Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LI Haiyan, QIANG Yu, HU Yanjiao, LIU Jing, QIN Fanxin. EFFECT OF MODIFIED NANO-TIO2 ON ARSENIC SPECIES AND ENZYME ACTIVITY IN ARSENIC CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 136-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208019
Citation: LI Haiyan, QIANG Yu, HU Yanjiao, LIU Jing, QIN Fanxin. EFFECT OF MODIFIED NANO-TIO2 ON ARSENIC SPECIES AND ENZYME ACTIVITY IN ARSENIC CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 136-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208019

EFFECT OF MODIFIED NANO-TIO2 ON ARSENIC SPECIES AND ENZYME ACTIVITY IN ARSENIC CONTAMINATED SOIL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208019
  • Received Date: 2021-07-13
  • Publish Date: 2022-11-08
  • Based on the stabilizing effect of nano-TiO2 dioxide on soil arsenic, using self-made modified nano-TiO2 (TiO2/AC and Fe-TiO2/AC) as the test material, the effects of modified nano-TiO2 on the speciation of As, soil pH, nutrients and enzymatic activities were studied through indoor simulation experiments. The results showed that: with the action of TiO2/AC and Fe-TiO2/AC, the non-specific adsorption state and obligate adsorption state of arsenic with strong activity in soil decreased by 1.1%~6.3%, 1.8%~9.5% and 2.1%~6.9%, 10.1%~18%, respectively. While the bound and residual states of inert arsenic amorphous and weakly crystalline hydrated iron-aluminum oxides increased by 1.0%~14.8%, 2.2%~10.5% and 3.7%~16.9%, 6.5%~16.7%, respectively. With the action of TiO2/AC and Fe-TiO2/AC, the soil pH increased by 0.05~0.13 and 0.20~0.35, respectively. The increase rates of available potassium were 17.2%~32.2% and 28.7%~29.5%, and the decrease rates of available nitrogen content were 25.1%~37.8% and 23.5%~44.6%, respectively. Two kinds of modified nano-TiO2 all had activating effect on soil neutral and alkaline phosphatase activity. TiO2/AC had an inhibiting effect on activity of urease and catalase, and after iron modification, its inhibiting effect tended to be weaker. The soil catalase activity increased by 19.5% compared with the control when the application amount was 0.3%; the soil urease activity decreased by 63.0%~76.6% after applying TiO2/AC, but under the action of 0.4% Fe-TiO2/AC, the soil urease activity decreased by 63.0%~76.6%. Urease activity increased by 5.8% compared with the control. In short, the modified nano-TiO2 transformed arsenic in soil from active states to inert states, and the influence on the soil properties could be controlled by iron modification.
  • [1]
    许文泽,杨春风,李静,等.二氧化钛光催化氧化阿散酸[J].环境科学,2016,37(1):193-197.
    [2]
    周雄,张金洋,王定勇,等.纳米TiO2吸附HgCl2水溶液中Hg(Ⅱ)[J].环境科学,2016(1):220-227.
    [3]
    段雅楠,张兴惠,李梦.TiO2/活性碳纤维膜光催化降解甲醛的研究[J].化工新型材料,2018,46(2):127-130.
    [4]
    赵顶.纳米TiO(2-x)的制备及其对砷离子吸附特性的研究[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2019.
    [5]
    赵红艳,陈爽,石中亮.纳米Fe2O3/TiO2复合材料用于吸附与氧化除As(Ⅲ)[J].沈阳化工大学学报,2019,33(1):46-53.
    [6]
    王阿楠,骆永明.纳米二氧化钛光催化修复二苯砷酸污染土壤的研究[J].土壤,2015,47(1):107-112.
    [7]
    陈美凤,李新丽,杨沛林,等.改性纳米TiO2对砷污染土壤的稳定化试验[J].环境工程,2020,38(10):222-227.
    [8]
    范峰华,郑荣波,郭雪莲,等.二氧化钛纳米颗粒对湖滨沼泽土壤氮矿化的影响[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(6):2220-2228.
    [9]
    叶兴银,张卫,龙精华,等.人工纳米颗粒输入对稻田土壤Cd形态转化及生物有效性的影响[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(12):3426-3432.
    [10]
    DU W C,SUN Y Y,JI R,et al.TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil[J].Journal of Environmental Monitoring,2011,13(4):822-828.
    [11]
    刘启明,李瑶,葛健,等.纳米TiO2和ZnO颗粒对红壤理化性质的影响[J].地球与环境,2019,47(3):380-384.
    [12]
    XU C,PENG C,SUN L J,et al.Distinctive effects of TiO2 and CuO nanoparticles on soil microbes and their community structures in flooded paddy soil[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2015,86(86):24-33.
    [13]
    李琳慧.纳米TiO2对土壤氮转化相关微生物和酶的影响[D].长春:吉林大学,2015.
    [14]
    孙影,李琳慧,郭平,等.纳米 TiO2对土壤中氮转化相关细菌活性的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2016,16(20):295-300.
    [15]
    张金洋,王定勇,梁丽,等.纳米TiO2对土壤重金属释放及形态变化的影响[J].环境科学,2016,37(5):1946-1952.
    [16]
    GIL-DÍAZ M,ALONSO J,RODRÍGUEZ-VALDÉSE,et al.Comparing different commercial zero valent iron nanoparticles to immobilize As and Hg in brownfield soil[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017(584/585):1324-1332.
    [17]
    YANG P L,QIN F X,DAI G C,et al.Reducing the leachability and bioaccessibility of arsenic in soils using supported nano titanium dioxide[J].Soil and Sediment Contamination:An International Journal,2019,28(4):347-359.
    [18]
    WENZEL W W,KIRCHBAUMER N,PROHASKA T,et al.Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure[J].Analytica Chimica Acta,2001,436(2):309-323.
    [19]
    国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会.土壤质量总汞、总砷、总铅的测定原子荧光法第2部分:土壤中总砷的测定:GB/T 22105.2—2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
    [20]
    鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
    [21]
    关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
    [22]
    SUNDARAY S K,NAYAK B B,LIN S,et al.Geochemical speciation and risk assessment of heavy metals in the river estuarine sediments—A case study:mahanadi basin,India[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,186(2/3):1837-1846.
    [23]
    窦韦强,安毅,秦莉,等.土壤pH对镉形态影响的研究进展[J].土壤,2020,52(3):439-444.
    [24]
    宋宜,王华伟,吴雅静,等.三价铁促进生物氧化锰稳定土壤砷的效果和机制[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(4):1460-1466.
    [25]
    MOORE T J,RIGHTMIRE C M,VEMPATI R K.Ferrous iron treatment of soils contaminated with arsenic-containing wood-preserving solution[J].Journal of Soil Contamination,2000,9 (4):375-405.
    [26]
    XU W Q,JIN Y,REN Y S,et al.Synergy mechanism for TiO2/activated carbon composite material:photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue solution[J].The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering,2022,100(2):276-290.
    [27]
    KOMAREK M,VANEK A,ETTLER V.Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides-a review[J].Environmental Pollution,2013,172:9-22.
    [28]
    刘启明,吴泽恩,曹英兰,等.纳米TiO2对耕作红壤土壤微生物活性的影响[J].生态环境学报,2014,23 (5):859-863.
    [29]
    黄志博,石艳,吴晓辉.蒙脱土有机改性研究进展[J].高分子通报,2021(10):1-10.
    [30]
    MALANDRINO M,ABOLLINO O,BUOSO S,et al.Accumulation of heavy metals from contaminated soil to plants and evaluation of soil remediation by vermiculite[J].Chemosphere,2011,82(2):169-178.
    [31]
    ASADISHAD B,CHAHAL S,AKBARI A,et al.Amendment of agricultural soil with metal nanoparticles:effects on soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2018,52(4):1908-1918.
    [32]
    尹勇.三种金属氧化物纳米材料对水稻幼苗生长及根际微生物群落结构的影响[D].桂林:广西师范大学,2019.
    [33]
    方国东,司友斌.纳米Fe3O4对红壤微生物数量、酶活性及2,4-D降解的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(6):1165-1172.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]SUN Yueyin, HUANG Qiong, ZHOU Jie, YU Xiaomeng, ZHU Jie, GU Mingyang, XU Lirui, YANG Bo, TAO Tao. PREPARATION OF VISIBLE LIGHT CATALYST AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF FORMALDEHYDE DEGRADATION OVER SILVER-BISMUTH MODIFIED TiO2 NANOMATERIAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 146-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302020
    [2]LI Geng, LI Haibo, LI Yinghua, CHEN Xi. SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION OF As IN SOIL USING BIOCHAR LOADED WITH FERRIC MANGANESE BINARY OXIDES(FMBO)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 118-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203018
    [3]YUAN Mingzhu, DING Lei, LI Shuang, LI Yonglian. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON REMOVAL OF ARSENIC AND ANTIMONY FROM SPENT EDTA SOIL WASHING SOLUTION BY IRON/ALUMINUM COAGULATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 121-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204017
    [4]LV Zijuan, WANG Huawei, WU Yajing, SUN Yingjie, WANG Yanan. EFFECT OF PHASE TRANSFORMATION OF NANO-ZERO-VALENT IRON ON STABILIZATION AND POTENTIAL TOXICITY OF ARSENIC IN CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 24-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203005
    [5]WANG Zhenhua, WU Juan, SONG Jianguo, BAI Jie. EFFECTS OF THERMAL HYDROLYSATES FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ON SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND SPINACH GROWTH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 126-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203019
    [6]TAN Hui, LIN Hua, DING Na, SHI En-ze, GAN Shu-ping. CHARACTERIZATION OF RHIZOSPHERE ENVIRONMENT OF LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ UNDER CONTAMINATION OF Ni AND Cr[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 109-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205016
    [7]WANG Hua-wei, WU Ya-jing, XU Rong, SUN Ying-jie, LI Shu-peng, WANG Ya-nan, ZHONG Chen-yu, SHI Chang-fei. STABILIZATION OF ARSENIC IN CONTAMINATED SOILS USING BIOLOGICAL Mn OXIDE (Bio-MnOx)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 205-210,216. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109029
    [8]QIU Ya-qun, LI Yi-hua, PENG Pei-qin, LI Er-ping, YU Zhen-hua. EFFECT OF CHELATING AGENT ON PTERIS VITTATA FOR REMEDIATION OF ARSENIC-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 204-209,119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103029
    [9]ZHOU Ying, WANG Xue-mei, JIANG Yu-zhuo, ZHAO Yun-feng, JI Hong-bing. SPECIATION AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF ARSENIC AND MERCURY IN SOIL AROUND A GOLD MINING AREA IN PINGGU DISTRICT, BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 203-210,164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108028
    [10]YU Gao, CHEN Fen, ZHAO Cheng-gang, HOU Jian-wei, DENG Xiao-mei. PASSIVATION AND REMEDIATION OF MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOIL BY POLYMER AND PASSIVATOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 174-179,186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104026
    [11]ZHOU Li-wei, WANG Hang, LIU Yang-sheng. EFFECT OF ELECTRODE-ORIENTATED ELECTROKINETIC ENHANCEMENT ON PHYTOREMEDIATION ON ARSENIC CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 228-233. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010036
    [12]ZHOU Li-jun, LIN Xiao-bing, WU Lin, HUANG Qian-ru, YU Ying, ZHANG Hong-yan, GUO Nai-jia, ZHANG Yun, LIU Hui. DIFFERENCES ANALYSIS ON PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTITES,MICROBIAL AND ENZYME ACTIVITIES OF CADMIUM CONTAMINATED PADDY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 202-206,227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010032
    [13]CHEN Mei-feng, LI Xin-li, YANG Pei-lin, LUO Qian, QIN Fan-xin. STABILIZATION OF AS CONTAMINATED SOILS BY MODIFIED NANO-TITANIUM DIOXIDE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 222-227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010035
    [20]Peng Gangzhi Xu Jianxia Wang Jianzhu, . RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND INORGANIC PHOSPHORUS FORMS IN HIGH PHOSPHORUS REGION OF XIANGXI RIVER WATERSHED[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 116-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506026
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.5 %FULLTEXT: 7.5 %META: 89.3 %META: 89.3 %PDF: 3.1 %PDF: 3.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 18.2 %其他: 18.2 %上海: 1.3 %上海: 1.3 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %北京: 1.9 %北京: 1.9 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %台州: 1.9 %台州: 1.9 %嘉兴: 1.3 %嘉兴: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %太原: 2.5 %太原: 2.5 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %宿州: 0.6 %宿州: 0.6 %常德: 1.3 %常德: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %晋城: 1.3 %晋城: 1.3 %景德镇: 0.6 %景德镇: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %济源: 1.3 %济源: 1.3 %湘潭: 1.3 %湘潭: 1.3 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 1.3 %福州: 1.3 %芒廷维尤: 17.6 %芒廷维尤: 17.6 %芝加哥: 1.9 %芝加哥: 1.9 %衢州: 2.5 %衢州: 2.5 %西宁: 23.9 %西宁: 23.9 %贵阳: 1.3 %贵阳: 1.3 %运城: 5.0 %运城: 5.0 %遵义: 0.6 %遵义: 0.6 %郑州: 1.3 %郑州: 1.3 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %鞍山: 0.6 %鞍山: 0.6 %其他上海东莞临汾北京南京台州嘉兴天津太原宣城宿州常德张家口成都扬州昆明晋城景德镇朝阳武汉沈阳济源湘潭漯河石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义郑州长沙鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (141) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return