guan-yi, DAN Zeng, QIONGDA Zhuo-ma, ZHOU Peng, WANG Jing. COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF REHABILITATION SCHEMES FOR GROUNDWATER LEAD IN LANDFILL AREA: A CASE STUDY OF LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 88-93. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006014
    [17]Wang Huitao Wu Yong Ke Bin Wu Weijie Cui Zhijun, . PRETREATMENT OF LANDFILL LEACHATES BY MICRO-ELECTROLYSIS INTEGRATED EQUIPMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 16-20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502004
    [18]Li Anfeng, Xu Wenjiang, Pan Tao, Yao Jinghua, Li Jian. APPLICATION OF CONSTRUCTED WETLAND IN EUTROPHICATED LANDSCAPE WATER REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 15-18. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501004
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 叶顺云,邓华,胡乐宁,张俊渝,黄紫薇,王威,黄瑞,付佳慧. 富微孔型生物炭对2, 4-二氯苯酚的吸附性能. 环境工程. 2024(08): 25-34 . 本站查看
    2. 尉永鹏,马会强,李爽,李聪,张林,亢琼. 污泥基生物炭的制备及其对萘的吸附性能研究. 化工新型材料. 2023(04): 281-286 .
    3. 江汝清,余广炜,王玉,邢贞娇,汪印. 污泥炭对厌氧发酵沼液的吸附特征. 环境科学与技术. 2022(03): 178-187 .
    4. 蒋玉柱,惠贺龙,刘弘毅,丁广超,卢文义,李松庚. 印染污泥基生物炭吸附处理难降解有机废水. 环境工程. 2022(10): 32-39 . 本站查看
    5. 姬江浩,胥思勤. 污泥生物炭制备及应用研究进展. 科技创新与生产力. 2021(05): 41-46 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.5 %FULLTEXT: 18.5 %META: 78.8 %META: 78.8 %PDF: 2.7 %PDF: 2.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.4 %其他: 10.4 %上海: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %北京: 1.5 %北京: 1.5 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %宿州: 0.4 %宿州: 0.4 %常德: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %弗里蒙特: 0.8 %弗里蒙特: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 2.3 %杭州: 2.3 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %济源: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %淄博: 0.4 %淄博: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.8 %湘潭: 0.8 %漯河: 1.5 %漯河: 1.5 %潍坊: 0.8 %潍坊: 0.8 %盐城: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %福州: 1.2 %福州: 1.2 %芒廷维尤: 20.1 %芒廷维尤: 20.1 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 38.6 %西宁: 38.6 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %西雅图: 1.2 %西雅图: 1.2 %贵阳: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.8 %运城: 3.5 %运城: 3.5 %连云港: 0.4 %连云港: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %随州: 0.4 %随州: 0.4 %青岛: 1.9 %青岛: 1.9 %其他上海临汾北京十堰南京台州安康宿州常德广州弗里蒙特张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源淄博湘潭漯河潍坊盐城福州芒廷维尤衢州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城连云港遵义郑州重庆长沙长治随州青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (204) PDF downloads(7) Cited by(11)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return